AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)LumbaCure2302NCT06662032

Clinical Investigation to Assess the Clinical Effect of the LumbaCure® Intervention on Patients Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain

A study testing LumbaCure® and Rehab program in people with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), run by Odix at 2 sites in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low Back Pain (LBP) is one of the common causes of morbidity worldwide, with a one-month prevalence of 23.3 %. Number of people with LBP reached 577 million people in 2020. LBP has been the leading cause of years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
What is being tested?
LumbaCure® and Rehab program
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesBelgium
Study dates
24 Jun 2024to 26 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Chronic non-specific LBP (without red flag)
  • LBP is the principal musculoskeletal condition
  • Aged between 18 and 85 years old
  • Able to read and understand questionnaires and communicate with the physiotherapist.
  • Average Back Pain intensity over the last week above 2, assessed on Numerical Pain Rating Scale from 0 to 10 anchored with "no pain" at 0 and "worst pain imaginable " at 10.

Who cannot join

  • Suspected or confirmed serious pathology (i.e infection, fracture, cancer, inflammatory arthritis, ….)
  • Significant sciatica VAS > 7
  • Radiculopathy
  • Cognitive impairment that precludes participant from consenting, completing investigation questionnaires or complying with recommendations
  • Previous spine surgery in the last 3 months
  • Pregnant women
Show all 9Show fewer
  • body weight > 120 kg
  • Neurological disease
  • Fibromyalgia

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Belgium2 sites
  • Jessa Ziekenhuis

    Hasselt

  • Jessa Ziekenhuis

    Herk-de-Stad

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Randomized Clinical Investigation to Assess Preliminary Clinical Performance, Effectiveness and Safety of the LumbaCure® (Prototype C190070.01) Medical Device When Used in Patients Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain

Low Back Pain (LBP) is one of the common causes of morbidity worldwide, with a one-month prevalence of 23.3 %. Number of people with LBP reached 577 million people in 2020. LBP has been the leading cause of years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017. The highest incidence of LBP is in people in their third decade of age. LBP is a complex disease difficult to treat as most of these cases (80 - 90 %) are classified as non-specific meaning that the pain cannot be attributed to any specific injury or pathology.

Until now exercise therapy is commonly used as the treatment of choice in the rehab program of LBP. The aim of physical treatment is to improve function and prevent disability from getting worse.

Read more

LumbaCure® is a robotic system driven by a proprietary movement algorithm to induce a specific and controlled mobilization of the low back in patient requiring treatment by physical exercises due to orthopedic disorder, especially low back pain.

In Belgium, the standard back-school programme (rehabilitation programme) includes 35 rehabilitation sessions of 2 h delivered 2x/week at the investigator site (whom the first session is the inclusion visit, no therapy performed) and one session to tackle the psychological component of the condition (information on how to cope with pain). Participants are divided into two groups: the intervention group uses the LumbaCure® device (a seat that mobilizes the lower back for 15 minutes) in addition to the standard sessions (from session 2 to 27), while the control group follows the standard program with an extra 15 minutes of exercises. After session 27 (around 13 weeks), all participants continue their programme without the LumbaCure®, and their progress is assessed before the final 35th session.

Read the detailed description

Low Back Pain (LBP) is one of the most common causes of morbidity worldwide, with a one-month prevalence of 23.3%. In 2020, the number of people suffering from LBP reached 577 million. From 1990 to 2017, LBP remained the leading cause of years lived with disability. The highest incidence of LBP is observed in individuals in their third decade of life. LBP is a complex condition that is often difficult to treat, as 80-90% of cases are classified as non-specific, meaning the pain cannot be attributed to a specific injury or pathology. Exercise therapy is currently the most common treatment for LBP rehabilitation, aiming to improve function and prevent the worsening of disability.

The study involves a standard rehabilitation program in Belgium consisting of 35 multidisciplinary sessions, each lasting 2 hours. Participants are divided into two groups: the intervention group and the control group. The intervention group follows the standard rehabilitation program but also uses the LumbaCure® device, a robotic system driven by a proprietary movement algorithm. The device is designed to induce controlled mobilization of the lower back, which is particularly beneficial for patients requiring physical treatment due to orthopedic disorders like low back pain. During each rehabilitation session, participants in the intervention group perform a 15-minute session on the LumbaCure® device under the supervision of a physiotherapist. Over the intervention period, participants in the intervention group are expected to complete 26 LumbaCure® sessions.

