Urinary StoneNCT06628765
Two Types of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscopies for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children
A study testing 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) and 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S) in people with Urinary Stone, run by The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The single-use digital flexible Ureteroscopy (fURS) is commonly used for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. The size of the outer diameter of the fURS can affect the safety, efficacy, and medical costs of the treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Stone
- What is being tested?
- 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) and 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 8 Oct 2024to 8 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients scheduled for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for individual renal stones ranging in size from 5 mm to 20 mm in all intrarenal locations (If there are multiple stones present, the total stone burden in cross section should not exceed 20 mm)
- Patients < 14 years
- For children younger than 8 years old, the informed consent form is signed by the parents; for children older than 8 years old, the informed consent form is signed by both the parents and the child themselves.
Who cannot join
- Children with uncontrolled urinary tract infections or coagulation disorders and other contraindications for surgery before the operation.
- Children with severe renal insufficiency, anatomical or functional solitary kidney, known nephrocalcinosis, and other significant comorbidities that are not suitable for participating in the study.
- Children who refuse to participate in this study.
- Any other reason that in the opinion of the investigator would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Children's hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310052
Hongbo Liu, +86 19329110160, 19329110160@zju.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: Two Types of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscopies for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children: A Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial
The single-use digital flexible Ureteroscopy (fURS) is commonly used for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. The size of the outer diameter of the fURS can affect the safety, efficacy, and medical costs of the treatment. Particularly for children, their ureters are thinner and more tortuous compared to adults, which places higher demands on medical devices. The investigators are interested in determining if the performance of the two different sizes of fURS (6.3 Fr vs. 8.6 Fr) are equivalent. This study will have guiding significance for the selection of upper urinary tract stones surgery in children in the future.
Read the detailed description
The single-use digital fURS is a sterile, disposable, flexible endoscope. Compared to traditional reusable digital flexible endoscopes, single-use digital fURS has lower maintenance costs, is easier to operate, and effectively avoids cross-infection between patients. With technological advancements, the size of single-use digital fURS has become increasingly slim, making them particularly suitable for children with narrow and tortuous ureters who suffered urinary stones. Currently, the single-use digital fURS used in our unit has an outer diameter of 8.6Fr. For younger children, the success rate of the first insertion of the fURS is still relatively low. When the fURS cannot pass through the ureter, it is necessary to actively dilate the ureter with a balloon in one stage, or passively dilate it with a urethral stent during the procedure to facilitate a second-stage fURS procedure. This not only increases the risk of ureteral injury but also incurs additional medical expenses. Recently, HugeMed Company has launched a single-use digital fURS with an outer diameter of 6.3 Fr, which is currently the thinnest single-use fURS in the world, and its effectiveness and safety have been preliminarily verified in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the 6.3 Fr fURS (HU30S) and the 8.6 Fr fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) in the clinical treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children.
- Conditions
- Urinary Stone
- Being tested
- 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC), 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)
- Keywords
- Urinary Stone, Flexible Ureteroscopy, Children
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Calculi
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC)Device
Comparative device
6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)Device
Device being tested
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) | Active comparator | 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) arm received 8.6 Fr single-use fURS Receives: Device: 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) |
| 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S) | Experimental | 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S) arm received 6.3 Fr single-use fURS Receives: Device: 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The success rate of the first fURS insertion
The first insertion of fURS is successful without the need for balloon dilation or passive dilation with a stent.
Measured: During the procedure
Secondary outcomes (9)
Ureteral access sheath placement (Yes/No)
Whether a ureteral access sheath is placed during the procedure
Measured: During the procedure
Balloon dilation rate
Due to difficulty in passing the fURS through the ureter, balloon dilation of the ureter is performed during the procedure
Measured: During the procedure
Pre-placement rate of double-J stents
Due to difficulty in passing the fURS through the ureter, the double-J stent is placed during the surgery to passively dilate the ureter, facilitating a second-stage fURS procedure
Measured: During the procedure
Surgical duration
From the initiation of fURS insertion to the completion of lithotripsy, the fURS is withdrawn from the body
Measured: During the procedure
Blood loss
Intraoperative blood loss
Measured: During the procedure
Indwelling catheter duration
Indwelling catheter duration postoperatively
Measured: Three days postoperatively
Postoperative hospital stay
Postoperative hospital stay
Measured: Up to one week postoperatively
Perioperative complications
Pain (e.g. dysuria and lumbar pain), Hematuria, Frequency and urgency of urination, Fever
Measured: Through study completion, up to two months postoperatively
Stone-free rate at 4 weeks postoperatively
Stone-free status was evaluated at 4-week and defined as a single residual fragment ≤2 mm
Measured: 4 weeks postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2024
- Study start8 Oct 2024
- Primary completion8 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion8 Apr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary StoneStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hongbo Liu, The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Hongbo Liu, Principal investigator, The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06628765
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-IRB-0310-P-01
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hu Q, Liu H, Lin C, Ru W, Xu Z, Hu L, Xu Z, He K, Liu L, Yan X. Efficacy and safety of 6.3-Fr versus 8.6-Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes for pediatric upper urinary tract stones </= 2 cm: a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2026 Mar 24;44(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s00345-026-06352-x.
