AzTrials
AzTrials

To Compare 2 Models of Midwifery Care in Maternity CarePhysioCareTwoNCT06630741

Support and Personalized Care in Alternative Midwifery Birth Units Versus Traditional Units in France: Effects on the Psychological Health of Couples and on the Health of the Mother and Child at the Age of 2 Years.

An observational study of To Compare 2 Models of Midwifery Care in Maternity Care, run by Rennes University Hospital at 3 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Majority of pregnancies and childbirths in France occur without complication. While the impact of care failure on maternal and neonatal morbi-mortality is now well- established, the literature reveals that an overmedicalization of pregnancy and childbirth care is not associated with improved maternal and child health… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
alternative midwifery units (AMU)
How many people
793 participants
Where
3 sitesFrance
Study dates
9 Oct 2024to 28 May 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Women who gave birth in a maternity hospital involved in the study, with a low-risk pregnancy and their co-parent

Who may be able to join

  • Women who participated in the PhysioCare study, as well as the already included first-time parents partners.
  • Non-first-time parent partners who received information about the PhysioCare study but did not participate.
  • Having been informed about the protocol and not having expressed opposition to participate in the PhysioCare study.
  • Non-inclusion Criteria:
  • Participant who has withdrawn his/her consent to participate in the PhysioCare study
  • Participant excluded from the PhysioCare study
  • Death of the child since the last questionnaire was entered
  • Adults under legal protection (safeguard of justice, curatorship, guardianship) and persons deprived of liberty.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

France3 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Simone Veil

    Eaubonne, 95600

  • Clinique Mutualiste la Sagesse

    Rennes, 35000

  • Rennes University Hospital

    Rennes, 35000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Accompagnement et Soins personnalisés Autour de la Naissance en filière Physiologique Versus filière Conventionnelle en France : Effets Sur la santé Psychique Des Couples et Sur la santé de la mère et de l'Enfant à l'âge de 2 Ans.

Majority of pregnancies and childbirths in France occur without complication. While the impact of care failure on maternal and neonatal morbi-mortality is now well- established, the literature reveals that an overmedicalization of pregnancy and childbirth care is not associated with improved maternal and child health outcomes. Conversely, it could have detrimental effects, in addition to representing unnecessary healthcare expenditure. Recent national and international guidelines on the management of normal childbirth (full-term birth without complications) aim to facilitate physiological labor and minimize unnecessary medical interventions, especially for women at low obstetrical risk (without relevant medical history and a normal pregnancy). Creating Midwifery birth units to support these pregnant women aligns with these recommendations.

In France, four innovative alternative midwifery units (AMU), devoted to management of low-risk pregnancy and natural or physiological childbirth (i.e., without any human intervention, including epidural anesthesia), have been developed within hospital structures during the recent years. The AMU, unlike freestanding midwifery units, enable a non-medicalized childbirth within a maternity hospital, with immediate care available for pregnant women and/or their child in cases of life-threatening emergencies (AMU co-exist in the same building on the same site as a hospital or host obstetric unit within conventional obstetric units, but with dedicated and separate spaces). Personalized follow-up, starting from the early stages of pregnancy, and birth and parenthood preparation classes are provided by a designated midwife and are offered to couples wishing to without any fee exceeding the standard medical charges. Delivery takes place in a birthing room with specific and not medicalized equipment.

Read more

Available studies in France and abroad suggest that home births or birth in freestanding midwifery units do not increase perinatal morbidity. They may enhance the childbirth experience, positively influencing the establishment of the mother-child bond and the psychological well-being of parents in the PostPartum (PP) period, which in turn can impact the short- and long-term child development. Professional support provided by midwives is crucial throughout this period (pregnancy, delivery and PP), benefiting both the pregnant woman and the future father. A positive birth experience can, therefore, strengthen self-confidence and be decisive for family unit cohesion. In addition, two recent studies have shown that a traumatic birth experience is strongly correlated with PP depression in both parents and difficulties in the mother-child bond. This lead to the conclusion that personalised and special support offer to couples during this experience of parenthood, which could involve the development of midwives-led birth units. A recent meta-analysis also encourages further research that would provide insights into the long-term effects of global perinatal care, particularly on mother-child interaction and PP depression.

