Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)NCT06659367
Dedinje FFR/QFR Registry
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Fractional Flow Reserve, run by Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje at 1 site in Serbia.
Trial summary
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) has shown good diagnostic performance against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in several meta-analyses, comparable or even superior to nonhyperemic pressure ratios. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Fractional Flow Reserve
- How many people
- 2,500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSerbia
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2024to 2 Oct 2034
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients >18 years old who present to the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" and undergo a planned or ad hoc FFR procedure will be asked to participate in the registry.
Who may be able to join
- >18 years old
- Had a clinically indicated FFR procedure performed (either as a planned procedure or ad hoc)
Who cannot join
- Declines to participate in the registry and provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Serbia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje"
Belgrade, 11040
Natalija Odanovic, +381654732220, natalija.odanovic@gmail.com
Natalija Odanovic, MD
About this study
Official title: Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) Registry
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) has shown good diagnostic performance against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in several meta-analyses, comparable or even superior to nonhyperemic pressure ratios. However, the reproducibility of QFR is modest and there is high inter- and intra-observer variability even when fairly experienced but non-core lab operators (at least 150 QFR procedure experience) are performing the analysis. Although smaller studies have demonstrated that non-core analysis and even paramedical user analysis can have good correlation with FFR, the concern about the diagnostic performance of QFR in real-world clinical practice by inexperienced users remains.
The primary objective of "Dedinje FFR/QFR Registry" is to determine the feasibility and diagnostic performance of QFR analysis by vendor-certified inexperienced medical users in a real-world setting using FFR as the gold standard. All patients >18 years old who present to the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" and undergo a planned or ad hoc FFR procedure will be asked to participate in the registry. FFR procedure is performed according to the standardized institutional protocol. QFR analysis will be subsequently performed offline according to a standard operating procedure.
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, fractional flow reserve, quantitative flow ratio, FFR, QFR
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
correlation coefficient (r) between Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Sensitivity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Sensitivity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Specificity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Specificity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Positive predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Positive predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Negative predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Negative predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Diagnostic gray zone
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) limits for achieving 95% sensitivity and specificity in comparison to Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Diagnostic accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Area under the curve (using cutoff values of <=0.80 for both methods)
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Diagnostic performance of nonhyperemic pressure ratios and 3-dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of nonhyperemic pressure ratios and 3-dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Diagnostic accuracy of nonhyperemic pressure ratios and 3-dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Area under the curve (using cutoff values of <=0.89 for nonhyperemic pressure ratios and >=50% diameter stenosis for 3-dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA)) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR, cutoff value <=0.80)
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Inter-observer variability
Coefficient of variation for repeated Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) computation between users, standard deviation for repeated Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) measurements between users, binary diagnostic classification agreement between users
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Intra-observer variability
Coefficient of variation for repeated Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) computation within users, standard deviation for repeated Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) measurements within users, binary diagnostic classification agreement within users
Measured: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
All-cause death
All-cause death
Measured: at 6 months, 1 year and annually for 5 years
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction
Measured: at 6 months, 1 year and annually for 5 years
Vessel-oriented composite outcome
Cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization
Measured: at 6 months, 1 year and annually for 5 years
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 Items Score (SAQ-7) at 6 months
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 Items Score (SAQ-7) at 6 months from the time of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) procedure. (scale 0-100, 100 = full health, 0 = worst health)
Measured: 6 months
Change in EuroQol-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Change in EuroQol-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score at 6 months from the time of the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) procedure (scale 5-25, 5= no problems in any dimension, 25= extreme problems on all dimensions; visual analogue scale 0-100, 0= worst health possible, 100= best health possible)
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2024
- Study start2 Oct 2024
- Primary completion2 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion2 Oct 2034 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Natalija Odanovic, Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06659367
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB4669
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD contains sensitive identifying patient information that patients are told will not be shared with anyone outside of the primary team of researchers.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) and Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) Registry
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06659367
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB4669
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, fractional flow reserve, quantitative flow ratio, FFR, QFR
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases DedinjeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 2 Oct 2034 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) has shown good diagnostic performance against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in several meta-analyses, comparable or even superior to nonhyperemic pressure ratios. However, the reproducibility of QFR is modest and there is high inter- and intra-observer variability even when fairly experienced but non-core lab operators (at least 150 QFR procedure experience) are performing the analysis. Although smaller studies have demonstrated that non-core analysis and even paramedical user analysis can have good correlation with FFR, the concern about the diagnostic performance of QFR in real-world clinical practice by inexperienced users remains.
The primary objective of "Dedinje FFR/QFR Registry" is to determine the feasibility and diagnostic performance of QFR analysis by vendor-certified inexperienced medical users in a real-world setting using FFR as the gold standard. All patients >18 years old who present to the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" and undergo a planned or ad hoc FFR procedure will be asked to participate in the registry. FFR procedure is performed according to the standardized institutional protocol. QFR analysis will be subsequently performed offline according to a standard operating procedure.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients >18 years old who present to the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" and undergo a planned or ad hoc FFR procedure will be asked to participate in the registry.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- >18 years old
- Had a clinically indicated FFR procedure performed (either as a planned procedure or ad hoc)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Declines to participate in the registry and provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Correlation between Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
correlation coefficient (r) between Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Sensitivity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Sensitivity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Specificity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Specificity of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Positive predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Positive predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Negative predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR)
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Negative predictive value of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Diagnostic gray zone
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) limits for achieving 95% sensitivity and specificity in comparison to Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Diagnostic accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Area under the curve (using cutoff values of <=0.80 for both methods)
9 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic performance of nonhyperemic pressure ratios and 3-dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Diagnostic accuracy of nonhyperemic pressure ratios and 3-dimensional Quantitative Coronary Angiography (3D-QCA) against Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) as the gold standard
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Inter-observer variability
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
Intra-observer variability
Time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)
All-cause death
Time frame: at 6 months, 1 year and annually for 5 years
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: at 6 months, 1 year and annually for 5 years
Vessel-oriented composite outcome
Time frame: at 6 months, 1 year and annually for 5 years
Change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 Items Score (SAQ-7) at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Change in EuroQol-5 Dimensions- 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD contains sensitive identifying patient information that patients are told will not be shared with anyone outside of the primary team of researchers.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Thiamine Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Coronary Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Anaesthetic Management in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Preoperative Fasting, Pulmonary Aspiration During Anesthetic Induction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and Fractional Flow Reserve, run by Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje at 1 site in Serbia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Natalija Odanovic, MD (+381654732220, natalija.odanovic@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) and Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) (time frame: at the time of Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) analysis completion (up to 1 year)). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2024.