PubMed 41876909
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Two Types of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscopies for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones in Children: A Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06628765
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-IRB-0310-P-01
- Conditions
- Urinary Stone
- Keywords
- Urinary Stone, Flexible Ureteroscopy, Children
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 8 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The single-use digital flexible Ureteroscopy (fURS) is commonly used for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones. The size of the outer diameter of the fURS can affect the safety, efficacy, and medical costs of the treatment. Particularly for children, their ureters are thinner and more tortuous compared to adults, which places higher demands on medical devices. The investigators are interested in determining if the performance of the two different sizes of fURS (6.3 Fr vs. 8.6 Fr) are equivalent. This study will have guiding significance for the selection of upper urinary tract stones surgery in children in the future.
Detailed description
The single-use digital fURS is a sterile, disposable, flexible endoscope. Compared to traditional reusable digital flexible endoscopes, single-use digital fURS has lower maintenance costs, is easier to operate, and effectively avoids cross-infection between patients. With technological advancements, the size of single-use digital fURS has become increasingly slim, making them particularly suitable for children with narrow and tortuous ureters who suffered urinary stones. Currently, the single-use digital fURS used in our unit has an outer diameter of 8.6Fr. For younger children, the success rate of the first insertion of the fURS is still relatively low. When the fURS cannot pass through the ureter, it is necessary to actively dilate the ureter with a balloon in one stage, or passively dilate it with a urethral stent during the procedure to facilitate a second-stage fURS procedure. This not only increases the risk of ureteral injury but also incurs additional medical expenses. Recently, HugeMed Company has launched a single-use digital fURS with an outer diameter of 6.3 Fr, which is currently the thinnest single-use fURS in the world, and its effectiveness and safety have been preliminarily verified in clinical practice. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the 6.3 Fr fURS (HU30S) and the 8.6 Fr fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) in the clinical treatment of upper urinary tract stones in children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) | Active comparator | Device: 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC)8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) arm received 8.6 Fr single-use fURS |
| 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S) | Experimental | Device: 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S) arm received 6.3 Fr single-use fURS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients scheduled for ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for individual renal stones ranging in size from 5 mm to 20 mm in all intrarenal locations (If there are multiple stones present, the total stone burden in cross section should not exceed 20 mm)
- Patients < 14 years
- For children younger than 8 years old, the informed consent form is signed by the parents; for children older than 8 years old, the informed consent form is signed by both the parents and the child themselves.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Children with uncontrolled urinary tract infections or coagulation disorders and other contraindications for surgery before the operation.
- Children with severe renal insufficiency, anatomical or functional solitary kidney, known nephrocalcinosis, and other significant comorbidities that are not suitable for participating in the study.
- Children who refuse to participate in this study.
- Any other reason that in the opinion of the investigator would make the participant unsuitable for enrollment in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC)Comparative device | Device | 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) |
| 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S)Device being tested | Device | 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (HugeMed, HU30S) |
Primary outcome
The success rate of the first fURS insertion
Time frame: During the procedure
The first insertion of fURS is successful without the need for balloon dilation or passive dilation with a stent.
9 secondary outcomes
Ureteral access sheath placement (Yes/No)
Time frame: During the procedure
Balloon dilation rate
Time frame: During the procedure
Pre-placement rate of double-J stents
Time frame: During the procedure
Surgical duration
Time frame: During the procedure
Blood loss
Time frame: During the procedure
Indwelling catheter duration
Time frame: Three days postoperatively
Postoperative hospital stay
Time frame: Up to one week postoperatively
Perioperative complications
Time frame: Through study completion, up to two months postoperatively
Stone-free rate at 4 weeks postoperatively
Time frame: 4 weeks postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Nov 2024.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41876909Hu Q, Liu H, Lin C, Ru W, Xu Z, Hu L, Xu Z, He K, Liu L, Yan X. Efficacy and safety of 6.3-Fr versus 8.6-Fr disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes for pediatric upper urinary tract stones </= 2 cm: a randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2026 Mar 24;44(1):259. doi: 10.1007/s00345-026-06352-x.
Related trials for Urinary Stone
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Ningmitai Capsules in Treating Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Stones After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Calculus of Upper Urinary Tract
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Renal Structural and Functional Alterations Following Repeated Ureteroscopic Procedures: An Exploratory Multimodal Imaging Study
Urolithiasis, Intrarenal Pressure
RecruitingObservational study
Stone Clearance With Aspiration vs Other Technologies: a Real-world Evidence Study
Urolithiasis, Stones, Kidney
Not yet recruiting
Intertransverse Process Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Kidney Stones, Urolithiasis, Hypocitraturia, Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Smart Pressure-Controlled Flexible Ureteroscopy and Flexible Suction Ureteral Access Sheath-Assisted Flexible Ureteroscopy for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
Kidney Stones
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hongbo Liu principal investigator
The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 8.6 Fr single-use fURS (XFGC-FU-660RC) and 6.3 Fr single-use fURS (Hugemed, HU30S) in people with Urinary Stone, run by The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aimei Ma (+86 15888864134, maaimei@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The success rate of the first fURS insertion (time frame: During the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06628765, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2024.