MalocclusionNCT06661551
Does the Generation to Which the Operator Belongs Influence the Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Accuracy in Dynamic Computer-guided Surgery?
A study testing Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery in people with Malocclusion and Malocclusion in Children, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to access the miniscrew accuracy insertion via dynamic computer-guided systems, inserted by three different clinicians belonging to three different generations, in childern in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition that need for orthodontic treatment, with good oral hygiene and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Malocclusion, Malocclusion in Children, Malocclusion; Displaced or Missing Teeth
- What is being tested?
- Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2022to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Children in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition;
- Need for orthodontic treatment;
- Good oral hygiene;
- Absence of acute infection in the oral cavity;
- Good general health.
Who cannot join
- Syndromic patients;
- Uncontrolled systemic disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Does the Generation to Which the Operator Belongs Influence the Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Accuracy in Dynamic Computer-guided Surgery? a Randomized Clinical Prospective Study
The goal of this clinical trial is to access the miniscrew accuracy insertion via dynamic computer-guided systems, inserted by three different clinicians belonging to three different generations, in childern in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition that need for orthodontic treatment, with good oral hygiene and absence of acute infection in the oral cavity and good general healt. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are there statistically significant differences between accuracy parameters and generation to which the clinician belongs?
- Does exist a significant correlation between the deviation parameters and the number of surgeries, and between the duration of interventions and the number of surgeries? Researchers wirll compare the deviation parameters to see if there are statistically significant differences in terms of accuracy.
Participants will undergo a surgical procedure of placement of 2 orthodontic miniscrews in the palatal region, and then a post-operative CBCT to assess the accuracy and presence or absence of damage to adjacent structures
Read the detailed description
This study will be conducted to evaluate intergenerational differences regarding orthodontic miniscrew placement accuracy in the palatine vault through dynamic computer-guided surgery. The secondary outcome will be to assess, for each operator, the correlation between the number of miniscrews inserted, i.e. surgeries, and the accuracy variables as well as the duration of interventions.
The clinical investigation will be conducted between December 2022 and September 2024, adhering to the ethical standards outlined in the seventh revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. Parents and guardians are going to be informed about the details of the study, including the benefits and potential risks, and provided written consent. The investigation is approved by the local ethics committee (no. 5951).
The eligibility criteria are: (1) children in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition, (2) need for orthodontic treatment, (3) good oral hygiene, (4) absence of acute infection in the oral cavity, (5) good general health. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) syndromic patients, (2) uncontrolled systemic disease.
Miniscrews will be placed by three different clinicians, belonging to three different generations and levels of experience in implant and orthodontic miniscrew placement in free-hand and static computer-guided surgery.
A block randomization sequence is going to be generated using the Sealed Envelope online tool (https://www.sealedenvelope.com) to allocate the subjects into three groups. The random allocation sequence generation, enrollment, and assignment of the participants to interventions will be done by an external researcher not involved in the research. The allocation ratio of the subjects will be balanced, based on the generation to which the researchers belong.
Group A is going to be treated by operator number 1, an oral surgeon with more than 30 Years of experience, which belongs to "Generation X"; operator number 2 (MG) will treat Group B and is a dentist with 15 years of experience in oral surgery and belonged to "Generation Y"; Group C will be treated by operator number 3 (DB), a final year dental student with no previous experience in oral surgery, that belonged to "Generation Z". However, all three were novices in the use of dynamic computer-guided surgical systems, and no pre-clinical training phase was done.
In order to achieve skeletal anchorage for orthodontic or orthopedic treatment, the miniscrews (BENEfit®, Benefit system; PSM Medical Solutions, Tuttlingen, Germany) will be inserted under local anesthesia, in the paramedian area of the hard palate at the level of the third palatine rugae, and to guarantee a minimally-invasive, flapless and pre-drilling free approach, the miniscrews will be inserted using the Navident dynamic navigation system (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), through a NSK iSD900 cordless battery screwdriver (Nakanishi INC., Tochigi, Japan).
The patients will undergo to optical scanning, using a Medit i700 intraoral scanner (Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea) and CBCT imaging of the upper jaw, captured using a Scanora 3Dx cone-beam device (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland).
The resulting STL (Standard Triangulation Language) and DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files are going to be superimposed to precisely determine the insertion site, diameter, and length of the miniscrews to achieve bicortical anchorage.
To evaluate the accuracy of miniscrew placement and to detect any potential root injury, a postoperative CBCT scan was conducted immediately after each surgical procedure.
