GERDAREANCT06641375
Anti-Reflux Endoscopic Therapy Using Argon Plasma Coagulation (AREA) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Patients: A Single Center, Randomized, Sham, Controlled Trial (The AREA Study)
A study testing Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy and Endoscopy in people with GERD, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
Background and Rationale: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is affecting 1 in 3 US adults with half experiencing daily symptoms. Per recent data, more than 50% continue to experience daily symptoms despite taking medical therapy and not eligible for surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- GERD
- What is being tested?
- Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy and Endoscopy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2024to 10 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with chronic GERD symptoms (at least 1 typical symptom of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for last 6 months and
- Objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study)
- Patients prescribed standard dose of PPI for symptoms of GERD
- Able to undergo upper endoscopy as evidenced by completion of pre-endoscopy standard of care checklist.
Who cannot join
- Patients unable to or unwilling to participate or consent
- Age <18 years or >80 years
- Allergic or intolerant to PPI medications
- Large hiatal hernia > 3 cm and Hill grade IV
- Barrett's esophagus
- Esophageal stricture with any prior intervention
- Major motility disorder on HRM
- 7. Eosinophilic esophagitis 8. Gastroparesis documented by abnormal gastric emptying time 9. Previous fundoplication, myotomy or LINX surgery 10. Cirrhosis with esophageal and/or gastric varices
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Rajesh Goud Dr Maragoni, Bpharm, Mpharm, MBA, PGDM contact
India1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology Hospital
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500082
Mohan Ramchandani, MBBS, 04023378888 ext. 802, ramchandanimohan@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Anti-Reflux Endoscopic Therapy Using Argon Plasma Coagulation (AREA) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Patients
Background and Rationale:
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is affecting 1 in 3 US adults with half experiencing daily symptoms. Per recent data, more than 50% continue to experience daily symptoms despite taking medical therapy and not eligible for surgery. In that small fraction of patients who are eligible for surgery, more than 70% resume taking a medicine for their reflux disease. GERD is common among the US veterans and currently there is a lack of minimally invasive endoscopic therapies for management of GERD. This study will investigate performance of minimally invasive, endoscopic therapy using antireflux mucosal ablation (hybrid argon plasma coagulation) that has been used in other areas of GI tract with efficacy and safety for management of chronic GERD among the US veterans.
Read more
Objective:
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of antireflux mucosal ablation or ARAT (intervention group) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (typical symptoms of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for the last 6 months and objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study off PPI for 5-7 days) compared to sham procedure (control group).
Read the detailed description
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria: Inclusion:
- Patients with chronic GERD symptoms (at least 1 typical symptom of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for last 6 months and
- Objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study)
- Patients prescribed standard dose of PPI for symptoms of GERD
- Able to undergo upper endoscopy as evidenced by completion of pre-endoscopy standard of care checklist.
Exclusion:
- Patients unable to or unwilling to participate or consent
- Age <18 years or >80 years
- Allergic or intolerant to PPI medications
- Large hiatal hernia > 3 cm and Hill grade IV
- Barrett's esophagus
- Esophageal stricture with any prior intervention
- Major motility disorder on HRM
- Eosinophilic esophagitis 8. Gastroparesis documented by abnormal gastric emptying time 9. Previous fundoplication, myotomy or LINX surgery 10. Cirrhosis with esophageal and/or gastric varices
Study groups:
Patients recruited will be randomized to undergo antireflux mucosal ablation (ARAT) OR sham intervention after inclusion and exclusion criteria have been met.
Study procedure:
Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the arms by computer generated random sequence of numbers.
The following study visits are foreseen for each patient:
Screening Visit(s) A screening visit is performed at the investigational site. During this visit out-patients will be informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to signing the informed consent form for inclusion in the study. Their medical history will be recorded as well as eventual clinical or laboratory examinations according to the local standard of care preparation for an upper endoscopy.
Randomization (Intervention) visit: Each eligible patient returns to the clinic to undergo either the study intervention OR sham intervention.
24-48 hour and 7-10 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.
25-30 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.
3-4 Month (80-112 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
6-7 month (165-196 days post randomization) visit phone call to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
11-12 month (336-365 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
- To determine if ARAT can improve GERD-HRQL score 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
- To determine if ARAT can decrease GERD scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary aims:
- To determine if ARAT can reduce esophageal acid exposure time <4% (using wireless ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring) in 50% subjects compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
- To determine if ARAT can achieve 50% reduction in DeMeester score compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
- To determine if ARAT can achieve PPI dose reduction or discontinuation in 25% of subjects after 3 months compared to sham intervention
- To evaluate the safety profile of ARAT the rapy by recording major (GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization, esophageal stricture) and minor complications (chest pain, fever, dysphagia) 7.5. Follow up Following the baseline assessment and performance of the upper endoscopy (either true intervention or sham), patients in both groups will be asked to complete the GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires at 3 month ,6 month and 12 months using appropriate case report forms. In addition, the study staff will contact the patients by phone call at day 24- 48 hours, by phone call at 7-10 days and 25-30 days post procedure to record any adverse events. This will be accomplished using designated case report forms. At months 3 and 12, all patients will also undergo an upper endoscopy with assessment for erosive esophagitis, and placement of pH capsule. During the 3 month, 6 month and 12 months visit, use of PPI therapy (dose and frequency) will be recorded. Response to therapy will be assessed using the following parameters: improvement of GERD-HRQL scores, reduction in RDQ scores, AET <4% and DeMeester score <14 (off PPI). Any patients with dysphagia after the ARAT will undergo repeat endoscopy for evaluation. If significant stricture, endoscopic dilation will be performed per severity of symptoms and stenosis.
