Adenocarcinoma of OvaryNCT06599749
Establishment and Standardization of a Platform for In-depth Tumour Profiling (TUPRO) in Patients With Advanced and Metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma of Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Origin (TUPRO-Gyn)
An observational study of Adenocarcinoma of Ovary and Adenocarcinoma, Tubular, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 3 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The aim of this prospective, multi-centre, exploratory research project is the establishment of a platform for in-depth tumour profiling in patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Adenocarcinoma of Ovary, Adenocarcinoma, Tubular, Peritoneal Cancer
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2018to 30 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≤ 2 (not bedridden for more than 50% of waking hours)
- Primary or recurrent HGAC of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV
- Written informed consent according to national legal and regulatory requirements prior to any project specific procedures
Who cannot join
- Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial or geographical condition, which in the judgment of the project leader may interfere with the project or affect patient compliance
- Legal incompetence
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland3 sites
University Hospital Basel
Basel, 4031
Kantonsspital Baselland
Liestal, 4410
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: Establishment and Standardization of a Platform for In-depth Tumour Profiling (TUPRO) in Patients With Advanced and Metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma of Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Origin - a Prospective, Multi-centre Human Research Ordinance Research Project / Category A
The aim of this prospective, multi-centre, exploratory research project is the establishment of a platform for in-depth tumour profiling in patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin.
Read the detailed description
TUPRO-Gyn is part of the Tumour Profiler (TUPRO) research collaboration, which aims to help generate information about patients' individual tumour biology for patients with advanced malignancies, using innovative biotechnologies and computational analyses for in-depth molecular profiling. The TUPRO-Gyn study focuses on improving treatment for patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer, who often face poor outcomes and limited options after initial therapy. The study aims to use advanced molecular profiling technologies to identify specific characteristics of tumors that can be targeted with personalized treatments. By building a comprehensive platform for in-depth tumor analysis, the project hopes to discover new biomarkers and support future clinical trials that match treatments to the molecular profile of individual tumors, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
- Keywords
- Advanced Ovarian Cancer, High-Grade Adenocarcinoma, Tubal Origin, Peritoneal Origin, Metastatic Cancer, Tumour Profiling
- Medical subject headings
- Adenocarcinoma, Neoplasm Metastasis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (1)
- Number of samples with sufficient material and quality for intended analysis.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sample Processing and Report Generation (2)
- Number of successfully processed samples per technology, with quality checks passed and interpretable results generated.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sample Processing and Report Generation (3)
- Successful data transfers into the research data management system, ensuring results are timely for inclusion in the molecular research report.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sample Processing and Report Generation (4)
- Number of molecular summary reports available for the Tumour Board.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sample Processing and Report Generation (5)
- Proportion of cases where the Tumour Board found the molecular report useful for treatment recommendations.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sample Processing and Report Generation (6)
- Proportion of cases where the treating physician found the Tumour Board's recommendation useful for treatment decisions.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Sample Processing and Report Generation (7)
- Types and combinations of molecular information considered useful for treatment recommendations beyond routine diagnostics.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Classification of Proposed Treatment Options
Possible treatment options are classified as follows:
- On-label molecularly matched treatment or immunotherapy (per SwissMedic), with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy;
- Classical chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy (on-label if applicable);
- Referral to a clinical trial;
- Off-label molecularly matched treatment or immunotherapy (per SwissMedic), with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy;
- Off-label treatment authorized in countries with comparable standards to SwissMedic, with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy;
- Best supportive care (no active anti-tumor treatment). Treatment options are discussed in an interdisciplinary Tumour Board, considering patient-centered factors like previous treatments, disease history, clinical status, and patient preferences.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Classification of Tumour Board Recommendations
Grading of treatment recommendations using the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT):
I-A: Randomized trials show survival improvement with a tumor's alteration-drug match.
I-B: Non-randomized trials show benefits in a specific tumor type. I-C: Clinical benefit seen across various tumor types or in basket trials. II-A: Retrospective studies show benefit in patients with a specific alteration vs. those without.
II-B: Trials show better drug responsiveness, but no survival data. III-A: Benefit shown in a different tumor type; limited evidence for the patient's cancer type.
III-B: Predicted impact similar to a studied alteration, lacking data. IV-A: Pre-clinical models show alteration affects drug sensitivity. IV-B: Actionability predicted in silico. V: Targeted therapy shows responses but no improved outcomes. X: No evidence the alteration is actionable
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST)
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST), incl. best supportive care
Measured: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio (TTFST 2 / TTFST 1: TTFST 2 = TTFST on current project; TTFST 1 = TTFST on previous treatment [before entering the project])
Measured: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Terminations due to toxicity
Frequency (proportion) of patients terminating treatment due to toxicity
Measured: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Survival
Overall survival (OS), calculated from registration until death due to any cause
Measured: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Event free survival (EFS)
Event free survival (EFS), defined as time to treatment failure or death
Measured: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Radiological tumour response
Proportion of patients with a radiological tumour response (complete response (CR) / partial response (PR)) according to local standards and trial protocol (in case of referral or trial)
Measured: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Quality of Life (FAC-G7) questionnaire
Quality of Life assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General 7 (FACT-G7) questionnaire. The FACT-G7 uses a Likert scale, where responses range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores indicate better quality of life, while lower scores suggest more severe symptoms or a poorer quality of life.
