Postoperative Pain ManagementPhase 4PLUSONCT06632184
Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline or Saline With Ondansetron for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
A Phase 4 study testing Ondansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage and Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage in people with Postoperative Pain Management and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, run by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
Brief Summary Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common procedure where postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting (PONV) remain significant issues, impairing recovery. Standardized multimodal analgesia (e.g., PROSPECT guidelines) is effective for pain, but PONV incidence stays high. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain Management, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ondansetron
- What is being tested?
- Ondansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage and Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2025to 31 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients meeting all the following criteria will be considered for enrollment:
- Aged between 18 and 60 years.
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status classification I or II.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to symptomatic cholelithiasis, resolved choledocholithiasis post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or gallbladder polyp.
- Placement of a ¾-inch Penrose drain in the subhepatic cavity as part of the standardized surgical technique, to allow evacuation of residual CO2, residual lavage fluid, and close monitoring for possible postoperative bleeding or bile leakage.
- Intraoperative surgical difficulty assessed as Grade I, II or III according to the Nassar scale
- Ability to provide written, informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patients presenting with any of the following will be excluded:
- Confirmed pregnancy or lactation
- Intraoperative findings of Nassar Grade IV, suspected gallbladder cancer, scleroatrophic gallbladder, or cirrhosis
- 5. Use of NSAIDs within 24 hours prior to surgery, or chronic use of NSAIDs, opioids, immunosuppressants, chemotherapy, or anticoagulants.
- 6. Known allergies to ondansetron, acetaminophen, diclofenac sodium, buprenorphine or tramadol
- 7. Significant cardiac disease (e.g., heart failure, arrhythmias, pacemaker dependency)
Show all 10Show fewer
- 8. Obesity Grade IV (Body Mass Index ≥ 50 kg/m2)
- 9. History of recurrent vertigo or motion sickness
- Elimination Criteria
- Patients who meet inclusion criteria but experience the following intraoperative events will be eliminated from the final per-protocol analysis: significant bleeding or bile duct injury requiring re-intervention, conversion to open surgery, or a total operative time exceeding 80 minutes.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mexico1 site
General Hospital No. 89 of the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS)
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44190
About this study
Official title: Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Brief Summary Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common procedure where postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting (PONV) remain significant issues, impairing recovery. Standardized multimodal analgesia (e.g., PROSPECT guidelines) is effective for pain, but PONV incidence stays high. Preliminary evidence suggests that adding ondansetron to the standard intraperitoneal saline lavage could provide additional analgesic and antiemetic benefits by blocking peripheral 5-HT3 receptors at the trauma site.
Objective: This pilot study aims to evaluate if intraperitoneal lavage with saline + 8mg ondansetron reduces the total burden of postoperative pain over the first 24 hours (Area Under the Curve of the Visual Analog Scale, AUC-VAS/24h) compared to saline lavage alone, within a standardized multimodal protocol.
Read more
Methods: This is a phase IV, pilot, randomized, controlled, triple-blind clinical trial. 40 adult patients (ASA I-II) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis (Nassar Grade I-II difficulty) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to:
Control Group: 500 ml of 0.9% saline intraperitoneal lavage.
Intervention Group: 500 ml of 0.9% saline + 8 mg ondansetron intraperitoneal lavage.
The lavage is performed for 5 minutes at the end of surgery, followed by complete aspiration. All patients receive a strict multimodal perioperative protocol, including pre-incisional port site infiltration with bupivacaine 0.75%, standardized anesthesia, and postoperative analgesics. The use of intravenous ondansetron is prohibited to avoid confounding.
Primary Outcome: Total postoperative pain burden (AUC-VAS/24h). Secondary Outcomes (Exploratory): PONV incidence; time to first rescue analgesia; rescue analgesic consumption (buprenorphine); postoperative sleep quality (Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire); safety and adverse events.