Duration of this study from subject randomization to completion is 1 year, however, we anticipate study duration of at least 24 months for subject screening, completion of study visits and data analysis.
- Conditions
- GERD
- Being tested
- Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy, Endoscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anti reflux endoscopic theraphyDevice
- the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20
The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated.
EndoscopyOther
Patients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy using Argon plasma coagulation in GERD | Active comparator | To the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20
The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated. Receives: Device: Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy |
| Endoscopy | Placebo comparator | Patients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks. Receives: Other: Endoscopy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
AREA
To determine if procedure can decrease Gastroesophageal reflux scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
Anti reflux ablation theraphy
To determine if ARAT can achieve 50% reduction in DeMeester score compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
Measured: 365 days
AREA
To determine if ARAT can achieve PPI dose reduction or discontinuation in 25% of subjects after 3 months compared to sham intervention
Measured: 1 year
Anti reflux ablation theraphy
To determine if intervention can reduce esophageal acid exposure time <4% (using wireless ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring) in 50% subjects compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
Measured: 1 year
Reflux disease
To evaluate the safety profile of ARAT therapy by recording major (GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization, esophageal stricture) and minor complications (chest pain, fever, dysphagia)
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2024
- Study start10 Feb 2024
- Primary completion1 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for GERDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mohan Ramchandani, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
- Investigators
- Mohan Dr Ramchandani, MBBS MD, Principal investigator, Asian institute of Gastroenterology/AIG HospitalsKriti Dr Krishna, MBBS MD, Principal investigator, AIG Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06641375
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AREA21
- Acronym
- AREA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Anti-Reflux Endoscopic Therapy Using Argon Plasma Coagulation (AREA) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06641375
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AREA / AREA21
- Conditions
- GERD
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and Rationale:
Gastroesophageal reflux disease is affecting 1 in 3 US adults with half experiencing daily symptoms. Per recent data, more than 50% continue to experience daily symptoms despite taking medical therapy and not eligible for surgery. In that small fraction of patients who are eligible for surgery, more than 70% resume taking a medicine for their reflux disease. GERD is common among the US veterans and currently there is a lack of minimally invasive endoscopic therapies for management of GERD. This study will investigate performance of minimally invasive, endoscopic therapy using antireflux mucosal ablation (hybrid argon plasma coagulation) that has been used in other areas of GI tract with efficacy and safety for management of chronic GERD among the US veterans.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of antireflux mucosal ablation or ARAT (intervention group) in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (typical symptoms of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for the last 6 months and objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study off PPI for 5-7 days) compared to sham procedure (control group).
Detailed description
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria: Inclusion:
- Patients with chronic GERD symptoms (at least 1 typical symptom of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for last 6 months and
- Objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study)
- Patients prescribed standard dose of PPI for symptoms of GERD
- Able to undergo upper endoscopy as evidenced by completion of pre-endoscopy standard of care checklist.
Exclusion:
- Patients unable to or unwilling to participate or consent
- Age <18 years or >80 years
- Allergic or intolerant to PPI medications
- Large hiatal hernia > 3 cm and Hill grade IV
- Barrett's esophagus
- Esophageal stricture with any prior intervention
- Major motility disorder on HRM
- Eosinophilic esophagitis 8. Gastroparesis documented by abnormal gastric emptying time 9. Previous fundoplication, myotomy or LINX surgery 10. Cirrhosis with esophageal and/or gastric varices
Study groups:
Patients recruited will be randomized to undergo antireflux mucosal ablation (ARAT) OR sham intervention after inclusion and exclusion criteria have been met.
Study procedure:
Patients will be randomized (1:1) to one of the arms by computer generated random sequence of numbers.
The following study visits are foreseen for each patient:
Screening Visit(s) A screening visit is performed at the investigational site. During this visit out-patients will be informed about the aims, procedures, benefits and possible risks of the study prior to signing the informed consent form for inclusion in the study. Their medical history will be recorded as well as eventual clinical or laboratory examinations according to the local standard of care preparation for an upper endoscopy.
Randomization (Intervention) visit: Each eligible patient returns to the clinic to undergo either the study intervention OR sham intervention.
24-48 hour and 7-10 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.
25-30 day post randomization phone call for adverse events among both groups.
