AzTrials
AzTrials

CsNCT06622733

Attitude Towards the Concept of CS on Demand

An observational study of Cs, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Caesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure performed to facilitate delivery of the baby through an incision made on the mother's abdomen. Ideally, it is recommended in situations where normal vaginal delivery (VD) can pose risks to either the mother baby or both . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cs
What is being tested?
Questionnaire
How many people
600 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
28 Sep 2024to 30 Sep 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Adult

Study population: Pregnant women attending the antenatal care clinic of Sohag University hospital

Who may be able to join

  • pregnant women attending the antenatal care clinic of Sohag University hospital

Who cannot join

  • postmenopausal women
  • women with previous two or more cs
  • women refusing to participate in the questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mohamed A Khalifa, Resident contact

01140103255

mohamed.khalifa2015@med.sohag.edu.eg

Yasser A Helmy, Professor contact

01226102105

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sohag University

    Sohag

    Magdy M Amin, Professor

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Attitude Towards the Concept of Cesarean Section on Demand Among a Random Sample of Pregnant Women Attending the Antenatal Care Clinic of Sohag University Hospital

Caesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure performed to facilitate delivery of the baby through an incision made on the mother's abdomen. Ideally, it is recommended in situations where normal vaginal delivery (VD) can pose risks to either the mother baby or both . In the western world women have only one or two children, while in the East or the Middle East, women are culturally coerced into having many children. Thus, they are more prone to multiple Cesarean deliveries in their lifetime [1.2]. ThisAccording to the World Health Organization (WHO), since 1985, the acceptable percentage of worldwide C-sections has been 10-15% of all deliveries [3]. One of the most critical findings of the American Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that the Cesarean delivery rate has increased from 20.7% in 1995 to 31.6% in 2016 [4 ]. It is important to mention that Cesarean deliveries are life-saving procedures when there are obstetrical indications.(5.6) Cesarean delivery indications include fetal malpresentation, multiple pregnancies, chorioamnionitis, arrested labour, oligohydramnios, cord prolapse, cephalo-pelvic disorders, and medical diseases such as eclampsia and HELPP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome .the number of patients undergoing Cesarean delivery for non-obstetric reasons has rapidly increased. This could be due to many factors influencing the patients' decisions, including possible fetal outcomes concerning beliefs in some cultures and the convenience of patients and obstetricians(7) .cesarean section on demand allows a woman to choose a cesarean section without a medical reason, based solely on her personal preference Five themes that reflected the reasons for elective cesarian birth without medical indication were identified: (1) fear of vaginal birth process, (2) concerns about future sexual life, (3) need for humanized birth, (4) personal reasons, and (5) decision-making process.(8) raising the awareness of providers about the appropriate indications for CS and the importance of advocating for vaginal delivery among eligible women - including those with a previous CScan trigger practice changes that may reduce the incidence of non-medically indicated caesarean delivery

Conditions
Cs
Being tested
Questionnaire

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • QuestionnaireBehavioural

    Attitude towards the concept of CS on demand

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Women's interest in caesarean section

    Questionnaire to inform women about benefits and risks of CS

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2024
  2. Study start28 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06622733
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh-Med-24-09---12MS
Status last verified
Sep 2024
First submitted
29 Sep 2024
Last updated
2 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Sobande A, Eskandar M. Multiple repeat caesarean sections: complications and outcomes. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006 Mar;28(3):193-197. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32105-3.

    PubMed 16650356
  • Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gulmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26681211
  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJ, Kirmeyer S, Mathews TJ, Wilson EC. Births: final data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011 Nov 3;60(1):1-70.

    PubMed 22670489
  • Abbaspoor Z, Moghaddam-Banaem L, Ahmadi F, Kazemnejad A. Iranian mothers' selection of a birth method in the context of perceived norms: a content analysis study. Midwifery. 2014 Jul;30(7):804-9. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

    PubMed 23870747

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cs, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mohamed A Khalifa, Resident (01140103255, mohamed.khalifa2015@med.sohag.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Women's interest in caesarean section (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06622733, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in