The preoperative and postoperative images were superimposed, through the use of EvaluNav software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), employing coordinated automatically given by the software as previously described [3, 10, 26]. To assess the differences between the planned position and the actual placement of miniscrews, five deviation parameters will be analyzed: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex vertical (vertical deviation), Angular deviation (Figure 2) The duration of the surgeries will be calculated by an external researcher using the Navident Software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada) from the moment when the Navigation View appears to the end of the navigation phase.
The sample size was calculated based on a previous study using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.6; Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). The significance level was set at 0.05 and the power at 0.8. A total sample size of thirty-three os considered acceptable, with an actual power of 0.81.
To reduce the risk of statistical analysis bias, the operator variable will be coded, and a blinded statistician will perform the statistical analysis, using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) to create a database to allocate the subjects, and the statistical software package SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., New York, USA).
Descriptive statistics analysis (including mean, minimum, maximum values, confidence interval at 95% and standard deviations) is going to be performed for each variable within each group.
Subsequently, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test will be conducted to assess the distribution of the data. For variables following a normal distribution, the ANOVA test will be employed; whereas, for variables exhibiting a non-normal distribution, a non-parametric test, namely the Kruskal-Wallis H test, is performed. In cases where the tests indicated statistically significant differences, post-hoc tests will be subsequently conducted. The Tukey test is going to be used for variables with a normal distribution, and the Dunn's for a non-normal distribution.
Furthermore, the Pearson Correlation will be utilized to analyze whether the number of surgeries influenced the deviation variables (Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex Vertical, Angular deviation, duration of the intervention).
The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
- Being tested
- Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery
- Keywords
- Dynamic computer-guided surgery, navigation systems, TADs, generations, accuracy
- Medical subject headings
- Malocclusion, Anodontia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgeryProcedure or surgery
The intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges.
Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Generation X operator) | Experimental | Group A is going to be treated by operator number 1, an oral surgeon with more than 30 Years of experience, which belongs to "Generation X" Receives: Procedure: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery |
| Group B (Generation Y operator) | Experimental | Operator number 2 (MG) will treat Group B and is a dentist with 15 years of experience in oral surgery and belonged to "Generation Y". Receives: Procedure: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery |
| Group C (Generation Z operator) | Experimental | Group C will be treated by operator number 3 (DB), a final year dental student with no previous experience in oral surgery, that belonged to "Generation Z". Receives: Procedure: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Miniscrew insertion accuracy assessment
The preoperative and postoperative DICOM images need to be superimposed, through the use of EvaluNav software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), employing coordinated automatically given by the software. The software, to assess the differences between the planned position and the actual placement of miniscrews, will provide five deviation parameters: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex vertical (vertical deviation), Angular deviation.
Entry 2D: deviation of the miniscrew platform in the x and y dimensions of space in an occlusal view; Entry 3D: deviation of the miniscrew platform in the three dimensions of space; Apex 3D: deviation of the miniscrew apex in the three dimensions of space; Apex vertical: deviation of miniscrew apex depth (z-axis), in millimeters (mm); Angle: angular deviation between the central axes of the planned position and the final position, in degrees (°).
Measured: Through study completion, and average of 1 year and a half
Secondary outcomes (1)
Correlation between the deviation parameters and the number of surgeries, and between the duration of interventions and the number of surgeries.
The Pearson Correlation will be utilized to analyze whether the number of surgeries influenced the deviation variables (Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex Vertical, Angular deviation, duration of the intervention).
Measured: Through study completion, and average of 1 year and a half
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Dec 2022
- Primary completion1 Sep 2024
- Study completion30 Sep 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalocclusionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La Sapienza
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michele Cassetta, University of Roma La Sapienza
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06661551
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- URomLS_5951
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Brilli D, Cauli I, Cassetta M. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2024 Jul;146:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105093. Epub 2024 May 22.
PubMed 38788916S. Bertoldo, D. Brilli, I. Cauli, M. Cassetta, Dynamic navigation for miniscrew insertion in the palatal vault: a pilot study, Dental Cadmos 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.19256/d.cadmos.07.2024.06.
Brilli D, Giansanti M, Cassetta M. Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jun 10;29(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01414-7.
PubMed 40493264
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does the Generation to Which the Operator Belongs Influence the Orthodontic Miniscrew Insertion Accuracy in Dynamic Computer-guided Surgery? a Randomized Clinical Prospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06661551
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- URomLS_5951
- Keywords
- Dynamic computer-guided surgery, navigation systems, TADs, generations, accuracy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Roma La SapienzaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to access the miniscrew accuracy insertion via dynamic computer-guided systems, inserted by three different clinicians belonging to three different generations, in childern in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition that need for orthodontic treatment, with good oral hygiene and absence of acute infection in the oral cavity and good general healt. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are there statistically significant differences between accuracy parameters and generation to which the clinician belongs?
