University StudentNCT06645483
ChatGPT Contribute to the Development of Psychological Preparedness and Disaster Risk Perception
A study testing ChatGPT-assisted instruction and Traditional lecture-based instruction in people with University Student, run by Lütfiye Parlak at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The study aims to contribute to the design of new approaches in enhancing disaster risk perception and the improvement of intervention strategies in this field by identifying the different levels of psychological preparedness among individuals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- University Student
- What is being tested?
- ChatGPT-assisted instruction and Traditional lecture-based instruction
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2024to 16 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Be over 18 years old
- Take an emergency disaster management course
- Volunteer to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Refusing to participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Kütahya Health Science University, Simav Health Services Vocational School
Kütahya, Simav, 43500
About this study
Official title: How Does ChatGPT Contribute to Improving University Students' Psychological Preparedness for Natural Disasters and Perceived Disaster Risk?: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The study aims to contribute to the design of new approaches in enhancing disaster risk perception and the improvement of intervention strategies in this field by identifying the different levels of psychological preparedness among individuals.
Type, Location, and Time of the Study
Read more
This study is a randomized controlled trial that will be conducted prospectively in a cross-sectional design. It will take place at Kütahya Health Sciences University, Simav Vocational School of Health Services, during the Fall semester of the 2024-2025 academic year, involving students enrolled in the "Emergency and Disaster Management" courses.
Population and Sample The population of this study will consist of second-year students enrolled in the Fall semester of the 2024-2025 academic year at Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Simav Vocational School of Health Services (https://oidb.ksbu.edu.tr/index/sayfa/10106/ocak-2024). The "Emergency and Disaster Management" course is offered as an elective for all second-year students across the departments of Simav Vocational School of Health Services. The course is taught in two separate sections (Sections A and B) by Lecturer Dr. Nahsan KAYA.
The sample size of the study, based on the power analysis conducted using the G*Power software, will consist of 72 students, with 36 students in each group, assuming 80% power, a 0.05 margin of error, and a 1:1 randomization ratio.
Branch A and Branch B will be randomly assigned as the experimental and control groups via a draw conducted through the randomizer.org website. At the beginning of the study, a pre-test will be administered to both groups. The lessons for the experimental group will be conducted using ChatGPT during the first two weeks, while the control group will receive instruction through the traditional teaching method (presentation-based instruction). At the end of the two weeks, a post-test will be administered to both groups. To ensure that the students receive the same course under the same conditions and opportunities, the teaching methods will be crossed between the groups during the following two weeks, with the experimental group receiving traditional education and the control group being taught with ChatGPT. At the end of the total four-week implementation, a follow-up test will be administered to both groups.
Read the detailed description
H1. The psychological preparedness levels of university students in the experimental group for natural disasters will be higher in the assessment conducted in the second week compared to the baseline assessment.
H1. The psychological preparedness levels of university students in the experimental group for natural disasters will be higher in the second-week assessment compared to the students in the control group.
H1. The psychological preparedness levels of university students in the control group for natural disasters will be higher in the assessment conducted in the fourth week compared to the baseline and second-week assessments.
H1. The disaster risk perceptions of university students in the experimental group will be higher in the assessment conducted in the second week compared to the baseline assessment.
H1. The disaster risk perceptions of university students in the experimental group will be higher in the second-week assessment compared to the students in the control group.
H1. The disaster risk perceptions of university students in the control group will be higher in the assessment conducted in the fourth week compared to the baseline and second-week assessments.
Data Collection Tools
Socio-demographic Characteristics and Introduction Information Form: It consists of a total of 12 questions prepared by the researchers in line with the purposes of the study. Questions 10, 11 and 12 will be answered by students using ChatCPT under the guidance of an instructor in the "Emergency and Disaster Management" course.
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale: The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale developed by Zulch (2019) regarding psychological preparedness for disasters in Northern Australian communities was conducted by Türkdoğan-Görgün, Koçak-Şen and McLennan (2023). The scale consists of a total of 21 items under 3 sub-dimensions: "External Situational Environment Knowledge and Management", "Management of the Person's Emotional and Psychological Response" and "Management of the Person's Social Environment". Each item in the scale is evaluated with a 4-point Likert-type rating as 1- Strongly Disagree, 4- Strongly Agree. A minimum of 21 and a maximum of 84 points can be obtained from the scale. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the sub-dimensions and the overall scale are 0.91, 0.93, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (Türkdoğan-Görgün, Koçak-Şen \& McLennan, 2023).
