AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventricular TachycardiaNCT06593418

Cardiac Radioablation for VT

A study testing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in people with Ventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Infarction, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2026to Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants must be 18 years or older.
  • Automatic implanted cardiac defibrillator present.
  • VT is monomorphic with at least two episodes of VT within an eight week (56 day) period as recorded by an AICD or heart failure related to VT or VT storm.
  • Ejection fraction ≥20%.
  • At least one previous cardiac ablation for VT.
  • VT refractory despite antiarrhythmic medications.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Likely to live for 12 months in the absence of VT.
  • AICD in a position in the chest RT to be given without direct radiation.
  • Woman of reproductive age must ensure that she won't become pregnant or breastfeed at the time of RT.
  • The participant has no contraindications to a Cardiac MRI as per routine Cardiology practice.

Who cannot join

  • Class IV heart failure
  • Abandoned leads.
  • Prior radiation therapy to the chest or upper abdomen.
  • Interstitial lung disease.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital

    Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073

    John Robertson, MD, (248) 551-7038, john.robertson@corewellhealth.org

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase I/II Study of Cardiac Radioablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

The goal of this interventional study is to determine the minimum dose necessary for successful cardiac radioablation of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and to study the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR) .

Read the detailed description

This voluntary study is designed to learn what is the minimum dose of radiation therapy (RT) needed to successfully reduce the incidence of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) by half. Additionally, the study will examine the utility of target volume definition using Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR). Radiation therapy, given in a highly focused single dose to a portion of the heart, by a non-invasive method, has been found to change the electrical conduction of the heart. This will be done with the goal of reducing the number of episodes of VT in people where invasive thermal (heat) ablation and heart medications have not completely worked.

Cardiac radioablation has been done at other institutions using a dose of RT that may be higher than needed to obtain the benefit of fewer episodes of VT. We are trying to learn if lower doses of RT will work to reduce VT. Cardiac radioablation is currently offered at a number of institutions worldwide at the standard dose of 25 Gray, or Gy (the unit of dose for radiation therapy) given in a single treatment. This study is testing if lower doses of RT are just as effective as 25 Gy. The doses being tested are 15 Gy (the dose that we will start at), 20 Gy and 25 Gy (if the lower doses are found not to work well).

Potential participants will be identified by their cardiologist. Electroanatomic mapping will have already been obtained as part of routine care. A Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI will be performed (if a new one is necessary) and a Radiation Therapy Simulation. Commercial RT software will be used to fuse the DE CMR and the RT Simulation treatment planning CT scan. The cardiologist and radiation oncologist will define the Gross Target Volume and the expansions for the Clinical and Planning Target Volumes. These volume definitions will be used by the Radiation Oncology Dosimetrist. The dose will be determined in standard 3+3 Phase I fashion. Dose escalation will proceed in a standard 3 + 3 Phase I fashion according to both dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and efficacy. Escalation will stop when there is efficacy 50% or greater without severe DLT or when there is severe DLT (2+ of 3 or 6 with DLT as per traditional 3 + 3 Phase I design). The dose will not be escalated within a single patient.

When the minimum effective dose (MED) or maximum tolerable dose (MTD) is determined, further accrual will occur at that dose level until 12 patients are accrued and observed for 14 weeks (6 week blanking and 8 week (56 day) evaluation).

DLT is defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4 - 5 toxicity (CTCAE v.5) determined to be treatment related (possibly, probably, or definitely related to study treatment) occurring within 14 weeks after treatment. DLT's occurring after the 14-week observation period may still impact on dose escalation.

Efficacy is defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.

Treatment will be given using standard SBRT technique. The week 14 assessment will be used to determine efficacy (defined as a 50% of higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6 week post-treatment blanking period).

Following determination of the study dose in the Phase I portion of the study, a Phase II portion will be performed until a total of 12 patients are accrued at the recommended dose.

Being tested
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Ventricular, Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)Radiation

    Stereotactic body radiation therapy, which delivers precise, high-dose radiation non-invasively to generate thermal scarring to myocardial targets causing VT

Study groups in NCT06593418
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radiation Therapy at 15 Gy for Ventricular TachycardiaExperimentalPost myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 15 Gy
Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Radiation Therapy at 20 Gy for Ventricular TachycardiaExperimentalPost myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 20 Gy
Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)
Radiation Therapy at 25 Gy for Ventricular TachycardiaExperimentalPost myocardial infarction patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia requiring cardio ablation, treated with 25 Gy
Receives: Radiation: Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in number of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes from pre-cardiac radioablation to post-cardiac radioablation

    Change in the number of episodes of VT over the 56 days before treatment versus over a consecutive 56 days post treatment (following the 6 week post-treatment blanking period). A negative number represents a reduction in episodes after treatment (improved function) and a positive number represents an increase in episodes after treatment (worsened function).

    Measured: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)

  2. Dose limiting toxicity

    Number of participants who had dose limiting toxicity defined as any grade 3 toxicity requiring hospitalization or any grade 4-5 toxicity determined to be treatment-related.

    Measured: 14 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Efficacy of ablation using target volume definition with Delayed Enhancement Cardiac MRI (DE-CMR)

    Number of participants who had successful cardiac radioablation using target volume definition DE-CMR, defined as a 50% or higher reduction in the number of episodes of VT archived over the 56 days before treatment (obtained from their automatic internal cardiac defibrillator (AICD) device) versus over a consecutive 56 days after treatment starting after the 6-week post-treatment blanking period.

    Measured: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study startJul 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06593418
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-069
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
9 Sep 2024
Last updated
20 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in people with Ventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Infarction, run by Corewell Health East at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact John Roberston, MD (248-551-7038, john.robertson@corewellhealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in number of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes from pre-cardiac radioablation to post-cardiac radioablation (time frame: 56 days pre-treatment and 98 days post treatment (42 day blanking period plus 56 days)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in