Chronic Non-cancer PainNCT06617065
Exploring Long-term Pain Relief with 5% Dextrose Added to Local Anesthetic
A study testing Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. in people with Chronic Non-cancer Pain, run by The Seekers Centre at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The goal of this single-arm, non-randomized, open-label trial is to determine whether adding a 5% dextrose solution to a local anesthetic can improve outcomes in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Non-cancer Pain
- What is being tested?
- Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient.
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 3 Sep 2024to 28 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women ≥ 18 years old, inclusive.
- A primary diagnosis of chronic non-cancer pain as determined by their physician.
- Present chronic pain symptoms of at least 3 months in duration.
- Currently receiving injection therapy every 1-3 weeks for at least 6 months.
- English proficiency
Who cannot join
- Age less than 18 years
- Scar or infection at the blockade puncture site
- Pregnancy
- Unstable neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder, depression or anxiety, dementia or neurodegenerative disorder
- Serious acute life stressor, clinical illness, or organ disease within the past three months
- Serious or significant traumatic injury, surgical or dental procedure within the past three months
- Lack of English proficiency or unable to complete patient forms
- Denial or withdrawal of consent, as per the informed consent form (ICF).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Open-label Self-controlled Trial to Assess Long-term Changes in Pain and Function with Addition of 5% Dextrose to Local Anesthetic Solutions - the PALPADE Study
The goal of this single-arm, non-randomized, open-label trial is to determine whether adding a 5% dextrose solution to a local anesthetic can improve outcomes in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.
The main question we aim to answer is whether adding a low-concentration (5%) dextrose solution to local anesthetics increases the effectiveness of trigger point injections and/or peripheral nerve blockade in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain.
Read more
Researchers will compare the outcomes of adding 5% dextrose to the usual local anesthetic solution with the outcomes of using the local anesthetic alone to determine if injection therapy is more effective when dextrose is added.
Participants will:
- Attend their scheduled injection treatments every two (2) weeks for a total of six (6) visits.
- Complete a demographic form at the first visit, and the usual pre-visit questionnaires (the Waiting Room Form and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)) at every visit, as well as four (4) weeks after the sixth visit (approximately 16 weeks from the study start date). They will also need to complete two short questionnaires-the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)-at the specified intervals.
- Complete all forms, which will be securely emailed to them.
Read the detailed description
Study Background:
There are many different approaches to treating chronic non-cancer pain, offering potential benefits such as symptom reduction, improved function, and enhanced quality of life. In most cases, conservative and noninvasive treatments are used first, with interventional procedures pursued for more persistent, severe, or disabling symptoms, either for diagnosis or treatment.
Injection treatments are typically considered when functional limitations persist despite physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and other non-invasive treatments. Corticosteroid injections into spinal and non-spinal joints, tendons, and ligaments are widely used, but repeated use has been associated with cartilage damage and tissue atrophy. Consequently, there is growing interest in other injectable solutions with potential benefits in pain management, including local anesthetics, dextrose, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
Prolotherapy is a non-surgical regenerative injection technique in which dextrose is delivered to tissues with degenerative damage, such as tendon insertions (entheses), joints, ligaments, and surrounding joint spaces. These injections are administered in a series of procedures at regular intervals. While the precise mechanism of action for prolotherapy remains unclear, some evidence suggests that a localized inflammatory cascade leads to collagen deposition and the release of growth factors. The increasing interest in prolotherapy is supported by a growing number of published intervention studies, which back anecdotal reports of its benefits in several painful conditions, with minimal adverse effects.
Dextrose has also been used as a diluent for local anesthetics, as it is soluble and does not cause pain or residual complications over time. Faiz et al. demonstrated that the addition of 5% dextrose to 0.5% bupivacaine provided an earlier onset of sensory block for the median nerve compared to normal saline. Additionally, Topol et al. showed superior effects of 1% lidocaine with 12.5% dextrose over lidocaine alone in adolescents with Osgood-Schlatter disease. While dextrose prolotherapy has been studied in several localized pain conditions, there is a lack of data on its role in generalized myofascial pain.
Our community-based pain clinic has been using repeated injections of local anesthetics as maintenance therapy for patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The purpose of this study is to assess the potential for dextrose to improve outcomes in these patients by delivering their usual local anesthetic in a 5% dextrose solution. Patients will receive six treatments over approximately three months, with long-term improvement measured by comparing outcomes at baseline, at the end of treatment, and four weeks after the final treatment, following the IMMPACT guidelines that inform this study's methodology.