Measured: Every 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) for 6 months after last tumour sampling (day 0)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2024
- Study start1 Dec 2018
- Primary completion30 Sep 2021
- Study completion30 Sep 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Adenocarcinoma of OvaryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andreas Wicki, Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Zürich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06599749
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-02052; me18Wicki
- Other IDs
- 2018
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Establishment and Standardization of a Platform for In-depth Tumour Profiling (TUPRO) in Patients With Advanced and Metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma of Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Origin - a Prospective, Multi-centre Human Research Ordinance Research Project / Category A
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06599749
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-02052; me18Wicki
- Keywords
- Advanced Ovarian Cancer, High-Grade Adenocarcinoma, Tubal Origin, Peritoneal Origin, Metastatic Cancer, Tumour Profiling
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this prospective, multi-centre, exploratory research project is the establishment of a platform for in-depth tumour profiling in patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin.
Detailed description
TUPRO-Gyn is part of the Tumour Profiler (TUPRO) research collaboration, which aims to help generate information about patients' individual tumour biology for patients with advanced malignancies, using innovative biotechnologies and computational analyses for in-depth molecular profiling. The TUPRO-Gyn study focuses on improving treatment for patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer, who often face poor outcomes and limited options after initial therapy. The study aims to use advanced molecular profiling technologies to identify specific characteristics of tumors that can be targeted with personalized treatments. By building a comprehensive platform for in-depth tumor analysis, the project hopes to discover new biomarkers and support future clinical trials that match treatments to the molecular profile of individual tumors, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score ≤ 2 (not bedridden for more than 50% of waking hours)
- Primary or recurrent HGAC of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV
- Written informed consent according to national legal and regulatory requirements prior to any project specific procedures
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial or geographical condition, which in the judgment of the project leader may interfere with the project or affect patient compliance
- Legal incompetence
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Sample Processing and Report Generation (1)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Number of samples with sufficient material and quality for intended analysis.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (2)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Number of successfully processed samples per technology, with quality checks passed and interpretable results generated.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (3)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Successful data transfers into the research data management system, ensuring results are timely for inclusion in the molecular research report.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (4)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Number of molecular summary reports available for the Tumour Board.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (5)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Proportion of cases where the Tumour Board found the molecular report useful for treatment recommendations.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (6)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Proportion of cases where the treating physician found the Tumour Board's recommendation useful for treatment decisions.
Sample Processing and Report Generation (7)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
- Types and combinations of molecular information considered useful for treatment recommendations beyond routine diagnostics.
Classification of Proposed Treatment Options
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Possible treatment options are classified as follows: * On-label molecularly matched treatment or immunotherapy (per SwissMedic), with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy; * Classical chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy (on-label if applicable); * Referral to a clinical trial; * Off-label molecularly matched treatment or immunotherapy (per SwissMedic), with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy; * Off-label treatment authorized in countries with comparable standards to SwissMedic, with or without radiotherapy/chemotherapy; * Best supportive care (no active anti-tumor treatment). Treatment options are discussed in an interdisciplinary Tumour Board, considering patient-centered factors like previous treatments, disease history, clinical status, and patient preferences.
Classification of Tumour Board Recommendations
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Grading of treatment recommendations using the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT): I-A: Randomized trials show survival improvement with a tumor's alteration-drug match. I-B: Non-randomized trials show benefits in a specific tumor type. I-C: Clinical benefit seen across various tumor types or in basket trials. II-A: Retrospective studies show benefit in patients with a specific alteration vs. those without. II-B: Trials show better drug responsiveness, but no survival data. III-A: Benefit shown in a different tumor type; limited evidence for the patient's cancer type. III-B: Predicted impact similar to a studied alteration, lacking data. IV-A: Pre-clinical models show alteration affects drug sensitivity. IV-B: Actionability predicted in silico. V: Targeted therapy shows responses but no improved outcomes. X: No evidence the alteration is actionable
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST)
Time frame: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST), incl. best supportive care
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio
Time frame: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio (TTFST 2 / TTFST 1: TTFST 2 = TTFST on current project; TTFST 1 = TTFST on previous treatment [before entering the project])
Terminations due to toxicity
Time frame: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Frequency (proportion) of patients terminating treatment due to toxicity
Survival
Time frame: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Overall survival (OS), calculated from registration until death due to any cause
Event free survival (EFS)
Time frame: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Event free survival (EFS), defined as time to treatment failure or death
Radiological tumour response
Time frame: Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up
Proportion of patients with a radiological tumour response (complete response (CR) / partial response (PR)) according to local standards and trial protocol (in case of referral or trial)
Quality of Life (FAC-G7) questionnaire
Time frame: Every 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) for 6 months after last tumour sampling (day 0)
Quality of Life assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General 7 (FACT-G7) questionnaire. The FACT-G7 uses a Likert scale, where responses range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores indicate better quality of life, while lower scores suggest more severe symptoms or a poorer quality of life.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Sep 2024.
Related trials for Adenocarcinoma of Ovary
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2, Open-label Study of ETX-929, a KRAS Inhibitor in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC), Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 1
DBC-664 in Adult Patients With Solid Tumors
Malignant Germ Cell Tumor, Lung Adenocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Tazemetostat in Treating Patients With Recurrent Ovarian or Endometrial Cancer
Recurrent Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma, Recurrent Malignant Uterine Corpus Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of Safety and Efficacy of KFA115 Alone and in Combo With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Select Advanced Cancers
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Cutaneous Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Sovilnesib in Subjects With Ovarian Cancer
High Grade Serous Adenocarcinoma of Ovary, Fallopian Tube Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas Wicki, Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
University Hospital, Zürich
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Adenocarcinoma of Ovary and Adenocarcinoma, Tubular, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 3 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sample Processing and Report Generation (1) (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 16 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.