DementiaNCT06635876
Caregivers Preparing for Their Own Health Care Emergency
A study testing Coaching Sessions in people with Dementia and Caregiver Burden, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The proposed research will develop and test an online Emergency Preparedness Toolkit to help caregivers prepare for their own unexpected health events. Caregivers of persons with dementia often ignore their own health needs as their primary focus is the care of the person with dementia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia, Caregiver Burden
- What is being tested?
- Coaching Sessions
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Jul 2025to 3 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be 55 years of age or older at the time of signing the informed consent
- Must self-identify as the spouse or partner of the PWD (may be subject to independent verification per PI discretion, e.g., medical record review or a signed doctor's note)
- Must provide some caregiving to a PWD
- Must live in the same dwelling as the PWD
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of dementia
- Unable to use or does not have access to a computer
- Complete deafness or blindness and/or unable to use a telephone
- Condition that prevents them from performing caregiving duties or providing physical/emotional support to the PWD
- Unable to follow directions
- Unable to read or write in English
- Participation in prior study involving the EPT
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California - Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817
About this study
Official title: Piloting an Online Emergency Preparedness Toolkit for Caregivers Preparing for Their Own Health Care Emergency
The proposed research will develop and test an online Emergency Preparedness Toolkit to help caregivers prepare for their own unexpected health events. Caregivers of persons with dementia often ignore their own health needs as their primary focus is the care of the person with dementia. This can lead to a caregiver delaying their own care and subsequently emergent health events. The Emergency Preparedness Toolkit provides guidance to the caregiver as to how to identify and transfer care to a standby caregiver. The goal is to provide a caregiver with the security and comfort that the person with dementia will be well cared for while they care for their own health needs.
- Conditions
- Dementia, Caregiver Burden
- Being tested
- Coaching Sessions
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia, Caregiver Burden
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Coaching SessionsBehavioural
The coach will use motivational interviewing techniques to:
- To assist and guide the caregiver to establish a standby caregiver relationship
- To assist and guide the caregiver as to how to use the EPT
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EPT-C | Active comparator | The EPT-C group will receive two coaching sessions to assist with the completion of the EPT. Receives: Behavioral: Coaching Sessions |
| EPT-A | No intervention | The EPT-A group will be responsible for completing the EPT alone, without coaching sessions. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Completion of the EPT six weeks from the baseline visit
This will be measured using de-identified data from the EPT system.
Measured: Six weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Identification and engagement of a standby caregiver six weeks from the baseline visit
This will be measured using de-identified data from the EPT system.
Measured: Six weeks
Change in caregiver preparedness from baseline to Month 3
This will be measured using the Caregiver Preparedness Scale (CPS). Responses are rated from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the more prepared the caregiver feels for caregiver; the lower the score, the less prepared the caregiver feels.
Measured: Three months
Change in caregiver confidence from baseline to Month 3
This will be measured using a Likert scale of caregiver confidence from "completely confident" to "not at all confident". Responses will be grouped into two categories: confident (completely confident, fairly confident, or somewhat confident) or not confident (slightly confident or not at all confident).
Measured: Three months
Change in caregiving self-efficacy from baseline to Month 3
This will be measured using the Revised Scale for Caregiver Self-Efficacy (RSCSE). Responses are rated from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the more self-efficacious the caregiver feels about caregiving; the lower the score, the less self-efficacious the caregiver feels.
Measured: Three months
Qualitative data and theme identification from participant experience surveys and EPT-C coaching session recordings
This will be measured using a qualitative descriptive approach and theme identification, based on participant experience surveys and EPT-C coaching session recordings.
Measured: Three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2024
- Study start18 Jul 2025
- Primary completion11 Jun 2026
- Study completion3 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (39)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, DavisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Davis
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rebecca S Boxer, MD, MS, Principal investigator, University of California, Davis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06635876
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2180909
- Other IDs
- 1R21AG089840-01, 5R21AG089840-02
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Brodaty H, Donkin M. Family caregivers of people with dementia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):217-28. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/hbrodaty.
PubMed 19585957Ornstein KA, Wolff JL, Bollens-Lund E, Rahman OK, Kelley AS. Spousal Caregivers Are Caregiving Alone In The Last Years Of Life. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):964-972. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00087.
