Smartphone AddictionNCT06598774
Cervical Parameters and Body Awareness in Relation to Smartphone Addiction
An observational study of Smartphone Addiction, run by Nagihan Acet at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The study was planned as a observational, cross-sectional study Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Smartphone Addiction
- What is being tested?
- Assessment of head posture:, Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold and Assessment of general cervical mobility
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 18 Sep 2024to 18 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: The study population consists of smartphone users aged between 18 and 25.
Who may be able to join
- being a smartphone user
- being between the ages of 18 and 25
Who cannot join
- neck pain
- radicular pain
- neurological symptoms
- cervical surgery or cervical trauma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Does Smartphone Addiction Affect Cervical Spine Mobility, Head Posture, Body Awareness, and Pain Pressure Threshold?
The study was planned as a observational, cross-sectional study
- Conditions
- Smartphone Addiction
- Being tested
- Assessment of head posture:, Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold, Assessment of general cervical mobility, Assessment of upper cervical mobility, Assessment of Body Awareness
- Keywords
- Smartphone, Cervical vertebrae, Range of motion, Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Internet Addiction Disorder, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Assessment of head posture:Other
Head posture was assessed using photographic methods and craniovertebral angle
Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure ThresholdOther
The cervical PPTs were assessed using a mechanical pressure algometer (Baseline Force Gauge Model 12-0304; Baseline, NY, USA).
Assessment of general cervical mobilityOther
Cervical mobility was assessed using the CROM (Cervical Range of Motion) deluxe device.
Assessment of upper cervical mobilityOther
It will be assessed using the CROM device and the flexion-rotation test.
Assessment of Body AwarenessOther
Body awareness will be assessed using a questionnaire designed to determine normal or abnormal sensitivity levels in body composition.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Smartphone addiction group | Participants with smartphone addiction Receives: Other: Assessment of head posture:; Other: Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold; Other: Assessment of general cervical mobility; Other: Assessment of upper cervical mobility; Other: Assessment of Body Awareness | |
| Control Group | Participants without smarthone addiction Receives: Other: Assessment of head posture:; Other: Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold; Other: Assessment of general cervical mobility; Other: Assessment of upper cervical mobility; Other: Assessment of Body Awareness |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of Body Awareness
Body awareness will be assessed using a questionnaire designed to determine normal or abnormal sensitivity levels in body composition. The questionnaire consists of four subgroups: 1) Changes in body processes, 2) Sleep-wake cycle, 3) Prediction of disease onset, and 4) Prediction of body responses, with a total of 18 items. Participants were asked to rate each item using a scale from 1 to 7. It has a minimum score of 18 and a maximum score of 126, with higher scores indicating greater body awareness. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire have been reported to be high.
Measured: Day 1
Assessment of head posture
Head posture will be assessed using photographic methods and craniovertebral angle. The craniovertebral angle is calculated as the angle between a horizontal line passing through C7 and a line extending from the tragus of the ear to C7 [23]. An angle less than 49 degrees indicates an anterior head position.
Measured: Day 1
Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
The cervical PPTs will be assessed using a mechanical pressure algometer (Baseline Force Gauge Model 12-0304; Baseline, NY, USA). A force will be applied perpendicularly to a 0.5 cm² area at an approximate rate of 3 N/s. While the patient is seated, pressure is applied at the midpoint of the upper trapezius muscle, and 2 cm lateral to the C2 spinous process bilaterally [25]. For each area, two measurements are taken at intervals, and the average of these measurements is calculated to determine the final value.
Measured: Day 1
Assessment of general cervical mobility
Cervical mobility will assessed using the CROM (Cervical Range of Motion) deluxe device, developed by the University of Minnesota. The CROM is an inclinometer system that utilizes gravity and magnetic effects [26]. It is validated for accuracy and reliability. The device consists of two fixed inclinometers for the sagittal and frontal planes, a horizontal inclinometer with a magnetic needle mounted on the top of the device, a magnetic neck brace, a scale-equipped arm with a ruler mounted on the top, and a vertebra locator arm with a weighing system.
