AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinocerebellar AtaxiasNCT06600269

Cycling-Based Priming Coordination Training for Enhancing Ataxia Recovery and Brain Plasticity

A study testing Cycling Training in people with Spinocerebellar Ataxias, run by Chang Gung University at 1 site in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Effective walking and balance require not only lower limb muscle strength but also coordinated movement. For individuals with Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA), rehabilitation strategies targeting coordination are essential to improving mobility and reducing the burden on caregivers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Spinocerebellar Ataxias
What is being tested?
Cycling Training
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
4 Oct 2024to Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of SCA.

Who cannot join

  • Musculoskeletal injuries on legs
  • Osteoporosis.
  • Any peripheral or central nervous system injury or disease patients.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Chang Gung University

    Taoyuan, 333

    Ya-Ju Chang, PhD, 88632118800 ext. 5515, yjchang@mail.cgu.edu.tw

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Cycling Priming Coordination Training on Ataxia and Brain Plasticity

Effective walking and balance require not only lower limb muscle strength but also coordinated movement. For individuals with Spinocerebellar Ataxia (SCA), rehabilitation strategies targeting coordination are essential to improving mobility and reducing the burden on caregivers. However, evidence-based rehabilitation approaches for ataxia remain limited.

Recent studies suggest that improvements in motor learning are often accompanied by changes in cortical excitability. Abnormal cortical excitability in SCA patients may hinder rehabilitation efforts, yet priming strategies-such as exercise or specific stimuli-have been shown to enhance motor learning by modulating cortical excitability. Cycling exercise, in particular, has demonstrated the potential to improve coordination and influence cortical plasticity in individuals with SCA, making it a promising priming strategy for coordination training.

Read more

This clinical trial aims to:

  1. Investigate the priming effect and neural mechanisms of acute cycling exercise on coordination training in patients with SCA.
  2. Explore the long-term impact of priming cycling training on cortical plasticity and functional mobility in individuals with SCA.

This study seeks to provide insights into optimized rehabilitation interventions that could enhance the quality of life and independence for people with SCA.

Being tested
Cycling Training
Keywords
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Gait, Motor Control, Motor Learning
Medical subject headings
Spinocerebellar Ataxias

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cycling TrainingProcedure or surgery

    Cycling combined with priming strategies to enhance motor learning tasks. Each session will last for 15 minutes, conducted three times per week, over a period of two weeks.

Study groups in NCT06600269
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SCA training groupExperimentalLong-term training
Receives: Procedure: Cycling Training
SCA Control groupNo interventionControl group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Response Time

    The sum of reaction time and movement time, providing a complete measure of the time taken from the stimulus presentation to the completion of the response. Unit: Second(s)

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  2. Overall Error Rate

    The total proportion of incorrect responses across a testing session or series of tasks.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  3. Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs)

    MEPs are the electrical responses recorded from muscles following stimulation of the motor cortex. They reflect the efficiency of neural transmission from the cortex to the muscle. Unit: millivolts (mV).

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  4. Intracortical Facilitation (ICF)

    ICF is measured by applying a pair of TMS pulses with a short interval (e.g., 8-15 ms) where the first (subthreshold) pulse is followed by a second (suprathreshold) pulse, leading to an increased amplitude of the MEP.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks

  5. Intracortical Inhibition (ICI)

    ICI is measured similarly to ICF but with a shorter inter-stimulus interval (e.g., 1-5 ms), resulting in a suppressed MEP amplitude. This suppression reflects inhibitory processes within the cortex.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  6. Total Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score

    To objectively assess ataxia severity across various domains of motor function including gait, stance, sitting, speech disturbance, finger chase, nose-finger test, fast alternating hand movements, and heel-shin slide. Each item is scored individually with a scale that typically ranges from 0 (no ataxia) to a maximum score that depends on the severity and the aspect of ataxia being assessed. The total score ranges from 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  7. Total Berg Balance Scale (BBS) Score

    To measure an individual's balance abilities through various tasks that mimic daily activities, assessing the risk of falls and overall balance proficiency. The BBS consists of 14 items that evaluate a range of functions including sitting to standing, standing unsupported, transferring, turning to look behind, picking up an object from the floor, and standing on one leg. Each task is rated on a scale from 0 (unable) to 4 (independent), with the total score ranging from 0 to 56. A higher total score indicates better balance and lower fall risk. Scores below 45 are generally indicative of increased fall risk.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  8. Total Time to Complete the Time Up and Go test (TUG test)

    The time, in seconds, it takes for a participant to complete the TUG test from the initial sitting position to returning to the seated position. An older adult who takes ≥12 seconds to complete the TUG is at risk for falling.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  9. Walking Speed

    The time taken by participants to walk a standardized distance, typically expressed in centimeters per second (cm/s).

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  10. Step Length

    The linear distance between the two ankles, typically expressed in centimeter(cm).

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  11. Step Time

    The duration taken for one complete step, measuring from foot-off of one foot to the next foot-off of the same foot, usually expressed in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  12. Fatigue Level Measurement Using Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)

    The MFI is a 20-item self-report questionnaire used to measure five dimensions of fatigue: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced activity, and reduced motivation. Each dimension is scored separately, with higher scores indicating greater fatigue

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  13. Sleep Quality Measurement Using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The PSQI is a 19-item self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a 1-month period. It generates a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. The PSQI includes seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Gait Speed Measurement Using 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)

    The 10MWT is a performance-based measure used to assess walking speed over a short distance. Participants will be instructed to walk 10 meters at their comfortable and/or fastest walking speed. The time taken to walk the central 6 meters is recorded to eliminate acceleration and deceleration effects, and gait speed is calculated as meters per second (m/s).

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  2. Double Support Time

    The portion of the gait cycle where both feet are in contact with the ground, indicating the transition phase between steps, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle or in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  3. Single Support Time

    The duration within the gait cycle when only one foot is in contact with the ground, typically measured in seconds or as a percentage of the total gait cycle.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  4. Swing Time

    The portion of the gait cycle where the foot is not in contact with the ground, moving forward to the next step. It is usually expressed as a percentage of the total gait cycle or in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  5. Stance Time

    The portion of the gait cycle when the foot is in contact with the ground, supporting body weight. It's typically expressed as a percentage of the total gait cycle or in seconds

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

  6. Cadence

    The number of steps an individual takes per minute, providing an overview of gait speed and rhythm, , expressed as steps per minute.

    Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2024
  2. Study start4 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06600269
Sponsor's protocol ID
SCA_001
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
13 Sep 2024
Last updated
8 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cycling Training in people with Spinocerebellar Ataxias, run by Chang Gung University at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Response Time (time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks and 4 weeks). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in