Vascular DiseaseTGR 23-02TANCT06658730
Long-term Characterization of GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft With ACTIVE CONTROL System Performance
An observational study of Vascular Disease and Dissection, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 37 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Vascular Disease, Dissection, Dissection Aortic Aneurysm
- What is being tested?
- Endovascular
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 1,500 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Jun 2025to Aug 2038
- How long will I take part?
- 10 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The target registry population is patients who are treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL at participating sites. This includes initial procedures and reinterventions (regardless of original intervention).
Who may be able to join
- Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) provides written authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements.
- Patient has been or is intended to be treated with an eligible registry device.*
- Patient is age ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent signature.
- The intent to treat a patient with a Gore product must be made prior to soliciting for possible registry participation. If pre-procedure consent is not feasible due to emergent situation, consent prior to the time of discharge for the index procedure is acceptable.
Who cannot join
- Patient who is, at the time of consent, unlikely to be available for standard of care (SOC) follow-up visits as defined by the site's guidelines and procedures.
- Patient with exclusion criteria required by local law.
- Patient is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent investigational drug and/or investigational device study* within 12 months of Together Registry enrollment. Subjects cannot be enrolled in another Together Registry module protocol.
- The term "study" does not apply to other observational registries or quality improvement projects. Collection of Registry Device performance from interventional studies may be permissible provided device application is not investigational and there are no novel requirements that alter follow-up conduct (i.e., protocol-mandated interventions).
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 10 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
37 sites in 10 countries
United States24 sites, 24 recruiting
- Recruiting
Augusta University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Yvonne Site Coordinator, yvdaniel@augusta.edu
William Jordan, M.D.
- Recruiting
University of Maryland - Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Langford Site Coordinator, lwgreen@som.umaryland.edu
Shahab Toursavadkohi, M.D.
- Not yet recruiting
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Fernando Site Coordinator, fmoreno@bidmc.harvard.edu
Marc Schermerhorn, M.D.
- Recruiting
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Amber Site Coordinator, amber_fix@med.unc.edu
Chris Site Coordinator, cdburges@email.unc.edu
- Recruiting
University Hospitals - Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Camille Site Coordinator, Camille.Opperman@uhhospitals.org
Jae-Sung Cho, M.D.
- Recruiting
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Sarah Site Coordinator, SarahAnn.Hooton@BSWHealth.org
Dennis Gable, M.D.
- Recruiting
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Hillary Site Coordinator, hillary.hood@duke.edu
Chad Hughes, M.D.
- Recruiting
University of Florida - Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Nancy Site Coordinator, nancy.hanson@surgery.ufl.edu
Zain Shahid, M.D.
- Recruiting
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Stephanie Site Coordinator, Stephanie.lynes@hmhn.org
Michael Wilderman, M.D.
- Recruiting
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Terri Strickland, TStrickland@IUHealth.org
Joel Corvera, MD
- Recruiting
The Hitchcock Foundation at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Paulene Site Coordinator, pauline.sirrell@hitchcock.org
Bjoern Suckow, M.D.
- Recruiting
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Stephanie Site Coordinator, stephanie.varela@med.usc.edu
Sukgu Han, M.D.
- Recruiting
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Ayda Site Coordinator, Ayda.Aliyari@cshs.org
Ali Azizzadeh, MD
- Recruiting
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Nicole Site Coordinator, byington@surgery.wisc.edu
Courtney Morgan, M.D.
- Recruiting
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84157
Lexi Site Coordinator, lexi.maycock@imail.org
Jane He, M.D.
- Recruiting
Sentara Medical Group, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23437
Kara Site Coordinator, kvwiggin@sentara.com
Animesh Rathore, M.D.
- Not yet recruiting
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Carolina Site Coordinator, carolina.reyes1@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
Grace Wang, M.D.
- Not yet recruiting
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Ashley Site Coordinator, ashley.borgella@jefferson.edu
Cecillia Chin, M.D.
- Recruiting
Columbia Medical Center of Plano
Plano, Texas, 75075
Pauline Site Coordinator, pauline.matheri@hcahealthcare.com
Edic Stephanian, M.D.
- Not yet recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Allison Site Coordinator, alari@uw.edu
Sara Zettervall, M.D.
- Recruiting
Leland Stanford Junior University
Stanford, California, 94305
Suneetha Site Coordinator, satluri2@stanford.edu
Kenneth Tran, M.D.
- Recruiting
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Avennette Site Coordinator, apinto3@usf.edu
Eric Site Coordinator, eej11@usf.edu
- Recruiting
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Karen Site Coordinator, kas10@arizona.edu
Wei Zhou, M.D.
