Point-of-care-ultrasoundSKILLS-2NCT06620549
Feasibility of Nurse-performed Gastric Ultrasound After Surgery
An observational study of Point-of-care-ultrasound and Gastric Ultrasonography, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Gastric ultrasound is a quick and non-invasive tool to evaluate gastric content. Emptying of gastric content can be affected after abdominal surgery leading to the inability of tolerating oral foods. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Point-of-care-ultrasound, Gastric Ultrasonography, Gastric Ultrasound
- What is being tested?
- gastric ultrasonograppy
- How many people
- 135 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 22 Apr 2024to 24 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients are selected from a surgical ward, patients recover from liver surgery, colorectal or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) surgery, pancreatic surgery, or other gastro-intestinal abdominal procedures
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Underwent gastrointestinal surgery:
- partial liver resection,
- colorectal resection,
- HIPEC,
- pancreatic procedures including Whipple procedures for pancreatic cancer or pancreatic disorders,
Show all 9Show fewer
- other gastro- intestinal abdominal procedures such as resections of sarcomas, correction of herniation.
- Obtained written informed consent.
- Admitted for at least 3 days.
Who cannot join
- patients with open abdominal wounds or with abdominal pain hindering adequate gastric ultrasound
- patients with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy catheter
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
RadboudUMC
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GE
Harm HJ van Noort, PhD, +31 (0)243613438, harm.vannoort@radboudumc.nl
- Recruiting
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, 6525GE
Harm H.J. van Noort, PhD, (024) 36 13438, harm.vannoort@radboudumc.nl
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of Nurse-performed Gastric Point-of-care Ultrasound to Determine Gastric Content After Gastro-intestinal and Oncologic Surgery: a Pilot Study
Gastric ultrasound is a quick and non-invasive tool to evaluate gastric content.
Emptying of gastric content can be affected after abdominal surgery leading to the inability of tolerating oral foods. Gastric content can be assessed by gastric ultrasound and nurses were recently trained to do so in healthy volunteers; however, feasibility of nurse-performed gastric ultrasound after major abdominal surgery is not investigated yet.
This study aims to investigate the feasibility of nurse-performed gastric point-of-care ultrasound after major gastro-intestinal surgery.
- Conditions
- Point-of-care-ultrasound, Gastric Ultrasonography, Gastric Ultrasound, Gastro Intestinal Surgery, Nursing, Abdominal Surgeries
- Being tested
- gastric ultrasonograppy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
gastric ultrasonograppyDiagnostic test
Patients will be scanned in both supine and right lateral decubitus position (RLD)s. If the antrum is visible, it will be judged if the antrum is empty in both positions or the antrum is empty in supine position and fluid apparent in RLD position suggesting a low fluid volume (<1,5 ml/Kg). The third option is fluid apparent in both supine and RLD position, suggesting a higher fluid volume (>1,5ml/Kg) and the last option is solid food in one or both positions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients after gastro-intestinal surgery | Postoperative patients after gastro-intestinal surgery (e.g. liver, pancreatic, colorectal or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) surgery) Receives: Diagnostic Test: gastric ultrasonograppy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of practicality
Practicality of gastric ultrasound will be measured by the length in minutes.
Measured: through study completion, for 6 months
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of usability
The Dutch-System Usability Scale will be used to assess usability
Measured: through study completion, for 6 months
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of acceptability perceived by patients
Acceptability will be measured by the patients' perspective towards undergoing gastric ultrasound during recovery after surgery.
Measured: through study completion, for 6 months
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of demand
Demand will be measured by indications for gastric ultrasound and the change for successful image acquisition. Indications involve a description of clinical signs that were present during the gastric ultrasound performance. Each attempt for gastric ultrasound will be counted, afterwards adequate images will be counted. Change for succesfull image acquisition wil be calculated by adequate images divided by numbers of attemps. Both values indicate the demand according to its definition
Measured: through study completion, for 6 months
Feasibility of Gastric ultrasound in terms of nurses accuracy and nurses confidence
The nurses accuracy and nurses' confidence to perform gastric ultrasound will be assessed. Accuracy will be measured by validating the ultrasound findings independently by expert sonographers and the nurses for their peers, determining inter-rater reliability.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of acceptability perceived by nurses
Acceptability will be measured by the nurses' perspective towards the acceptability of gastric ultrasound. This is measured with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability-based (TFA) questionnaire which is modified to assess the acceptability of gastric ultrasound during recovery after surgery.