Read the detailed description
- Study Rationale and Background Postoperative pain and PONV are prevalent after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, leading to patient discomfort, prolonged hospitalization, and increased resource use. The PROSPECT guidelines recommend a multimodal approach, including intraperitoneal saline lavage, to mitigate pain by diluting irritants and reducing acidosis. However, even with this approach, PONV rates remain high (30-50%). Ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, is a established antiemetic. Emerging evidence indicates a peripheral analgesic mechanism via blocking 5-HT3 receptors on nociceptive neurons, inhibiting neuropeptide release, and potential local anesthetic effects. Administering it intraperitoneally targets the site of surgical trauma. A previous study (Abdelaziz et al., 2021) using 4mg showed promise, but it had a small sample size and was not integrated into a strict, modern multimodal protocol. This pilot study addresses this gap by testing an 8mg dose within a rigorous, standardized PROSPECT-aligned protocol, using the AUC-VAS/24h to comprehensively capture the pain burden.
- Overall Study Design and Methodology This is a single-center, prospective, phase IV, randomized, controlled, triple-blind, parallel-group pilot study, designed and reported according to CONSORT guidelines for pilot trials. Blinding (Triple): Patients are unaware of their assignment. Care Providers \& Outcome Assessors: Surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and research interns collecting data are all blinded. Data Analyst: The statistician performs the initial analysis on coded data (Group A/B) before unblinding. Randomization: A computer-generated sequence using permuted blocks (sizes 4 and 6), stratified by sex and ASA status (I vs. II), will allocate patients 1:1. Allocation is concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. A designated "blinding coordination nurse" opens the envelope, prepares the identical-looking study solution, and labels it only with a code (A or B).
- Standardization of Procedures A strict, standardized perioperative protocol is mandated for all participants to minimize variability. Preoperative: Dexamethasone 8mg IV (antiemetic), antibiotic prophylaxis. Intraoperative: Anesthesia: Standardized induction (Midazolam 0.02-0.03 mg/kg, Fentanyl 2-4 mcg/kg, Propofol 1-2 mg/kg, Cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg) and maintenance (Sevoflurano 1-1.5 MAC). Multimodal analgesia: Acetaminophen 1g IV and Diclofenac 75mg IV. Surgery: Pneumoperitoneum pressure strictly maintained at 10-12 mmHg. Four-port technique with identical placement. Pre-incisional infiltration of all port sites with Bupivacaine 0.75% (up to 20 ml total). Critical view of safety dissection. Active and complete aspiration of pneumoperitoneum at closure. Intervention: The assigned solution (500ml) is instilled into the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes with the patient in a 20° Trendelenburg position, followed by complete aspiration. Postoperative: Scheduled analgesics: Acetaminophen 1g (every 8 hours) and Diclofenac 75mg IV (every 12 hours). Rescue Analgesia: Buprenorphine 75mcg SC is administered only upon patient request AND a pain score ≥50mm on the VAS or ≥6 on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Rescue Antiemesis: Metoclopramida 10mg IV is permitted for PONV. The use of intravenous ondansetron is prohibited during the entire perioperative period to avoid confounding the intervention's effects.
- Objectives and Endpoints as a Pilot Study As a pilot trial, its primary goal is to assess feasibility, refine procedures, and obtain preliminary estimates of effect and variability to power a future definitive trial. The primary outcome, AUC-VAS/24h, integrates pain intensity and duration, providing a robust measure of the "total pain burden." All secondary outcomes (PONV, rescue analgesia consumption, sleep quality) are explicitly exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
- Safety and Monitoring The safety of intraperitoneal saline lavage and ondansetron is well-established. The combination presents minimal anticipated risk. All adverse events and postoperative complications will be actively monitored and recorded for the first 24 hours and up to 30 days post-surgery. An interim analysis for safety and efficacy will be conducted after 50% recruitment (n=20). Any serious adverse events will be reported promptly to the Institutional Ethics Committee.
- Significance This is the first study to evaluate the combination of standard saline lavage with 8mg of intraperitoneal ondansetron within a rigorously standardized, PROSPECT-aligned, multimodal protocol. Using a triple-blind pilot design and a comprehensive primary endpoint, it will generate high-quality preliminary evidence on this simple, low-cost intervention's efficacy and safety in a Mexican population. The results will determine the feasibility and inform the design of a larger, definitive multicenter randomized controlled trial.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain Management, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ondansetron, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- Being tested
- Ondansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage, Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage
- Keywords
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Ondansetron Formulations, Intraperitoneal Analgesia, Saline Solution, Pain Management, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ondansetron Intraperitoneal LavageDrug
Also called Ondansetron, Zofran, 0.9% Sodium Chloride
A single dose of 8 mg of ondansetron diluted in 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution will be administered as an intraperitoneal lavage at the end of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The solution will remain in the abdominal cavity for 5 minutes and then be fully aspirated before surgical closure. This intervention aims to evaluate the local analgesic and antiemetic effects of ondansetron when used via the peritoneal route.