- Not yet recruiting
MedStar Health, MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
Kassaye Site Coordinator, kassaye.t.sesaba@medstar.net
William Yoon, M.D.
Germany4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Marwan Hamiko, M.D., Marwan.Hamiko@ukbonn.de
Marwan Hamiko
- Recruiting
Universitatsmedizin Frankfurt
Frankfurt
Kyriakos Oikonomou, Prof., kyriakos.oikonomou@unimedizin-ffm.de
- Recruiting
Regensburg University Hospital
Regensburg, D-93053
Fiona Rohlffs, Prof., fiona.rohlffs@ukr.de
- Recruiting
Universitatsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, D-89081
Bernd Mühling, Prof., bernd.muehling@uniklinik-ulm.de
Bernd Mühling, Prof.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
AORN S.Anna e S. Sebastiano
Caserta
Andrea Montalto, +39 0823 232694., andrea.montalto@aorncaserta.it
Andrea Montalto, M.D.
- Recruiting
IRCCS Policlinico di Milano
Milan
Santi Trimarchi, Prof, santi.trimarchi@policlinico.mi.it
Santi Trimarchi, Prof.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, DK-2100
Timothy A Resch, Prof., +45 35457931, timothy.andrew.resch@regionh.dk
Mette Velloev Petersen, Mrs, +45 3545 6207, Mette.velloev.petersen@regionh.dk
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67000
Salomé Kuntz, M.D., salome.kuntz@chru-strasbourg.fr
Manon Ruhlmann, manon.ruhlmann@gepromed.com
Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Laiko General Hospital of Athens
Athens, 11527
Chris Klonaris, M.D., cklonaris@yahoo.com
Antonia Skotsimara, antwnia.skot@gmail.com
Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
Riyāḑ
Omer Abdulgadir Abdulrahim, M.D., +966553321922, oabdulrahim@kfshrc.edu.sa
Omer Abdulgadir Abdulrahim, M.D.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
Barcelona, 08907
Elena Iborra Ortega, Dr., 0034932706500, eiborra@bellvitgehospital.cat
Elena Iborra Ortega, Dr.
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Uppsala University
Uppsala, SE-751 85
Kevin Mani, MD, kevin.mani@uu.se
Clara Clara Rydmyr, +46 0186112394, forskning.karlkirurgi@akademiska.se
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Bristol
Marcus Brooks, Dr., marcus.brooks@nbt.nhs.uk
Marcus Brooks, Dr.
About this study
An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. This post-market registry for the GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System (CTAG w/AC) is intended to demonstrate that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for lesions of the descending thoracic aorta continues to be a suitable treatment option for appropriately selected patients.
- Conditions
- Vascular Disease, Dissection, Dissection Aortic Aneurysm, Dissection of Aorta, Aneurysm Thoracic, Aneurysm Dissecting
- Being tested
- Endovascular
- Keywords
- Endovascular, CTAG, Post-market Registry, Observational, Multi-regional, Real world data, Together Registry, Gore Together Registry, Gore Together Aortic Registry, Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft, TGR 23-02TA, TGR23-02TA, GORE TAG
- Medical subject headings
- Vascular Diseases, Aortic Dissection, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EndovascularDevice
TEVAR - thoracic endovascular aortic repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Aneurysm/Other Isolated Lesion | Not described Receives: Device: Endovascular | |
| Dissection | Not described Receives: Device: Endovascular |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Deployment Technical Success
- Successful access, delivery, and accurate deployment of the device to the intended location, and retrieval of the delivery system.
- The absence of any additional corrective procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Events will not include interventions at the access site(s), lumbar drains to address spinal cord ischemia, or additional interventions to address non-treatment areas.
Measured: Index Procedure
Lesion-related Mortality
Death meeting at least one of the following characteristics:
- Death within 30 days of the index procedure or following conversion to open repair.
- Death within 30 days following a complication from a secondary procedure associated with the index lesion or registry device.
- Any death where the treated disease / index lesion or registry device caused or significantly contributed to the death, including lesion-rupture, aortic-related complications, disease progression involving the index lesion.