Measured: Day 1
Assessment of upper cervical mobility
The CROM device is securely attached to the participant\'s head while they lay supine on a treatment table. The evaluator asks the participant to relax while the neck is brought to its maximum cervical flexion. In the full flexion position, the head and neck are passively rotated as far as possible within the limits of comfortable pain or physiological stiffness. The procedure is repeated twice on each side with a 30-second rest between tests. The sensitivity of the flexion-rotation test was found to be 91%, its specificity 90%, and its overall diagnostic accuracy 91% . The cervical flexion-rotation test is an important tool in identifying movement impairment at the C1/2 segment and can be used accurately and reliably even by inexperienced examiners.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study start18 Sep 2024
- Primary completion18 Nov 2024
- Study completion18 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Smartphone AddictionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nagihan Acet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nagihan Acet, Atılım University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06598774
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Atılım Üniversitesi
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Sarraf F, Varmazyar S. Comparing the effect of the posture of using smartphones on head and neck angles among college students. Ergonomics. 2022 Dec;65(12):1631-1638. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2047229. Epub 2022 May 4.
PubMed 35199629Ruivo RM, Pezarat-Correia P, Carita AI. Cervical and shoulder postural assessment of adolescents between 15 and 17 years old and association with upper quadrant pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;18(4):364-71. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0027. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
PubMed 25054381Hanten WP, Lucio RM, Russell JL, Brunt D. Assessment of total head excursion and resting head posture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;72(11):877-80. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(91)90003-2.
PubMed 1929804Braun BL, Amundson LR. Quantitative assessment of head and shoulder posture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Apr;70(4):322-9.
PubMed 2930348Niewiadomski C, Bianco RJ, Afquir S, Evin M, Arnoux PJ. Experimental assessment of cervical ranges of motion and compensatory strategies. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jan 22;27:9. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0223-x. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 30680090Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614. Epub 2009 May 19.
PubMed 19440300Karaca, S., Vücut farkındalığı anketinin Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Muğla, 2017.
Jung SI, Lee NK, Kang KW, Kim K, Lee DY. The effect of smartphone usage time on posture and respiratory function. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):186-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.186. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
PubMed 26957754AlZarea, B.K. and S.R. Patil, Mobile phone head and neck pain syndrome: proposal of a new entity. Headache, 2015. 251(63): p. 313-317.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does Smartphone Addiction Affect Cervical Spine Mobility, Head Posture, Body Awareness, and Pain Pressure Threshold?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06598774
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Atılım Üniversitesi
- Conditions
- Smartphone Addiction
- Keywords
- Smartphone, Cervical vertebrae, Range of motion, Pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nagihan AcetUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study was planned as a observational, cross-sectional study
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Smartphone addiction group | – | Other: Assessment of head posture:, Other: Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold, Other: Assessment of general cervical mobility, Other: Assessment of upper cervical mobility, Other: Assessment of Body AwarenessParticipants with smartphone addiction |
| Control Group | – | Other: Assessment of head posture:, Other: Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold, Other: Assessment of general cervical mobility, Other: Assessment of upper cervical mobility, Other: Assessment of Body AwarenessParticipants without smarthone addiction |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of smartphone users aged between 18 and 25.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- being a smartphone user
- being between the ages of 18 and 25
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- neck pain
- radicular pain
- neurological symptoms
- cervical surgery or cervical trauma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of head posture:Head posture was assessed using photographic methods and craniovertebral angle | Other | Control Group, Smartphone addiction group |
| Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure ThresholdThe cervical PPTs were assessed using a mechanical pressure algometer (Baseline Force Gauge Model 12-0304; Baseline, NY, USA). | Other | Control Group, Smartphone addiction group |
| Assessment of general cervical mobilityCervical mobility was assessed using the CROM (Cervical Range of Motion) deluxe device. | Other | Control Group, Smartphone addiction group |
| Assessment of upper cervical mobilityIt will be assessed using the CROM device and the flexion-rotation test. | Other | Control Group, Smartphone addiction group |
| Assessment of Body AwarenessBody awareness will be assessed using a questionnaire designed to determine normal or abnormal sensitivity levels in body composition. | Other | Control Group, Smartphone addiction group |
Primary outcome
Assessment of Body Awareness
Time frame: Day 1
Body awareness will be assessed using a questionnaire designed to determine normal or abnormal sensitivity levels in body composition. The questionnaire consists of four subgroups: 1) Changes in body processes, 2) Sleep-wake cycle, 3) Prediction of disease onset, and 4) Prediction of body responses, with a total of 18 items. Participants were asked to rate each item using a scale from 1 to 7. It has a minimum score of 18 and a maximum score of 126, with higher scores indicating greater body awareness. The validity and reliability of this questionnaire have been reported to be high.
