AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry Eye Disease (DED)DED OSDI FBUTNCT06605495

Using Dry Eye As a Disease Model, Investigators Demonstrated the Optimal Selection of Individualized Clinical Interventions and the Superiority of Dynamic Treatment Discrimination in Chinese Medicine.

A study testing fumigation with Chinese medicine, Oral herbal medicine and Modern Western Medicine in people with Dry Eye Disease (DED), run by Xuejing Lu.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, dry eye disease (leukoaraiosis) is used as a model disease, and the methodological system for evaluating the clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine for dry eye disease is constructed with the core of "subgrouping dynamic and static parallel group design", so as to carry out a real-world demonstration… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye Disease (DED)
What is being tested?
fumigation with Chinese medicine, Oral herbal medicine and Modern Western Medicine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
4,000 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
25 Sep 2024to 1 Oct 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Be 18-75 years of age and of any gender
  • Meets Western diagnostic criteria for dry eye
  • Formed consent and signed the Informed Consent Form

Who cannot join

  • Those who are unable to perform a dry eye examination due to various factors
  • Patients with severe diseases of the liver or renal system, or infectious eye diseases
  • Those who are allergic to the medications used in this study
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding Mental illness or intellectual disability; Participants in clinical trials of other drugs within the last 3 months.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Demonstration Clinical Study of Dry Eye Disease Advantage

In this study, dry eye disease (leukoaraiosis) is used as a model disease, and the methodological system for evaluating the clinical efficacy of Chinese medicine for dry eye disease is constructed with the core of "subgrouping dynamic and static parallel group design", so as to carry out a real-world demonstration study of dry eye disease as a dominant disease in Chinese medicine treatment. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the selection of individualized clinical interventions and the superiority of dynamic diagnosis and treatment using dry eye as a disease model. The study provides a clinical example of a subgroup-based dynamic and static parallel group design for TCM clinical research on "disease-based integrated treatment". Based on the conclusions of the efficacy evaluation study, investigators will provide real-world clinical data of dry eye syndrome for the artificial intelligence prediction of the integrated platform of individualized clinical evaluation and evidence support of Chinese medicine with multi-source data integration.

Being tested
fumigation with Chinese medicine, Oral herbal medicine, Modern Western Medicine
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • fumigation with Chinese medicineCombination product

    Eye fumigation with the Eyesight Eye Therapy,10 minutes once daily for 6 weeks.

  • Oral herbal medicineDrug

    Patients were identified into the appropriate group according to the individual evidence profile, and the herbal formula under the corresponding evidence profile was taken orally as one dose of 150 ml of water twice a day for 6 weeks.

  • Modern Western MedicineDrug

    Referring to the Chinese Expert Consensus on Dry Eye: Treatment (2020), this course of treatment totaled 6 weeks.

Study groups in NCT06605495
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chinese Medicine External Treatment GroupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Combination Product: fumigation with Chinese medicine
Chinese Medicine Internal Treatment Group (Oral Herbal Medicine)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Oral herbal medicine
Western medicine treatment groupActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Modern Western Medicine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Chinese Medical Evidence Scale

    The TCM evidence scale converts symptoms and signs into TCM evidence, and assigns 1, 2, and 3 points according to three levels of severity, with reference to the "Guiding Principles for Clinical Research on New Drugs of Traditional Chinese Medicine" and the "International TCM Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stemmed Eyes (2021-12-14)". If the points of TCM evidence are higher or unchanged after the intervention, it means that the intervention measures are ineffective or inefficient, and that patients\' clinical symptoms do not improve significantly or their conditions worsen after the treatment. If the TCM syndrome score increases or remains unchanged after the intervention compared with that before treatment, it means that the intervention is ineffective or inefficient, and the patient\'s clinical symptoms do not improve or worsen after treatment.

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

  2. Ocular Surface Disease Index

    By evaluating the points before and after the intervention treatment, if the points are lower than before the treatment, it suggests that the intervention treatment is effective, on the contrary, it indicates that the intervention is ineffective or ineffective, and the clinical symptoms of the patients do not improve significantly or worsen after the treatment.

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

  3. Fluorescein Breakup Time

    Efficacy was evaluated by the values tested before and after the intervention

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Schirmer Ⅰ test

    Efficacy was evaluated by the values tested before and after the intervention

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

  2. Height of the River of Tears

    Efficacy was evaluated by the values tested before and after the intervention

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

  3. fluorescent staining of the cornea

    See the Chinese Expert Consensus on Dry Eye: Expert Consensus on Definition and Classification (2020): the cornea was divided into 4 quadrants on average, and each quadrant was scored from 0 to 3 according to the staining of sodium fluorescein, with a score of 0: no staining; 1: 1-30 punctate staining; 2: \>30 punctate staining but staining not fused; and 3: fusion of the corneal punctate staining with the appearance of filaments and ulcers, etc. The final tally scores for each quadrant were summed. The efficacy was evaluated by tallying the scores detected before and after the intervention.

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

  4. Classification of blepharoplasty deficiency

    The efficacy was evaluated by scoring the blepharoplasty area values detected before and after the intervention. According to the Chinese Expert Consensus on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (2023), investigators graded the results as follows: score 0: no meibomian gland deficiency; score 1: meibomian gland deficiency ratio \<1/3; score 2: meibomian gland deficiency ratio 1/3-2/3; and score 3: meibomian gland deficiency ratio \>2/3.

    Measured: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2024
  2. Study start25 Sep 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
4,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06605495
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024YH008
Acronym
DED OSDI FBUT
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
18 Sep 2024
Last updated
24 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing fumigation with Chinese medicine, Oral herbal medicine and Modern Western Medicine in people with Dry Eye Disease (DED), run by Xuejing Lu.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Lu (18908178510, luxuejing@cdutcm.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Chinese Medical Evidence Scale (time frame: From enrollment to end of 6-week treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in