PubMed 31158025Rykkje L, Tranvåg O. Caring for one's wife with dementia-at home: older husbands' experiences with managing challenges of everyday life. Sage Open. 2019;9(1):215824401983445. doi:10.1177/2158244019834453
Perkins M, Howard VJ, Wadley VG, Crowe M, Safford MM, Haley WE, Howard G, Roth DL. Caregiving strain and all-cause mortality: evidence from the REGARDS study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jul;68(4):504-12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs084. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
PubMed 23033358Tarlow BJ, Wisniewski SR, Belle SH, Rubert M, Ory MG, Gallagher-Thompson D. Positive aspects of caregiving: Contributions of the REACH project to the development of new measures for Alzheimer's caregiving. Res Aging. 2004;26(4):429-453. doi:10.1177/0164027504264493
Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):P126-37. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.p126.
PubMed 17379673Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304.
PubMed 24618967Boxer RS, Daddato AE, Jessen A, Portz JD, Shetterly S. Hospitalizations of Caregivers Increases Risk of Hospitalization for Patients Living with Dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):502-507. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07902-w. Epub 2022 Nov 14. No abstract available.
PubMed 36376629Whitlatch CJ, Orsulic-Jeras S. Meeting the Informational, Educational, and Psychosocial Support Needs of Persons Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers. Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S58-S73. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx162.
PubMed 29361068Pearce J, Forsyth W, Boyd R, Jackson GA. Empowering people with dementia: Rutherglen and Cambuslang Values History Project. Dementia. 2012;11(5):695-698. doi:10.1177/1471301211431364
Mittelman MS, Haley WE, Clay OJ, Roth DL. Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1592-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242727.81172.91.
PubMed 17101889Yaffe K, Fox P, Newcomer R, Sands L, Lindquist K, Dane K, Covinsky KE. Patient and caregiver characteristics and nursing home placement in patients with dementia. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2090-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2090.
PubMed 11966383Young HM, Bell JF, Whitney RL, Ridberg RA, Reed SC, Vitaliano PP. Social Determinants of Health: Underreported Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Caregiver Interventions. Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S14-S28. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz148.
PubMed 32057083Wawrziczny E, Berna G, Ducharme F, Kergoat MJ, Pasquier F, Antoine P. Modeling the Distress of Spousal Caregivers of People with Dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;55(2):703-716. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160558.
PubMed 27716667Turner RL, Reese-Melancon C, Harrington EE, Andreo M. Caregiving During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Factors Associated With Feelings of Caregiver Preparedness. J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Oct;42(10):2089-2099. doi: 10.1177/07334648231182242. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
PubMed 37395127
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Piloting an Online Emergency Preparedness Toolkit for Caregivers Preparing for Their Own Health Care Emergency
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06635876
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2180909
- Conditions
- Dementia, Caregiver Burden
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, DavisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 18 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The proposed research will develop and test an online Emergency Preparedness Toolkit to help caregivers prepare for their own unexpected health events. Caregivers of persons with dementia often ignore their own health needs as their primary focus is the care of the person with dementia. This can lead to a caregiver delaying their own care and subsequently emergent health events. The Emergency Preparedness Toolkit provides guidance to the caregiver as to how to identify and transfer care to a standby caregiver. The goal is to provide a caregiver with the security and comfort that the person with dementia will be well cared for while they care for their own health needs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EPT-C | Active comparator | Behavioral: Coaching SessionsThe EPT-C group will receive two coaching sessions to assist with the completion of the EPT. |
| EPT-A | No intervention | –The EPT-A group will be responsible for completing the EPT alone, without coaching sessions. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Must be 55 years of age or older at the time of signing the informed consent
- Must self-identify as the spouse or partner of the PWD (may be subject to independent verification per PI discretion, e.g., medical record review or a signed doctor's note)
- Must provide some caregiving to a PWD
- Must live in the same dwelling as the PWD
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of dementia
- Unable to use or does not have access to a computer
- Complete deafness or blindness and/or unable to use a telephone
- Condition that prevents them from performing caregiving duties or providing physical/emotional support to the PWD
- Unable to follow directions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Coaching SessionsThe coach will use motivational interviewing techniques to: 1. To assist and guide the caregiver to establish a standby caregiver relationship 2. To assist and guide the caregiver as to how to use the EPT | Behavioural | EPT-C |
Primary outcome
Completion of the EPT six weeks from the baseline visit
Time frame: Six weeks
This will be measured using de-identified data from the EPT system.