This study is significant because it will be the first to compare the outcomes of injection treatment using local anesthetics with dextrose to local anesthetics alone, using a low concentration of dextrose, in a series of treatments to identify long-term improvements in chronic non-cancer pain. The hypothesis is that injection therapy will be more effective when dextrose is added, supporting the recommendation that dextrose should be routinely included in local anesthetic solutions for injection-based pain treatments. Our research question aims to determine whether adding a low-concentration (5%) dextrose solution to local anesthetics increases the effectiveness of trigger point injections and/or peripheral nerve blockade in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain.
METHODS and MATERIALS
Study Design:
This study will be a single-arm, non-randomized, open-label trial. Patients with chronic non-cancer pain who are currently receiving routine care at a community-based pain clinic will be invited to participate. Eligible patients must have been receiving peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections for the management of their chronic pain for at least six months prior to enrollment. A 50% dextrose solution will be used to achieve a final concentration of 5% dextrose in addition to their usual local anesthetic solution. The results will be compared with historical data from when they received only nerve blocks.
DATA COLLECTION
Patient Demographics:
Demographic information will be collected, including age, gender, BMI, duration of symptoms, employment status, and pain intensity (measured using a Visual Analogue Scale). Additionally, during the initial visit, nurses will conduct a clinical assessment to determine the primary diagnosis, review current medications, and screen for mental illness, cognitive impairment, comorbidities, and prior spinal surgery.
Intervention:
The Principal Investigator will use a palpation-guided approach to choose injection sites. Injection solutions will be prepared by clinic nurses. 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution (Pfizer Canada ULS, Kirkland, Québec) will be added to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. Solutions contain either 0.3% Ropivacaine, 1% Procaine, 0.5% Lidocaine, 0.25% Bupivacaine, or a mixture of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in a 9:1 ratio.
The palpation-guided injection technique uses a novel approach to identify hypersensitive sensory fibres associated with pain generators in myofascial tissues and related structures. The procedure involves lightly sliding the fingertips along the skin in a linear direction (approximately 2-3 centimetres per second) until a palpable stress response is detected, which can be described as a change in skin turgor or tissue tension that can be felt by the examiner. This subtle but clearly discernible response may represent a lower threshold activation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR), a widely used marker of central sensitization. Efforts are underway to evaluate the reliability of this palpation technique and its potential as a reliable, noninvasive tool for evaluating and treating painful disorders. Patients will receive this intervention a total of six times every 1-3 weeks, following their usual injection treatment schedule.
Clinical Measures:
Intervention data and patient-reported outcomes data will be extracted from routinely collected data, using the OceanMD platform. Patient-reported outcomes data will include the Brief Pain Inventory form (BPI), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), duration of pain relief, and pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 at the first visit (baseline/week 1), the third visit (week 5), the sixth and final visit (end of the intervention period/week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (week 15). In addition, the Patient's Global Impression of the Change (PGIC) will also be measured at the end of the intervention (week 11) and four weeks later (week 15). Intervention data will include the number of injections, injection sites, and local anesthetic solutions used. Moreover, patients will fill out the usual waiting room questionnaire at every visit.
Rescue Treatment:
Patients who require urgent care for an acute injury or pain flare will be assessed and treated following usual protocols. Rescue injections and any other treatment administered will be based solely on the physician's judgment and will be documented in the patient's usual clinical chart notes (OSCAR EMR version 15).
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-cancer Pain
- Being tested
- Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient.
- Keywords
- Dextrose, Local anesthetics, Prolotherapy, Chronic pain, Interventional pain treatment, Peripheral nerve block
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient.Drug
The principal investigator will use a palpation-guided approach to select the injection sites. Injection solutions will be prepared by the assisting nurse. For each patient, 1 mL of a 50% dextrose solution (Pfizer Canada ULS, Kirkland, Québec) will be added to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice.
Solutions contain either 0.3% Ropivacaine, 1% Procaine, 0.5% Lidocaine, 0.25% Bupivacaine, or a mixture of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in a 9:1 ratio.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice | Experimental | The physician will add 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution (Pfizer Canada ULS, Kirkland, Québec) to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. Solutions contain either 0.3% Ropivacaine, 1% Procaine, 0.5% Lidocaine, 0.25% Bupivacaine, or a mixture of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in a 9:1 ratio. Receives: Drug: Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Brief Pain Inventory form (BPI)
The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function.
Measured: BPI is administered at the following intervals: first visit (Baseline/week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
The PHQ-9 is a depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).
