Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)Phase 4OM85OLDERNCT06655272
OM 85 to Prevent Respiratory Infections in Older At Risk Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Bacterial Lysate in people with Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI), run by Campus Bio-Medico University at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
People living in NH are at higher risk of respiratory infections compared to their counterpart living in the community. Products obtained from dead bacteria ("bacterial lysate") can be used to boost immune system and may reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 75 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
- What is being tested?
- Bacterial Lysate
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2025to Apr 2026
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 75 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 75 years or older
- At least 2 RTIs in the year prior to enrollment
- Patients must have been residing in nursing homes for at least 6 months and have an estimated length of stay in nursing homes of at least 6 months by their treating physician.
- Signed informed consent. If participants are unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment, consent will be provided by a legally recognized representative or trustee of the patient (pursuant to Article 4 of Law No. 219 of December 22, 2017).
- Have a life expectancy of at least one year in the judgment of their treating physician.
Who cannot join
- Patients with known allergy or previous intolerance to any component (including the excipient) of the study drug
- Patients with active neoplasia and prognosis of less than one year
- Patients with previous organ transplantation
- Patients treated with prohibited drugs (see Table 1) in the 3 months prior to the start of the study
- Patients who have taken bacterial lysates in the 6 months prior to enrollment or are currently using them
- Patients regularly treated with oral corticosteroids
- Patients unable to follow instructions and unreliable patients (including patients with alcoholism or patients unwilling to give informed consent or comply with protocol requirements)
- Patients with any other clinical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would not allow completion of the protocol and safe administration of the study drugs
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico
Roma, RM, 00128
About this study
People living in NH are at higher risk of respiratory infections compared to their counterpart living in the community. Products obtained from dead bacteria ("bacterial lysate") can be used to boost immune system and may reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Very little information is available on the effect of these substances in older people. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a bacterial lysate in reducing the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections in older people living in nursing homes. The study will include a treatment arm, in which participants will received the lysate, and a control arm in which participants will received a matching placebo (i.e., a pill that has the same appearance of the lysate but does not contain the lysate itself).
Read the detailed description
OM 85 (lyophilized bacterial lysate) proved effective in increasing the immune response against bacteria in animal models. Furthermore, its use was shown to be associated with lower incidence of RTIs in children and at risk adults. However, there is a paucity of information about OM 85 efficacy in the elderly, i.e., in a population which, due to immunosenescence and multimorbidity, might have a distinctive response to this immunostimulating strategy. Indeed, the only study properly designed for a geriatric population is a randomized controlled trial on 290 people over-65 with chronic bronchitis and frequent exacerbations; here, a significant decrease in the incidence of acute bronchitis was observed in the OM 85 group over 6 months (Orcel B et al. Eur Respir J, 1994, 7, 446-452). However, this population seems poorly representative of the average older population at risk of RTI. Indeed, chronic diseases like congestive heart failure and chronic renal failure qualified as exclusion criteria. Furthermore, a history of at least 4 episodes of acute bronchitis treated with antibiotics in the 6-month reference period of the previous year were requested for the enrollment. Thus, the study population is unlikely to reflect the profile of risk of the elderly and frail population, which is characterized by a high prevalence of chronic diseases, but not by such a high incidence of respiratory infections. Indeed, even in severe COPD the frequency of exacerbations rarely exceeds 2 yearly and is rapidly declining (Andreas et al. Respiratory Research (2019) 20:186). Geriatric patients are variably represented in other studies which proved the efficacy of OM 85 in adult populations with COPD or chronic bronchitis. Twelve studies met the quality criteria to be eligible for a recently published meta-analysis (Huang Y, Pei Y, Qian Y, Yao Z, Chen C, Du J, Shi M, and Zhou T, 2022. A meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front. Med. 9:877124. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.877124). However, elderly patients and especially those over 75, the most vulnerable to respiratory infections, were a minority of probands. Furthermore, the selection criteria pointed at COPD as the main disease in the vast majority of the studies. IMP has never been tested in an older population with a heavy burden of multimorbility and frailty and a high risk of RTI, I e in the population most likely to benefit from it. Accordingly, this trial is expected to clarify what previous studies could not because they were not designed to study this kind of population, and only sparse and partial information could be derived by picking selected patients from the study populations. Furthermore, all our patients will receive the recommended vaccines, and this will allow test IMP in a framework free from confounding by heterogeneity in vaccine policy.
Primary objective:
To evaluate whether and to which extent OM85 compared with placebo is able to reduce respiratory tract infections (RTIs) over a 12-month period in a population of subjects aged 75 years and older, residing in nursing homes, and with a history of at least two RTIs in the 12 months prior to enrollment.
Secondary objectives:
To verify whether the rate of hospital admissions and emergency department visits due to RTI decreases from the previous year differently in the OM 85 group compared with placebo.
Evaluate the number of antibiotic prescriptions between the two groups (OM 85 and placebo) during the 12-month study period.
Describe the demographic, clinical and functional characteristics of patients with higher RTI numbers.
Evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
- Conditions
- Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
- Being tested
- Bacterial Lysate, Placebo
- Keywords
- Older people, Nursing home, Bacterial lysate
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bacterial LysateDrug
Administration p.o. for 10 days per month for 3 months, two consecutive cycles.
PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Bacterial lysate p.o. administered for two three-months cycles. Receives: Drug: Bacterial Lysate |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of lower respiratory tract infections.