Measured: through study completion, for 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2024
- Study start22 Apr 2024
- Primary completion16 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion24 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Point-of-care-ultrasoundStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Harm HJ van Noort, PhD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06620549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-17217
- Acronym
- SKILLS-2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2024
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Data will be stored according to hospital guidelines and shared upon reasonable request
Publications
Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):12-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu151. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
PubMed 24893784Lamm R, Collins M, Bloom J, Joel M, Iosif L, Park D, Reny J, Schultz S, Yeo CJ, Beausang D, Schwenk ES, Costanzo C, Phillips BR. Postoperative Handheld Gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Delayed Bowel Function. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Apr 1;236(4):554-559. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000536. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
PubMed 36602237Lamm R, Bloom J, Collins M, Goldman D, Beausang D, Costanzo C, Schwenk ES, Phillips B. A Role for Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound in Postoperative Delayed Gastrointestinal Functioning. J Surg Res. 2022 Aug;276:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
PubMed 35339785Brotfain E, Erblat A, Luft P, Elir A, Gruenbaum BF, Livshiz-Riven I, Koyfman A, Fridrich D, Koyfman L, Friger M, Grivnev A, Zlotnik A, Klein M. Nurse-performed ultrasound assessment of gastric residual volume and enteral nasogastric tube placement in the general intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103183. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
PubMed 34924254Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Cubillos J, Ye XY, Perlas A. Anesthesiologists' learning curves for bedside qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content: a cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;60(8):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9974-y. Epub 2013 May 24.
PubMed 23703533Cozza V, Barberis L, Altieri G, Donatelli M, Sganga G, La Greca A. Prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting by point-of-care gastric ultrasound: can we improve complications and length of stay in emergency surgery? A cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Aug 31;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01428-0.
PubMed 34465303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of Nurse-performed Gastric Point-of-care Ultrasound to Determine Gastric Content After Gastro-intestinal and Oncologic Surgery: a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06620549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SKILLS-2 / 2024-17217
- Conditions
- Point-of-care-ultrasound, Gastric Ultrasonography, Gastric Ultrasound, Gastro Intestinal Surgery, Nursing, Abdominal Surgeries
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 135 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 24 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Gastric ultrasound is a quick and non-invasive tool to evaluate gastric content.
Emptying of gastric content can be affected after abdominal surgery leading to the inability of tolerating oral foods. Gastric content can be assessed by gastric ultrasound and nurses were recently trained to do so in healthy volunteers; however, feasibility of nurse-performed gastric ultrasound after major abdominal surgery is not investigated yet.
This study aims to investigate the feasibility of nurse-performed gastric point-of-care ultrasound after major gastro-intestinal surgery.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients after gastro-intestinal surgery | – | Diagnostic Test: gastric ultrasonograppyPostoperative patients after gastro-intestinal surgery (e.g. liver, pancreatic, colorectal or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) surgery) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients are selected from a surgical ward, patients recover from liver surgery, colorectal or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) surgery, pancreatic surgery, or other gastro-intestinal abdominal procedures
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Underwent gastrointestinal surgery:
- Obtained written informed consent.
- Admitted for at least 3 days.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients with open abdominal wounds or with abdominal pain hindering adequate gastric ultrasound
- patients with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy catheter
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| gastric ultrasonograppyPatients will be scanned in both supine and right lateral decubitus position (RLD)s. If the antrum is visible, it will be judged if the antrum is empty in both positions or the antrum is empty in supine position and fluid apparent in RLD position suggesting a low fluid volume (<1,5 ml/Kg). The third option is fluid apparent in both supine and RLD position, suggesting a higher fluid volume (>1,5ml/Kg) and the last option is solid food in one or both positions. | Diagnostic test | Patients after gastro-intestinal surgery |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of practicality
Time frame: through study completion, for 6 months
Practicality of gastric ultrasound will be measured by the length in minutes.
