ImmunodeficiencyRESPONSENCT06612515
Vaccine-induced Immunity in Immunocompromised Patients
An observational study of Immunodeficiency, run by University of Cologne at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Managing respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary approach, including vaccination, though its effectiveness is often suboptimal in these individuals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunodeficiency
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 25 Mar 2025to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Immunocompromised patients vaccinated against respiratory virus infections or willing to be vaccinated
Who may be able to join
- Signed informed consent form
- Patients with immunosuppression either by treatment or underlying diseases
- Patients who are vaccinated or willing to be vaccinated against respiratory virus infections in ac-cordance with current recommendations
- Age of 18 years or older
Who cannot join
- Patients unwilling/ineligible for vaccination under current recommendations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Cologne
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Sibylle C Mellinghoff, MD, +4915901029684, sibylle.mellinghoff@uk-koeln.de
About this study
Official title: Prospective Cohort-study for the Investigation of the Vac-cine-induced Immune Response After Vaccination Against RESPiratory Viral Infections in Immunocompromised Pa-tients With or Without Haemato-ONcological diseaSEs
Managing respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary approach, including vaccination, though its effectiveness is often suboptimal in these individuals.
In hematological patients, poor humoral immunogenicity is common, especially when the B cell axis is affected by disease or treatment, while T cell responses may offer better protection. Current immunologic data on these patients is limited, focusing mostly on serologic parameters. To address this, we will conduct an observational study analyzing early and late booster vaccinations, with a focus on virus-specific T cell responses in vaccinated patients.
Read the detailed description
Respiratory virus infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, partic-ularly among immunocompromised patients. These infections are caused by a varie-ty of viral pathogens, including influenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza viruses, adenoviruses, rhinoviruses, and coronaviruses, among oth-ers. In the general population, these infections typically result in self-limiting ill-nesses; however, in individuals with compromised immune systems, such as those undergoing chemotherapy, organ transplant recipients, patients with haematological malignancies, and those with HIV, the consequences can be severe and often life-threatening. For example, patients with haematological and oncological diseases are at elevated risk for severe morbidity and mortality by influenza infections. Com-pared to influenza-associated hospitalization rates in the general population (37.9 per 100,000 person-years for persons age 50 to 64 years)1 patients with cancer were hospitalized at a rate of 219 per 100,000 person-years for patients younger than 65 years.
The immune system plays a crucial role in defending against viral pathogens. Im-munocompromised patients, due to either primary immune deficiencies or second-ary immunosuppression (e.g., from immunosuppressive therapies), have impaired immune responses that hinder the effective clearance of viral infections. This im-pairment can lead to prolonged viral shedding, increased risk of secondary bacterial infections, and more severe disease manifestations, including acute respiratory dis-tress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ failure. The management of respiratory vi-rus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary ap-proach. Prophylactic measures, including vaccination and the use of antiviral prophylaxis, are crucial in reducing the incidence of these infections.
Given the significant impact of respiratory virus infections on immunocompromised patients, ongoing research is crucial to improve preventive strategies. This research includes studies on viral pathophysiology, host immune responses, and the devel-opment of optimal vaccination schedules. The emergence of new viral pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2, underscores the importance of surveillance and prepared-ness in this vulnerable population.
Respiratory virus infections represent a major health concern for immunocompro-mised patients, necessitating comprehensive and specialised care. Continued ad-vancements in diagnostics, therapeutics, and preventive measures are vital to miti-gate the impact of these infections and improve the quality of life and survival of immunocompromised individuals.
The management of respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary approach and prophylactic measures, including vaccina-tion, to reduce the incidence and severity of these infections. However, the efficacy of vaccination is often suboptimal in immunocompromised individuals and not well assessed in clinical trials.
A poor humoral immunogenicity has been shown for most available vaccines in haematological patients. Especially affection of the B cell axis by either disease, treatment, or both, impacts humoral vaccine immune response.
