AzTrials
AzTrials

Vascular DiseaseTGR 23-02TANCT06658730

Long-term Characterization of GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft With ACTIVE CONTROL System Performance

An observational study of Vascular Disease and Dissection, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 37 sites in 10 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Endovascular
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
1,500 participants
Where
37 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
19 Jun 2025to Aug 2038
How long will I take part?
10 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The target registry population is patients who are treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL at participating sites. This includes initial procedures and reinterventions (regardless of original intervention).

Who may be able to join

  • Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) provides written authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements.
  • Patient has been or is intended to be treated with an eligible registry device.*
  • Patient is age ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent signature.
  • The intent to treat a patient with a Gore product must be made prior to soliciting for possible registry participation. If pre-procedure consent is not feasible due to emergent situation, consent prior to the time of discharge for the index procedure is acceptable.

Who cannot join

  • Patient who is, at the time of consent, unlikely to be available for standard of care (SOC) follow-up visits as defined by the site's guidelines and procedures.
  • Patient with exclusion criteria required by local law.
  • Patient is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent investigational drug and/or investigational device study* within 12 months of Together Registry enrollment. Subjects cannot be enrolled in another Together Registry module protocol.
  • The term "study" does not apply to other observational registries or quality improvement projects. Collection of Registry Device performance from interventional studies may be permissible provided device application is not investigational and there are no novel requirements that alter follow-up conduct (i.e., protocol-mandated interventions).

Trial locations and contacts

37 sites in 10 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ashley Hoedt, MS contact

+1 928-864-3987

ahoedt@wlgore.com

37 sites in 10 countries

United States24 sites, 24 recruiting
  • Augusta University

    Augusta, Georgia, 30912

    Yvonne Site Coordinator, yvdaniel@augusta.edu

    William Jordan, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of Maryland - Baltimore

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

    Langford Site Coordinator, lwgreen@som.umaryland.edu

    Shahab Toursavadkohi, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

    Fernando Site Coordinator, fmoreno@bidmc.harvard.edu

    Marc Schermerhorn, M.D.

    Not yet recruiting
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

    Amber Site Coordinator, amber_fix@med.unc.edu

    Chris Site Coordinator, cdburges@email.unc.edu

    Recruiting
  • University Hospitals - Cleveland Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

    Camille Site Coordinator, Camille.Opperman@uhhospitals.org

    Jae-Sung Cho, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Baylor Research Institute

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

    Sarah Site Coordinator, SarahAnn.Hooton@BSWHealth.org

    Dennis Gable, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

    Hillary Site Coordinator, hillary.hood@duke.edu

    Chad Hughes, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of Florida - Gainesville

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

    Nancy Site Coordinator, nancy.hanson@surgery.ufl.edu

    Zain Shahid, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack University Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

    Stephanie Site Coordinator, Stephanie.lynes@hmhn.org

    Michael Wilderman, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Indiana University School of Medicine

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

    Terri Strickland, TStrickland@IUHealth.org

    Joel Corvera, MD

    Recruiting
  • The Hitchcock Foundation at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

    Paulene Site Coordinator, pauline.sirrell@hitchcock.org

    Bjoern Suckow, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

    Stephanie Site Coordinator, stephanie.varela@med.usc.edu

    Sukgu Han, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

    Ayda Site Coordinator, Ayda.Aliyari@cshs.org

    Ali Azizzadeh, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

    Nicole Site Coordinator, byington@surgery.wisc.edu

    Courtney Morgan, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Intermountain Medical Center

    Murray, Utah, 84157

    Lexi Site Coordinator, lexi.maycock@imail.org

    Jane He, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Sentara Medical Group, Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23437

    Kara Site Coordinator, kvwiggin@sentara.com

    Animesh Rathore, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

    Carolina Site Coordinator, carolina.reyes1@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Grace Wang, M.D.

    Not yet recruiting
  • Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

    Ashley Site Coordinator, ashley.borgella@jefferson.edu

    Cecillia Chin, M.D.

