AzTrials
AzTrials

Invasive Fungal DiseaseNCT06654076

Assessing Diagnostic Methods for Invasive Fungal Disease in Lung Transplant Recipients

An observational study of Invasive Fungal Disease and Lung Transplant Recipients, run by Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of different tests, including metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), real-time PCR, galactomannan assay, and lateral-flow device tests, in detecting invasive fungal disease in lung transplant recipients using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
109 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2015to 1 Aug 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who underwent lung transplantation and were suspected of having invasive fungal infections (IPA or PJP) based on clinical symptoms, radiological findings, or microbiological results. The study includes adults aged 18 and above who were treated at a tertiary hospital from January 2015 to April 2023.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult lung transplant recipients aged 18 years and older.
  • Suspected cases of invasive fungal infection (invasive pulmonary aspergillosis or -Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia) based on clinical symptoms, radiological findings, or microbiological evidence.
  • Able to provide sufficient bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples for diagnostic testing.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with confirmed non-fungal infections.
  • Patients unable to provide adequate BALF samples for analysis.
  • Patients with severe comorbidities that prevent study participation or completion.

About this study

Official title: Evaluating Ultra-Sensitive mNGS, Real-Time PCR, Galactomannan, and Lateral-Flow Device for Diagnosing Invasive Fungal Disease in Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of different tests, including metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), real-time PCR, galactomannan assay, and lateral-flow device tests, in detecting invasive fungal disease in lung transplant recipients using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. The study is retrospective and cross-sectional in design.

Read the detailed description

This retrospective, cross-sectional study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of various tests in detecting invasive fungal disease (IFD) in lung transplant recipients. The diagnostic methods under assessment include metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), galactomannan (GM) assay, and lateral-flow device (LFD) testing, all performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples. The study analyzes the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each method for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). The sample cohort consists of 109 lung transplant recipients, with data collected from January 2015 to April 2023

Keywords
mNGS, Real-time PCR, Galactomannan Assay, Lateral-flow Device, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Diagnostic Methods, Lung Transplantation, Fungal Infection
Medical subject headings
Invasive Fungal Infections, Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis, Pneumonia, Pneumocystis, Mycoses

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of mNGS for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

    Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) using bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples.

    Measured: From January 2015 to April 2023

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between mNGS and Other Methods

    Comparative analysis of diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity and specificity, between mNGS, real-time PCR, Galactomannan (GM) assay, and lateral-flow device (LFD) tests for detecting IPA and PJP in lung transplant recipients.

    Measured: From January 2015 to April 2023.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2024
  2. Study start1 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2023
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
109 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06654076
Sponsor's protocol ID
GS001
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
21 Oct 2024
Last updated
12 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Invasive Fungal Disease and Lung Transplant Recipients, run by Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic Accuracy of mNGS for Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis and Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia (time frame: From January 2015 to April 2023). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in