Measured: From time of index procedure through 10 years of follow-up
Lesion Rupture (treated area)
Rupture in the treated segment of the vessel (e.g., aorta or branch) verified with direct observation or CT / CTA scan.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Lesion Enlargement (treated area)
An increase in maximum vessel (e.g., aorta or treated branch) diameter of > 5 mm in the region encompassed by the initial lesion as compared to baseline using orthogonal (i.e., perpendicular to the centerline) measurements on CT / CTA scans.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Endoleaks
Perfusion of a treated lesion via:
- Type I endoleak is defined as a sealing failure at one of the attachment zones of the graft to the vessel wall, whereby arterial flow perfuses the treated lesion via a perigraft channel:
- Type Ia: Proximal aortic attachment zone
- Type Ib: Distal aortic attachment zone
- Type Ic: Distal attachment zone for branch component
- Type II: Retrograde flow from native aortic branch arteries
- Type III endoleak: Component disconnection or fabric disruption resulting in arterial flow into the perigraft space
- Type IIIa: Attachment of aortic components (aortic-aortic)
- Type IIIb: Fabric tear or disruption
- Type IIIc: Attachment of aortic component-side-branch or side-branch-side-branch
- Type IV: Late endoleak due to flow through porous fabric
- Type V/Endotension: Aneurysm sac enlargement > 5 mm with no imaging evidence of an endoleak
- Indeterminate: Endoleak is identified, but source cannot be ascertained
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Device Migration
Longitudinal movement of all or part of the device for a distance ≥ 10 mm, as confirmed by CTA scan, relative to anatomical landmarks and device positioning at the first post-operative CTA scan.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Loss of aortic / branch patency
No flow or contrast detected through the implanted aortic and/or branch component (for branched devices) confirmed with imaging and/or direct observation.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Stroke (All, Serious, Non-Serious)
Stroke is the acute onset of symptoms consistent with focal or multifocal Central Nervous System (CNS) injury caused by vascular blockage resulting in ischemia or vascular rupture resulting in hemorrhage, that:
- Persists for > 24 hours or until death -or-
- Symptoms lasting < 24 hours, with pathology or neuroimaging confirmation of CNS infarction
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Paraplegia (within 30 days of index procedure)
New onset spinal cord injury rendering a subject non-ambulatory within 30 days of the index procedure
Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure
Paraparesis (within 30 days of index procedure)
New onset spinal cord injury causing a minor motor deficit of the lower extremities within 30 days of the index procedure
Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure
New onset renal failure (within 30 days of index procedure)
New onset sustained renal failure identified within 30 days of the index procedure, combined with requiring dialysis for > 4 weeks
Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure
Renal function deterioration
New onset of a decrease in eGFR > 30% following treatment when compared to baseline eGFR.
Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure
Device integrity events (e.g., fracture, kinking, compression)
Defined as any of the following:
- Wire fractures, including stents, hooks, or barbs
- Stent kinking: Narrowing of the stent graft associated with demonstrable angulation in any of the stent components, with demonstrable flow
- Disruption/tears in the graft component of the stent graft Stent compression or invagination: Transient or permanent stent-graft collapse following complete device deployment, resulting in an overall reduction in the vessel luminal diameter
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Reintervention
Additional surgical or interventional procedure related to the treated disease / index lesion, the registry device, or to the treatment / procedure.
This may include surgical or interventional treatment for endoleaks, access site(s) complications, disease progression (including interventions to address issues related to non-treated area of the index lesion, such as bare stent implantation to address bowel ischemia associated with aortic dissection), spinal drains for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) management, or conversion to open surgery.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (6)
Access-related complications
Complications associated with the access sites used during treatment that may include pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, thrombosis, or complications associated with percutaneous closure devices.
Measured: Intra-operatively
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
Transient focal neurological signs or symptoms (lasting <24 h) presumed to be due to focal brain ischemia but without evidence of acute infarction by neuroimaging or pathology (or in the absence of imaging)
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
New Dissection
A new arterial tear either caused by a stent graft, natural disease progression or iatrogenic injury from endovascular manipulation. This can include the propagation, or extension, of a previous dissection that was not present at the time of initial presentation.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
False Lumen Status - treated segment
Status of the false lumen within the segment of the aorta initially treated with an endovascular stent graft:
- Patent: Flow present throughout the entire aortic false lumen (absence of thrombus) on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
- Partial thrombosis: Thrombus or clot within the aortic false lumen but with a residual patent flow channel on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
- Complete thrombosis: Complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen on arterial- and delayed-phase imaging.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
False Lumen Status - untreated segment
Status of the false lumen outside of the segment of the aorta initially treated with an endovascular stent graft:
- Patent: Flow present throughout the entire aortic false lumen (absence of thrombus) on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
- Partial thrombosis: Thrombus or clot within the aortic false lumen but with a residual patent flow channel on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
- Complete thrombosis: Complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen on arterial- and delayed-phase imaging.