New cases of clinically-diagnosed lower respiratory tract infections
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Rate of hospitalizations and emergency room admissions
Rate of hospitalizations and emergency room admissions due to respiratory tract infections.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Feb 2025
- Primary completionJan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Campus Bio-Medico University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- OM Pharma SA
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Campus Bio-Medico University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06655272
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 23892
- Other IDs
- 2024-513592-41-00
- Acronym
- OM85OLDER
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- OM 85 to Prevent Respiratory Infections in Older At Risk Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06655272
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OM85OLDER / 23892
- Conditions
- Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
- Keywords
- Older people, Nursing home, Bacterial lysate
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Campus Bio-Medico UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- OM Pharma SA
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People living in NH are at higher risk of respiratory infections compared to their counterpart living in the community. Products obtained from dead bacteria ("bacterial lysate") can be used to boost immune system and may reduce the risk of respiratory infections. Very little information is available on the effect of these substances in older people. This study will evaluate the efficacy of a bacterial lysate in reducing the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections in older people living in nursing homes. The study will include a treatment arm, in which participants will received the lysate, and a control arm in which participants will received a matching placebo (i.e., a pill that has the same appearance of the lysate but does not contain the lysate itself).
Detailed description
OM 85 (lyophilized bacterial lysate) proved effective in increasing the immune response against bacteria in animal models. Furthermore, its use was shown to be associated with lower incidence of RTIs in children and at risk adults. However, there is a paucity of information about OM 85 efficacy in the elderly, i.e., in a population which, due to immunosenescence and multimorbidity, might have a distinctive response to this immunostimulating strategy. Indeed, the only study properly designed for a geriatric population is a randomized controlled trial on 290 people over-65 with chronic bronchitis and frequent exacerbations; here, a significant decrease in the incidence of acute bronchitis was observed in the OM 85 group over 6 months (Orcel B et al. Eur Respir J, 1994, 7, 446-452). However, this population seems poorly representative of the average older population at risk of RTI. Indeed, chronic diseases like congestive heart failure and chronic renal failure qualified as exclusion criteria. Furthermore, a history of at least 4 episodes of acute bronchitis treated with antibiotics in the 6-month reference period of the previous year were requested for the enrollment. Thus, the study population is unlikely to reflect the profile of risk of the elderly and frail population, which is characterized by a high prevalence of chronic diseases, but not by such a high incidence of respiratory infections. Indeed, even in severe COPD the frequency of exacerbations rarely exceeds 2 yearly and is rapidly declining (Andreas et al. Respiratory Research (2019) 20:186). Geriatric patients are variably represented in other studies which proved the efficacy of OM 85 in adult populations with COPD or chronic bronchitis. Twelve studies met the quality criteria to be eligible for a recently published meta-analysis (Huang Y, Pei Y, Qian Y, Yao Z, Chen C, Du J, Shi M, and Zhou T, 2022. A meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front. Med. 9:877124. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.877124). However, elderly patients and especially those over 75, the most vulnerable to respiratory infections, were a minority of probands. Furthermore, the selection criteria pointed at COPD as the main disease in the vast majority of the studies. IMP has never been tested in an older population with a heavy burden of multimorbility and frailty and a high risk of RTI, I e in the population most likely to benefit from it. Accordingly, this trial is expected to clarify what previous studies could not because they were not designed to study this kind of population, and only sparse and partial information could be derived by picking selected patients from the study populations. Furthermore, all our patients will receive the recommended vaccines, and this will allow test IMP in a framework free from confounding by heterogeneity in vaccine policy.
Primary objective:
To evaluate whether and to which extent OM85 compared with placebo is able to reduce respiratory tract infections (RTIs) over a 12-month period in a population of subjects aged 75 years and older, residing in nursing homes, and with a history of at least two RTIs in the 12 months prior to enrollment.
Secondary objectives:
To verify whether the rate of hospital admissions and emergency department visits due to RTI decreases from the previous year differently in the OM 85 group compared with placebo.
Evaluate the number of antibiotic prescriptions between the two groups (OM 85 and placebo) during the 12-month study period.
Describe the demographic, clinical and functional characteristics of patients with higher RTI numbers.
Evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Drug: Bacterial LysateBacterial lysate p.o. administered for two three-months cycles. |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboMatching placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 75 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 75 years or older
- At least 2 RTIs in the year prior to enrollment
- Patients must have been residing in nursing homes for at least 6 months and have an estimated length of stay in nursing homes of at least 6 months by their treating physician.
- Signed informed consent. If participants are unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment, consent will be provided by a legally recognized representative or trustee of the patient (pursuant to Article 4 of Law No. 219 of December 22, 2017).
- Have a life expectancy of at least one year in the judgment of their treating physician.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with known allergy or previous intolerance to any component (including the excipient) of the study drug
- Patients with active neoplasia and prognosis of less than one year
- Patients with previous organ transplantation
- Patients treated with prohibited drugs (see Table 1) in the 3 months prior to the start of the study
- Patients who have taken bacterial lysates in the 6 months prior to enrollment or are currently using them
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bacterial LysateAdministration p.o. for 10 days per month for 3 months, two consecutive cycles. | Drug | Intervention |
| PlaceboMatching placebo. | Drug | Control |
Primary outcome
Incidence of lower respiratory tract infections.
Time frame: 12 months
New cases of clinically-diagnosed lower respiratory tract infections
1 secondary outcome
Rate of hospitalizations and emergency room admissions
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
VIRal Pulmonary Infections in Older AGE
Viral Pulmonary Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Bacterial Lysate in people with Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI), run by Campus Bio-Medico University at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Silvia Travaglini, MD (+39 06 22541 ext. 1, silvia.travaglini@unicampus.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of lower respiratory tract infections. (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2025.