The PhysioCare study (end in July 2023) aimed to investigate the impact of such care on women's psychological health during the first six weeks following childbirth. However, no study has examined the long-term effects on mental health beyond the immediate PP period. PhysioCareTwo will serve as the continuation of the PhysioCare research project (Principal Investigator: R. GARLANTEZEC). This research has been conducted in three French centers, with follow-up assessments extending up to six weeks PP. Inclusion for this previous project began on 01/09/2022 and ended on 29/04/2023. This is the first French study to address this issue and to evaluate care units such as AMU, with the participation of 3 out of 4 maternity units in France offering this kind of care.

The coexistence of standard obstetric units (SOU) and AMU within the same maternity unit provides an opportunity to assess the impact of this innovative care approach. PhysioCareTwo will enable the ongoing followed up of couples beyond the initial 6 weeks PP, with an assessment of the mental well-being of both mothers and co-parents two years after childbirth.

Providing AMU care to women with low obstetrical risk, as compared to standard birth care units, could enhance the psychological well-being of parents in both the short and long term.

Read the detailed description

Method and Material:

Couples included in the prospective multi-center observational PhysioCare study (3 centers ; exposed/unexposed,1:2 ratio (1 woman in AMU for 2 in SOU), matched by center and parity) will be invited to complete standardized questionnaires online 2 years after birth: City Birth Trauma Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, generic SF-12 questionnaire, Mother-to-Infant Bonding scale, Questionnaire d'Auto-Evaluation de la Compétence Educative Parentale, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, Child Development Inventory (short version), data on breastfeeding and health. Estimated sample size at 2 years (with 70% of respondents): 420 women; 328 coparents. Semi-structured interviews to assess women's, partners' and professionals' perceptions of care will be conducted on a sample of couples. Multivariate intention-to-treat statistical analyses (linear/logistic regression with propensity score, IPTW) will be performed.

Findings expected :

PhysioCareTwo study has the potential to produce significant results that improve maternal and child health, strengthen medical practices, and promote family well-being. These spin-offs can have a positive impact in the short, medium and long term in the perinatal field.

Conclusion :

To generate concrete knowledge for the benefit of parents and their children, improve perinatal care in France, and promote these care approach.

Being tested
alternative midwifery units (AMU)
Keywords
Midwife-led care, midwifery birth units, physiologic birth; continuity of patient care, humanized care, post-traumatic stress disorders, postpartum depression
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Depression, Postpartum

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • alternative midwifery units (AMU)Other

    Alternative midwifery birth units are a new model of care in France in which the midwife is the primary health care professional caring for low-risk pregnant women, as opposed to those cared for by an obstetrician-led medical team. Accordingly, alternative midwifery birth units also provide a space within which midwives can practice to their fullest potential with more professional autonomy than in a traditional obstetric setting. These birth units emphasizes care that promotes normal physiologic pregnancy and labor and supports the natural ability of women to experience birth with minimum or no routine intervention.

    Alternative midwifery birth units named Filière physiologique co-exist in the same building on the same site as a hospital or host obstetric unit. In the event a laboring women needs comprehensive emergency obstetric care, she can be transferred immediatly in a conventionnal birth room

Study groups in NCT06630741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients in alternative midwifery units (AMU)In alternative midwifery birth units: personalized follow-up with a midwife from the beginning of pregnancy, birth and parenthood preparation classes and delivery (birth room)
Receives: Other: alternative midwifery units (AMU)
patients in standard obstetric units (SOU)In standard obstetric units, most full time midwives are rostered to work. They follow women during their pregnancy but not through labour. All low-risk pregnant women benefit from 5 prenatal consultations with a general practitioner, a midwife or an obstetrician, then 2 consultations with a midwife in maternity hospital of delivery. Couples have got the option to elaborate a birth project if desired.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To investigate the impact of providing care to women in AMU, compared to women receiving standard care in SOU, on the level of post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth for the mother, two years after birth