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
False Lumen Perfusion
Flow into the false lumen via:
- Type IA entry flow: flow between the proximal endograft and aortic wall allowing systemic pressure antegrade flow into the primary entry tear and proximal false lumen
- Type IB entry flow: distal entry tear adjacent to endograft due to septal fenestration or a new intimal tear at the distal aspect of the stent graft (dSINE) allowing systemic pressure direct flow into the false lumen
- Type II entry flow: retrograde entry flow through arch vessel branches (innominate, carotid, subclavian) or thoracic bronchial and intercostal arteries into the false lumen
- Type R entry flow: antegrade entry flow from the true lumen into the false lumen through distal branch fenestrations (uncovered intercostal arteries, visceral or renal arteries, lumbar arteries, iliac branches) or septal fenestrations (excluding SINE)
Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2024
- Study start19 Jun 2025
- Primary completionAug 2038 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2038 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Vascular DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by W.L.Gore & AssociatesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 10 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & Associates
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ali Azizzadeh, M.D., Principal investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterTimothy Resch, Principal investigator, Univ. of CPH - DenmarkKazuo Shimamura, Principal investigator, Osaka University Hospital - Japan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06658730
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TGR 23-02TA
- Other IDs
- TGR 23-02TA
- Acronym
- TGR 23-02TA
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yamanouchi D, Khashram M, Gable D, Milner R, Yeung KK, Resch TA, Bockler D, Delaney C, Azizzadeh A, Shimamura K, Qasabian R, Han S, Feito Y, Trimarchi S. Real-world data on aortic endografts: Gore Together aortic registry protocol. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026 Aug 28;13:1803528. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1803528. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42729155
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Characterization of GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft With ACTIVE CONTROL System Performance
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06658730
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TGR 23-02TA / TGR 23-02TA
- Conditions
- Vascular Disease, Dissection, Dissection Aortic Aneurysm, Dissection of Aorta, Aneurysm Thoracic, Aneurysm Dissecting
- Keywords
- Endovascular, CTAG, Post-market Registry, Observational, Multi-regional, Real world data, Together Registry, Gore Together Registry
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- W.L.Gore & AssociatesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2038 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2038 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. This post-market registry for the GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System (CTAG w/AC) is intended to demonstrate that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for lesions of the descending thoracic aorta continues to be a suitable treatment option for appropriately selected patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 10 Years
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Aneurysm/Other Isolated Lesion | – | Device: Endovascular |
| Dissection | – | Device: Endovascular |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The target registry population is patients who are treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL at participating sites. This includes initial procedures and reinterventions (regardless of original intervention).
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) provides written authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements.
- Patient has been or is intended to be treated with an eligible registry device.*
- Patient is age ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent signature.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient who is, at the time of consent, unlikely to be available for standard of care (SOC) follow-up visits as defined by the site's guidelines and procedures.
- Patient with exclusion criteria required by local law.
- Patient is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent investigational drug and/or investigational device study* within 12 months of Together Registry enrollment. Subjects cannot be enrolled in another Together Registry module protocol.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EndovascularTEVAR - thoracic endovascular aortic repair | Device | Aneurysm/Other Isolated Lesion, Dissection |
Primary outcome
Deployment Technical Success
Time frame: Index Procedure
* Successful access, delivery, and accurate deployment of the device to the intended location, and retrieval of the delivery system. * The absence of any additional corrective procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Events will not include interventions at the access site(s), lumbar drains to address spinal cord ischemia, or additional interventions to address non-treatment areas.
Lesion-related Mortality
Time frame: From time of index procedure through 10 years of follow-up
Death meeting at least one of the following characteristics: * Death within 30 days of the index procedure or following conversion to open repair. * Death within 30 days following a complication from a secondary procedure associated with the index lesion or registry device. * Any death where the treated disease / index lesion or registry device caused or significantly contributed to the death, including lesion-rupture, aortic-related complications, disease progression involving the index lesion.
Lesion Rupture (treated area)
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Rupture in the treated segment of the vessel (e.g., aorta or branch) verified with direct observation or CT / CTA scan.
Lesion Enlargement (treated area)
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
An increase in maximum vessel (e.g., aorta or treated branch) diameter of > 5 mm in the region encompassed by the initial lesion as compared to baseline using orthogonal (i.e., perpendicular to the centerline) measurements on CT / CTA scans.