University Students Disaster Risk Perception Scale: Developed by Mızrak and Aslan (2020) to assess the disaster risk perception of university students. The scale consists of 19 items in total under 4 sub-dimensions named "Exposure", "Anxiety", "Impact" and "Unmanageability". Each item in the scale is evaluated with a 5-point Likert-type rating as 1- Strongly Disagree and 5- Strongly Agree. A minimum of 19 and a maximum of 95 points can be obtained from the scale. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficients for the sub-dimensions of the scale are 0.89, 0.89, 0.88 and 0.78, respectively. (Mızrak \& Aslan, 2020).
Mızrak, S., \& Aslan, R. (2020). Disaster risk perception of university students. Risk, Hazards \& Crisis in Public Policy, 11(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12202
Türkdoğan-Görgün, C., Koçak-Şen, İ., \& McLennan, J. (2023). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06006-w
- Conditions
- University Student
- Being tested
- ChatGPT-assisted instruction, Traditional lecture-based instruction
- Keywords
- disaster, risk perception, university students, chatgpt
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ChatGPT-assisted instructionOther
ChatGPT will interactively support students by answering questions, initiating discussions, and providing customized learning materials in line with the course objectives. It will be supervised by the instructor to ensure guidance and prevent misinformation.
Duration: ChatGPT-assisted learning for the first two weeks, followed by traditional teaching for the next two weeks.
Traditional lecture-based instructionOther
Students will learn through a traditional teaching format, where the instructor delivers the course content through lectures and presentations.
Duration: Traditional teaching for the first two weeks, followed by ChatGPT-assisted learning for the next two weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Group | Experimental | In this group, students will receive ChatGPT-assisted education for the first two weeks of the "Emergency and Disaster Management" course. ChatGPT will be integrated into the course to answer student questions, explain topics, and provide customized content aligned with the learning objectives. For the following two weeks, students will be taught using traditional instructional methods (lecture-based teaching). Receives: Other: ChatGPT-assisted instruction |
| Traditional Teaching Group | Active comparator | In this group, students will receive traditional lecture-based instruction for the first two weeks of the course. For the following two weeks, they will switch to ChatGPT-assisted education. Receives: Other: Traditional lecture-based instruction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS) - Total Score
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS): This scale assesses psychological preparedness for disaster threats in three subdimensions: "External Situational Awareness and Management," "Management of Emotional and Psychological Response," and "Management of Social Environment." Scores range from 21 to 84, with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological preparedness. Data will be summarized using the total scale score as well as subdimension scores. Total score from the PPDTS, ranging from 21 to 84. This scale measures psychological preparedness across three subdimensions. The total score will be used as the primary outcome measure for preparedness.
Measured: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Perceived Disaster Risk Scale for University Students (PDRSUS) - Total Score
Perceived Disaster Risk Scale for University Students (PDRSUS): This scale evaluates perceived disaster risk among university students across four subdimensions: "Exposure," "Anxiety," "Impact," and "Unmanageability." Scores range from 19 to 95, with higher scores indicating greater perceived risk. Data will be summarized using the total scale score and subdimension scores. Total score from the PDRSUS, ranging from 19 to 95. This scale measures perceived disaster risk across four subdimensions. The total score will be used as the primary outcome measure for risk perception
Measured: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Subdimension Scores on the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS)
Subdimension scores for "External Situational Awareness and Management," "Management of Emotional and Psychological Response," and "Management of Social Environment." Scores for each subdimension range from 3 to 12 or 9 to 36. These scores will be analyzed separately as secondary outcome measures.
Measured: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Subdimension Scores on the Perceived Disaster Risk Scale for University Students (PDRSUS)
Subdimension scores for "Exposure," "Anxiety," "Impact," and "Unmanageability." Scores for each subdimension range from 5 to 25 or 6 to 30. These scores will be analyzed separately as secondary outcome measures.
Measured: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Oct 2024
- Study start18 Nov 2024
- Primary completion25 Nov 2024
- Study completion16 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for University StudentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Branch A and Branch B will be randomly assigned as the experimental and control groups via a draw conducted through the randomizer.org website. At the beginning of the study, a pre-test will be administered to both groups. The lessons for the experimental group will be conducted using ChatGPT during the first two weeks, while the control group will receive instruction through the traditional teaching method (presentation-based instruction). At the end of the two weeks, a post-test will be administered to both groups. To ensure that the students receive the same course under the same conditions and opportunities, the teaching methods will be crossed between the groups during the following two weeks, with the experimental group receiving traditional education and the control group being taught with ChatGPT. At the end of the total four-week implementation, a follow-up test will be administered to both groups.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lütfiye Parlak
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Lütfiye Parlak, Kutahya Health Sciences University
- Investigators
- PINAR DURU, Assoc. Prof., Study director, pduru@ogu.edu.tr
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06645483
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KutahyaHSU-PARLAK-043
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How Does ChatGPT Contribute to Improving University Students' Psychological Preparedness for Natural Disasters and Perceived Disaster Risk?: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06645483
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KutahyaHSU-PARLAK-043
- Conditions
- University Student
- Keywords
- disaster, risk perception, university students, chatgpt
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lütfiye ParlakUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to contribute to the design of new approaches in enhancing disaster risk perception and the improvement of intervention strategies in this field by identifying the different levels of psychological preparedness among individuals.