- Does exist a significant correlation between the deviation parameters and the number of surgeries, and between the duration of interventions and the number of surgeries? Researchers wirll compare the deviation parameters to see if there are statistically significant differences in terms of accuracy.
Participants will undergo a surgical procedure of placement of 2 orthodontic miniscrews in the palatal region, and then a post-operative CBCT to assess the accuracy and presence or absence of damage to adjacent structures
Detailed description
This study will be conducted to evaluate intergenerational differences regarding orthodontic miniscrew placement accuracy in the palatine vault through dynamic computer-guided surgery. The secondary outcome will be to assess, for each operator, the correlation between the number of miniscrews inserted, i.e. surgeries, and the accuracy variables as well as the duration of interventions.
The clinical investigation will be conducted between December 2022 and September 2024, adhering to the ethical standards outlined in the seventh revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. Parents and guardians are going to be informed about the details of the study, including the benefits and potential risks, and provided written consent. The investigation is approved by the local ethics committee (no. 5951).
The eligibility criteria are: (1) children in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition, (2) need for orthodontic treatment, (3) good oral hygiene, (4) absence of acute infection in the oral cavity, (5) good general health. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) syndromic patients, (2) uncontrolled systemic disease.
Miniscrews will be placed by three different clinicians, belonging to three different generations and levels of experience in implant and orthodontic miniscrew placement in free-hand and static computer-guided surgery.
A block randomization sequence is going to be generated using the Sealed Envelope online tool (https://www.sealedenvelope.com) to allocate the subjects into three groups. The random allocation sequence generation, enrollment, and assignment of the participants to interventions will be done by an external researcher not involved in the research. The allocation ratio of the subjects will be balanced, based on the generation to which the researchers belong.
Group A is going to be treated by operator number 1, an oral surgeon with more than 30 Years of experience, which belongs to "Generation X"; operator number 2 (MG) will treat Group B and is a dentist with 15 years of experience in oral surgery and belonged to "Generation Y"; Group C will be treated by operator number 3 (DB), a final year dental student with no previous experience in oral surgery, that belonged to "Generation Z". However, all three were novices in the use of dynamic computer-guided surgical systems, and no pre-clinical training phase was done.
In order to achieve skeletal anchorage for orthodontic or orthopedic treatment, the miniscrews (BENEfit®, Benefit system; PSM Medical Solutions, Tuttlingen, Germany) will be inserted under local anesthesia, in the paramedian area of the hard palate at the level of the third palatine rugae, and to guarantee a minimally-invasive, flapless and pre-drilling free approach, the miniscrews will be inserted using the Navident dynamic navigation system (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), through a NSK iSD900 cordless battery screwdriver (Nakanishi INC., Tochigi, Japan).
The patients will undergo to optical scanning, using a Medit i700 intraoral scanner (Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea) and CBCT imaging of the upper jaw, captured using a Scanora 3Dx cone-beam device (Soredex, Tuusula, Finland).
The resulting STL (Standard Triangulation Language) and DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files are going to be superimposed to precisely determine the insertion site, diameter, and length of the miniscrews to achieve bicortical anchorage.
To evaluate the accuracy of miniscrew placement and to detect any potential root injury, a postoperative CBCT scan was conducted immediately after each surgical procedure.
The preoperative and postoperative images were superimposed, through the use of EvaluNav software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), employing coordinated automatically given by the software as previously described [3, 10, 26]. To assess the differences between the planned position and the actual placement of miniscrews, five deviation parameters will be analyzed: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex vertical (vertical deviation), Angular deviation (Figure 2) The duration of the surgeries will be calculated by an external researcher using the Navident Software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada) from the moment when the Navigation View appears to the end of the navigation phase.
The sample size was calculated based on a previous study using G*Power software (version 3.1.9.6; Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany). The significance level was set at 0.05 and the power at 0.8. A total sample size of thirty-three os considered acceptable, with an actual power of 0.81.
To reduce the risk of statistical analysis bias, the operator variable will be coded, and a blinded statistician will perform the statistical analysis, using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) to create a database to allocate the subjects, and the statistical software package SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp., New York, USA).
Descriptive statistics analysis (including mean, minimum, maximum values, confidence interval at 95% and standard deviations) is going to be performed for each variable within each group.
