The Effect of I-PRF As An Adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy on Clinical Parameters in Smokers With Periodontitis

Twenty-five systemically healthy, smoker patients with periodontitis were included in the study. All individuals were examined at baseline, 1st and 3rd months after non-surgical periodontal treatment including, whole mouth probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), presence of bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI) and Turesky Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (TQHPI) except the third molars. PPD and CAL were measured at six sites per tooth using a manual periodontal probe. All measurements and NSPT were performed by the same blinded and calibrated examiner (TCG).

The NSPT included supra- and subgingival scaling, root planing and oral hygiene instructions. Subgingival scaling and root planing were performed under local anesthesia within the 24 h. After NSPT, four contralateral deep pockets (two for each side) in premolar/molar ares were determined. The sites were randomly divided into test sites receiving the subgingival application of i-PRF and controls treated with saline.

After the NSPT was completed, the i-PRF was produced as follows: 9 mL of whole blood was collected from the antecubital vein in a sterile plastic tubes without anticoagulant and immediately centrifuged at 700 rpm for 3 minutes with a centrifuge device. After centrifugation, the upper liquid layer was collected as i-PRF and placed into an insulin syringe connected to a 29G needle.

Before the i-PRF application, the teeth were isolated with a cotton roll and dried with a cotton pellet. The 29-gauge needle tip was gently placed into the periodontal pocket and the i-PRF was injected into the periodontal pocket until it reached the gingival margin (until it overflowed from the sulcus). For the subgingival saline application, the insulin syringe was filled with saline and the 29-gauge needle tip was gently placed into the periodontal pocket. The saline was injected into the periodontal pocket until it was seen to overflow from the gingival margin. After the subgingival application of i-PRF/saline , the application areas were isolated and waited for 10 minutes in order to prevent the i-PRF from being removed from the sulcus with oral fluids until it turned into a gel. Subgingival i-PRF/salin application was performed by a periodontist (BMY).Patients were instructed not to drink or eat anything, including water, for at least 30 minutes after the procedure. Patients were informed about oral hygiene practices (tooth brushing and interdental cleaning) and were motivated to perform daily oral care. Patients were given an appointment for the second application of i-PRF/salin application 7 days later. In this session, i-PRF/salin application was applied to the previously applied areas, oral hygiene was checked and patients were informed again. Patients were called again in the 1st and 3rd months, periodontal clinical measurements were repeated and oral hygiene motivation was given.

Statistical analyses were performed using a statistical analysis software (SPSS v.25.0; IBM). The Shapiro Wilk test was used to determine the normality of the present data and the variance homogeneity was checked with the Levene test. For non-normally distributed data, the Mann Whitney U test was used for pairwise comparison. The Independent Samples T test was performed for normally distributed data. The Friedman test was used to examine the differences between three dependent groups. Bonferroni correction was performed for multiple variations. The statistical significance value was accepted as p \< 0.05.