Saline Intraperitoneal LavageDrug
Also called normal saline, 0.9% Sodium Chloride, Saline Solution
At the end of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a peritoneal lavage will be performed using 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution (normal saline). The solution will be maintained in the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes and then fully aspirated before surgical closure. This intervention serves as the comparator to assess the added effect of ondansetron in the experimental group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Saline Lavage Only | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive intraoperative peritoneal lavage with 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution for 5 minutes at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The solution will be fully aspirated before abdominal closure. The solution will remain in the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes and then be completely aspirated before closure. All participants will also receive standard multimodal analgesia including paracetamol, diclofenac, and local wound infiltration with bupivacaine. Receives: Drug: Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage |
| Saline Lavage With Ondansetron | Experimental | Participants in this arm will undergo peritoneal lavage with 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution combined with 8 mg of ondansetron, administered intraperitoneally at the end of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The solution will remain in the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes and then be completely aspirated before closure. All participants will also receive standard multimodal analgesia including paracetamol, diclofenac, and local wound infiltration with bupivacaine. Receives: Drug: Ondansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total Pain Burden as Measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Over the First 24 Postoperative Hours
The primary outcome is the total burden of postoperative pain, quantified as the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of serial Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores measured at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The AUC is calculated using the trapezoidal rule, which integrates both the intensity and duration of pain into a single composite measure (units: mm*hour). This provides a more comprehensive assessment of the patient's pain experience over the critical first postoperative day than isolated time-point measurements. A lower AUC indicates superior pain control.
Measured: 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Secondary outcomes (4)
Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
The presence and number of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
Measured: 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Use of Rescue Analgesia Within 24 Hours Postoperatively
The proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 75 mcg subcutaneously) will be recorded. The time to first dose and the total number of doses will also be analyzed.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Sleep Quality Assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire
Sleep quality will be evaluated using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire, which includes six visual analog items rated from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better sleep. The total average score will be calculated for each participant.
Measured: Night of surgery to morning after surgery
Incidence of Adverse Events Possibly Related to Intraperitoneal Ondansetron
Any unexpected clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities that could be associated with the intraperitoneal use of ondansetron will be recorded and evaluated by the study team.
Measured: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Dec 2025
- Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (58)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative Pain ManagementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- nterventional Study Model: Parallel assignment. Participants are randomized into one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the experimental intervention or the control intervention for the duration of the study. The model incorporates triple-blinding (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor) and a randomized, controlled design. Allocation is performed using a computer-generated sequence with permuted blocks, stratified by sex and ASA physical status classification to ensure balanced groups.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francisco Aguilar Espinosa, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
- Investigators
- Francisco Aguilar Espinosa, Dr., Principal investigator, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06632184
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F-CNIC-2024-097
- Other IDs
- R-2025-785-080
- Acronym
- PLUSO
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The decision to share individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been finalized. Data sharing will depend on the outcomes of the pilot study, ethical considerations, and institutional policies. Any future data sharing will ensure patient confidentiality and comply with regulatory standards.
Publications
Subhas G, Gupta A, Bhullar J, Dubay L, Ferguson L, Goriel Y, Jacobs MJ, Kolachalam RB, Silapaswan S, Mittal VK. Prolonged (longer than 3 hours) laparoscopic cholecystectomy: reasons and results. Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):981-4.