Measured: The PHQ-9 is administered at the following intervals: At the first visit (Baseline/Week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
VAS consists of a 10 cm horizontal line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as no pain at all and pain as bad as possible.
Measured: The VAS is administered at the following intervals: At the first visit (Baseline/Week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
Patient's Global Impression of the Change (PGIC)
The PGIC is a short questionnaire that provides a responsive and interpretable assessment of how a participant evaluates changes in their status.
Measured: The PGIC is administered at the following intervals: At the end of the intervention (Week 11) and four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2024
- Study start3 Sep 2024
- Primary completion30 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Non-cancer PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Seekers Centre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Richard Nahas, The Seekers Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06617065
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11997-RNahas
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 24 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data will be collected and stored using tablet-based case report forms on the PIPHA-compliant OCEAN platform (Well Health Technologies, Canada). All data will be anonymized, with direct identifiers removed and replaced by a unique study ID code. The study protocol, anonymized participant outcome data, and related data analysis will be shared.
Publications
Patel KV, Amtmann D, Jensen MP, Smith SM, Veasley C, Turk DC. Clinical outcome assessment in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e784. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000784. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
PubMed 33521482Bae G, Kim S, Lee S, Lee WY, Lim Y. Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Jan;16(1):81-95. doi: 10.17085/apm.20078. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
PubMed 33348947Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 7;9:139-59. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S39160. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27429562Wee TC, Neo EJR, Tan YL. Dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 20;19:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.015. eCollection 2021 Aug.
PubMed 34046305Rabago D, Slattengren A, Zgierska A. Prolotherapy in primary care practice. Prim Care. 2010 Mar;37(1):65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.09.013.
PubMed 20188998Hung CY, Hsiao MY, Chang KV, Han DS, Wang TG. Comparative effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy versus control injections and exercise in the management of osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2016 Oct 18;9:847-857. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S118669. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27799816Goswami A. Prolotherapy. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;26(4):376-8. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.734900.
PubMed 23216178
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Open-label Self-controlled Trial to Assess Long-term Changes in Pain and Function with Addition of 5% Dextrose to Local Anesthetic Solutions - the PALPADE Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06617065
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11997-RNahas
- Conditions
- Chronic Non-cancer Pain
- Keywords
- Dextrose, Local anesthetics, Prolotherapy, Chronic pain, Interventional pain treatment, Peripheral nerve block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Seekers CentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this single-arm, non-randomized, open-label trial is to determine whether adding a 5% dextrose solution to a local anesthetic can improve outcomes in patients with chronic non-cancer pain.
The main question we aim to answer is whether adding a low-concentration (5%) dextrose solution to local anesthetics increases the effectiveness of trigger point injections and/or peripheral nerve blockade in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain.
Researchers will compare the outcomes of adding 5% dextrose to the usual local anesthetic solution with the outcomes of using the local anesthetic alone to determine if injection therapy is more effective when dextrose is added.
Participants will:
- Attend their scheduled injection treatments every two (2) weeks for a total of six (6) visits.
- Complete a demographic form at the first visit, and the usual pre-visit questionnaires (the Waiting Room Form and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)) at every visit, as well as four (4) weeks after the sixth visit (approximately 16 weeks from the study start date). They will also need to complete two short questionnaires-the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)-at the specified intervals.
- Complete all forms, which will be securely emailed to them.
Detailed description
Study Background:
There are many different approaches to treating chronic non-cancer pain, offering potential benefits such as symptom reduction, improved function, and enhanced quality of life. In most cases, conservative and noninvasive treatments are used first, with interventional procedures pursued for more persistent, severe, or disabling symptoms, either for diagnosis or treatment.
Injection treatments are typically considered when functional limitations persist despite physiotherapy, pharmacotherapy, and other non-invasive treatments. Corticosteroid injections into spinal and non-spinal joints, tendons, and ligaments are widely used, but repeated use has been associated with cartilage damage and tissue atrophy. Consequently, there is growing interest in other injectable solutions with potential benefits in pain management, including local anesthetics, dextrose, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP).
Prolotherapy is a non-surgical regenerative injection technique in which dextrose is delivered to tissues with degenerative damage, such as tendon insertions (entheses), joints, ligaments, and surrounding joint spaces. These injections are administered in a series of procedures at regular intervals. While the precise mechanism of action for prolotherapy remains unclear, some evidence suggests that a localized inflammatory cascade leads to collagen deposition and the release of growth factors. The increasing interest in prolotherapy is supported by a growing number of published intervention studies, which back anecdotal reports of its benefits in several painful conditions, with minimal adverse effects.