5 secondary outcomes
Identification and engagement of a standby caregiver six weeks from the baseline visit
Time frame: Six weeks
Change in caregiver preparedness from baseline to Month 3
Time frame: Three months
Change in caregiver confidence from baseline to Month 3
Time frame: Three months
Change in caregiving self-efficacy from baseline to Month 3
Time frame: Three months
Qualitative data and theme identification from participant experience surveys and EPT-C coaching session recordings
Time frame: Three months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2026.
- Background: PubMed 19585957Brodaty H, Donkin M. Family caregivers of people with dementia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):217-28. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/hbrodaty.
- Background: PubMed 31158025Ornstein KA, Wolff JL, Bollens-Lund E, Rahman OK, Kelley AS. Spousal Caregivers Are Caregiving Alone In The Last Years Of Life. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):964-972. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00087.
- BackgroundRykkje L, Tranvåg O. Caring for one's wife with dementia-at home: older husbands' experiences with managing challenges of everyday life. Sage Open. 2019;9(1):215824401983445. doi:10.1177/2158244019834453
- Background: PubMed 23033358Perkins M, Howard VJ, Wadley VG, Crowe M, Safford MM, Haley WE, Howard G, Roth DL. Caregiving strain and all-cause mortality: evidence from the REGARDS study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Jul;68(4):504-12. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs084. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
- BackgroundTarlow BJ, Wisniewski SR, Belle SH, Rubert M, Ory MG, Gallagher-Thompson D. Positive aspects of caregiving: Contributions of the REACH project to the development of new measures for Alzheimer's caregiving. Res Aging. 2004;26(4):429-453. doi:10.1177/0164027504264493
- Background: PubMed 17379673Pinquart M, Sorensen S. Correlates of physical health of informal caregivers: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007 Mar;62(2):P126-37. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.2.p126.
- Background: PubMed 24618967Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, Dion S, Lachs MS. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014 Mar 12;311(10):1052-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.304.
- Background: PubMed 36376629Boxer RS, Daddato AE, Jessen A, Portz JD, Shetterly S. Hospitalizations of Caregivers Increases Risk of Hospitalization for Patients Living with Dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):502-507. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07902-w. Epub 2022 Nov 14. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 29361068Whitlatch CJ, Orsulic-Jeras S. Meeting the Informational, Educational, and Psychosocial Support Needs of Persons Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers. Gerontologist. 2018 Jan 18;58(suppl_1):S58-S73. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx162.
- BackgroundPearce J, Forsyth W, Boyd R, Jackson GA. Empowering people with dementia: Rutherglen and Cambuslang Values History Project. Dementia. 2012;11(5):695-698. doi:10.1177/1471301211431364
- Background: PubMed 17101889Mittelman MS, Haley WE, Clay OJ, Roth DL. Improving caregiver well-being delays nursing home placement of patients with Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1592-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000242727.81172.91.
- Background: PubMed 11966383Yaffe K, Fox P, Newcomer R, Sands L, Lindquist K, Dane K, Covinsky KE. Patient and caregiver characteristics and nursing home placement in patients with dementia. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2090-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2090.
- AARP, National Alliance for Caregiving. Caregiving in the U.S. 2020. AARP; 2020. doi:10.26419/ppi.00103.001Link provided by the sponsor.
- National Research Summit on Care Services and Supports for Persons with Dementia and Their Caregivers: Report to the National Advisory Council on Alzheimer's Research, Care, and Services.; 2018.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Reinhard S, Ryan E. Stepping Up to Support Family Caregivers. blog.aarp.org. June 7, 2016. https://blog.aarp.org/thinking-policy/stepping-up-to-support-family-caregiversLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rebecca S Boxer, MD, MS principal investigator
University of California, Davis
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Coaching Sessions in people with Dementia and Caregiver Burden, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Completion of the EPT six weeks from the baseline visit (time frame: Six weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06635876, which also lists 39 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.