AzTrials
AzTrials

Hiv202372NCT06595225

Nutrition Education Intervention for PLHIV

A study testing Nutrition education sessions in people with Hiv and Nutritional Deficiency, run by United Arab Emirates University at 1 site in United Arab Emirates.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study tested two hypotheses, which are mentioned below: Hypotheses: The project will test 5 hypotheses related to the various aspects of the study. H1: implementing a nutrition education intervention will significantly improve the patient's nutritional knowledge, dietary practices, and attitudes (KAP) post-6… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hiv, Nutritional Deficiency
What is being tested?
Nutrition education sessions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
63 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Arab Emirates
Study dates
28 Aug 2023to 30 Apr 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The inclusion criteria were patients of:
  • more or equal to 18 years of age;
  • Who have the virus with or without any co-morbidities;
  • And who give consent to participate.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are imprisoned;
  • And/or refuse to participate were excluded.
  • Disclaimer: prisoners were excluded as their confinement and lack of access will hinder them from receiving the intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Arab Emirates1 site
  • Dubai Health - Rashid Hospital

    Dubai, Dubai

Other trials in United Arab Emirates

About this study

Official title: Lifestyle and Nutrition Intervention for Patients Living with HIV Attending an Outpatient Clinic in Dubai, UAE

The study tested two hypotheses, which are mentioned below:

Hypotheses: The project will test 5 hypotheses related to the various aspects of the study.

Read more

H1: implementing a nutrition education intervention will significantly improve the patient's nutritional knowledge, dietary practices, and attitudes (KAP) post-6 months of intervention.

H2: implementing a nutrition education intervention will significantly improve the patients' food intake of immune-boosting foods, physical activity levels, anthropometric measurements, nutrition-related biochemical biomarkers, and mental health status, post the intervention period.

Note: H2 is a complex hypothesis consisting of 5 sub-hypotheses corresponding to the five mentioned measurements (food intake of immune-boosting foods, physical activity levels, anthropometric measurements, nutrition-related biochemical biomarkers, and mental health status). Each of these sub-hypotheses will be statistically tested.

Read the detailed description

The intervention was guided by the Health Belief model. The topics to be covered and the content of the educational program were designed with input from dietitians working with PLHIV to ensure the relevance for the target participants. Participants randomized into the intervention group received individualized sessions with a registered dietitian once a month for 6 months. During the sessions, the dietitian elaborated on the medical nutrition therapy for each participant which consists of nutritional diagnosis and nutritional counseling services. Topics covered include general nutrition knowledge, MyPlate food groups, immune-boosting foods and nutrients, improving physical activity levels, the nutritional aspects of the existing co-morbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, etc. The intervention provided by the dietitian (primary investigator) which was guided by the Health Belief Model (HBM) which suggests that an individual's beliefs about health threats, perceived benefits of acting, and perceived barriers to acting are key determinants of health-related behaviors. Each session lasted for approximately 30-45 minutes through virtual platforms or in-person, or a combination of both, using several teaching tools such as discussions, demonstrations, educational materials, and educational videos.

The participants were met with online once per month and they were followed up on weekly basis on Whatsapp to reinforce the last session message.

Being tested
Nutrition education sessions
Keywords
Nutrition education, HIV, PLHIV, Intervention, Knowledge. attitude, practices
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Malnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nutrition education sessionsBehavioural

    Participants received nutrition education each month, covering topics ranging from general nutrition knowledge, nutrition knowledge related to their diagnosis of living with HIV infection whether during the acute or chronic phase. In addition, specific information was shared about other comorbidities the participant could be living with, finally information was shared on ways to improve mental health and enhance physical activity levels.

Study groups in NCT06595225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nutrition Education Sessions GroupExperimentalthis group received nutrition education sessions each month for a period of 6 months. Where they were followed up once a week via Whatsapp, reminded of the previous session's message and had their questions answered.
Receives: Behavioral: Nutrition education sessions
Control groupNo interventionthis group did not receive the intervention that the experimental group received

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. KAP score (knowledge, attitude, and practices)

    improving the overall nutrition-related knowledge and its reflection on patients' dietary knowledge, attitudes, and practices.