Dextrose has also been used as a diluent for local anesthetics, as it is soluble and does not cause pain or residual complications over time. Faiz et al. demonstrated that the addition of 5% dextrose to 0.5% bupivacaine provided an earlier onset of sensory block for the median nerve compared to normal saline. Additionally, Topol et al. showed superior effects of 1% lidocaine with 12.5% dextrose over lidocaine alone in adolescents with Osgood-Schlatter disease. While dextrose prolotherapy has been studied in several localized pain conditions, there is a lack of data on its role in generalized myofascial pain.
Our community-based pain clinic has been using repeated injections of local anesthetics as maintenance therapy for patients with chronic non-cancer pain. The purpose of this study is to assess the potential for dextrose to improve outcomes in these patients by delivering their usual local anesthetic in a 5% dextrose solution. Patients will receive six treatments over approximately three months, with long-term improvement measured by comparing outcomes at baseline, at the end of treatment, and four weeks after the final treatment, following the IMMPACT guidelines that inform this study's methodology.
This study is significant because it will be the first to compare the outcomes of injection treatment using local anesthetics with dextrose to local anesthetics alone, using a low concentration of dextrose, in a series of treatments to identify long-term improvements in chronic non-cancer pain. The hypothesis is that injection therapy will be more effective when dextrose is added, supporting the recommendation that dextrose should be routinely included in local anesthetic solutions for injection-based pain treatments. Our research question aims to determine whether adding a low-concentration (5%) dextrose solution to local anesthetics increases the effectiveness of trigger point injections and/or peripheral nerve blockade in the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain.
METHODS and MATERIALS
Study Design:
This study will be a single-arm, non-randomized, open-label trial. Patients with chronic non-cancer pain who are currently receiving routine care at a community-based pain clinic will be invited to participate. Eligible patients must have been receiving peripheral nerve blocks and trigger point injections for the management of their chronic pain for at least six months prior to enrollment. A 50% dextrose solution will be used to achieve a final concentration of 5% dextrose in addition to their usual local anesthetic solution. The results will be compared with historical data from when they received only nerve blocks.
DATA COLLECTION
Patient Demographics:
Demographic information will be collected, including age, gender, BMI, duration of symptoms, employment status, and pain intensity (measured using a Visual Analogue Scale). Additionally, during the initial visit, nurses will conduct a clinical assessment to determine the primary diagnosis, review current medications, and screen for mental illness, cognitive impairment, comorbidities, and prior spinal surgery.
Intervention:
The Principal Investigator will use a palpation-guided approach to choose injection sites. Injection solutions will be prepared by clinic nurses. 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution (Pfizer Canada ULS, Kirkland, Québec) will be added to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. Solutions contain either 0.3% Ropivacaine, 1% Procaine, 0.5% Lidocaine, 0.25% Bupivacaine, or a mixture of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in a 9:1 ratio.
The palpation-guided injection technique uses a novel approach to identify hypersensitive sensory fibres associated with pain generators in myofascial tissues and related structures. The procedure involves lightly sliding the fingertips along the skin in a linear direction (approximately 2-3 centimetres per second) until a palpable stress response is detected, which can be described as a change in skin turgor or tissue tension that can be felt by the examiner. This subtle but clearly discernible response may represent a lower threshold activation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR), a widely used marker of central sensitization. Efforts are underway to evaluate the reliability of this palpation technique and its potential as a reliable, noninvasive tool for evaluating and treating painful disorders. Patients will receive this intervention a total of six times every 1-3 weeks, following their usual injection treatment schedule.
Clinical Measures:
Intervention data and patient-reported outcomes data will be extracted from routinely collected data, using the OceanMD platform. Patient-reported outcomes data will include the Brief Pain Inventory form (BPI), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), duration of pain relief, and pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 at the first visit (baseline/week 1), the third visit (week 5), the sixth and final visit (end of the intervention period/week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (week 15). In addition, the Patient's Global Impression of the Change (PGIC) will also be measured at the end of the intervention (week 11) and four weeks later (week 15). Intervention data will include the number of injections, injection sites, and local anesthetic solutions used. Moreover, patients will fill out the usual waiting room questionnaire at every visit.
Rescue Treatment:
Patients who require urgent care for an acute injury or pain flare will be assessed and treated following usual protocols. Rescue injections and any other treatment administered will be based solely on the physician's judgment and will be documented in the patient's usual clinical chart notes (OSCAR EMR version 15).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice | Experimental | Drug: Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient.The physician will add 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution (Pfizer Canada ULS, Kirkland, Québec) to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. Solutions contain either 0.3% Ropivacaine, 1% Procaine, 0.5% Lidocaine, 0.25% Bupivacaine, or a mixture of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in a 9:1 ratio. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Men and women ≥ 18 years old, inclusive.