The humoral vaccine-induced immune response facilitates early protection directly after vaccination, while long-term protection warrants antibody persistence as well as immune memory cells. Data from immunocompetent persons suggest that cell mediated immune response may be a better correlate of protection against virus in-fections in vaccinated patients with poor immune responses than humoral im-munity due to its major role in recovery from infection and in virus clearance.
Immunologic data in patients with haematological malignancies are generally scarce and mainly focus on serologic parameters. However, cellular response and especially T cell response seems often to be induced more reliably in those patients than humoral response as seen in other immunocompromised populations18 and other vaccines.
To close this knowledge gap, we will perform an observational study to prospectively analyse the effect of early and late booster vaccination with special focus on the virus-specific T cells. Samples will be collected from patients that have been vac-cinated as part of clinical routine.
- Conditions
- Immunodeficiency
- Keywords
- vaccine; Immunocompromised; immune response
- Medical subject headings
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Humoral immune response after vaccination
To compare antibody titres between different subgroups of immunocompromised patients after vaccination against respiratory virus infections
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Cellular immune response after vaccination
To analyse T cell response after vaccination against respiratory virus infections
Measured: 12 months
Seroconversion
To compare antibody response rates between dif-ferent subgroups of immunocompromised patients after vaccination against respiratory virus infections
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2024
- Study start25 Mar 2025
- Primary completion30 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ImmunodeficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cologne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sibylle C Mellinghoff, University of Cologne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06612515
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 231244-NIS
- Acronym
- RESPONSE
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 12 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Felipe Fumero E, Stemler J, Sprute R, Sauer KM, Gruell H, Kreer C, Klein F, Theobald SJ, Rybniker J, Cornely OA, Kappes L, Cremer LM, Mellinghoff SC. Investigation of Vaccine-Induced Immune Response After Vaccination Against Respiratory Viruses in Immunocompromised Patients With or Without Hemato-Oncological Diseases (RESPONSE): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 Jul 23;15:e88520. doi: 10.2196/88520.
PubMed 42492070
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Cohort-study for the Investigation of the Vac-cine-induced Immune Response After Vaccination Against RESPiratory Viral Infections in Immunocompromised Pa-tients With or Without Haemato-ONcological diseaSEs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06612515
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESPONSE / 231244-NIS
- Conditions
- Immunodeficiency
- Keywords
- vaccine; Immunocompromised; immune response
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CologneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Managing respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary approach, including vaccination, though its effectiveness is often suboptimal in these individuals.
In hematological patients, poor humoral immunogenicity is common, especially when the B cell axis is affected by disease or treatment, while T cell responses may offer better protection. Current immunologic data on these patients is limited, focusing mostly on serologic parameters. To address this, we will conduct an observational study analyzing early and late booster vaccinations, with a focus on virus-specific T cell responses in vaccinated patients.
Detailed description
Respiratory virus infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, partic-ularly among immunocompromised patients. These infections are caused by a varie-ty of viral pathogens, including influenza viruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza viruses, adenoviruses, rhinoviruses, and coronaviruses, among oth-ers. In the general population, these infections typically result in self-limiting ill-nesses; however, in individuals with compromised immune systems, such as those undergoing chemotherapy, organ transplant recipients, patients with haematological malignancies, and those with HIV, the consequences can be severe and often life-threatening. For example, patients with haematological and oncological diseases are at elevated risk for severe morbidity and mortality by influenza infections. Com-pared to influenza-associated hospitalization rates in the general population (37.9 per 100,000 person-years for persons age 50 to 64 years)1 patients with cancer were hospitalized at a rate of 219 per 100,000 person-years for patients younger than 65 years.
The immune system plays a crucial role in defending against viral pathogens. Im-munocompromised patients, due to either primary immune deficiencies or second-ary immunosuppression (e.g., from immunosuppressive therapies), have impaired immune responses that hinder the effective clearance of viral infections. This im-pairment can lead to prolonged viral shedding, increased risk of secondary bacterial infections, and more severe disease manifestations, including acute respiratory dis-tress syndrome (ARDS) and multi-organ failure. The management of respiratory vi-rus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary ap-proach. Prophylactic measures, including vaccination and the use of antiviral prophylaxis, are crucial in reducing the incidence of these infections.
