AzTrials
AzTrials

Robot SurgeryNCT06612606

Transfer Learning of a Neural Network for Robotic Surgical Assessment

An observational study of Robot Surgery, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational study is to explore how pretrained artificial intelligence (AI) models, trained on preclinical data, can improve the accuracy of action recognition and skills assessment in robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in urological patients by the use of transfer learning. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Robot Surgery
What is being tested?
observational study
How many people
5 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
22 May 2023to 26 May 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population consisted of robot surgeons who where either experienced or novice (being specialized doctors undergoing surgical fellowship to become robot surgeons). All procedures where robot-assisted procedures done on patients, who were admitted for treatment at the urological department. The patients also gave their consent regarding data collection. However, the real participant where the robot surgeons.

Who may be able to join

  • Robot surgeons who are experienced with more than 100 cases.
  • Robot surgical fellows with less than 100 cases.
  • Robot surgeons who worked at the urological department of Aalborg University Hospital.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Department of urology, Aalborg University Hospital

    Aalborg, North Jutland, 9000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Transfer Learning of a Pretrained Preclinical Neural Network for Robotic Surgical Assessment on Limited Clinical Data

The goal of this observational study is to explore how pretrained artificial intelligence (AI) models, trained on preclinical data, can improve the accuracy of action recognition and skills assessment in robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in urological patients by the use of transfer learning. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Can pretrained AI models accurately assess action recognition and skills assessment in clinical surgeries?
  • How do different training approaches of transfer learning affect the performance of the AI models? A baseline model developed from scratch using clinical data will be compared to pretrained models that are (1) directly applied to clinical data (2) fine-tuned by training only some layers of the AI model, and (3) fully retrained to see if these approaches improve performance.
Read more

Participants who are robot surgeons will:

  • Undergo RAS procedures on patients, with no intervention, where video data will be collected for later action recognition and skills assessment.
  • Contribute to model training and evaluation through clinical dataset integration.
Conditions
Robot Surgery
Being tested
observational study
Keywords
deep learning, transfer learning, robot surgery, surgical assessment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • observational studyOther

    This was an observational study with no intervention.

Study groups in NCT06612606
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experienced robot surgeonsRobot surgeons with 100 or more performed robot surgical cases.
Receives: Other: observational study
Novice robot surgeonsRobot surgeons with less than 100 performed robot surgical cases.
Receives: Other: observational study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of action recognition using clinical data from scratch

    Accuracy of the deep learning algorithm for action recognition, when training the model from scratch using clinical data from robot surgical procedures.

    Measured: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of action recognition.

  2. Accuracy of skills assessment using clinical data from scratch

    Accuracy of the deep learning algorithm for skills assessment, when training the model from scratch using clinical data from robot surgical procedures.

    Measured: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of action recognition.

  3. Accuracy of action recognition using the pretrained network directly on clinical data

    Accuracy of the pretrained deep learning algorithm for action recognition, when using the model directly on clinical data from robot surgical procedures.

    Measured: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of action recognition.

  4. Accuracy of skills assessment using the pretrained model directly on clinical data

    Accuracy of the pretrained deep learning algorithm for skills assessment, when using the model directly on clinical data from robot surgical procedures.

    Measured: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of skills assessment.

  5. K fold accuracies for action recognition and skills assessment for the complete retraining of the pretrained network.

    K fold cross-validation accuracies when retraining the complete pretrained model on the clinical data for both action recognition and skills assessment.

    Measured: From the start to the end of the clinical procedures.

  6. K fold accuracies for action recognition and skills assessment for the partial retraining of the pretrained network.

    K fold cross validation accuracies for action recognition and skills assessment for the retraining of the LSTM and dense layers of the pretrained network using clinical data.

    Measured: From the start to the end of the clinical procedures.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Weighted recall/sensitivity, precision and F1 score for action recognition of the clinical network trained from scratch

    Based on the performance of action recognition from the clinical network trained from scratch.

    Measured: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of action recognition.

  2. Weighted recall/sensitivity, precision and F1 score for Skills Assessment of the clinical network trained from scratch

    Based on the performance of skills assessment from the clinical network trained from scratch.

    Measured: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of skills assessment..

  3. Predictive certainty of the action recognition and skills assessment of the network trained from scratch on the clinical data.

    Predictive certainty with overall mean, minimum and maximum and depicted in probability plots for action recognition and skills assessment of the network trained from scratch on clinical data.

    Measured: From the start to the end of the clinical procedures.

  4. Predictive certainty of the action recognition and skills assessment of the network partially retrained network.

    Predictive certainty with overall mean, minimum and maximum and depicted in probability plots for action recognition and skills assessment of the partially retrained network, where only the LSTM and deep layers of the network was trained on clinical data.

    Measured: From the start to the end of the clinical procedures.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Sep 2024
  2. Study start22 May 2023
  3. Primary completion26 May 2023
  4. Study completion26 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
5 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06612606
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-247
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
22 Sep 2024
Last updated
26 Sep 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The IPD will be shared as anonymous and GDPR secure data on an open access website. The data will be shared as the anonymized footage of the surgical procedures that the participants made.

Publications

  • Hashemi N, Mose M, Ostergaard LR, Bjerrum F, Sogaard-Andersen E, Fabrin K, Tuckus G, Friis ML, Rasmussen S, Tolsgaard MG. Closing the data gap: leveraging pretrained neural networks for robotic surgical assessment on limited clinical data. J Robot Surg. 2025 Nov 24;20(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02994-y.

    PubMed 41276704

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Robot Surgery, run by Aalborg University at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of action recognition using clinical data from scratch (time frame: From start to end of a the robot surgical procedure that is being assessed in terms of action recognition.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06612606, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in