AzTrials
AzTrials

DysphagiaDYS-CBASNCT06618742

Focal Cryoballoon Ablation for Malignant Dysphagia

A study testing Cryotherapy in people with Dysphagia and Esophageal Cancer, run by Laura Boer at 1 site in Netherlands.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationale: Dysphagia is commonly encountered in patients with esophageal carcinoma who are no candidates for treatment with curative intent. It often has a considerable impact on quality of life and can cause malnourishment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dysphagia, Esophageal Cancer, Cryotherapy
What is being tested?
Cryotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
24 Jun 2024to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age \>18 years at time of consent
  • Histopathologically-confirmed esophageal / gastroesophageal cancer
  • Patients in the palliative setting (with or without (future) systemic chemotherapy)
  • Dysphagia defined as a score of ≥2 (able to swallow only semi-solids)
  • Signed written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Alternative etiology for dysphagia
  • Inability to pass the ultraslim endoscope
  • Severe medical comorbidities precluding endoscopy
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Prior distal esophagectomy
  • Previous esophageal varices
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Expected survival \<6 weeks
  • Prior radiotherapy for esophageal cancer
  • T4b esophageal cancer
  • Incapacitated subjects
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Laura S Boer, Degree of medicine contact

0887550224

l.s.boer-17@umcutrecht.nl

Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
  • UMCU

    Utrecht

    Laura S Boer, Degree of medicine, 0887550224, l.s.boer-17@umcutrecht.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Focal Cryoballoon Ablation for Dysphagia Palliation in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Rationale:

Dysphagia is commonly encountered in patients with esophageal carcinoma who are no candidates for treatment with curative intent. It often has a considerable impact on quality of life and can cause malnourishment. Current palliative treatments mainly include esophageal stenting and radiotherapy, but these can be associated with substantial drawbacks such as a high rate of adverse events, fatigue or an untimely/ temporary symptom improvement. Recent studies showed promising results for the use of spray cryotherapy as palliation for dysphagia. Moreover, there are suggestions that cryotherapy has a positive effect on the host's anti-tumor response. However, no data exists on the feasibility, efficacy and safety for cryoballoon therapy in the esophagus. Secondly, cryo-immunologic data in patients with EC is lacking.

Read more

Objective:

  1. To evaluate the feasibility of cryoballoon ablation in patients with esophageal carcinoma and symptoms of dysphagia. Additionally, efficacy and safety will be assessed.
  2. To evaluate the effect of cryoballoon ablation on host's anti-tumor response. Study design: Pilot study, Multi-center Prospective Uncontrolled Intervention

Study Study population: Adult patients (≥18 years) with dysphagia due to incurable esophageal carcinoma Intervention (if applicable): Focal cryoballoon ablation of visible tumor during an upper endoscopy. Cryoballoon ablation will be performed for two cycles of 12 seconds. In total, patients will undergo 3 treatment sessions (range 1-3) with an interval of 1-3 weeks based onthe severity of symptoms reported by the patient.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

  • - Feasibility of cryoballoon ablation defined as technical success of the procedure
  • Safety based on incidence of procedure-related serious adverse events
  • Efficacy defined as success rates two weeks after the last cryoablation treatment based on patient reported symptom improvement, and objective evaluation of the esophageal lumen that is free from tumor
  • Host's anti-tumor response after cryoballoon ablation based on sequential esophageal tumor biopsies and peripheral blood samples
Being tested
Cryotherapy
Keywords
cryoballoon ablation
Medical subject headings
Deglutition Disorders, Esophageal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CryotherapyProcedure or surgery

    Also called cryoballoon ablation

    Focal cryoballoon ablation, 1-3 treatments with an interval of 1-3 weeks

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary outcome safety

    Safety based on incidence of all procedure related serious adverse events up to the end of follow-up. The technique is considered to be safe if ≥80% of the procedures is performed without the occurrence of procedure-related serious adverse events.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  2. primary outcome efficacy

    Efficacy

    • Subjective parameters based on clinical success rate at week 2 after last therapy, using the 5 point Likert dysphagia score (0= no dysphagia, 1= dysphagia to solids, 2= dysphagia to semisolids, 3= dysphagia to liquids, 4= dysphagia to saliva). An improvement of one point is considered as clinical success.
    • Objective parameters:
    • Ability of the diagnostic endoscope to pass
    • Percentage of the diameter of the esophageal lumen that is open/ free from tumor, as assessed by the treating endoscopist and two independent assessors, comparing pre- and post-treatment.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. primary outcome feasibility

    Feasibility: defined as technical success rates of a full cryotherapy procedure. This includes the ability to pass the scope and the completion of a full circle of freezing and thawing, with the number of cycles needed per site as deemed necessary by the endoscopist. The technique is considered to be feasible if ≥70% of the procedures is technically successful.

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. secondary outcome efficacy subjective

    General questions, twice weekly, up to two weeks after last treatment:

    • How do you experience your symptoms now compared to before treatment (0= fully disappeared, 1= symptoms significantly improved, 2= symptoms slightly improved, 3 = symptoms remained the same, 4= symptoms got slightly worse, 5= symptoms got significantly worse)
    • How do you experience your symptoms now compared to yesterday (0= symptoms significantly improved, 1= symptoms slightly improved, 2= symptoms remained the same, 3, symptoms got slightly worse, 4= symptoms got significantly worse)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  2. secondary outcome efficacy subjective

    Reported outcomes on dysphagia scores twice weekly, up to two weeks after endoscopy, and thereafter at week 6, 8 and 12.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. secondary outcome pain

    Post procedural pain based on twice weekly pain scores up to two weeks after last treatment

    • Pain at the area of the esophageal tumor during meals based on a NRS 0-10 (with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating unbearable pain)
    • Pain at the area of the esophageal tumor when not eating/at rest using the same score as above

    Measured: 2 weeks

  4. secondary outcome safety

    Incidence of all (S)AE's

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. secondary outcome other palliation

    Necessity of receiving any other kind of palliation for dysphagia during follow-up

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Secondary outcome immunology

    (Changes in) Host's anti-tumor response after cryoballoon ablation compared to baseline. Analyses on both blood and tissue samples will be performed. Moreover, the peripheral immune response will be compared with the tissue immune response.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2024
  2. Study start24 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06618742
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL84764.000.23
Acronym
DYS-CBAS
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
24 Sep 2024
Last updated
1 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cryotherapy in people with Dysphagia and Esophageal Cancer, run by Laura Boer at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Laura S Boer, Degree of medicine (0887550224, l.s.boer-17@umcutrecht.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary outcome safety (time frame: 2 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in