Type, Location, and Time of the Study
This study is a randomized controlled trial that will be conducted prospectively in a cross-sectional design. It will take place at Kütahya Health Sciences University, Simav Vocational School of Health Services, during the Fall semester of the 2024-2025 academic year, involving students enrolled in the "Emergency and Disaster Management" courses.
Population and Sample The population of this study will consist of second-year students enrolled in the Fall semester of the 2024-2025 academic year at Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Simav Vocational School of Health Services (https://oidb.ksbu.edu.tr/index/sayfa/10106/ocak-2024). The "Emergency and Disaster Management" course is offered as an elective for all second-year students across the departments of Simav Vocational School of Health Services. The course is taught in two separate sections (Sections A and B) by Lecturer Dr. Nahsan KAYA.
The sample size of the study, based on the power analysis conducted using the G*Power software, will consist of 72 students, with 36 students in each group, assuming 80% power, a 0.05 margin of error, and a 1:1 randomization ratio.
Branch A and Branch B will be randomly assigned as the experimental and control groups via a draw conducted through the randomizer.org website. At the beginning of the study, a pre-test will be administered to both groups. The lessons for the experimental group will be conducted using ChatGPT during the first two weeks, while the control group will receive instruction through the traditional teaching method (presentation-based instruction). At the end of the two weeks, a post-test will be administered to both groups. To ensure that the students receive the same course under the same conditions and opportunities, the teaching methods will be crossed between the groups during the following two weeks, with the experimental group receiving traditional education and the control group being taught with ChatGPT. At the end of the total four-week implementation, a follow-up test will be administered to both groups.
Detailed description
H1. The psychological preparedness levels of university students in the experimental group for natural disasters will be higher in the assessment conducted in the second week compared to the baseline assessment.
H1. The psychological preparedness levels of university students in the experimental group for natural disasters will be higher in the second-week assessment compared to the students in the control group.
H1. The psychological preparedness levels of university students in the control group for natural disasters will be higher in the assessment conducted in the fourth week compared to the baseline and second-week assessments.
H1. The disaster risk perceptions of university students in the experimental group will be higher in the assessment conducted in the second week compared to the baseline assessment.
H1. The disaster risk perceptions of university students in the experimental group will be higher in the second-week assessment compared to the students in the control group.
H1. The disaster risk perceptions of university students in the control group will be higher in the assessment conducted in the fourth week compared to the baseline and second-week assessments.
Data Collection Tools
Socio-demographic Characteristics and Introduction Information Form: It consists of a total of 12 questions prepared by the researchers in line with the purposes of the study. Questions 10, 11 and 12 will be answered by students using ChatCPT under the guidance of an instructor in the "Emergency and Disaster Management" course.
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale: The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale developed by Zulch (2019) regarding psychological preparedness for disasters in Northern Australian communities was conducted by Türkdoğan-Görgün, Koçak-Şen and McLennan (2023). The scale consists of a total of 21 items under 3 sub-dimensions: "External Situational Environment Knowledge and Management", "Management of the Person's Emotional and Psychological Response" and "Management of the Person's Social Environment". Each item in the scale is evaluated with a 4-point Likert-type rating as 1- Strongly Disagree, 4- Strongly Agree. A minimum of 21 and a maximum of 84 points can be obtained from the scale. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the sub-dimensions and the overall scale are 0.91, 0.93, 0.83 and 0.95, respectively (Türkdoğan-Görgün, Koçak-Şen \& McLennan, 2023).
University Students Disaster Risk Perception Scale: Developed by Mızrak and Aslan (2020) to assess the disaster risk perception of university students. The scale consists of 19 items in total under 4 sub-dimensions named "Exposure", "Anxiety", "Impact" and "Unmanageability". Each item in the scale is evaluated with a 5-point Likert-type rating as 1- Strongly Disagree and 5- Strongly Agree. A minimum of 19 and a maximum of 95 points can be obtained from the scale. Cronbach Alpha reliability coefficients for the sub-dimensions of the scale are 0.89, 0.89, 0.88 and 0.78, respectively. (Mızrak \& Aslan, 2020).
