Atrial FibrillationNCT06607510
Exercise Effects on Atrial Fibrillation
A study testing Experimental HIIT and Experimental HIFT in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by European University Miguel de Cervantes at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly affects quality of life and increases the demand for medical care of those affected. It is very important to identify triggering factors, such as oxidative stress or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), as well as to identify potential biomarkers through plasma… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- Experimental HIIT and Experimental HIFT
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2024to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
- Age between 18 and 80 years.
- Sedentary lifestyle.
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Permanent atrial fibrillation.
- Moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction.
- Moderate to severe left valvulopathy.
- Severe pulmonary hypertension.
- Ischemic heart disease with incomplete revascularization.
- Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site
Universidad Europea Miguel de Cervantes
Valladolid, 47012
Alejandro Santos, PhD, asantos@uemc.es
About this study
Official title: Exercise in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Effect of Different Types of Exercise on the Burden of the Pathology, on the Biochemical Profile, and on the Functional Capacity of the Patients.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly affects quality of life and increases the demand for medical care of those affected. It is very important to identify triggering factors, such as oxidative stress or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), as well as to identify potential biomarkers through plasma analysis. At the same time, it is essential to establish adequate training and rehabilitation programs, which would result in a decrease in hospitalizations and the health care costs associated with the pathology. Current cardiac rehabilitation programs based on physical exercise, especially moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), have demonstrated effectiveness. MICT improves cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in patients with AF. However, high-intensity intervallic training (HIIT) has shown superior benefits in these variables.
Although HIIT traditionally has an aerobic focus, a variant called high-intensity functional training (HIFT) is suggested that incorporates muscle strengthening exercises recommended in the guidelines for AF management. This innovative modality seeks to achieve cardiovascular and neuromuscular adaptations simultaneously, with a high transfer to daily activities. Despite its potential, the effects at the functional, molecular and clinical levels in patients with AF are unknown. The purpose of the study is to determine the benefits of HIFT on molecular, functional and clinical variables in patients with AF, and to compare these benefits with those achieved with HIIT and the usual care and recommendations in current clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- Experimental HIIT, Experimental HIFT
- Keywords
- HIFT, HIIT, Intervallic training, Arrhythmia
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental HIITOther
Subjects belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise (3 sessions weekly spaced at least 48 hours apart with a maximum duration of 40 minutes), followed by 12 weeks of detraining follow-up. Before starting the intervention, two familiarization sessions for assessing strength and functional capacity will be conducted. This program is designed in a standardized warm-up: joint mobility exercises and neuromuscular activation (5 minutes). Main part os the training is design in treadmill walking exercise (28 minutes). Participants must complete four four-minute blocks at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate.The initial starting speed is 5 km/h and adjust the intensity with incline increments of 2%. Between sets, a prescribed active rest period lasts three minutes, during which patients walk on the treadmill at an intensity of 60-70% of peak heart. The last part of the training is a cool-down (5 minutes treadmill walking at an intensity of 50-60% of peak heart rate).
Experimental HIFTOther
Subject belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise (3 sessions weekly spaced at least 48 hours apart with a maximum duration of 40 minutes), followed by 12 weeks of detraining follow-up. Before starting the intervention, two familiarization sessions for assessing strength and functional capacity will be conducted. AMRAP will consist of a circuit of six global, functional exercises with external loads [i) squat; ii) rowing; iii) dead weight; iv) chest press; v) step up; vi) farmer walk]. Patients will perform 10 repetitions of each exercise and complete as many rounds as possible within the specified time. Between blocks, there will be a prescribed active rest period lasting three minutes, during which patients will walk on the treadmill at an intensity of 60-70% of peak heart rate. The last part of the training is a cool-down (5 minutes treadmill walking at an intensity of 50-60% of peak heart rate).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental HIIT. | Experimental | Subjects belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise. Treadmill walking exercise. Participants must complete four four-minute blocks at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate. Receives: Other: Experimental HIIT |
| Experimental HIFT. | Experimental | Subjects belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise. Four blocks of 4 minutes each of the highest number of repetitions/rounds possible (AMRAP) at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate. Receives: Other: Experimental HIFT |
| No intervention: Control. | No intervention | These patients do not receive training sessions. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Concentration of proteins in blood (proteome).
Venous blood samples are collected from the antecubital vein and kept at 4°C until preparation to avoid clotting and minimise protein degradation. Samples are centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 minutes at 4°C.