    Post-traumatic stress disorder symptom intensity score measured with the City Birth Trauma Scale for women.It assesses exposure to a traumatic stressor linked to childbirth through the first two questions. It includes 29 items, 23 of which are based on a Likert-type scale and four subdimensions: symptoms of re-experiencing childbirth, symptom avoidance, negative cognitions and mood and hyperarousal. Scores for these items are to 0 and 60. The higher the score, the higher the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. The following items assess symptoms of self-dissociation and dissociation, the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (with a score of zero indicating that post-traumatic stress disorder began before birth and a score of two indicating that the onset of traumatic post-traumatic stress disorder was delayed), the duration of symptoms, symptoms of distress and impairment. The last item is linked to the exclusion criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: The level of post-traumatic stress disorders following childbirth for the co-parent

    Psychological trauma related to childbirth for the co-parent: City Birth Trauma Scale for Partners. It assesses exposure to a traumatic stressor linked to childbirth through the first two questions. It includes 29 items, 23 of which are based on a Likert-type scale and four subdimensions: symptoms of re-experiencing childbirth, symptom avoidance, negative cognitions and mood and hyperarousal. Scores for these items are to 0 and 60. The higher the score, the higher the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. The following items assess symptoms of self-dissociation and dissociation, the occurrence of post-traumatic stress disorder (with a score of zero indicating that post-traumatic stress disorder began before birth and a score of two indicating that the onset of traumatic post-traumatic stress disorder was delayed), the duration of symptoms, symptoms of distress and impairment. The last item is linked to the exclusion criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  2. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery:The risk of depression for mothers and co-parents over the 2 year period

    Postpartum depressive symptomatology assessment score for the mother and co-parent : Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). The EPDS is a 10-item questionnaire, simple and quick to administer, specific to the postnatal period which makes it possible to calculate a depression score varying between 0 and 30. It allows both early detection in the immediate postpartum period of mothers at risk of developing depression and, in the first weeks after delivery, that of mothers who present with postpartum depression. For research, a threshold greater than 12 (validated in France) defines the existence of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  3. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery:. Mother's and co-parent's general quality-of-life

    Quality-of-life score for mother and co-parent: generic Short Form 12 questionnaire (SF 12). The SF-12 questionnaire is a general health assessment questionnaire: it combines synthetic information which accumulates a score on the physical dimension and a score on the mental dimension. It is made up of 12 questions which concern the last four weeks preceding the questioning.

    Each question is evaluated on a Likert scale, with 5 to 6 possible response levels. The higher the score, the greater the patient's capacity.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  4. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: The development of the mother-child bond in mothers

    Mother-child attachment score for mothers: Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS). This is a self-questionnaire measuring the quality of early Mother-Child relationships and making it possible to detect possible problems in the relationship. This scale consists of eight sentences describing an emotional reaction (negative or positive; such as love, resentment, neutrality, joy, aversion, protection, disappointment and aggression) in relation to the baby and uses a Likert scale from 0 to 3, which which gives a total score of 0 to 24. A low score indicates a good quality of early mother-child relationships, while a high score would be an indicator of disturbance in the relationship with difficulties in bonding

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  5. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: Parenting Sense of Competence for the mother and co-parent

    Parental competence score for the mother and co-parent : Parental Educational Competence Self-Assessment Questionnaire (QAECEP). The questionnaire is made up of 17 statements which measure the feeling of competence in exercising the parental role.

