AzTrials
AzTrials

Intermittent ExotropiaNCT06650735

Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Versus Bilateral Primary Medial Rectus Resection in Intermittent Exotropia

A study testing BMR resection and BLR recession in people with Intermittent Exotropia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bilateral lateral rectus recession and bilateral primary medial rectus resection in basic type intermittent exotropia Participants will be randomized into two groups: bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) recession and bilateral medial rectus (BMR) resection… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 30 years
Conditions the study is for
Intermittent Exotropia
What is being tested?
BMR resection and BLR recession
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Jul 2023to Nov 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with basic type intermittent exotropia
  • Measurable angle 25-40 prism diopters

Who cannot join

  • Restrictive or paralytic deviation or if forced duction test is positive on horizontal muscles
  • Incomitant deviation, vertical or oblique muscles surgery and significant A or V pattern
  • Previous strabismus, orbital or buckle surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Cairo University

    Cairo, 11562

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession and Bilateral Primary Medial Rectus Resection in Basic Type Intermittent Exotropia

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of bilateral lateral rectus recession and bilateral primary medial rectus resection in basic type intermittent exotropia

Participants will be randomized into two groups: bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) recession and bilateral medial rectus (BMR) resection groups then followed up in the clinic for 6 months to compare motor alignment and sensory functions

Read the detailed description

Study location: Cairo university hospitals

Methodology:

Patients with basic type intermittent exotropia who are indicated to undergo surgical intervention will be grouped into two groups one group will undergo bilateral lateral rectus recession and the other will undergo bilateral medial rectus resection.

  • Preoperatively, all patients will be subjected to:
  1. A detailed history taking including presence of asthenopia, monocular closure, disfigurement or diplopia. The previous use of glasses for optical correction, use of minus lenses, or prior part time occlusion will be documented.
  2. A detailed ophthalmological examination; including uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity whenever possible, cycloplegic refraction, anterior segment examination and dilated fundus examination.
  3. Motor Evaluation:
  • Ductions and versions will be done to assess the ocular motility in 9 positions of gaze.
  • The angle of deviation will be measured by the alternate prism cover test for both distance (6 meters) and near (33 cm) , with and without glasses.
  • The angles of misalignment will also be measured in side gazes and in straight up and down gaze whenever possible.
  • In patients with near-far disparity, the angle of deviation will be measured again after patching one eye for 30 minutes, as well as after putting +3 D lenses in front of each eye. Patients with near-far disparity >10 prism diopters (PD) will not be included
  1. Sensory Evaluation: Worth 4 dot test and stereopsis using Random dot test (when possible) The control of exotropia will be assessed using both the newcastle control score Patients will be randomly assigned to either surgery using simple randomization by random number generator
  • Intervention:
  • One group will undergo bilateral lateral rectus recession and the other will undergo bilateral medial rectus resection according to the standard tables.
  • All cases will be done under general anaesthesia.
  • Both surgeries take about 30 minutes.
  • Postoperative treatment combined tobramycin 0.3% and dexamethasone 0.1% eye drops 3 times daily and the same combination eye ointment at night for 3 weeks.
  • Postoperative follow up will be 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months (minimum follow up)
  • Postoperative assessment:
  • Extraocular movement in lateral gazes will be examined for comitance
  • Alignment in the primary position will be assessed and any deviation will be measured using alternate prism cover test
  • Palpebral fissure height will be measured
  • Worth 4 dot test and stereopsis will be assessed (when possible)
  • In cases of failure either over correction or under correction reoperation will be performed after 3 months of the initial surgery.
  • Sample size

We are planning a study of the difference in the postoperative angle between the 2 surgical techniques. Assuming a mean difference of 5 PD with a standard deviation of 5 PD, an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of study of 0.8, a total of 17 subjects were found to be needed in each group. Assuming a drop-out rate of 20%, a sample of 20 subjects will be targeted in each group.

Being tested
BMR resection, BLR recession
Keywords
IXT, lateral rectus recession, medial rectus resection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BMR resectionProcedure or surgery

    Lid speculum will be applied. Fornix conjunctival incision will be used to expose medial rectus muscle. Area that will be resected will be marked using calipers. Double-armed polyglactin 910 suture (6/0 Vicryl) will be used in securing the muscle.

    The muscle then excised anterior to the sutures and the stump cut flush to the sclera.

    The muscle will be sutured again to the original insertion by scleral sutures which will be tied together.

    Conjunctiva will be closed using polyglactin 910 suture (6/0 Vicryl).

  • BLR recessionProcedure or surgery

    Lid speculum will be applied. Fornix conjunctival incision will be used to expose lateral rectus muscle. Double-armed polyglactin 910 suture (6/0 Vicryl) will be used in securing the muscle close to the insertion.

    The muscle will then be cut anterior to the sutures flush with the sclera. Calipers will used to mark the new insertion on sclera measured from the stump. The muscle will be sutured again to the new insertion by scleral sutures, which will be tied together.

    Conjunctiva will be closed using polyglactin 910 suture (6/0 Vicryl).

Study groups in NCT06650735
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BMR resectionActive comparatorBilateral medial rectus muscle resection
Receives: Procedure: BMR resection
BLR recessionActive comparatorBilateral lateral rectus muscle recession
Receives: Procedure: BLR recession

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Motor alignment in primary position

    Success rate defined as orthophoria between exotropia/phoria ≤ to 8 prism diopters \& esotropia/phoria ≤ 4 prism diopters

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Palpebral fissure height

    Change in palpebral fissure height in mm

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Lateral gaze comitance/incomitance

    Difference between angles of deviation in right gaze, primary position, and left gaze

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Stereopsis

    Change in stereoacuity in log seconds of arc

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2024
  2. Study start1 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completionNov 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06650735
Sponsor's protocol ID
MD-328-2023
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
18 Oct 2024
Last updated
21 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Choi MY, Hwang JM. The long-term result of slanted medial rectus resection in exotropia of the convergence insufficiency type. Eye (Lond). 2006 Nov;20(11):1279-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702095. Epub 2005 Sep 9.

    PubMed 16151478
  • Wang X, Zhang W, Chen B, Liao M, Liu L. Comparison of bilateral medial rectus plication and resection for the treatment of convergence insufficiency-type intermittent exotropia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019 May;97(3):e448-e453. doi: 10.1111/aos.14056. Epub 2019 Feb 11.

    PubMed 30740923
  • Kushner BJ. Selective surgery for intermittent exotropia based on distance/near differences. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Mar;116(3):324-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.3.324.

    PubMed 9514485
  • Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Writing Committee; Donahue SP, Chandler DL, Holmes JM, Arthur BW, Paysse EA, Wallace DK, Petersen DB, Melia BM, Kraker RT, Miller AM. A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):305-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.034. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

    PubMed 30189281

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing BMR resection and BLR recession in people with Intermittent Exotropia, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Motor alignment in primary position (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06650735, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in