PubMed 21944510Wang DE, Bakshi C, Sugiyama G, Coppa G, Alfonso A, Chung P. Does Operative Time Affect Complication Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4479-4484. doi: 10.1177/00031348221117032. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
PubMed 38050322Rudasill SE, Dillon D, Karunungan K, Mardock AL, Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Tran Z, Benharash P. The obesity paradox: Underweight patients are at the greatest risk of mortality after cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
PubMed 33933284Reeves JJ, Burton BN, Broderick RC, Waterman RS, Gabriel RA. Obesity and unanticipated hospital admission following outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1348-1354. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07514-7. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
PubMed 32206919Augustin T, Moslim MA, Brethauer S, Aminian A, Kroh M, Schneider E, Walsh RM. Obesity and its implications for morbidity and mortality after cholecystectomy: A matched NSQIP analysis. Am J Surg. 2017 Mar;213(3):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.037. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
PubMed 28237044Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
PubMed 20053272Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
PubMed 15189396Miranda-Ackerman RC, Lira-Trujillo M, Gollaz-Cervantez AC, Cortes-Flores AO, Zuloaga-Fernandez Del Valle CJ, Garcia-Gonzalez LA, Morgan-Villela G, Barbosa-Camacho FJ, Pintor-Belmontes KJ, Guzman-Ramirez BG, Bernal-Hernandez A, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Associations between stressors and difficulty sleeping in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05497-8.
PubMed 32646516Garcia-Galicia A, Guzman-Maya I, Montiel-Jarquin AJ, Parra-Salazar JA, Gonzalez-Lopez AM, Loria-Castellanos J. Validation of a faces pain scale in postsurgical geriatric patients. Cir Cir. 2021;89(2):212-217. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.20000094.
PubMed 33784276Sandoval-Jimenez CH, Mendez-Sashida GJ, Cruz-Marquez-Rico LM, Cardenas-Victorica R, Guzman-Esquivel H, Luna-Silva M, Diaz-Valero R. [Postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. A randomized clinical trial.]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2009 Oct-Dec;74(4):314-20. Spanish.
PubMed 20423760Reddi BA. Why is saline so acidic (and does it really matter?). Int J Med Sci. 2013 Apr 17;10(6):747-50. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5868. Print 2013.
PubMed 23630439Graham CL, Dukes GE, Kao CF, Bertch JM, Hak LJ. Stability of ondansetron in large-volume parenteral solutions. Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Jun;26(6):768-71. doi: 10.1177/106002809202600603.
PubMed 1535245Zhang D, Wang X, Yang X, Xia D. The effect of intraperitoneal instillation of drugs on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a network meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2025 Sep 12;16:1646917. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1646917. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 41020002Sravanthi GC, Abuji K, Soni SL, Nagaraj SS, Sharma A, Jafra A, Tandup C, Kurdia KC, Dahiya D. Effect of intraperitoneal magnesium sulfate in the prevention of postoperative pain in daycare laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A prospective randomized controlled trial. Indian J Pharmacol. 2023 May-Jun;55(3):174-178. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_827_22.
PubMed 37555412Vijayaraghavalu S, Bharthi Sekar E. A Comparative Study on the Postoperative Analgesic Effects of the Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine Versus Normal Saline Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Cureus. 2021 Mar 27;13(3):e14151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14151.
PubMed 33927953
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06632184
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PLUSO / F-CNIC-2024-097
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain Management, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ondansetron, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- Keywords
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Ondansetron Formulations, Intraperitoneal Analgesia, Saline Solution, Pain Management, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialOther government
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Brief Summary Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common procedure where postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting (PONV) remain significant issues, impairing recovery. Standardized multimodal analgesia (e.g., PROSPECT guidelines) is effective for pain, but PONV incidence stays high. Preliminary evidence suggests that adding ondansetron to the standard intraperitoneal saline lavage could provide additional analgesic and antiemetic benefits by blocking peripheral 5-HT3 receptors at the trauma site.
Objective: This pilot study aims to evaluate if intraperitoneal lavage with saline + 8mg ondansetron reduces the total burden of postoperative pain over the first 24 hours (Area Under the Curve of the Visual Analog Scale, AUC-VAS/24h) compared to saline lavage alone, within a standardized multimodal protocol.
Methods: This is a phase IV, pilot, randomized, controlled, triple-blind clinical trial. 40 adult patients (ASA I-II) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis (Nassar Grade I-II difficulty) will be randomly assigned (1:1) to:
Control Group: 500 ml of 0.9% saline intraperitoneal lavage.
Intervention Group: 500 ml of 0.9% saline + 8 mg ondansetron intraperitoneal lavage.