Endoleaks
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Perfusion of a treated lesion via: * Type I endoleak is defined as a sealing failure at one of the attachment zones of the graft to the vessel wall, whereby arterial flow perfuses the treated lesion via a perigraft channel: * Type Ia: Proximal aortic attachment zone * Type Ib: Distal aortic attachment zone * Type Ic: Distal attachment zone for branch component * Type II: Retrograde flow from native aortic branch arteries * Type III endoleak: Component disconnection or fabric disruption resulting in arterial flow into the perigraft space * Type IIIa: Attachment of aortic components (aortic-aortic) * Type IIIb: Fabric tear or disruption * Type IIIc: Attachment of aortic component-side-branch or side-branch-side-branch * Type IV: Late endoleak due to flow through porous fabric * Type V/Endotension: Aneurysm sac enlargement > 5 mm with no imaging evidence of an endoleak * Indeterminate: Endoleak is identified, but source cannot be ascertained
Device Migration
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Longitudinal movement of all or part of the device for a distance ≥ 10 mm, as confirmed by CTA scan, relative to anatomical landmarks and device positioning at the first post-operative CTA scan.
Loss of aortic / branch patency
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
No flow or contrast detected through the implanted aortic and/or branch component (for branched devices) confirmed with imaging and/or direct observation.
Stroke (All, Serious, Non-Serious)
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Stroke is the acute onset of symptoms consistent with focal or multifocal Central Nervous System (CNS) injury caused by vascular blockage resulting in ischemia or vascular rupture resulting in hemorrhage, that: * Persists for > 24 hours or until death -or- * Symptoms lasting < 24 hours, with pathology or neuroimaging confirmation of CNS infarction
Paraplegia (within 30 days of index procedure)
Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure
New onset spinal cord injury rendering a subject non-ambulatory within 30 days of the index procedure
Paraparesis (within 30 days of index procedure)
Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure
New onset spinal cord injury causing a minor motor deficit of the lower extremities within 30 days of the index procedure
New onset renal failure (within 30 days of index procedure)
Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure
New onset sustained renal failure identified within 30 days of the index procedure, combined with requiring dialysis for > 4 weeks
Renal function deterioration
Time frame: Within 30 days of index procedure
New onset of a decrease in eGFR > 30% following treatment when compared to baseline eGFR.
Device integrity events (e.g., fracture, kinking, compression)
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Defined as any of the following: * Wire fractures, including stents, hooks, or barbs * Stent kinking: Narrowing of the stent graft associated with demonstrable angulation in any of the stent components, with demonstrable flow * Disruption/tears in the graft component of the stent graft Stent compression or invagination: Transient or permanent stent-graft collapse following complete device deployment, resulting in an overall reduction in the vessel luminal diameter
Reintervention
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Additional surgical or interventional procedure related to the treated disease / index lesion, the registry device, or to the treatment / procedure. This may include surgical or interventional treatment for endoleaks, access site(s) complications, disease progression (including interventions to address issues related to non-treated area of the index lesion, such as bare stent implantation to address bowel ischemia associated with aortic dissection), spinal drains for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) management, or conversion to open surgery.
6 secondary outcomes
Access-related complications
Time frame: Intra-operatively
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
New Dissection
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
False Lumen Status - treated segment
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
False Lumen Status - untreated segment
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
False Lumen Perfusion
Time frame: Through 10 years post-procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42729155Yamanouchi D, Khashram M, Gable D, Milner R, Yeung KK, Resch TA, Bockler D, Delaney C, Azizzadeh A, Shimamura K, Qasabian R, Han S, Feito Y, Trimarchi S. Real-world data on aortic endografts: Gore Together aortic registry protocol. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026 Aug 28;13:1803528. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1803528. eCollection 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vascular Disease
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1b/2 Study of Sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) as Monotherapy and in Various Combinations With Dexamethasone Plus Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone Plus Daratumumab, and Dexamethasone Plus Pomalidomide in Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 4
Translational Health Research Into Vascular and Neurocognitive Effects of Weight Loss
Class I/II Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Combination of Venetoclax and Rituximab, in Comparison to the Usual Treatment (Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab or Zanubrutinib Alone) for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma
Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous T Cells Transduced With Retroviral Vectors Expressing TCRs for Participant-specific Neoantigens in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Malignancy, Hematologic, Neoplasms, Hematologic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Ali Azizzadeh, M.D. principal investigator
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Timothy Resch principal investigator
Univ. of CPH - Denmark
Kazuo Shimamura principal investigator
Osaka University Hospital - Japan
37 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Vascular Disease and Dissection, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 37 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, Denmark, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ashley Hoedt, MS (+1 928-864-3987, ahoedt@wlgore.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Deployment Technical Success (time frame: Index Procedure). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06658730, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026.