    Not yet recruiting
  • Columbia Medical Center of Plano

    Plano, Texas, 75075

    Pauline Site Coordinator, pauline.matheri@hcahealthcare.com

    Edic Stephanian, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of Washington

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

    Allison Site Coordinator, alari@uw.edu

    Sara Zettervall, M.D.

    Not yet recruiting
  • Leland Stanford Junior University

    Stanford, California, 94305

    Suneetha Site Coordinator, satluri2@stanford.edu

    Kenneth Tran, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of South Florida

    Tampa, Florida, 33606

    Avennette Site Coordinator, apinto3@usf.edu

    Eric Site Coordinator, eej11@usf.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Arizona

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

    Karen Site Coordinator, kas10@arizona.edu

    Wei Zhou, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • MedStar Health, MedStar Washington Hospital Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

    Kassaye Site Coordinator, kassaye.t.sesaba@medstar.net

    William Yoon, M.D.

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in United States

Germany4 sites, 4 recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn

    Bonn, 53127

    Marwan Hamiko, M.D., Marwan.Hamiko@ukbonn.de

    Marwan Hamiko

    Recruiting
  • Universitatsmedizin Frankfurt

    Frankfurt

    Kyriakos Oikonomou, Prof., kyriakos.oikonomou@unimedizin-ffm.de

    Recruiting
  • Regensburg University Hospital

    Regensburg, D-93053

    Fiona Rohlffs, Prof., fiona.rohlffs@ukr.de

    Recruiting
  • Universitatsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, D-89081

    Bernd Mühling, Prof., bernd.muehling@uniklinik-ulm.de

    Bernd Mühling, Prof.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • AORN S.Anna e S. Sebastiano

    Caserta

    Andrea Montalto, +39 0823 232694., andrea.montalto@aorncaserta.it

    Andrea Montalto, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • IRCCS Policlinico di Milano

    Milan

    Santi Trimarchi, Prof, santi.trimarchi@policlinico.mi.it

    Santi Trimarchi, Prof.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Rigshospitalet

    Copenhagen, DK-2100

    Timothy A Resch, Prof., +45 35457931, timothy.andrew.resch@regionh.dk

    Mette Velloev Petersen, Mrs, +45 3545 6207, Mette.velloev.petersen@regionh.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Strasbourg

    Strasbourg, 67000

    Salomé Kuntz, M.D., salome.kuntz@chru-strasbourg.fr

    Manon Ruhlmann, manon.ruhlmann@gepromed.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Laiko General Hospital of Athens

    Athens, 11527

    Chris Klonaris, M.D., cklonaris@yahoo.com

    Antonia Skotsimara, antwnia.skot@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Greece

Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center

    Riyāḑ

    Omer Abdulgadir Abdulrahim, M.D., +966553321922, oabdulrahim@kfshrc.edu.sa

    Omer Abdulgadir Abdulrahim, M.D.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

    Barcelona, 08907

    Elena Iborra Ortega, Dr., 0034932706500, eiborra@bellvitgehospital.cat

    Elena Iborra Ortega, Dr.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Uppsala University

    Uppsala, SE-751 85

    Kevin Mani, MD, kevin.mani@uu.se

    Clara Clara Rydmyr, +46 0186112394, forskning.karlkirurgi@akademiska.se

    Recruiting

Other trials in Sweden

United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Bristol NHS Foundation Trust

    Bristol

    Marcus Brooks, Dr., marcus.brooks@nbt.nhs.uk

    Marcus Brooks, Dr.

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

An observational, prospective multi-regional post-market registry collecting mid- and long-term data to assess outcomes through ten years of follow-up for subjects treated with GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System as a part of routine clinical practice. This post-market registry for the GORE® TAG® Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft with ACTIVE CONTROL System (CTAG w/AC) is intended to demonstrate that thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for lesions of the descending thoracic aorta continues to be a suitable treatment option for appropriately selected patients.