Given the significant impact of respiratory virus infections on immunocompromised patients, ongoing research is crucial to improve preventive strategies. This research includes studies on viral pathophysiology, host immune responses, and the devel-opment of optimal vaccination schedules. The emergence of new viral pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2, underscores the importance of surveillance and prepared-ness in this vulnerable population.
Respiratory virus infections represent a major health concern for immunocompro-mised patients, necessitating comprehensive and specialised care. Continued ad-vancements in diagnostics, therapeutics, and preventive measures are vital to miti-gate the impact of these infections and improve the quality of life and survival of immunocompromised individuals.
The management of respiratory virus infections in immunocompromised patients requires a multidisciplinary approach and prophylactic measures, including vaccina-tion, to reduce the incidence and severity of these infections. However, the efficacy of vaccination is often suboptimal in immunocompromised individuals and not well assessed in clinical trials.
A poor humoral immunogenicity has been shown for most available vaccines in haematological patients. Especially affection of the B cell axis by either disease, treatment, or both, impacts humoral vaccine immune response.
The humoral vaccine-induced immune response facilitates early protection directly after vaccination, while long-term protection warrants antibody persistence as well as immune memory cells. Data from immunocompetent persons suggest that cell mediated immune response may be a better correlate of protection against virus in-fections in vaccinated patients with poor immune responses than humoral im-munity due to its major role in recovery from infection and in virus clearance.
Immunologic data in patients with haematological malignancies are generally scarce and mainly focus on serologic parameters. However, cellular response and especially T cell response seems often to be induced more reliably in those patients than humoral response as seen in other immunocompromised populations18 and other vaccines.
To close this knowledge gap, we will perform an observational study to prospectively analyse the effect of early and late booster vaccination with special focus on the virus-specific T cells. Samples will be collected from patients that have been vac-cinated as part of clinical routine.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Immunocompromised patients vaccinated against respiratory virus infections or willing to be vaccinated
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Signed informed consent form
- Patients with immunosuppression either by treatment or underlying diseases
- Patients who are vaccinated or willing to be vaccinated against respiratory virus infections in ac-cordance with current recommendations
- Age of 18 years or older
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients unwilling/ineligible for vaccination under current recommendations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Humoral immune response after vaccination
Time frame: 12 months
To compare antibody titres between different subgroups of immunocompromised patients after vaccination against respiratory virus infections
2 secondary outcomes
Cellular immune response after vaccination
Time frame: 12 months
Seroconversion
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42492070Felipe Fumero E, Stemler J, Sprute R, Sauer KM, Gruell H, Kreer C, Klein F, Theobald SJ, Rybniker J, Cornely OA, Kappes L, Cremer LM, Mellinghoff SC. Investigation of Vaccine-Induced Immune Response After Vaccination Against Respiratory Viruses in Immunocompromised Patients With or Without Hemato-Oncological Diseases (RESPONSE): Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 Jul 23;15:e88520. doi: 10.2196/88520.
Related trials for Immunodeficiency
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Phase 2 and 3 Placebo Controlled & Long-term Extension Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adults With iCVID to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability
Immunodeficiency Common Variable
Enrolling by invitation
Promoting Aging and Thriving With HIV
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Geriatric
RecruitingObservational study
Cohort of Women Living With HIV-1 and Receiving Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Pregnancy
Enrolling by invitation
Effect of Omega-3 Supplementation on Pregnant Outcomes and Inflammation Markers of Women Infected With HIV Using Antiretroviral Therapy
Pregnant HIV Positive Women
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Immunodeficiency, run by University of Cologne at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sibylle Mellinghoff, MD (+4947885523, sibylle.mellinghoff@uk-koeln.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Humoral immune response after vaccination (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06612515, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2026.