    The data was collected face-to-face using a questionnaire adapted from the relevant literature including questions related to nutrition knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of HIV patients attending an outpatient clinic in India. This questionnaire assessed all 3 aspects, where the score ranges of knowledge, attitude, and practices are 0-14, 14-42, and 0-13, respectively. The total score of all three subsections ranges between 13-69 where a score between 13 and 32 represents poor KAP values, 33-51 average, and 52-69 good values. The original scores were modified in our study based on face and content validity results.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Improve in intake of immune boosting nutrients

    Improving the food intake of immune-boosting foods and food groups (e.g.: fruits and vegetables, protein-containing food groups).

    Two-non-consecutive days 24-hour dietary recalls was used both pre- and post-intervention to measure the intake of total calories and protein as well as nutrients of immune-boosting properties (Vitamin A, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, Vitamin D, Selenium, Zinc, omega 3 omega 6 fatty acids, Iron). Additionally, a qualitative food frequency questionnaire was developed from the literature on the immune-boosting food groups. It was used to measure the change in intake of the immune-boosting food groups pre- and post-intervention period. It covered 10 components (fruits, vegetables, animal-derived protein food sources, plant-based protein food sources, whole grains, nuts, seeds, probiotic-rich foods, herbs, plant-based monounsaturated fatty acids rich oils, plant-based polyunsaturated fatty acids rich oils).

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Improve in physical activity

    Improving the physical activity levels and anthropometric measurements of PLHIV.

    Physical activity level (active versus inactive) was determined using a questionnaire developed by the American College of Sports Medicine for assessing the physical activity level of patients in clinical settings, namely the "Physical Vital Sign Questionnaire". The physically active versus inactive status is determined following the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2023, which recommend a physical activity level for adults of 150 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity and 2 days of muscle-strengthening activity.

    Any participant performing any kind of physical activity for 150 minutes/week as well as 2-3 days of muscle strengthening workouts is considered physically active. Any participant below 150 minutes/week and no strength training whatsoever is considered physically inactive.

    Measured: in 6 months

  2. Body mass index (BMI) reduction

    The measurements of weight is kilograms and the height in centimeter will be aggregated to arrive at one reported value which is BMI in Kg/m^2.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Improving nutrition-related biochemical data

    Improving the nutrition-related biochemical lab values in relation to adjustment of patients' dietary and lifestyle factors.

    Biochemical measurements were collected from the patient's medical files pre- and post-intervention for both control and intervention group.

    Reference Range for each biochemical parameter:

    Viral load: Ref not detected (Negative) copies/mL. CD4: Ref 219 - 1,621 CELL/uL. Hemoglobin: Ref males 13.0 - 17.0 g/dL versus females 12.0-15.0 g/dL. ALT: Ref males 0-41 U/L versus females 0-31 U/L. AST: Ref males 0-40 U/L versus females 0-32 U/L. Creatinine: Ref: males 0.7-1.2 mg/dL versus females 0.5-0.9 mg/dL. Urea: Ref 12-40 mg/dL. HbA1c: Ref more than5.7% - 5.7-6.4% prediabetes - \>=6.5 diabetes. eGFR: Ref more than 60 mL/min/1.73(2) VitaminD3: Ref 30-100 ng/mL. LDL: Ref less than 115 mg/dL HDL: Ref above40 mg/dL men, above 48 mg/dL women. Triglyceride: Ref less than 90 mg/dL

    Measured: in 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start28 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2024
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants were assigned randomly into either the control or intervention group based on 4 aspects which were: gender, 0 co-morbidities, 1 co-morbidity, 2 or more co-morbidities, whereas the interventional group received nutrition education sessions of various topics related to general nutrition knowledge, with more focus on nutrition related to patients living with HIV (PLHIV) for a 6 months period, were there was one encounter per month and follow up was weekly over a social media platform (Whatsapp)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
63 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06595225
Sponsor's protocol ID
202372
Acronym
202372
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
27 Aug 2024
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nutrition education sessions in people with Hiv and Nutritional Deficiency, run by United Arab Emirates University at 1 site in United Arab Emirates.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Arab Emirates. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

KAP score (knowledge, attitude, and practices) (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in