Samples shall are stored at -80°C for subsequent analysis and only one freeze-thaw cycle shall be allowed. All samples shall are prepared within 1 hour of sample collection and show no signs of haemolysis.
The protein concentrarion will be analyzed (μg/ml).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Oxidative stress status
Oxidative stress is measured through the analysis of plasma oxidative stress biomarkers concentrations in pg/ml.
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Cardiac function: concentrations (pg/ml) of NT-proBNP (type B natriuretic peptide).
Measurement of cardiac dysfunction is analyzed through the presence of plasma markers of cardiac injury (NT-proBNP; pg/ml).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Maximal strength of upper and lower extremity muscles.
Maximal strength of upper and lower extremity muscles from one concentric repetition maximum (1RM) of half squat and bench press will be assessed (maximal strength).
Measurements in weight lifted and the number of times. Maximum Repetition or 1RM is the maximum weight (kg) you can move in just one time.
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: power strength by bar displacement
Changes in bar displacement in centimeter (cm).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: power strength by propulsive velocity
Mean propulsive velocity (in meter per second).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: power strength
Average power (in watts).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: Handgrip strength.
Changes in the manual dynamometer measurements (in kg).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: Assessment of cardiorespiratory capacity.
Changes in measurements by a treadmill. The following variables will be assessed before and after the cardiorespiratory capacity measurement:
- Gas exchange analysis (VO2, VCO2), in ml·kg-1·min-1.
- Maximum speed in treadmill (km/h).
- Blood pressure (systolic pressure and diastolic pressure in mm Hg).
- Heart rate (bpm).
- Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) using a RPE-CR10 scale.
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: Assessment of functional capacity (6MWT).
Changes in six-minute walk test (6MWT): number of laps around the hallway and the additional distance covered on the last lap if it is not completed using the markings in the hallway. The outcome measure is quantified in meters.
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Functional variables: Levels of physical activity
GT3X+ accelerometers estimate physical activity levels based on the accelerometer output in units called "counts per minute".
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Clinical variables: Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).
The SF-36 questionnaire consists of eight scales yielding two summary measures: physical and mental health. The physical health measure includes four scales of physical functioning (10 items), role-physical (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), and general health (5 items). The mental health measure is composed of vitality (4 items), social functioning (2 items), role-emotional (3 items), and mental health (5 items). A final item, termed self-reported health transition, is answered by the client but is not included in the scoring process. The SF-36 offers a choice of recall format at a standard (4 week) or acute (1 week) time frame. Likert scales and yes/no options are used to assess function and well-being on this 36-item questionnaire. To score the SF-36, scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value.
Measured: 0 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Clinical variables: Atrial fibrillation burden.
Changes in electrocardiogram (electrical signal from the heart to detect different heart conditions).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Clinical variables: Atrial fibrillation burden (subjective measurement).
Changes in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire: palpitations, dyspnea, fatigue and limitations in daily activities. AFEQT evaluates health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and provides an overall score; plus scores for symptoms, daily activities, treatment concerns, and treatment satisfaction.
20 questions on 7-point Likert scale Overall or subscale scores range from 0-100. A score of 0 corresponds to complete disability (or responding "extremely" limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered), while a score of 100 corresponds to no disability (or responding "not at all" limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Clinical variables: Arterial stiffness.
Changes in the images of the right common carotid artery are obtained using an ultrasound.
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Clinical variables: Heart rate variability.
Changes in the variation in the time intervals between heartbeats (R-R intervals).
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Clinical variables: Vascular dysfunction.
The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a new index of the overall stiffness of the artery from the origin of the aorta to the ankle. CAVI values range from 3 to 18. Depending on the cut-off values.
Standardized values established by the manufacturer, a value < 8 is considered normal, between 8 and 9 is borderline, and 9 is high and indicates advanced atherosclerosis.
