Ventricular TachycardiaNCT06593418
Cardiac Radioablation for VT
A study testing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in people with Ventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Infarction, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventricular Tachycardia, Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2026to Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants must be 18 years or older.
- Automatic implanted cardiac defibrillator present.
- VT is monomorphic with at least two episodes of VT within an eight week (56 day) period as recorded by an AICD or heart failure related to VT or VT storm.
- Ejection fraction ≥20%.
- At least one previous cardiac ablation for VT.
- VT refractory despite antiarrhythmic medications.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Likely to live for 12 months in the absence of VT.
- AICD in a position in the chest RT to be given without direct radiation.
- Woman of reproductive age must ensure that she won't become pregnant or breastfeed at the time of RT.
- The participant has no contraindications to a Cardiac MRI as per routine Cardiology practice.
Who cannot join
- Class IV heart failure
- Abandoned leads.
- Prior radiation therapy to the chest or upper abdomen.
- Interstitial lung disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
John Robertson, MD, (248) 551-7038, john.robertson@corewellhealth.org
About this study
Official title: A Phase I/II Study of Cardiac Radioablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia
The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) .
Read the detailed description
This voluntary study is designed to learn what is the minimum dose of radiation therapy (RT) needed to successfully reduce the incidence of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) by half. Additionally, the study will examine the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR). Radiation therapy, given in a highly focused single dose to a portion of the heart, by a non-invasive method, has been found to change the electrical conduction of the heart. This will be done with the goal of reducing the number of episodes of VT in people where invasive thermal (heat) ablation and heart medications have not completely worked.
Cardiac radioablation has been done at other institutions using a dose of RT that may be higher than needed to obtain the benefit of fewer episodes of VT. We are trying to learn if lower doses of RT will work to reduce VT. Cardiac radioablation is currently offered at a number of institutions worldwide at the standard dose of 25 Gray, or Gy (the unit of dose for radiation therapy) given in a single treatment. This study is testing if lower doses of RT are just as effective as 25 Gy. The doses being tested are 15 Gy (the dose that we will start at), 20 Gy and 25 Gy (if the lower doses are found not to work well).
Potential participants will be identified by their cardiologist. Electroanatomic mapping will have already been obtained as part of routine care. A Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI will be performed (if a new one is necessary) and a Radiation Therapy Simulation. Commercial RT software will be used to fuse the DE CMR and the RT Simulation treatment planning CT scan. The cardiologist and radiation oncologist will define the Gross Target Volume and the expansions for the Clinical and Planning Target Volumes. These volume definitions will be used by the Radiation Oncology Dosimetrist. The dose will be determined in standard 3+3 Phase I fashion. Dose escalation will proceed in a standard 3 + 3 Phase I fashion according to both dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and efficacy. Escalation will stop when there is efficacy 50% or greater without severe DLT or when there is severe DLT (2+ of 3 or 6 with DLT as per traditional 3 + 3 Phase I design). The dose will not be escalated within a single patient.
When the minimum effective dose (MED) or maximum tolerable dose (MTD) is determined, further accrual will occur at that dose level until 12 patients are accrued and observed for 14 weeks (6 week blanking and 8 week (56 day) evaluation).
DLT is defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4 - 5 toxicity (CTCAE v.5) determined to be treatment related (possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment) occurring within 14 weeks after treatment. DLT's occurring after the 14-week observation period may still impact on dose escalation.
Efficacy is defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.
Treatment will be given using standard SBRT technique. The week 14 assessment will be used to determine efficacy (defined as a 50% of higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6 week post-treatment blanking period).
Following determination of the study dose in the Phase I portion of the study, a Phase II portion will be performed until a total of 12 patients are accrued at the recommended dose.
- Conditions
- Ventricular Tachycardia, Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
- Medical subject headings
- Tachycardia, Ventricular, Myocardial Infarction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Radiation
Stereotactic body radiation therapy, which delivers precise, high-dose radiation non-invasively to generate thermal scarring to myocardial targets causing VT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy at 15 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia | Experimental | Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 15 Gy Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) |
| Radiation Therapy at 20 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia | Experimental | Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 20 Gy Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) |
| Radiation Therapy at 25 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia | Experimental | Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 25 Gy Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in number of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes from pre-cardiac radioablation to post-cardiac radioablation
Change in the number of episodes of VT over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days post treatment (following the 6 week post-treatment blanking period). A negative number represents a reduction in episodes after treatment (improved function) and a positive number represents an increase in episodes after treatment (worsened function).
Measured: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)
Dose limiting toxicity
Number of participants who had dose limiting toxicity defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4-5 toxicity determined to be treatment-related.
Measured: 14 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Efficacy of ablation using target volume definition with Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR)
Number of participants who had successful cardiac radioablation using target volume definition DE-CMR, defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.