Assessment of head posture
Time frame: Day 1
Head posture will be assessed using photographic methods and craniovertebral angle. The craniovertebral angle is calculated as the angle between a horizontal line passing through C7 and a line extending from the tragus of the ear to C7 [23]. An angle less than 49 degrees indicates an anterior head position.
Assessment of Cervical Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT)
Time frame: Day 1
The cervical PPTs will be assessed using a mechanical pressure algometer (Baseline Force Gauge Model 12-0304; Baseline, NY, USA). A force will be applied perpendicularly to a 0.5 cm² area at an approximate rate of 3 N/s. While the patient is seated, pressure is applied at the midpoint of the upper trapezius muscle, and 2 cm lateral to the C2 spinous process bilaterally [25]. For each area, two measurements are taken at intervals, and the average of these measurements is calculated to determine the final value.
Assessment of general cervical mobility
Time frame: Day 1
Cervical mobility will assessed using the CROM (Cervical Range of Motion) deluxe device, developed by the University of Minnesota. The CROM is an inclinometer system that utilizes gravity and magnetic effects [26]. It is validated for accuracy and reliability. The device consists of two fixed inclinometers for the sagittal and frontal planes, a horizontal inclinometer with a magnetic needle mounted on the top of the device, a magnetic neck brace, a scale-equipped arm with a ruler mounted on the top, and a vertebra locator arm with a weighing system.
Assessment of upper cervical mobility
Time frame: Day 1
The CROM device is securely attached to the participant\'s head while they lay supine on a treatment table. The evaluator asks the participant to relax while the neck is brought to its maximum cervical flexion. In the full flexion position, the head and neck are passively rotated as far as possible within the limits of comfortable pain or physiological stiffness. The procedure is repeated twice on each side with a 30-second rest between tests. The sensitivity of the flexion-rotation test was found to be 91%, its specificity 90%, and its overall diagnostic accuracy 91% . The cervical flexion-rotation test is an important tool in identifying movement impairment at the C1/2 segment and can be used accurately and reliably even by inexperienced examiners.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 35199629Sarraf F, Varmazyar S. Comparing the effect of the posture of using smartphones on head and neck angles among college students. Ergonomics. 2022 Dec;65(12):1631-1638. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2022.2047229. Epub 2022 May 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 25054381Ruivo RM, Pezarat-Correia P, Carita AI. Cervical and shoulder postural assessment of adolescents between 15 and 17 years old and association with upper quadrant pain. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Jul-Aug;18(4):364-71. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0027. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 1929804Hanten WP, Lucio RM, Russell JL, Brunt D. Assessment of total head excursion and resting head posture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;72(11):877-80. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(91)90003-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 2930348Braun BL, Amundson LR. Quantitative assessment of head and shoulder posture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Apr;70(4):322-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 30680090Niewiadomski C, Bianco RJ, Afquir S, Evin M, Arnoux PJ. Experimental assessment of cervical ranges of motion and compensatory strategies. Chiropr Man Therap. 2019 Jan 22;27:9. doi: 10.1186/s12998-018-0223-x. eCollection 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 19440300Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A. Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614. Epub 2009 May 19.
- Results publicationKaraca, S., Vücut farkındalığı anketinin Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Muğla, 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 26957754Jung SI, Lee NK, Kang KW, Kim K, Lee DY. The effect of smartphone usage time on posture and respiratory function. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):186-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.186. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
- Results publicationAlZarea, B.K. and S.R. Patil, Mobile phone head and neck pain syndrome: proposal of a new entity. Headache, 2015. 251(63): p. 313-317.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Smartphone Addiction
RecruitingObservational study
The Association Between Smartphone Overuse and Mechanical Neck Pain Among Galala University Students
Mechanical Neck Pain, Forward Head Posture (FHP)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ecological Momentary Assessment of State-Dependent Decision-Making and Metacognition Across a Psychopathology Continuum
Depression, Anxiety
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Smartphone Addiction and Upper Extremity Sensorimotor Performance
Smartphone Addiction
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screen Addiction and Postoperative Pain
Pain, Postoperative
Recruiting
Sustaining Recovery for People on Opioid Agonist Treatment With Conversational Agents
Opioid Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Smartphone Addiction, run by Nagihan Acet at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of Body Awareness (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06598774, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2025.