AzTrials
AzTrials

Care DeliveryNCT06652347

Understanding the Preferences and Views of Older Adults on the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning.

A study testing Cancer care delivery in people with Care Delivery and Geriatrics, run by Fox Chase Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Care Delivery, Geriatrics, Geriatric Assessment
What is being tested?
Cancer care delivery
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Feb 2025to May 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 65
  • At the time of study screening either:
  • Started a new qualifying index regimen within the last 30 days (inclusive)
  • Are being considered for a new qualifying index regimen

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded if they
  • Do not have the capacity to consent to study procedures
  • Are unable to complete English language questionnaires
  • Are already using an activity tracker on a daily basis (and therefore may be aware of their current level of activity)
  • Are enrolled in another study in which physical activity is a substantial part or all of the therapeutic intervention or where physical activity is specifically being evaluated and shared with patients. Patients on studies not evaluating or sharing physical activity are eligible for the present study if they meet the other inclusion/exclusion criteria and participation in the present study is not excluded by other studies in which they are enrolled.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Zachary Frosch, MD MSHP contact

215-728-2674

Zachary.Frosch@fccc.edu

Leslie J Fortin, MPH contact

215-214-3996

Leslie.Fortin@fccc.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19111

    Leslie J Fortin, MPH, 215-214-3996, Leslie.Fortin@fccc.edu

    Gerald T Nkogbu, MBBS, MSc, 215-214-5378, gerald.nkogbu@fccc.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Facilitating the Engagement and Satisfaction of Older Adults in Their Cancer Care Planning: A Randomized Study to Understand the Preferences and Views of Older Adults Regarding the Use of Geriatric and Objective Functional Assessments for Cancer Treatment Planning

This Interventional clinical study aims to explore how receiving information about their health and physical abilities affects the treatment decisions of older adults. The study will look at whether sharing detailed assessments of their health and functional status helps older adults better understand their condition and make informed decisions about their care.

The main question it aims to answer is if providing this information changes the treatment priorities of older adults, helping them focus on what matters most to them in their medical care.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, interventional, cancer care delivery trial will test whether receipt of Geriatric Assessment (GA) and Objective Functional Status (OFS) assessment data affects older adults' treatment priorities. It will also assess the preferences of older adults for the collection, sharing, and use of their assessment data. Finally, it will explore whether less fit patients experience a lower level of satisfaction and a greater degree of regret with their decision to undergo anti-cancer therapy. This study will utilize a randomized design where participants will be randomized to either the intervention arm (early sharing of GA and OFS results) or to the control arm (delayed sharing of GA and OFS results). To assess patients' preferences for quality vs quantity of life, the investigators will use the Quality Quantity (QQ) questionnaire. All patients will complete this at baseline and then undergo their GA and OFS assessments. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be provided the results of their GA and OFS assessments, and then complete the QQ Questionnaire for a second time to assess for any changes following receipt of their assessment results. Patients randomized to the control group will undergo the assessments and complete the same questionnaire as the intervention group but will not receive the results of their GA and OFS assessments prior to completing the second QQ Questionnaire. For the control group, assessment results will be shared with patients after completion of the follow-up QQ Questionnaire. After reviewing their assessment results, patients in both groups will then complete a questionnaire that inquire about their preferences for receipt, use, and sharing of their assessment data. It will also inquire about the degree to which receipt of these data affected how they experienced their cancer care.

The Investigators will determine whether sharing of geriatric and OFS assessment results affected patients' treatment priorities by measuring the absolute change from baseline in the QQ questionnaire scores for quantity and quality of life, comparing the change in the intervention versus the control group. The Investigators will also describe patients' preferences for the collection, use and sharing of their assessment data as reported in the preferences questionnaire, both overall and by race/ethnicity. To explore differences in patients' satisfaction with their decision to pursue anti-cancer therapy by functional status level, participants will complete the "Was it Worth It" (WIWI) questionnaire at the first of either 1) the conclusion of their treatment regimen or 2) three months after enrollment. The provider assessment will ask whether patients experienced any of the following: a toxicity of treatment ≥grade 3, treatment dose reduction, treatment interruption, treatment discontinuation, hospitalization, or a decline in performance status.

Being tested
Cancer care delivery
Keywords
fitness tracking, Care delivery Intervention, Functional Status in Older Adults, Cancer Treatment Preferences, Quality vs Quantity of Life, Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology, Randomized Controlled Trial, Quality of Life in Cancer care, Functional Health Assessments, Patient-Centered Cancer Treatment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cancer care deliveryOther

    Also called geriatric and OFS assessment, Quality Quantity (QQ) questionnaire, Non-therapeutic

    Early vs. delayed sharing of GA and OFS diagnostic results and how that sharing affects patient preferences, decision- making, and satisfaction in the context of participants' cancer care.

Study groups in NCT06652347
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early Sharing ArmExperimentalearly sharing of GA and OFS results to participants
Receives: Other: Cancer care delivery
Delayed Sharing ArmNo interventiondelayed sharing of GA and OFS results to participants

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute change in QQ-Length of life from baseline to post-intervention

    The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-L subscale. The scores for this subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-L. The total score from the 4 QQ-L items measures the strength of a participant's preference for length of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for length of life.

    Measured: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. The secondary outcome will be the absolute change in the QQ quality of life subscale (QQ-Q) from baseline to post-intervention.

    The QQ uses a 5-point Likert scale to rate each of the 4 questions on the QQ-Q subscale. The scores for the subscale are then summed, meaning that patients will receive a score ranging from 4-20 for the QQ-Q. The total score from the 4 QQ-Q items measures the strength of a participant's preference for quality of life, with higher scores meaning greater preference for quality of life.

    Measured: From baseline questionnaire at enrollment to post intervention questionnaire at an average of 4 weeks after enrollment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2024
  2. Study start21 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completionMar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06652347
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-1020
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
15 Oct 2024
Last updated
21 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual Participant Data will not be shared due to privacy concerns.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in