The lavage is performed for 5 minutes at the end of surgery, followed by complete aspiration. All patients receive a strict multimodal perioperative protocol, including pre-incisional port site infiltration with bupivacaine 0.75%, standardized anesthesia, and postoperative analgesics. The use of intravenous ondansetron is prohibited to avoid confounding.
Primary Outcome: Total postoperative pain burden (AUC-VAS/24h). Secondary Outcomes (Exploratory): PONV incidence; time to first rescue analgesia; rescue analgesic consumption (buprenorphine); postoperative sleep quality (Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire); safety and adverse events.
Detailed description
- Study Rationale and Background Postoperative pain and PONV are prevalent after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, leading to patient discomfort, prolonged hospitalization, and increased resource use. The PROSPECT guidelines recommend a multimodal approach, including intraperitoneal saline lavage, to mitigate pain by diluting irritants and reducing acidosis. However, even with this approach, PONV rates remain high (30-50%). Ondansetron, a 5-HT3 antagonist, is a established antiemetic. Emerging evidence indicates a peripheral analgesic mechanism via blocking 5-HT3 receptors on nociceptive neurons, inhibiting neuropeptide release, and potential local anesthetic effects. Administering it intraperitoneally targets the site of surgical trauma. A previous study (Abdelaziz et al., 2021) using 4mg showed promise, but it had a small sample size and was not integrated into a strict, modern multimodal protocol. This pilot study addresses this gap by testing an 8mg dose within a rigorous, standardized PROSPECT-aligned protocol, using the AUC-VAS/24h to comprehensively capture the pain burden.
- Overall Study Design and Methodology This is a single-center, prospective, phase IV, randomized, controlled, triple-blind, parallel-group pilot study, designed and reported according to CONSORT guidelines for pilot trials. Blinding (Triple): Patients are unaware of their assignment. Care Providers \& Outcome Assessors: Surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and research interns collecting data are all blinded. Data Analyst: The statistician performs the initial analysis on coded data (Group A/B) before unblinding. Randomization: A computer-generated sequence using permuted blocks (sizes 4 and 6), stratified by sex and ASA status (I vs. II), will allocate patients 1:1. Allocation is concealed using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. A designated "blinding coordination nurse" opens the envelope, prepares the identical-looking study solution, and labels it only with a code (A or B).
- Standardization of Procedures A strict, standardized perioperative protocol is mandated for all participants to minimize variability. Preoperative: Dexamethasone 8mg IV (antiemetic), antibiotic prophylaxis. Intraoperative: Anesthesia: Standardized induction (Midazolam 0.02-0.03 mg/kg, Fentanyl 2-4 mcg/kg, Propofol 1-2 mg/kg, Cisatracurium 0.15 mg/kg) and maintenance (Sevoflurano 1-1.5 MAC). Multimodal analgesia: Acetaminophen 1g IV and Diclofenac 75mg IV. Surgery: Pneumoperitoneum pressure strictly maintained at 10-12 mmHg. Four-port technique with identical placement. Pre-incisional infiltration of all port sites with Bupivacaine 0.75% (up to 20 ml total). Critical view of safety dissection. Active and complete aspiration of pneumoperitoneum at closure. Intervention: The assigned solution (500ml) is instilled into the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes with the patient in a 20° Trendelenburg position, followed by complete aspiration. Postoperative: Scheduled analgesics: Acetaminophen 1g (every 8 hours) and Diclofenac 75mg IV (every 12 hours). Rescue Analgesia: Buprenorphine 75mcg SC is administered only upon patient request AND a pain score ≥50mm on the VAS or ≥6 on the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Rescue Antiemesis: Metoclopramida 10mg IV is permitted for PONV. The use of intravenous ondansetron is prohibited during the entire perioperative period to avoid confounding the intervention's effects.
- Objectives and Endpoints as a Pilot Study As a pilot trial, its primary goal is to assess feasibility, refine procedures, and obtain preliminary estimates of effect and variability to power a future definitive trial. The primary outcome, AUC-VAS/24h, integrates pain intensity and duration, providing a robust measure of the "total pain burden." All secondary outcomes (PONV, rescue analgesia consumption, sleep quality) are explicitly exploratory and hypothesis-generating.