    For each question, the respondent must indicate their degree of agreement with the statement. The feeling of parental competence is expressed by a numerical score ranging from sixteen to ninety-six. Sixteen is a very low feeling of competence and ninety-six is a very high feeling of competence. Two scores are calculated to quantify the feeling of parental competence: the feeling of effectiveness and the feeling of satisfaction. These two scores (effectiveness and satisfaction) are added to obtain the overall feeling of parental competence score.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  6. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: Global infant development at age 2

    Average child development score completed by the mother: Child Development Inventory, short form of General Development (IDE-DG). It is composed of the 70 items. The inventory concerns children up to 6 and a half years old. It is divided into parts A, B, C and D. Descriptions of behaviors are ordered according to age: starting from the youngest to the oldest children.Instructions for correction: Score 1 point for each YES. Add up the YES: circle the score obtained in the Scores column. Calculate the development quotient (DQ): developmental age / chronological age x 100. A DQ equal to or greater than 125 corresponds to a DQ overestimated by parents or to a child very far ahead in his development.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  7. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: Perceived social support for mother and co-parent

    Perceived social support score completed by mother and co-parent: Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Self-administered questionnaire composed of 12 items that assess perceived social support from three sources: family (FAM), friends (FRI), and significant others (SO). Participants indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with the items using a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Each of the three dimensions (FAM, FRI, SO) has four items and the sub-dimension scores vary from 4 to 28 points. A high score on each of these subdimensions indicates high perceived social support.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  8. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: h. Breastfeeeding duration

    Rate and duration of exclusive and mixed breastfeeding

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  9. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: Mother indicators for the first two years of life

    Health data for mother completed by the mother: data relating to a health condition likely to influence the results : Rate of depressive complications

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  10. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery:The evolution of scores on Post Partum (PP) depression questionnaires completed in the PhysioCare study (PP depression and development of the mother-child bond) from birth to 2 years

    Comparison of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) scores at 6 weeks postpartum and 2 years postpartum. The EPDS is a 10-item questionnaire, simple and quick to administer, specific to the postnatal period which makes it possible to calculate a depression score varying between 0 and 30. It allows both early detection in the immediate postpartum period of mothers at risk of developing depression and, in the first weeks after delivery, that of mothers who present with postpartum depression. For research, a threshold greater than 12 (validated in France) defines the existence of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  11. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: representations of care by the mother and co-parent, birth experience, establishment of the mother child bond and quality of life 2 years after birth

    Semi-structured interviews conducted using an open-ended interview guide that covers the themes of childbirth experience, mother-child bonding and quality of life: feeling competent to give birth, self-confidence, link with investment in the baby, collection of somatic complaints (difference between channels) in relation to the support provided to each FP, relationship with the healthcare professional.

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  12. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: The evolution of mother-child bonding development scores in the PhysioCare study from birth to 2 years

    Comparison of Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale scores at 6 weeks postpartum and 2 years postpartum. This is a self-questionnaire measuring the quality of early Mother-Child relationships and making it possible to detect possible problems in the relationship. This scale consists of eight sentences describing an emotional reaction (negative or positive; such as love, resentment, neutrality, joy, aversion, protection, disappointment and aggression) in relation to the baby and uses a Likert scale from 0 to 3, which which gives a total score of 0 to 24. A low score indicates a good quality of early mother-child relationships, while a high score would be an indicator of disturbance in the relationship with difficulties in bonding

    Measured: Two years after delivery

  13. Compare between AMU and SOU, 2 years after delivery: Child indicators for the first two years of life

    Health data for mother completed by the mother: rates of bronchiolitis

    Measured: Two years after delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Oct 2024
  2. Study start9 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion28 May 2025
  4. Study completion28 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
793 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06630741
Sponsor's protocol ID
35RC23_8925_PhysioCareTwo
Acronym
PhysioCareTwo
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
1 Oct 2024
Last updated
12 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of To Compare 2 Models of Midwifery Care in Maternity Care, run by Rennes University Hospital at 3 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To investigate the impact of providing care to women in AMU, compared to women receiving standard care in SOU, on the level of post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth for the mother, two years after birth (time frame: Two years after delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in