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of usability
Time frame: through study completion, for 6 months
The Dutch-System Usability Scale will be used to assess usability
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of acceptability perceived by patients
Time frame: through study completion, for 6 months
Acceptability will be measured by the patients' perspective towards undergoing gastric ultrasound during recovery after surgery.
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of demand
Time frame: through study completion, for 6 months
Demand will be measured by indications for gastric ultrasound and the change for successful image acquisition. Indications involve a description of clinical signs that were present during the gastric ultrasound performance. Each attempt for gastric ultrasound will be counted, afterwards adequate images will be counted. Change for succesfull image acquisition wil be calculated by adequate images divided by numbers of attemps. Both values indicate the demand according to its definition
Feasibility of Gastric ultrasound in terms of nurses accuracy and nurses confidence
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
The nurses accuracy and nurses' confidence to perform gastric ultrasound will be assessed. Accuracy will be measured by validating the ultrasound findings independently by expert sonographers and the nurses for their peers, determining inter-rater reliability.
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of acceptability perceived by nurses
Time frame: through study completion, for 6 months
Acceptability will be measured by the nurses' perspective towards the acceptability of gastric ultrasound. This is measured with the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability-based (TFA) questionnaire which is modified to assess the acceptability of gastric ultrasound during recovery after surgery.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 24893784Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):12-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu151. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
- Background: PubMed 36602237Lamm R, Collins M, Bloom J, Joel M, Iosif L, Park D, Reny J, Schultz S, Yeo CJ, Beausang D, Schwenk ES, Costanzo C, Phillips BR. Postoperative Handheld Gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Delayed Bowel Function. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Apr 1;236(4):554-559. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000536. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 35339785Lamm R, Bloom J, Collins M, Goldman D, Beausang D, Costanzo C, Schwenk ES, Phillips B. A Role for Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound in Postoperative Delayed Gastrointestinal Functioning. J Surg Res. 2022 Aug;276:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 34924254Brotfain E, Erblat A, Luft P, Elir A, Gruenbaum BF, Livshiz-Riven I, Koyfman A, Fridrich D, Koyfman L, Friger M, Grivnev A, Zlotnik A, Klein M. Nurse-performed ultrasound assessment of gastric residual volume and enteral nasogastric tube placement in the general intensive care unit. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Apr;69:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103183. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
- Background: PubMed 23703533Arzola C, Carvalho JC, Cubillos J, Ye XY, Perlas A. Anesthesiologists' learning curves for bedside qualitative ultrasound assessment of gastric content: a cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;60(8):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9974-y. Epub 2013 May 24.
- Background: PubMed 34465303Cozza V, Barberis L, Altieri G, Donatelli M, Sganga G, La Greca A. Prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting by point-of-care gastric ultrasound: can we improve complications and length of stay in emergency surgery? A cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Aug 31;21(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01428-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Data will be stored according to hospital guidelines and shared upon reasonable request
Related trials for Point-of-care-ultrasound
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Ketamine on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter During Procedural Analgesia
Procedural Pain, Procedural Sedation and Analgesia
Not yet recruiting
Importance of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Early Detection of Valvular and Cardiac Diseases (IMPROVE)
Valvular Heart Disease Patients, Aortic Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
Title of Study: Anesthesiologists' Learning Curves for Ultrasound Assessment of Difficult Airway
Airway Ultrasound, Difficult Airway Management
RecruitingPhase 4
Optimizing Preeclampsia Postpartum With Point-of-care Ultrasound
Preeclampsia, Preeclampsia Postpartum
Enrolling by invitation
TruVascular Access - Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access Study
Peripheral Venous Catheterization, Difficult Intravenous Access
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Harm HJ van Noort, PhD principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Point-of-care-ultrasound and Gastric Ultrasonography, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 2 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Harm H.J. van Noort, PhD (0243613438, harm.vannoort@radboudumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of gastric ultrasound in terms of practicality (time frame: through study completion, for 6 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06620549, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2024.