Measured: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2024
- Study start1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective single-center randomized clinical trial.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- European University Miguel de Cervantes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06607510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI-DOC004-AF
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2024
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exercise in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Effect of Different Types of Exercise on the Burden of the Pathology, on the Biochemical Profile, and on the Functional Capacity of the Patients.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06607510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PI-DOC004-AF
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- HIFT, HIIT, Intervallic training, Arrhythmia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- European University Miguel de CervantesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly affects quality of life and increases the demand for medical care of those affected. It is very important to identify triggering factors, such as oxidative stress or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), as well as to identify potential biomarkers through plasma analysis. At the same time, it is essential to establish adequate training and rehabilitation programs, which would result in a decrease in hospitalizations and the health care costs associated with the pathology. Current cardiac rehabilitation programs based on physical exercise, especially moderate intensity continuous training (MICT), have demonstrated effectiveness. MICT improves cardiorespiratory fitness and quality of life in patients with AF. However, high-intensity intervallic training (HIIT) has shown superior benefits in these variables.
Although HIIT traditionally has an aerobic focus, a variant called high-intensity functional training (HIFT) is suggested that incorporates muscle strengthening exercises recommended in the guidelines for AF management. This innovative modality seeks to achieve cardiovascular and neuromuscular adaptations simultaneously, with a high transfer to daily activities. Despite its potential, the effects at the functional, molecular and clinical levels in patients with AF are unknown. The purpose of the study is to determine the benefits of HIFT on molecular, functional and clinical variables in patients with AF, and to compare these benefits with those achieved with HIIT and the usual care and recommendations in current clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Prospective single-center randomized clinical trial.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental HIIT. | Experimental | Other: Experimental HIITSubjects belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise. Treadmill walking exercise. Participants must complete four four-minute blocks at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate. |
| Experimental HIFT. | Experimental | Other: Experimental HIFTSubjects belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise. Four blocks of 4 minutes each of the highest number of repetitions/rounds possible (AMRAP) at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate. |
| No intervention: Control. | No intervention | –These patients do not receive training sessions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation.
- Age between 18 and 80 years.
- Sedentary lifestyle.
- Signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Permanent atrial fibrillation.
- Moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction.
- Moderate to severe left valvulopathy.
- Severe pulmonary hypertension.
- Ischemic heart disease with incomplete revascularization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental HIITSubjects belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise (3 sessions weekly spaced at least 48 hours apart with a maximum duration of 40 minutes), followed by 12 weeks of detraining follow-up. Before starting the intervention, two familiarization sessions for assessing strength and functional capacity will be conducted. This program is designed in a standardized warm-up: joint mobility exercises and neuromuscular activation (5 minutes). Main part os the training is design in treadmill walking exercise (28 minutes). Participants must complete four four-minute blocks at an intensity of 85-95% of peak heart rate.The initial starting speed is 5 km/h and adjust the intensity with incline increments of 2%. Between sets, a prescribed active rest period lasts three minutes, during which patients walk on the treadmill at an intensity of 60-70% of peak heart. The last part of the training is a cool-down (5 minutes treadmill walking at an intensity of 50-60% of peak heart rate). | Other | Experimental HIIT. |
| Experimental HIFTSubject belonging to this group perform a 12-week supervised exercise (3 sessions weekly spaced at least 48 hours apart with a maximum duration of 40 minutes), followed by 12 weeks of detraining follow-up. Before starting the intervention, two familiarization sessions for assessing strength and functional capacity will be conducted. AMRAP will consist of a circuit of six global, functional exercises with external loads [i) squat; ii) rowing; iii) dead weight; iv) chest press; v) step up; vi) farmer walk]. Patients will perform 10 repetitions of each exercise and complete as many rounds as possible within the specified time. Between blocks, there will be a prescribed active rest period lasting three minutes, during which patients will walk on the treadmill at an intensity of 60-70% of peak heart rate. The last part of the training is a cool-down (5 minutes treadmill walking at an intensity of 50-60% of peak heart rate). | Other | Experimental HIFT. |
Primary outcome
Concentration of proteins in blood (proteome).
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Venous blood samples are collected from the antecubital vein and kept at 4°C until preparation to avoid clotting and minimise protein degradation. Samples are centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Samples shall are stored at -80°C for subsequent analysis and only one freeze-thaw cycle shall be allowed. All samples shall are prepared within 1 hour of sample collection and show no signs of haemolysis. The protein concentrarion will be analyzed (μg/ml).
Oxidative stress status
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Oxidative stress is measured through the analysis of plasma oxidative stress biomarkers concentrations in pg/ml.
Cardiac function: concentrations (pg/ml) of NT-proBNP (type B natriuretic peptide).
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Measurement of cardiac dysfunction is analyzed through the presence of plasma markers of cardiac injury (NT-proBNP; pg/ml).