- Safety and Monitoring The safety of intraperitoneal saline lavage and ondansetron is well-established. The combination presents minimal anticipated risk. All adverse events and postoperative complications will be actively monitored and recorded for the first 24 hours and up to 30 days post-surgery. An interim analysis for safety and efficacy will be conducted after 50% recruitment (n=20). Any serious adverse events will be reported promptly to the Institutional Ethics Committee.
- Significance This is the first study to evaluate the combination of standard saline lavage with 8mg of intraperitoneal ondansetron within a rigorously standardized, PROSPECT-aligned, multimodal protocol. Using a triple-blind pilot design and a comprehensive primary endpoint, it will generate high-quality preliminary evidence on this simple, low-cost intervention's efficacy and safety in a Mexican population. The results will determine the feasibility and inform the design of a larger, definitive multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- nterventional Study Model: Parallel assignment. Participants are randomized into one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the experimental intervention or the control intervention for the duration of the study. The model incorporates triple-blinding (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor) and a randomized, controlled design. Allocation is performed using a computer-generated sequence with permuted blocks, stratified by sex and ASA physical status classification to ensure balanced groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Saline Lavage Only | Active comparator | Drug: Saline Intraperitoneal LavageParticipants in this arm will receive intraoperative peritoneal lavage with 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution for 5 minutes at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The solution will be fully aspirated before abdominal closure. The solution will remain in the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes and then be completely aspirated before closure. All participants will also receive standard multimodal analgesia including paracetamol, diclofenac, and local wound infiltration with bupivacaine. |
| Saline Lavage With Ondansetron | Experimental | Drug: Ondansetron Intraperitoneal LavageParticipants in this arm will undergo peritoneal lavage with 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution combined with 8 mg of ondansetron, administered intraperitoneally at the end of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The solution will remain in the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes and then be completely aspirated before closure. All participants will also receive standard multimodal analgesia including paracetamol, diclofenac, and local wound infiltration with bupivacaine. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 60 years.
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status classification I or II.
- Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to symptomatic cholelithiasis, resolved choledocholithiasis post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), or gallbladder polyp.
- Placement of a ¾-inch Penrose drain in the subhepatic cavity as part of the standardized surgical technique, to allow evacuation of residual CO2, residual lavage fluid, and close monitoring for possible postoperative bleeding or bile leakage.
- Intraoperative surgical difficulty assessed as Grade I, II or III according to the Nassar scale
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Confirmed pregnancy or lactation
- Intraoperative findings of Nassar Grade IV, suspected gallbladder cancer, scleroatrophic gallbladder, or cirrhosis
- 5. Use of NSAIDs within 24 hours prior to surgery, or chronic use of NSAIDs, opioids, immunosuppressants, chemotherapy, or anticoagulants.
- 6. Known allergies to ondansetron, acetaminophen, diclofenac sodium, buprenorphine or tramadol
- 7. Significant cardiac disease (e.g., heart failure, arrhythmias, pacemaker dependency)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ondansetron Intraperitoneal LavageAlso: Ondansetron, Zofran, 0.9% Sodium ChlorideA single dose of 8 mg of ondansetron diluted in 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution will be administered as an intraperitoneal lavage at the end of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The solution will remain in the abdominal cavity for 5 minutes and then be fully aspirated before surgical closure. This intervention aims to evaluate the local analgesic and antiemetic effects of ondansetron when used via the peritoneal route. | Drug | Saline Lavage With Ondansetron |
| Saline Intraperitoneal LavageAlso: normal saline, 0.9% Sodium Chloride, Saline SolutionAt the end of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a peritoneal lavage will be performed using 500 mL of 0.9% saline solution (normal saline). The solution will be maintained in the peritoneal cavity for 5 minutes and then fully aspirated before surgical closure. This intervention serves as the comparator to assess the added effect of ondansetron in the experimental group. | Drug | Saline Lavage Only |
Primary outcome
Total Pain Burden as Measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Over the First 24 Postoperative Hours
Time frame: 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
The primary outcome is the total burden of postoperative pain, quantified as the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of serial Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores measured at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The AUC is calculated using the trapezoidal rule, which integrates both the intensity and duration of pain into a single composite measure (units: mm*hour). This provides a more comprehensive assessment of the patient's pain experience over the critical first postoperative day than isolated time-point measurements. A lower AUC indicates superior pain control.