3-4 Month (80-112 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
6-7 month (165-196 days post randomization) visit phone call to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
11-12 month (336-365 days post randomization) visit with upper endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring to include administration of the validated GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires
- To determine if ARAT can improve GERD-HRQL score 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
- To determine if ARAT can decrease GERD scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary aims:
- To determine if ARAT can reduce esophageal acid exposure time <4% (using wireless ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring) in 50% subjects compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
- To determine if ARAT can achieve 50% reduction in DeMeester score compared to sham intervention at 3 and 12 months
- To determine if ARAT can achieve PPI dose reduction or discontinuation in 25% of subjects after 3 months compared to sham intervention
- To evaluate the safety profile of ARAT the rapy by recording major (GI bleeding, perforation, hospitalization, esophageal stricture) and minor complications (chest pain, fever, dysphagia) 7.5. Follow up Following the baseline assessment and performance of the upper endoscopy (either true intervention or sham), patients in both groups will be asked to complete the GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaires at 3 month ,6 month and 12 months using appropriate case report forms. In addition, the study staff will contact the patients by phone call at day 24- 48 hours, by phone call at 7-10 days and 25-30 days post procedure to record any adverse events. This will be accomplished using designated case report forms. At months 3 and 12, all patients will also undergo an upper endoscopy with assessment for erosive esophagitis, and placement of pH capsule. During the 3 month, 6 month and 12 months visit, use of PPI therapy (dose and frequency) will be recorded. Response to therapy will be assessed using the following parameters: improvement of GERD-HRQL scores, reduction in RDQ scores, AET <4% and DeMeester score <14 (off PPI). Any patients with dysphagia after the ARAT will undergo repeat endoscopy for evaluation. If significant stricture, endoscopic dilation will be performed per severity of symptoms and stenosis.
Duration of this study from subject randomization to completion is 1 year, however, we anticipate study duration of at least 24 months for subject screening, completion of study visits and data analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy using Argon plasma coagulation in GERD | Active comparator | Device: Anti reflux endoscopic theraphyTo the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20 The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated. |
| Endoscopy | Placebo comparator | Other: EndoscopyPatients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with chronic GERD symptoms (at least 1 typical symptom of GERD, i.e. heartburn or acid reflux/regurgitation at least twice a week) for last 6 months and
- Objective evidence of reflux disease (positive ambulatory pH study)
- Patients prescribed standard dose of PPI for symptoms of GERD
- Able to undergo upper endoscopy as evidenced by completion of pre-endoscopy standard of care checklist.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients unable to or unwilling to participate or consent
- Age <18 years or >80 years
- Allergic or intolerant to PPI medications
- Large hiatal hernia > 3 cm and Hill grade IV
- Barrett's esophagus
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anti reflux endoscopic theraphyo the intervention arm, the area of cardia, along greater curvature will be cleaned first followed by demarcation of a 1-1.5 cm area of non-ablation zone with two vertical lines by use of Pulsed APC using the H-APC catheter for marking and to prevent excess ablation . After this, the area of cardia, on either side will be injected in sequence using a combination of methylene blue and normal saline using the H-APC catheter jet system using between Effect 30 and Effect 70 on the ErbeJet 2 to raise the mucosa and create a submucosal cushion . Once adequate submucosal cushion is created, the mucosa starting below the z-line and up to 3 cm below will be treated by Pulsed APC 50W-80W using the H-APC catheter till golden-brown discoloration of the ablated tissue20 The area of cardia below the Z-line will be treated in a 270-320-degree fashion. Once adequate ablation is achieved and no deeper tissue injury or bleeding is ensured, the procedure will be terminated. | Device | Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy using Argon plasma coagulation in GERD |
| EndoscopyPatients randomized to the control arm, will undergo a sham intervention. This will include performing upper endoscopy with procedural sedation followed by markings of landmarks as described. This will be followed by gastroscope retroflexion in the gastric cardia with at least 15 minute of examination time spent in retroflexion to reciprocate the H-APC intervention. No H-APC or submucosal injection or other intervention will be performed during the upper endoscopy with sham intervention. All Patients will also continue their PPI daily for 4 weeks. | Other | Endoscopy |
Primary outcome
AREA
Time frame: 1 year
To determine if procedure can decrease Gastroesophageal reflux scores (RDQ) 50% compared to sham intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months
4 secondary outcomes
Anti reflux ablation theraphy
Time frame: 365 days
AREA
Time frame: 1 year
Anti reflux ablation theraphy
Time frame: 1 year
Reflux disease
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for GERD
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Recruiting
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation - APOLLO-EU Trial
Mitral Regurgitation
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Marketing Surveillance to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Zastaprazan Citrate
Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rajesh Goud Dr Maragoni, Bpharm, Mpharm, MBA, PGDM contact
Mohan Dr Ramchandani, MBBS MD principal investigator
Asian institute of Gastroenterology/AIG Hospitals
Kriti Dr Krishna, MBBS MD principal investigator
AIG Hospitals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Anti reflux endoscopic theraphy and Endoscopy in people with GERD, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Rakesh Dr Kalapala, MBBS MD DNB (04023378888 ext. 112, drrakesh.kalapala@aighospitals.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
AREA (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2025.