Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionNCT06620341
A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Rate of Antibiotic Infusion
A study testing drug education in people with Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection and Bacterial Infections, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Acute upper respiratory tract infection, commonly known as upper respiratory infection, is an acute inflammation primarily affecting the nose, pharynx, or larynx caused by various viruses and/or bacteria. Viruses are more common, accounting for 70% to 80% of cases, while bacterial infections account for 20% to 30%. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection, Bacterial Infections
- What is being tested?
- drug education
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11,900 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2024to 30 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with upper respiratory tract infections seeking emergency medical attention;
- Patients with laboratory tests indicating White Blood Cell (WBC) >10×10^9/L or White Blood Cell (CRP) ≥ 10.0mg/L, requiring the use of antimicrobial agents;
- Patients aged ≥ 18 years; ④ Patients with at least one of the following local signs and symptoms: (1) fever, (2) cough, (3) rhinitis (sneezing, nasal congestion, or rhinorrhea), (4) pharyngitis (sore throat), (5) shortness of breath, (6) wheezing, (7) chest pain, (8) abnormal auscultation findings.
Who cannot join
- Patients with other infections in addition to upper respiratory tract infections; ② Patients who require hospitalization or treatment in a higher-level medical institution as assessed by medical professionals;
- Patients who cannot take oral medications or have severe gastrointestinal dysfunction; ④ Special patients, including those with neutropenia, bone marrow suppression, during radiochemotherapy, undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, patients with congenital immune deficiency, pregnant patients, and patients with mental illnesses.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang
Haibin Dai, Professor, 86+057187783891, haibindai@zju.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Rate of Antibiotic Infusion Among Patients with Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Bacterial Infections in the Emergency Department -- a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute upper respiratory tract infection, commonly known as upper respiratory infection, is an acute inflammation primarily affecting the nose, pharynx, or larynx caused by various viruses and/or bacteria. Viruses are more common, accounting for 70% to 80% of cases, while bacterial infections account for 20% to 30%. For a long time, the high rate of intravenous infusion use has been a prominent issue in clinical diagnosis and treatment in China. The irrational and excessive use of antimicrobials in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections has also become increasingly apparent, imposing unnecessary financial burdens and risks of drug side effects on patients. Therefore, reducing the rate of intravenous antimicrobial administration in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections has become an urgent problem to be solved. By implementing measures such as health education by clinical pharmacists and enhancing the awareness of rational antimicrobial use in doctors, it is expected to lower the rate of intravenous antimicrobial administration, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, improve treatment convenience for patients, and lower treatment costs while ensuring therapeutic efficacy.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether clinical pharmacists can reduce the intravenous infusion rate of antimicrobials in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections through medication education for emergency medical staff and to observe whether this intervention will affect the prognosis and medication safety of these patients.
- Being tested
- drug education
- Keywords
- Bacterial infection of upper respiratory tract, Infusion rate, pharmacist
- Medical subject headings
- Bacterial Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
drug educationBehavioural
- Training: Train emergency doctors every month on how to use antibiotic infusion reasonably; The prescription, cancellation, or method of use of antibiotics is decided by doctors.
- Implementation of intervention cards: When the C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients is exceed 10mg/L, the doctor should determine whether to use antibiotics based on the clinical status of patients.
- Promotion: Promote reasonably use of intravenous antibiotics through public accounts and posters.
- Patient education: Distribute educational flyers to patients about how to use antibiotics reasonably.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacist medication education group | Experimental | Pharmacists give emergency doctors medication education every month about how to use antibiotic infusion reasonably Receives: Behavioral: drug education |
| No pharmacists' education on antibiotics | No intervention | Following routine clinical practices, with no pharmacists' education on rational use of antibiotics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Infusion rate of antibacterial drugs in patients with bacterial infection of upper respiratory tract
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Disease maintenance
Days of respiratory tract infection symptoms keeps
Measured: Within 14 days after enrolment
Adverse drug reaction
Allergic reaction, rash or pruritus
Measured: Within 14 days after enrolment
Disease recurrence within a 14 days period
Patients re-attend outpatient clinic or emergency department of the hospital for treatment
Measured: Within 14 days after enrolment
Disease recurrence within a 14 days period
Patients who did not re-attend outpatient clinic or emergency but re-used antibiotic infusion after first visit in emergency
Measured: Within 14 days after enrolment
Worsening of disease within a 14 days period
Patients be hospitalized
Measured: Within 14 days after enrolment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2024
- Study start18 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion17 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 11,900 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Haibin Dai, Professor, Principal investigator, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06620341
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-0469
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Zhang J, Lou SG, Chu J, Zhang L, Wu Q, Xu Y, Dong Y, Hu T, Huo M, Yan P, Shao R, Zhou J, Zhan Z, Zhang M, Ji C, Lin L, Wang J, Zhou S, He M, Deng L, Ke J, Wang J, He J, Chen J, Wang S, Rui Z, Yang T, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Ke L, Chen T, Jiang H, Chen M, Hu Y, Dai H. Impact of pharmaceutical intervention on the use of intravenous antibiotics in patients with bacterial upper respiratory tract infections: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2026 Mar 10;14:1742217. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1742217. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 41883827