4 secondary outcomes
Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Time frame: 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
Use of Rescue Analgesia Within 24 Hours Postoperatively
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative Sleep Quality Assessed by the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire
Time frame: Night of surgery to morning after surgery
Incidence of Adverse Events Possibly Related to Intraperitoneal Ondansetron
Time frame: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 21944510Subhas G, Gupta A, Bhullar J, Dubay L, Ferguson L, Goriel Y, Jacobs MJ, Kolachalam RB, Silapaswan S, Mittal VK. Prolonged (longer than 3 hours) laparoscopic cholecystectomy: reasons and results. Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):981-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 38050322Wang DE, Bakshi C, Sugiyama G, Coppa G, Alfonso A, Chung P. Does Operative Time Affect Complication Rate in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 2023 Nov;89(11):4479-4484. doi: 10.1177/00031348221117032. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 33933284Rudasill SE, Dillon D, Karunungan K, Mardock AL, Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Tran Z, Benharash P. The obesity paradox: Underweight patients are at the greatest risk of mortality after cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):675-681. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.034. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 32206919Reeves JJ, Burton BN, Broderick RC, Waterman RS, Gabriel RA. Obesity and unanticipated hospital admission following outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1348-1354. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07514-7. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 28237044Augustin T, Moslim MA, Brethauer S, Aminian A, Kroh M, Schneider E, Walsh RM. Obesity and its implications for morbidity and mortality after cholecystectomy: A matched NSQIP analysis. Am J Surg. 2017 Mar;213(3):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.11.037. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 20053272Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Giangregorio L, Goldsmith CH. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 6;10:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.
- Results publication: PubMed 15189396Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 32646516Miranda-Ackerman RC, Lira-Trujillo M, Gollaz-Cervantez AC, Cortes-Flores AO, Zuloaga-Fernandez Del Valle CJ, Garcia-Gonzalez LA, Morgan-Villela G, Barbosa-Camacho FJ, Pintor-Belmontes KJ, Guzman-Ramirez BG, Bernal-Hernandez A, Fuentes-Orozco C, Gonzalez-Ojeda A. Associations between stressors and difficulty sleeping in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05497-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 33784276Garcia-Galicia A, Guzman-Maya I, Montiel-Jarquin AJ, Parra-Salazar JA, Gonzalez-Lopez AM, Loria-Castellanos J. Validation of a faces pain scale in postsurgical geriatric patients. Cir Cir. 2021;89(2):212-217. doi: 10.24875/CIRU.20000094.
- Results publication: PubMed 20423760Sandoval-Jimenez CH, Mendez-Sashida GJ, Cruz-Marquez-Rico LM, Cardenas-Victorica R, Guzman-Esquivel H, Luna-Silva M, Diaz-Valero R. [Postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. A randomized clinical trial.]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2009 Oct-Dec;74(4):314-20. Spanish.
- Results publication: PubMed 23630439Reddi BA. Why is saline so acidic (and does it really matter?). Int J Med Sci. 2013 Apr 17;10(6):747-50. doi: 10.7150/ijms.5868. Print 2013.
- Results publication: PubMed 1535245Graham CL, Dukes GE, Kao CF, Bertch JM, Hak LJ. Stability of ondansetron in large-volume parenteral solutions. Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Jun;26(6):768-71. doi: 10.1177/106002809202600603.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The decision to share individual participant data (IPD) has not yet been finalized. Data sharing will depend on the outcomes of the pilot study, ethical considerations, and institutional policies. Any future data sharing will ensure patient confidentiality and comply with regulatory standards.
Related trials for Postoperative Pain Management
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy of Ketorolac for Postoperative Pain Management in Hip Arthroscopy
Femoracetabular Impingement, Hip Arthroscopy
RecruitingObservational study
Cryo NerVe Block Extremity AmputatioN RegIStry for Post Operative and pHantom Limb Pain
Amputation, Amputation of Lower Limb
Recruiting
Conditioned Open Label Placebo for Postoperative Pain Management
Pain, Postoperative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francisco Aguilar Espinosa, Dr. principal investigator
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Ondansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage and Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage in people with Postoperative Pain Management and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, run by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total Pain Burden as Measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores Over the First 24 Postoperative Hours (time frame: 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06632184, which also lists 58 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2025.