Mızrak, S., \& Aslan, R. (2020). Disaster risk perception of university students. Risk, Hazards \& Crisis in Public Policy, 11(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12202
Türkdoğan-Görgün, C., Koçak-Şen, İ., \& McLennan, J. (2023). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threat Scale. Nat Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06006-w
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Branch A and Branch B will be randomly assigned as the experimental and control groups via a draw conducted through the randomizer.org website. At the beginning of the study, a pre-test will be administered to both groups. The lessons for the experimental group will be conducted using ChatGPT during the first two weeks, while the control group will receive instruction through the traditional teaching method (presentation-based instruction). At the end of the two weeks, a post-test will be administered to both groups. To ensure that the students receive the same course under the same conditions and opportunities, the teaching methods will be crossed between the groups during the following two weeks, with the experimental group receiving traditional education and the control group being taught with ChatGPT. At the end of the total four-week implementation, a follow-up test will be administered to both groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT Group | Experimental | Other: ChatGPT-assisted instructionIn this group, students will receive ChatGPT-assisted education for the first two weeks of the "Emergency and Disaster Management" course. ChatGPT will be integrated into the course to answer student questions, explain topics, and provide customized content aligned with the learning objectives. For the following two weeks, students will be taught using traditional instructional methods (lecture-based teaching). |
| Traditional Teaching Group | Active comparator | Other: Traditional lecture-based instructionIn this group, students will receive traditional lecture-based instruction for the first two weeks of the course. For the following two weeks, they will switch to ChatGPT-assisted education. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Be over 18 years old
- Take an emergency disaster management course
- Volunteer to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Refusing to participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT-assisted instructionChatGPT will interactively support students by answering questions, initiating discussions, and providing customized learning materials in line with the course objectives. It will be supervised by the instructor to ensure guidance and prevent misinformation. Duration: ChatGPT-assisted learning for the first two weeks, followed by traditional teaching for the next two weeks. | Other | ChatGPT Group |
| Traditional lecture-based instructionStudents will learn through a traditional teaching format, where the instructor delivers the course content through lectures and presentations. Duration: Traditional teaching for the first two weeks, followed by ChatGPT-assisted learning for the next two weeks. | Other | Traditional Teaching Group |
Primary outcome
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS) - Total Score
Time frame: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS): This scale assesses psychological preparedness for disaster threats in three subdimensions: "External Situational Awareness and Management," "Management of Emotional and Psychological Response," and "Management of Social Environment." Scores range from 21 to 84, with higher scores indicating higher levels of psychological preparedness. Data will be summarized using the total scale score as well as subdimension scores. Total score from the PPDTS, ranging from 21 to 84. This scale measures psychological preparedness across three subdimensions. The total score will be used as the primary outcome measure for preparedness.
Perceived Disaster Risk Scale for University Students (PDRSUS) - Total Score
Time frame: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Perceived Disaster Risk Scale for University Students (PDRSUS): This scale evaluates perceived disaster risk among university students across four subdimensions: "Exposure," "Anxiety," "Impact," and "Unmanageability." Scores range from 19 to 95, with higher scores indicating greater perceived risk. Data will be summarized using the total scale score and subdimension scores. Total score from the PDRSUS, ranging from 19 to 95. This scale measures perceived disaster risk across four subdimensions. The total score will be used as the primary outcome measure for risk perception
2 secondary outcomes
Subdimension Scores on the Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS)
Time frame: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Subdimension Scores on the Perceived Disaster Risk Scale for University Students (PDRSUS)
Time frame: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2025.
Related trials for University Student
Not yet recruiting
Web-Based Sustainable Food Literacy Program for University Students
Food Literacy, Healthy Eating
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Based Model for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Risk Using Lifestyle Factors Among Senior Nursing Students
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingObservational study
Bruxism, Anxiety, and Periodontal Status Among Dental Students
Bruxism, Anxiety
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Prediction Via Machine Learning: Electrical Thresholds and Interoception
University Students
RecruitingObservational study
The Association Between Smartphone Overuse and Mechanical Neck Pain Among Galala University Students
Mechanical Neck Pain, Forward Head Posture (FHP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
PINAR DURU, Assoc. Prof. study director
pduru@ogu.edu.tr
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ChatGPT-assisted instruction and Traditional lecture-based instruction in people with University Student, run by Lütfiye Parlak at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Psychological Preparedness for Disaster Threats Scale (PPDTS) - Total Score (time frame: Week 0 (at the beginning of the study), week 2, and week 4 (at the end of the study)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2025.