Being tested
Endovascular
Keywords
Endovascular, CTAG, Post-market Registry, Observational, Multi-regional, Real world data, Together Registry, Gore Together Registry, Gore Together Aortic Registry, Conformable Thoracic Stent Graft, TGR 23-02TA, TGR23-02TA, GORE TAG
Medical subject headings
Vascular Diseases, Aortic Dissection, Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EndovascularDevice

    TEVAR - thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Study groups in NCT06658730
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aneurysm/Other Isolated LesionNot described
Receives: Device: Endovascular
DissectionNot described
Receives: Device: Endovascular

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Deployment Technical Success

    • Successful access, delivery, and accurate deployment of the device to the intended location, and retrieval of the delivery system.
    • The absence of any additional corrective procedure related to the device, procedure, or withdrawal of the delivery system. Events will not include interventions at the access site(s), lumbar drains to address spinal cord ischemia, or additional interventions to address non-treatment areas.

    Measured: Index Procedure

  2. Lesion-related Mortality

    Death meeting at least one of the following characteristics:

    • Death within 30 days of the index procedure or following conversion to open repair.
    • Death within 30 days following a complication from a secondary procedure associated with the index lesion or registry device.
    • Any death where the treated disease / index lesion or registry device caused or significantly contributed to the death, including lesion-rupture, aortic-related complications, disease progression involving the index lesion.

    Measured: From time of index procedure through 10 years of follow-up

  3. Lesion Rupture (treated area)

    Rupture in the treated segment of the vessel (e.g., aorta or branch) verified with direct observation or CT / CTA scan.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  4. Lesion Enlargement (treated area)

    An increase in maximum vessel (e.g., aorta or treated branch) diameter of > 5 mm in the region encompassed by the initial lesion as compared to baseline using orthogonal (i.e., perpendicular to the centerline) measurements on CT / CTA scans.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  5. Endoleaks

    Perfusion of a treated lesion via:

    • Type I endoleak is defined as a sealing failure at one of the attachment zones of the graft to the vessel wall, whereby arterial flow perfuses the treated lesion via a perigraft channel:
    • Type Ia: Proximal aortic attachment zone
    • Type Ib: Distal aortic attachment zone
    • Type Ic: Distal attachment zone for branch component
    • Type II: Retrograde flow from native aortic branch arteries
    • Type III endoleak: Component disconnection or fabric disruption resulting in arterial flow into the perigraft space
    • Type IIIa: Attachment of aortic components (aortic-aortic)
    • Type IIIb: Fabric tear or disruption
    • Type IIIc: Attachment of aortic component-side-branch or side-branch-side-branch
    • Type IV: Late endoleak due to flow through porous fabric
    • Type V/Endotension: Aneurysm sac enlargement > 5 mm with no imaging evidence of an endoleak
    • Indeterminate: Endoleak is identified, but source cannot be ascertained

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  6. Device Migration

    Longitudinal movement of all or part of the device for a distance ≥ 10 mm, as confirmed by CTA scan, relative to anatomical landmarks and device positioning at the first post-operative CTA scan.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  7. Loss of aortic / branch patency

    No flow or contrast detected through the implanted aortic and/or branch component (for branched devices) confirmed with imaging and/or direct observation.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  8. Stroke (All, Serious, Non-Serious)

    Stroke is the acute onset of symptoms consistent with focal or multifocal Central Nervous System (CNS) injury caused by vascular blockage resulting in ischemia or vascular rupture resulting in hemorrhage, that:

    • Persists for > 24 hours or until death -or-
    • Symptoms lasting < 24 hours, with pathology or neuroimaging confirmation of CNS infarction

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  9. Paraplegia (within 30 days of index procedure)

    New onset spinal cord injury rendering a subject non-ambulatory within 30 days of the index procedure

    Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure

  10. Paraparesis (within 30 days of index procedure)

    New onset spinal cord injury causing a minor motor deficit of the lower extremities within 30 days of the index procedure

    Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure

  11. New onset renal failure (within 30 days of index procedure)

    New onset sustained renal failure identified within 30 days of the index procedure, combined with requiring dialysis for > 4 weeks

    Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure

  12. Renal function deterioration

    New onset of a decrease in eGFR > 30% following treatment when compared to baseline eGFR.