Maximal strength of upper and lower extremity muscles.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Maximal strength of upper and lower extremity muscles from one concentric repetition maximum (1RM) of half squat and bench press will be assessed (maximal strength). Measurements in weight lifted and the number of times. Maximum Repetition or 1RM is the maximum weight (kg) you can move in just one time.
Functional variables: power strength by bar displacement
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in bar displacement in centimeter (cm).
Functional variables: power strength by propulsive velocity
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Mean propulsive velocity (in meter per second).
Functional variables: power strength
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Average power (in watts).
Functional variables: Handgrip strength.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in the manual dynamometer measurements (in kg).
Functional variables: Assessment of cardiorespiratory capacity.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in measurements by a treadmill. The following variables will be assessed before and after the cardiorespiratory capacity measurement: 1. Gas exchange analysis (VO2, VCO2), in ml·kg-1·min-1. 2. Maximum speed in treadmill (km/h). 3. Blood pressure (systolic pressure and diastolic pressure in mm Hg). 4. Heart rate (bpm). 5. Rate of perceived exertion (RPE) using a RPE-CR10 scale.
Functional variables: Assessment of functional capacity (6MWT).
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in six-minute walk test (6MWT): number of laps around the hallway and the additional distance covered on the last lap if it is not completed using the markings in the hallway. The outcome measure is quantified in meters.
Functional variables: Levels of physical activity
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
GT3X+ accelerometers estimate physical activity levels based on the accelerometer output in units called "counts per minute".
Clinical variables: Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36).
Time frame: 0 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
The SF-36 questionnaire consists of eight scales yielding two summary measures: physical and mental health. The physical health measure includes four scales of physical functioning (10 items), role-physical (4 items), bodily pain (2 items), and general health (5 items). The mental health measure is composed of vitality (4 items), social functioning (2 items), role-emotional (3 items), and mental health (5 items). A final item, termed self-reported health transition, is answered by the client but is not included in the scoring process. The SF-36 offers a choice of recall format at a standard (4 week) or acute (1 week) time frame. Likert scales and yes/no options are used to assess function and well-being on this 36-item questionnaire. To score the SF-36, scales are standardized with a scoring algorithm or by the SF-36v2 scoring software to obtain a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health status, and a mean score of 50 has been articulated as a normative value.
Clinical variables: Atrial fibrillation burden.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in electrocardiogram (electrical signal from the heart to detect different heart conditions).
Clinical variables: Atrial fibrillation burden (subjective measurement).
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire: palpitations, dyspnea, fatigue and limitations in daily activities. AFEQT evaluates health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and provides an overall score; plus scores for symptoms, daily activities, treatment concerns, and treatment satisfaction. 20 questions on 7-point Likert scale Overall or subscale scores range from 0-100. A score of 0 corresponds to complete disability (or responding "extremely" limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered), while a score of 100 corresponds to no disability (or responding "not at all" limited, difficult or bothersome to all questions answered).
Clinical variables: Arterial stiffness.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in the images of the right common carotid artery are obtained using an ultrasound.
Clinical variables: Heart rate variability.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
Changes in the variation in the time intervals between heartbeats (R-R intervals).
Clinical variables: Vascular dysfunction.
Time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.
The cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) is a new index of the overall stiffness of the artery from the origin of the aorta to the ankle. CAVI values range from 3 to 18. Depending on the cut-off values. Standardized values established by the manufacturer, a value < 8 is considered normal, between 8 and 9 is borderline, and 9 is high and indicates advanced atherosclerosis.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingObservational study
Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated With Catheter Ablation
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Predict Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Burden in Participants With PAF and PsAF Treated With the VARIPULSE™ PFA Catheter
Atrial Fibrillation
Recruiting
Anatomical Navigation for Guided Electrophysiology in AFL and AFib
Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter
Not yet recruiting
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Repeat Ablation Strategies With Durably Isolated Pulmonary Veins
Ablation Techniques, Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Recruiting
A Study of VARIPULSE Catheter in Participants With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Pulmonary Vein and Superior Vena Cava Isolation
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental HIIT and Experimental HIFT in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by European University Miguel de Cervantes at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Alejandro Santos, PhD (+34983001000, asantos@uemc.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Concentration of proteins in blood (proteome). (time frame: 0 weeks, 2 weeks, 13 weeks, 24 weeks.). The study lists 17 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2024.