Measured: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study startJul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ventricular TachycardiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Corewell Health East
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, John Robertson, MD, Corewell Health East
- Investigators
- John Robertson, MD, Principal investigator, Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06593418
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-069
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase I/II Study of Cardiac Radioablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06593418
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-069
- Conditions
- Ventricular Tachycardia, Myocardial Infarction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Corewell Health EastUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) .
Detailed description
This voluntary study is designed to learn what is the minimum dose of radiation therapy (RT) needed to successfully reduce the incidence of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) by half. Additionally, the study will examine the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR). Radiation therapy, given in a highly focused single dose to a portion of the heart, by a non-invasive method, has been found to change the electrical conduction of the heart. This will be done with the goal of reducing the number of episodes of VT in people where invasive thermal (heat) ablation and heart medications have not completely worked.
Cardiac radioablation has been done at other institutions using a dose of RT that may be higher than needed to obtain the benefit of fewer episodes of VT. We are trying to learn if lower doses of RT will work to reduce VT. Cardiac radioablation is currently offered at a number of institutions worldwide at the standard dose of 25 Gray, or Gy (the unit of dose for radiation therapy) given in a single treatment. This study is testing if lower doses of RT are just as effective as 25 Gy. The doses being tested are 15 Gy (the dose that we will start at), 20 Gy and 25 Gy (if the lower doses are found not to work well).
Potential participants will be identified by their cardiologist. Electroanatomic mapping will have already been obtained as part of routine care. A Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI will be performed (if a new one is necessary) and a Radiation Therapy Simulation. Commercial RT software will be used to fuse the DE CMR and the RT Simulation treatment planning CT scan. The cardiologist and radiation oncologist will define the Gross Target Volume and the expansions for the Clinical and Planning Target Volumes. These volume definitions will be used by the Radiation Oncology Dosimetrist. The dose will be determined in standard 3+3 Phase I fashion. Dose escalation will proceed in a standard 3 + 3 Phase I fashion according to both dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and efficacy. Escalation will stop when there is efficacy 50% or greater without severe DLT or when there is severe DLT (2+ of 3 or 6 with DLT as per traditional 3 + 3 Phase I design). The dose will not be escalated within a single patient.
When the minimum effective dose (MED) or maximum tolerable dose (MTD) is determined, further accrual will occur at that dose level until 12 patients are accrued and observed for 14 weeks (6 week blanking and 8 week (56 day) evaluation).
DLT is defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4 - 5 toxicity (CTCAE v.5) determined to be treatment related (possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment) occurring within 14 weeks after treatment. DLT's occurring after the 14-week observation period may still impact on dose escalation.
Efficacy is defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.
Treatment will be given using standard SBRT technique. The week 14 assessment will be used to determine efficacy (defined as a 50% of higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6 week post-treatment blanking period).
Following determination of the study dose in the Phase I portion of the study, a Phase II portion will be performed until a total of 12 patients are accrued at the recommended dose.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Radiation Therapy at 15 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia | Experimental | Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 15 Gy |
| Radiation Therapy at 20 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia | Experimental | Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 20 Gy |
| Radiation Therapy at 25 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia | Experimental | Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Post myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 25 Gy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Participants must be 18 years or older.
- Automatic implanted cardiac defibrillator present.
- VT is monomorphic with at least two episodes of VT within an eight week (56 day) period as recorded by an AICD or heart failure related to VT or VT storm.
- Ejection fraction ≥20%.
- At least one previous cardiac ablation for VT.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Class IV heart failure
- Abandoned leads.
- Prior radiation therapy to the chest or upper abdomen.
- Interstitial lung disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Stereotactic body radiation therapy, which delivers precise, high-dose radiation non-invasively to generate thermal scarring to myocardial targets causing VT | Radiation | Radiation Therapy at 15 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia, Radiation Therapy at 20 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia, Radiation Therapy at 25 Gy for Ventricular Tachycardia |
Primary outcome
Change in number of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes from pre-cardiac radioablation to post-cardiac radioablation
Time frame: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)
Change in the number of episodes of VT over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days post treatment (following the 6 week post-treatment blanking period). A negative number represents a reduction in episodes after treatment (improved function) and a positive number represents an increase in episodes after treatment (worsened function).
Dose limiting toxicity
Time frame: 14 weeks
Number of participants who had dose limiting toxicity defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4-5 toxicity determined to be treatment-related.
1 secondary outcome
Efficacy of ablation using target volume definition with Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR)
Time frame: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ventricular Tachycardia
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Recruiting
Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia (RADIATE-VT)
Tachycardia, Ventricular
RecruitingObservational study
AI-Based Differential Diagnosis and Localization of Tachycardia Using ECG: Multicenter Registry (EP-AI ASSIST)
Tachycardia, Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia
Not yet recruiting
MRI-guided Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of SGT-501 Gene Therapy in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)
Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
John Robertson, MD principal investigator
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in people with Ventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Infarction, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact John Roberston, MD (248-551-7038, john.robertson@corewellhealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in number of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes from pre-cardiac radioablation to post-cardiac radioablation (time frame: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2026.