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Rate of Antibiotic Infusion Among Patients with Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Bacterial Infections in the Emergency Department -- a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06620341
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-0469
- Keywords
- Bacterial infection of upper respiratory tract, Infusion rate, pharmacist
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 11,900 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 17 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute upper respiratory tract infection, commonly known as upper respiratory infection, is an acute inflammation primarily affecting the nose, pharynx, or larynx caused by various viruses and/or bacteria. Viruses are more common, accounting for 70% to 80% of cases, while bacterial infections account for 20% to 30%. For a long time, the high rate of intravenous infusion use has been a prominent issue in clinical diagnosis and treatment in China. The irrational and excessive use of antimicrobials in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections has also become increasingly apparent, imposing unnecessary financial burdens and risks of drug side effects on patients. Therefore, reducing the rate of intravenous antimicrobial administration in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections has become an urgent problem to be solved. By implementing measures such as health education by clinical pharmacists and enhancing the awareness of rational antimicrobial use in doctors, it is expected to lower the rate of intravenous antimicrobial administration, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, improve treatment convenience for patients, and lower treatment costs while ensuring therapeutic efficacy.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether clinical pharmacists can reduce the intravenous infusion rate of antimicrobials in emergency patients with upper respiratory tract bacterial infections through medication education for emergency medical staff and to observe whether this intervention will affect the prognosis and medication safety of these patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacist medication education group | Experimental | Behavioral: drug educationPharmacists give emergency doctors medication education every month about how to use antibiotic infusion reasonably |
| No pharmacists' education on antibiotics | No intervention | –Following routine clinical practices, with no pharmacists' education on rational use of antibiotics |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with upper respiratory tract infections seeking emergency medical attention;
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with other infections in addition to upper respiratory tract infections; ② Patients who require hospitalization or treatment in a higher-level medical institution as assessed by medical professionals;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| drug education* Training: Train emergency doctors every month on how to use antibiotic infusion reasonably; The prescription, cancellation, or method of use of antibiotics is decided by doctors. * Implementation of intervention cards: When the C-reactive protein (CRP) of patients is exceed 10mg/L, the doctor should determine whether to use antibiotics based on the clinical status of patients. * Promotion: Promote reasonably use of intravenous antibiotics through public accounts and posters. * Patient education: Distribute educational flyers to patients about how to use antibiotics reasonably. | Behavioural | Pharmacist medication education group |
Primary outcome
Infusion rate of antibacterial drugs in patients with bacterial infection of upper respiratory tract
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
5 secondary outcomes
Disease maintenance
Time frame: Within 14 days after enrolment
Adverse drug reaction
Time frame: Within 14 days after enrolment
Disease recurrence within a 14 days period
Time frame: Within 14 days after enrolment
Disease recurrence within a 14 days period
Time frame: Within 14 days after enrolment
Worsening of disease within a 14 days period
Time frame: Within 14 days after enrolment
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41883827Zhang J, Lou SG, Chu J, Zhang L, Wu Q, Xu Y, Dong Y, Hu T, Huo M, Yan P, Shao R, Zhou J, Zhan Z, Zhang M, Ji C, Lin L, Wang J, Zhou S, He M, Deng L, Ke J, Wang J, He J, Chen J, Wang S, Rui Z, Yang T, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Ke L, Chen T, Jiang H, Chen M, Hu Y, Dai H. Impact of pharmaceutical intervention on the use of intravenous antibiotics in patients with bacterial upper respiratory tract infections: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2026 Mar 10;14:1742217. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1742217. eCollection 2026.
Related trials for Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of S-337395 in Symptomatic Nonhospitalized Adults With Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Who Are at High Risk of Progression to Severe Disease
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections
Recruiting
Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic Decision Support to Reduce Antimicrobial Prescriptions in Young Children With Colds
Acute Otitis Media (AOM), Upper Respiratory Infection
Not yet recruiting
Enhanced Telemedicine in Primary Care for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections Study
Acute Respiratory Tract Infection, Ear Infection
RecruitingObservational study
A Long-term Observational Study Evaluating the Presentation and Management of Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care Across Europe
Acute Respiratory Tract Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Effectiveness of Immunization in Preventing Severe Acute Respiratory Infection RSV in Children Under 6 Months in Bogotá
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections, Severe Acute Respiratory Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Haibin Dai, Professor principal investigator
Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing drug education in people with Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infection and Bacterial Infections, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Haibin Dai, Professor (86+057187783891, haibindai@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Infusion rate of antibacterial drugs in patients with bacterial infection of upper respiratory tract (time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06620341, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.