    Measured: Within 30 days of index procedure

  13. Device integrity events (e.g., fracture, kinking, compression)

    Defined as any of the following:

    • Wire fractures, including stents, hooks, or barbs
    • Stent kinking: Narrowing of the stent graft associated with demonstrable angulation in any of the stent components, with demonstrable flow
    • Disruption/tears in the graft component of the stent graft Stent compression or invagination: Transient or permanent stent-graft collapse following complete device deployment, resulting in an overall reduction in the vessel luminal diameter

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  14. Reintervention

    Additional surgical or interventional procedure related to the treated disease / index lesion, the registry device, or to the treatment / procedure.

    This may include surgical or interventional treatment for endoleaks, access site(s) complications, disease progression (including interventions to address issues related to non-treated area of the index lesion, such as bare stent implantation to address bowel ischemia associated with aortic dissection), spinal drains for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) management, or conversion to open surgery.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Access-related complications

    Complications associated with the access sites used during treatment that may include pseudoaneurysm, hematoma, thrombosis, or complications associated with percutaneous closure devices.

    Measured: Intra-operatively

  2. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)

    Transient focal neurological signs or symptoms (lasting <24 h) presumed to be due to focal brain ischemia but without evidence of acute infarction by neuroimaging or pathology (or in the absence of imaging)

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  3. New Dissection

    A new arterial tear either caused by a stent graft, natural disease progression or iatrogenic injury from endovascular manipulation. This can include the propagation, or extension, of a previous dissection that was not present at the time of initial presentation.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  4. False Lumen Status - treated segment

    Status of the false lumen within the segment of the aorta initially treated with an endovascular stent graft:

    • Patent: Flow present throughout the entire aortic false lumen (absence of thrombus) on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
    • Partial thrombosis: Thrombus or clot within the aortic false lumen but with a residual patent flow channel on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
    • Complete thrombosis: Complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen on arterial- and delayed-phase imaging.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  5. False Lumen Status - untreated segment

    Status of the false lumen outside of the segment of the aorta initially treated with an endovascular stent graft:

    • Patent: Flow present throughout the entire aortic false lumen (absence of thrombus) on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
    • Partial thrombosis: Thrombus or clot within the aortic false lumen but with a residual patent flow channel on arterial-phase or delayed contrast-enhanced imaging.
    • Complete thrombosis: Complete thrombosis of the aortic false lumen on arterial- and delayed-phase imaging.

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

  6. False Lumen Perfusion

    Flow into the false lumen via:

    • Type IA entry flow: flow between the proximal endograft and aortic wall allowing systemic pressure antegrade flow into the primary entry tear and proximal false lumen
    • Type IB entry flow: distal entry tear adjacent to endograft due to septal fenestration or a new intimal tear at the distal aspect of the stent graft (dSINE) allowing systemic pressure direct flow into the false lumen
    • Type II entry flow: retrograde entry flow through arch vessel branches (innominate, carotid, subclavian) or thoracic bronchial and intercostal arteries into the false lumen
    • Type R entry flow: antegrade entry flow from the true lumen into the false lumen through distal branch fenestrations (uncovered intercostal arteries, visceral or renal arteries, lumbar arteries, iliac branches) or septal fenestrations (excluding SINE)

    Measured: Through 10 years post-procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2024
  2. Study start19 Jun 2025
  3. Primary completionAug 2038 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2038 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,500 participants (estimated)
Target duration
10 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06658730
Sponsor's protocol ID
TGR 23-02TA
Other IDs
TGR 23-02TA
Acronym
TGR 23-02TA
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
16 Oct 2024
Last updated
19 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Yamanouchi D, Khashram M, Gable D, Milner R, Yeung KK, Resch TA, Bockler D, Delaney C, Azizzadeh A, Shimamura K, Qasabian R, Han S, Feito Y, Trimarchi S. Real-world data on aortic endografts: Gore Together aortic registry protocol. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026 Aug 28;13:1803528. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2026.1803528. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 42729155

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vascular Disease and Dissection, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 37 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 37 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, Denmark, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ashley Hoedt, MS (+1 928-864-3987, ahoedt@wlgore.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Deployment Technical Success (time frame: Index Procedure). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06658730, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in