- A primary diagnosis of chronic non-cancer pain as determined by their physician.
- Present chronic pain symptoms of at least 3 months in duration.
- Currently receiving injection therapy every 1-3 weeks for at least 6 months.
- English proficiency
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age less than 18 years
- Scar or infection at the blockade puncture site
- Pregnancy
- Unstable neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance use disorder, depression or anxiety, dementia or neurodegenerative disorder
- Serious acute life stressor, clinical illness, or organ disease within the past three months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient.The principal investigator will use a palpation-guided approach to select the injection sites. Injection solutions will be prepared by the assisting nurse. For each patient, 1 mL of a 50% dextrose solution (Pfizer Canada ULS, Kirkland, Québec) will be added to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice. Solutions contain either 0.3% Ropivacaine, 1% Procaine, 0.5% Lidocaine, 0.25% Bupivacaine, or a mixture of 0.25% Bupivacaine and 2% Lidocaine in a 9:1 ratio. | Drug | Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice |
Primary outcome
Brief Pain Inventory form (BPI)
Time frame: BPI is administered at the following intervals: first visit (Baseline/week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
The BPI allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function.
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time frame: The PHQ-9 is administered at the following intervals: At the first visit (Baseline/Week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
The PHQ-9 is a depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: The VAS is administered at the following intervals: At the first visit (Baseline/Week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
VAS consists of a 10 cm horizontal line with the endpoints defining extreme limits such as no pain at all and pain as bad as possible.
Patient's Global Impression of the Change (PGIC)
Time frame: The PGIC is administered at the following intervals: At the end of the intervention (Week 11) and four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).
The PGIC is a short questionnaire that provides a responsive and interpretable assessment of how a participant evaluates changes in their status.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 33521482Patel KV, Amtmann D, Jensen MP, Smith SM, Veasley C, Turk DC. Clinical outcome assessment in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments. Pain Rep. 2021 Jan 21;6(1):e784. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000784. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
- Background: PubMed 33348947Bae G, Kim S, Lee S, Lee WY, Lim Y. Prolotherapy for the patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Jan;16(1):81-95. doi: 10.17085/apm.20078. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 27429562Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 7;9:139-59. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S39160. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 34046305Wee TC, Neo EJR, Tan YL. Dextrose prolotherapy in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 20;19:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.015. eCollection 2021 Aug.
- Background: PubMed 20188998Rabago D, Slattengren A, Zgierska A. Prolotherapy in primary care practice. Prim Care. 2010 Mar;37(1):65-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2009.09.013.
- Background: PubMed 27799816Hung CY, Hsiao MY, Chang KV, Han DS, Wang TG. Comparative effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy versus control injections and exercise in the management of osteoarthritis pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Res. 2016 Oct 18;9:847-857. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S118669. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 23216178Goswami A. Prolotherapy. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2012 Dec;26(4):376-8. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.734900.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data will be collected and stored using tablet-based case report forms on the PIPHA-compliant OCEAN platform (Well Health Technologies, Canada). All data will be anonymized, with direct identifiers removed and replaced by a unique study ID code. The study protocol, anonymized participant outcome data, and related data analysis will be shared.
Related trials for Chronic Non-cancer Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Web-based Pain Coping Skills Training for Breast Cancer Survivors With AI-Associated Arthralgia
Breast Cancer, Arthralgia
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Chiropractic Care on Opioid Use for Chronic Spinal Pain: A Feasibility Study
Back Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events for Naldemedine & Other Medications for Opioid Induced Constipation
Opioid-induced Constipation
Recruiting
Improved Treatment for Patients With Long-term Opioid Therapy for Non-cancer Pain in Primary Care
Chronic Pain, Chronic Pain Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Drug-Drug Interaction Between KL0011034 Injection and Alfentanil Hydrochloride Injection in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Non-Cancer Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Addition of 1 mL of 50% dextrose solution to the usual local anesthetic solution of choice for each patient. in people with Chronic Non-cancer Pain, run by The Seekers Centre at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Brief Pain Inventory form (BPI) (time frame: BPI is administered at the following intervals: first visit (Baseline/week 1), the third visit (Week 5), the sixth and final visit (Week 11), and again four weeks after the end of the intervention period (Week 15).). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06617065, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024.