AzTrials
AzTrials

DementiaNCT06638632

Decision Aid for Dementia Therapies

A study testing Decision aid in people with Dementia and Decision Aids, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to develop a decision aid to support patients and families making decisions about medications for dementia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dementia, Decision Aids
What is being tested?
Decision aid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2025to 28 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients:
  • UCHealth patient
  • Ages 18 y/o and above
  • Documented neurocognitive deficits suggestive of mild cognitive impairment or early dementia as determined by their treating clinician.
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Caregiver:
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Ages 18 y/o and above
  • Identified by the study participant as the person who helps the most with their medical care outside the hospital or clinic.
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Clinicians:
  • Neurologists, primary care clinicians, pharmacists, or psychologists involved in dementia decision-making.
  • English or Spanish speaking

Who cannot join

  • Patients:
  • Not English or Spanish-speaking
  • Neurocognitive deficits suggestive of moderate or severe cognitive impairment or late stage dementia.
  • Not able to consent for themselves
  • Caregiver:
  • Ages 17 y/o and below
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Not English or Spanish-speaking
  • Clinicians:
  • Neurologists, primary care clinicians, pharmacists, or psychologists involved in dementia decision-making.
  • English or Spanish-speaking

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • University of Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

    Kaitlynn Walton, MPH, 303-724-7162, kaitlynn.walton@cuanschutz.edu

    Kate Noonan, kate.noonan@cuanschutz.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Helping Patients, Families, and Clinicians Make Shared Decisions About Therapies for Dementia

The purpose of this study is to develop a decision aid to support patients and families making decisions about medications for dementia.

Being tested
Decision aid
Keywords
Lecanemab
Medical subject headings
Dementia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Decision aidBehavioural

    Patients with dementia and care partners will receive an iteration of the decision aid and provide feedback.

Study groups in NCT06638632
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Decision AidExperimentalParticipants provide feedback on the development of a decision aid for dementia therapies.
Receives: Behavioral: Decision aid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decisional Conflict

    To access the preliminary efficacy on decisional conflict including personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, factors that contribute to feelings of uncertainty and effective decision making.

    Decisional Conflict Scale - Higher numbers mean more uncertainty. O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical decision making, 15(1), 25-30. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decisional_Conflict.pdf

    Measured: From enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2

  2. Shared Decision Making

    To determine the extent that health care providers engage with patients as a part of their shared decision making, specifically looking at the discussion of treatment options and their pros and cons as well as the patient's preferences.

    Shared Decision Making Process Scale - Higher numbers mean more shared decision making. https://mghdecisionsciences.org/tools-training/sdm-process-survey/

    Measured: From enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2

  3. Decisional Self-Efficacy

    To determine the patient's perception of their self-efficacy in decision making including measuring their self-confidence in their ability to make decisions.

    Decision Self-Efficacy Scale where higher numbers mean they patient has a higher perception of self-efficacy.

    https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/Tools/Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf

    Measured: From enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2024
  2. Study startNov 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJan 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This is an iterative, user-centered design process. Therefore, patients and care partners will receive iterations of the decision aid as updates are made to it.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06638632
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-0866
Other IDs
NIA Grant#: R21AG088955
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
4 Oct 2024
Last updated
16 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM. Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec;30(6):701-11. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10386231. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

    PubMed 21088131
  • van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, Bateman RJ, Chen C, Gee M, Kanekiyo M, Li D, Reyderman L, Cohen S, Froelich L, Katayama S, Sabbagh M, Vellas B, Watson D, Dhadda S, Irizarry M, Kramer LD, Iwatsubo T. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):9-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948. Epub 2022 Nov 29.

    PubMed 36449413

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in