AzTrials
AzTrials

Pressure UlcersNCT06634095

Effect of Moulage on Self-efficacy and Clinical Practice in Pressure Sores

A study testing Moulage group in people with Pressure Ulcers, run by Cukurova University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the process of preventing, treating and caring for pressure ulcers, nurses take on an important responsibility and are one of the most common adverse events during hospitalizations worldwide. Pressure ulcers, which are a serious problem especially in cases requiring long-term care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pressure Ulcers
What is being tested?
Moulage group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
94 participants
Where
2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Oct 2024to 3 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Students who have clinical field experience (internship),
  • Volunteer to participate in the study,
  • Have no attendance problems will be included in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Students without clinical internship experience,
  • Those who do not voluntarily participate in the work,
  • Those with attendance issues will not be included in the work.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

    Van, Tuşba, 65080

  • VAN YYU Faculty of Health Sciences

    Van, 65080

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Using Moulage-Assisted Standardized Patient Simulation on Nursing Students

In the process of preventing, treating and caring for pressure ulcers, nurses take on an important responsibility and are one of the most common adverse events during hospitalizations worldwide. Pressure ulcers, which are a serious problem especially in cases requiring long-term care. These ulcers occur as a result of prolonged exposure of soft tissues to pressure and can lead to local tissue damage, carrying the risk of infection. In Turkey, pressure ulcers are considered an indicator of patient care quality for healthcare institutions, and many healthcare institutions continue their efforts to reduce the rate of pressure ulcers.

Read the detailed description

Moulage-supported education provides appropriate care that increases the quality of care. Therefore, it is critical for nurses to develop pressure injury assessment skills before and after graduation. However, in clinical settings, there are challenges such as limited opportunities for developing psychomotor skills, increasing student numbers, complexity of the healthcare system, and patient safety issues. In response to these challenges, the importance of simulation-based education that provides practices similar to clinical experience has emerged. Moulage plays an important role in high-quality simulations that appeal to many senses. Moulage can be defined as the application of make-up or other elements to add realism to simulation training by creating realistic-looking wounds. The use of moulage provides a valuable opportunity for practical experience that can be perceived by many senses such as vision, hearing and touch. The use of moulage helps students understand the etiology, physiology and healing processes of the wound and is an effective tool for developing wound assessment skills.

Simulated patients, known as standardized patients, which have recently emerged, are used to promote performance, competence and knowledge development among nursing students. Standardized patients help students improve their clinical and speaking performances by providing them with the opportunity to realistically play the role of a patient with a health problem.

Evaluating nursing students' perceptions and thoughts about clinical practice and their self-efficacy perceptions can contribute to the development of more effective strategies by evaluating the effectiveness of clinical practice strategies.

No research has been found on the effect of the use of moulage-supported standardized patient simulation on nursing students' self-efficacy and clinical practice attitudes towards pressure ulcers. This study is planned to be conducted as an experimental study to investigate the effect of the use of moulage-supported standardized patient simulation on nursing students' self-efficacy and clinical practice attitudes towards pressure ulcers.

Conditions
Pressure Ulcers
Being tested
Moulage group
Keywords
self-sufficiency, Moulage, Clinical Practice Regarding
Medical subject headings
Pressure Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Moulage groupBehavioural

    Also called Control Group

    The experimental group is trained with a moulage-supported standardized patient simulation. Participants in the experimental group practice during the specified moulage-supported standardized patient simulation. Moulage-supported simulations regarding pressure ulcers will be created and training will be provided.

Study groups in NCT06634095
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Moulage groupExperimental"It will consist of students trained with standardized patient simulation supported by a model."
Receives: Behavioral: Moulage group
Contol groupNo interventionStudents in the control group will receive standard care.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pressure Injury Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses

    Each item in the 10-item survey is scored from 1 (not competent at all) to 5 (completely competent). It should be measured using 0-100 points. The total score range to be obtained from the scale is 0-100.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Attitude Scale for Nursing Students Towards Clinical Practices

    The scale items are of 5-point Likert type, scored as "Strongly disagree (1 point)", "Disagree (2 points)", "Undecided (3 points)", "Agree (4 points)" and Strongly Agree (5 points)". The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 26, the highest score is 130, and an increase in the total score indicates that students have developed a positive attitude towards clinical practice.

    Measured: Baseline and 12 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Oct 2024
  2. Study start1 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion3 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion3 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Experimental, randomised controlled, single-blind study
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
94 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06634095
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024 03-04
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
14 Sep 2024
Last updated
3 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Celik H, Ozer M, Zincir H. Modification and Validation of the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale for Turkish Adult Vaccination. J Nurs Meas. 2024 Mar 14;32(1):82-94. doi: 10.1891/JNM-2022-0020.

    PubMed 37827583
  • Gilkey MB, McRee AL, Magnus BE, Reiter PL, Dempsey AF, Brewer NT. Vaccination Confidence and Parental Refusal/Delay of Early Childhood Vaccines. PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159087. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27391098
  • Franklin MD, Schlundt DG, Wallston KA. Development and validation of a religious health fatalism measure for the African-American faith community. J Health Psychol. 2008 Apr;13(3):323-35. doi: 10.1177/1359105307088137.

    PubMed 18420767
  • Costa JC, Weber AM, Darmstadt GL, Abdalla S, Victora CG. Religious affiliation and immunization coverage in 15 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccine. 2020 Jan 29;38(5):1160-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.024. Epub 2019 Nov 30.

    PubMed 31791811
  • Ahmed A, Lee KS, Bukhsh A, Al-Worafi YM, Sarker MMR, Ming LC, Khan TM. Outbreak of vaccine-preventable diseases in Muslim majority countries. J Infect Public Health. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):153-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

    PubMed 28988775
  • Sarpdagi Y, Kaplan E, Sir O, Askan F, Yildiz M. The effect of moulage supported standardised patient simulation on nursing students' self-efficacy and clinical practice attitudes towards pressure injuries : A randomised controlled study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2026 Jan;90:104695. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104695. Epub 2025 Dec 17.

    PubMed 41420980

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Moulage group in people with Pressure Ulcers, run by Cukurova University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pressure Injury Management Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses (time frame: Baseline and 12 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06634095, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in