Subsequently, the Shapiro-Wilk normality test will be conducted to assess the distribution of the data. For variables following a normal distribution, the ANOVA test will be employed; whereas, for variables exhibiting a non-normal distribution, a non-parametric test, namely the Kruskal-Wallis H test, is performed. In cases where the tests indicated statistically significant differences, post-hoc tests will be subsequently conducted. The Tukey test is going to be used for variables with a normal distribution, and the Dunn's for a non-normal distribution.
Furthermore, the Pearson Correlation will be utilized to analyze whether the number of surgeries influenced the deviation variables (Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex Vertical, Angular deviation, duration of the intervention).
The level of significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A (Generation X operator) | Experimental | Procedure: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgeryGroup A is going to be treated by operator number 1, an oral surgeon with more than 30 Years of experience, which belongs to "Generation X" |
| Group B (Generation Y operator) | Experimental | Procedure: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgeryOperator number 2 (MG) will treat Group B and is a dentist with 15 years of experience in oral surgery and belonged to "Generation Y". |
| Group C (Generation Z operator) | Experimental | Procedure: Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgeryGroup C will be treated by operator number 3 (DB), a final year dental student with no previous experience in oral surgery, that belonged to "Generation Z". |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Children in late mixed dentition or permanent dentition;
- Need for orthodontic treatment;
- Good oral hygiene;
- Absence of acute infection in the oral cavity;
- Good general health.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Syndromic patients;
- Uncontrolled systemic disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgeryThe intervention more executed in the literature is by using static computer-guided systems (s-CAS) . However, the s-CAS has limitations, including the time and cost associated with guide production, furthermore, the guide's bulk prevents its use in patients with limited mouth opening, and reduced irrigation potentially leads to overheating and bone burns during implant placement. Additionally, the inability to adjust the surgical plan intraoperatively, the lack of real-time visualization during implant site preparation and implant insertion, and the requirement for specific surgical kits for each implant system present further challenges. Dynamic navigation systems offer several benefits as highlighted in the literature, including: real-time feedback of the position of surgical drill or implant, allowing intraoperative changes adjusting the implant position during the surgery, reduction of risk of injury to adjacent anatomical structures, promotion of accuracy in novices | Procedure or surgery | Group A (Generation X operator), Group B (Generation Y operator), Group C (Generation Z operator) |
Primary outcome
Miniscrew insertion accuracy assessment
Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year and a half
The preoperative and postoperative DICOM images need to be superimposed, through the use of EvaluNav software (ClaroNav Technology Inc., Toronto, Canada), employing coordinated automatically given by the software. The software, to assess the differences between the planned position and the actual placement of miniscrews, will provide five deviation parameters: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex vertical (vertical deviation), Angular deviation. Entry 2D: deviation of the miniscrew platform in the x and y dimensions of space in an occlusal view; Entry 3D: deviation of the miniscrew platform in the three dimensions of space; Apex 3D: deviation of the miniscrew apex in the three dimensions of space; Apex vertical: deviation of miniscrew apex depth (z-axis), in millimeters (mm); Angle: angular deviation between the central axes of the planned position and the final position, in degrees (°).
1 secondary outcome
Correlation between the deviation parameters and the number of surgeries, and between the duration of interventions and the number of surgeries.
Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year and a half
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Oct 2024.
- Background: PubMed 38788916Brilli D, Cauli I, Cassetta M. How palatal vault morphology and screw length influence the accuracy of dynamic computer-guided orthodontic miniscrew insertion. A prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2024 Jul;146:105093. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105093. Epub 2024 May 22.
- BackgroundS. Bertoldo, D. Brilli, I. Cauli, M. Cassetta, Dynamic navigation for miniscrew insertion in the palatal vault: a pilot study, Dental Cadmos 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.19256/d.cadmos.07.2024.06.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40493264Brilli D, Giansanti M, Cassetta M. Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jun 10;29(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01414-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Malocclusion
Recruiting
FM Technique in Orthodontic Clear Aligner Therapy: A Single-Arm Clinical Study
Malocclusion
Not yet recruiting
Treatment of Mandibular Overjet in Children With Maxillary Retrognathism
Maxillary Retrognathism, Children
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Customized CBCT-Based Assessment of Transverse Discrepancies
Transverse Skeletal Discrepancy
Recruiting
Maxillary Arch Distalization With Infrazygomatic Crest Miniscrews for Class II Malocclusion
Class II Malocclusion
Enrolling by invitation
Evaluation of Corticotomy-Assisted Canine Retraction Rate
Malocclusion, Corticotomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Miniscrew insertion in dynamic-computer guided surgery in people with Malocclusion and Malocclusion in Children, run by University of Roma La Sapienza at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Miniscrew insertion accuracy assessment (time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year and a half). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06661551, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Oct 2024.