AzTrials
AzTrials

GERDAREANCT06641375

Anti-Reflux Endoscopic Therapy Using Argon Plasma Coagulation (AREA) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Patients: A Single Center, Randomized, Sham, Controlled Trial (The AREA Study)

A study testing Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy and Endoscopy in people with GERD, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background and Rationale: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is affecting 1 in 3 US adults with half experiencing daily symptoms. Per recent data, more than 50% continue to experience daily symptoms despite taking medical therapy and not eligible for surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
GERD
What is being tested?
Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy and Endoscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
10 Feb 2024to 10 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with chronic GERD symptoms (at least 1 typical symptom of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for last 6 months and
  • Objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study)
  • Patients prescribed standard dose of PPI for symptoms of GERD
  • Able to undergo upper endoscopy as evidenced by completion of pre-endoscopy standard of care checklist.

Who cannot join

  • Patients unable to or unwilling to participate or consent
  • Age <18 years or >80 years
  • Allergic or intolerant to PPI medications
  • Large hiatal hernia > 3 cm and Hill grade IV
  • Barrett's esophagus
  • Esophageal stricture with any prior intervention
  • Major motility disorder on HRM
  • 7. Eosinophilic esophagitis 8. Gastroparesis documented by abnormal gastric emptying time 9. Previous fundoplication, myotomy or LINX surgery 10. Cirrhosis with esophageal and/or gastric varices

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rakesh Dr Kalapala, MBBS MD DNB contact

04023378888 ext. 112

drrakesh.kalapala@aighospitals.com

Rajesh Goud Dr Maragoni, Bpharm, Mpharm, MBA, PGDM contact

04023378888 ext. 224

rajeshgoud761@gmail.com

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital

    Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082

    Mohan Ramchandani, MBBS, 04023378888 ext. 802, ramchandanimohan@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Anti-Reflux Endoscopic Therapy Using Argon Plasma Coagulation (AREA) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Patients

Background and Rationale:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is affecting 1 in 3 US adults with half experiencing daily symptoms. Per recent data, more than 50% continue to experience daily symptoms despite taking medical therapy and not eligible for surgery. In that small fraction of patients who are eligible for surgery, more than 70% resume taking a medicine for their reflux disease. GERD is common among the US veterans and currently there is a lack of minimally invasive endoscopic therapies for management of GERD. This study will investigate performance of minimally invasive, endoscopic therapy using antireflux mucosal ablation (hybrid argon plasma coagulation) that has been used in other areas of GI tract with efficacy and safety for management of chronic GERD among the US veterans.

Read more

Objective:

The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of antireflux mucosal ablation or ARAT (intervention group) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (typical symptoms of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for the last 6 months and objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study off PPI for 5-7 days) compared to sham procedure (control group).

Read the detailed description

Inclusion/Exclusion criteria: Inclusion:

  • Patients with chronic GERD symptoms (at least 1 typical symptom of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for last 6 months and
  • Objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study)
  • Patients prescribed standard dose of PPI for symptoms of GERD
  • Able to undergo upper endoscopy as evidenced by completion of pre-endoscopy standard of care checklist.

Exclusion:

  1. Patients unable to or unwilling to participate or consent
  2. Age <18 years or >80 years
  3. Allergic or intolerant to PPI medications
  4. Large hiatal hernia > 3 cm and Hill grade IV
  5. Barrett's esophagus
  6. Esophageal stricture with any prior intervention
  7. Major motility disorder on HRM
  8. Eosinophilic esophagitis 8. Gastroparesis documented by abnormal gastric emptying time 9. Previous fundoplication, myotomy or LINX surgery 10. Cirrhosis with esophageal and/or gastric varices

Study groups:

Patients recruited will be randomized to undergo antireflux mucosal ablation (ARAT) OR sham intervention after inclusion and exclusion criteria have been met.

Study procedure:

Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the arms by computer generated random sequence of numbers.

The following study visits are foreseen for each patient:

Screening Visit(s) A screening visit is performed at the investigational site. During this visit out-patients will be informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to signing the informed consent form for inclusion in the study. Their medical history will be recorded as well as eventual clinical or laboratory examinations according to the local standard of care preparation for an upper endoscopy.

Randomization (Intervention) visit: Each eligible patient returns to the clinic to undergo either the study intervention OR sham intervention.

24-48 hour and 7-10 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.

25-30 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.

3-4 Month (80-112 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires

6-7 month (165-196 days post randomization) visit phone call to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires

11-12 month (336-365 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires

  1. To determine if ARAT can improve GERD-HRQL score 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
  2. To determine if ARAT can decrease GERD scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary aims:

  1. To determine if ARAT can reduce esophageal acid exposure time <4% (using wireless ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring) in 50% subjects compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
  2. To determine if ARAT can achieve 50% reduction in DeMeester score compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
  3. To determine if ARAT can achieve PPI dose reduction or discontinuation in 25% of subjects after 3 months compared to sham intervention
  4. To evaluate the safety profile of ARAT the rapy by recording major (GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization, esophageal stricture) and minor complications (chest pain, fever, dysphagia) 7.5. Follow up Following the baseline assessment and performance of the upper endoscopy (either true intervention or sham), patients in both groups will be asked to complete the GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires at 3 month ,6 month and 12 months using appropriate case report forms. In addition, the study staff will contact the patients by phone call at day 24- 48 hours, by phone call at 7-10 days and 25-30 days post procedure to record any adverse events. This will be accomplished using designated case report forms. At months 3 and 12, all patients will also undergo an upper endoscopy with assessment for erosive esophagitis, and placement of pH capsule. During the 3 month, 6 month and 12 months visit, use of PPI therapy (dose and frequency) will be recorded. Response to therapy will be assessed using the following parameters: improvement of GERD-HRQL scores, reduction in RDQ scores, AET <4% and DeMeester score <14 (off PPI). Any patients with dysphagia after the ARAT will undergo repeat endoscopy for evaluation. If significant stricture, endoscopic dilation will be performed per severity of symptoms and stenosis.

Duration of this study from subject randomization to completion is 1 year, however, we anticipate study duration of at least 24 months for subject screening, completion of study visits and data analysis.

Conditions
GERD
Being tested
Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy, Endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anti reflux endoscopic theraphyDevice

    • the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20

    The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated.

  • EndoscopyOther

    Patients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks.

Study groups in NCT06641375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy using Argon plasma coagulation in GERDActive comparatorTo the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20 The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated.
Receives: Device: Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy
EndoscopyPlacebo comparatorPatients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks.
Receives: Other: Endoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. AREA

    To determine if procedure can decrease Gastroesophageal reflux scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Anti reflux ablation theraphy

    To determine if ARAT can achieve 50% reduction in DeMeester score compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months

    Measured: 365 days

  2. AREA

    To determine if ARAT can achieve PPI dose reduction or discontinuation in 25% of subjects after 3 months compared to sham intervention

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Anti reflux ablation theraphy

    To determine if intervention can reduce esophageal acid exposure time <4% (using wireless ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring) in 50% subjects compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Reflux disease

    To evaluate the safety profile of ARAT therapy by recording major (GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization, esophageal stricture) and minor complications (chest pain, fever, dysphagia)

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Oct 2024
  2. Study start10 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06641375
Sponsor's protocol ID
AREA21
Acronym
AREA
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
12 Oct 2024
Last updated
12 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy and Endoscopy in people with GERD, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rakesh Dr Kalapala, MBBS MD DNB (04023378888 ext. 112, drrakesh.kalapala@aighospitals.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

AREA (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in