In the control group, participants follow the same standard rehabilitation program with a frequency of ideally twice a week. To match the duration of the intervention group's additional LumbaCure® sessions, participants in the control group perform 15 minutes of additional exercises based on the standard care practices of their respective rehabilitation center.

After session 27, which ideally take place over a period of 13 weeks, all participants continue with the remaining 8 sessions of the standard rehabilitation program. However, during this final phase, no LumbaCure® sessions are included for the intervention group. Participants' progress is monitored throughout the study, with a final evaluation taking place before the completion of the 35th session. This follow-up allows researchers to assess the overall effectiveness of the rehabilitation program, including the impact of the LumbaCure® device on patient outcomes compared to the standard care protocol.

Being tested
LumbaCure®, Rehab program
Keywords
LBP, rehab, nCLPB

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LumbaCure®Device

    LumbaCure® is a robotic system that systematically moves the spine of affected patients with a complex proprietary algorithm.

  • Rehab programOther

    Standard rehabilitation program

Study groups in NCT06662032
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Test InterventionExperimentalIn the intervention arm, participants will follow the standard rehabilitation programme at a frequency of ideally 2 times a week. LumbaCure® device will be used in addition to the standard programme. A session of 15 min will be performed at each rehabilitation session. The device is to be used by the Physiotherapist at the rehabilitation centre. In total, the participant should perform 26 LumbaCure® sessions during the intervention period, this corresponds to the number of rehabilitation sessions considered in the intervention period.
Receives: Device: LumbaCure®; Other: Rehab program
Control InterventionActive comparatorParticipants in the control arm will follow the standard rehabilitation programme at a frequency of ideally 2 times a week. To align with the duration of the intervention arm, participants in the control arm will also perform an additional 15 minutes of exercises (following standard care of the site).
Receives: Other: Rehab program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disability

    Comparison of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) evolution from baseline to session 26 (visit 4, end of intervention) between the two treatment arms.

    Measured: Around week 13 (intervention period)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Disability

    • Comparison of the difference in the ODI evolution from baseline to session 8 (visit2) session 18 (visit 3) and during the follow-up period (visit 5), between the two treatment arms.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9 (intervention period) and week 18 (follow-up)

  2. Back pain

    • Changes from baseline, in average back pain intensity over the last week, assessed on Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) from 0 to 10. Assessed at the different timepoints (visits 2 to 4).
    • Changes in average back pain intensity over the last week, assessed on Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10, during the follow-up period (V5).

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  3. Function

    • Change in function score, assessed using the Patient Specific Functional Scale, between baseline, and the different time points (visits 2 to 4). The PSFS requires participants to identify three problematic activities and to rate these activities on a scale from 0 to 10. A high score indicates a greater ability to accomplish the task.
    • Change in function score during the follow-up period, assessed using the Pain Specific Functional Scale.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  4. Kinesiophobia

    • Change in fear of movements and attitudes and behaviour towards pain score, evaluated through the Tampa questionnaire (TSK-17) between baseline to the different timepoints (visits 2 to 4). The total score is calculated by adding up 17 sub-questions assessed using a 4-point Likert scale (from 1 to 4), with high scores indicating a greater degree of kinesiophobia.
    • Change in fear of movements and attitudes and behaviour towards pain score, evaluated through the Tampa questionnaire,during the follow-up period (V5)

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  5. Pain catastrophizing

    Change in pain catastrophizing score, evaluated through the Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS), between baseline to the different timepoints (visits 2 to 4 and during follow-up : V5). The total score is calculated by adding up 13 sub-questions assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (from 0 to 4), with high score indicating a greater degree of pain catastrophising.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  6. Flexibility

    The ability of the patient to flex the lower back via fingertips to floor distance.

    It will be performed at each visit for both groups.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  7. Disability

    • Disability Responding rate: Number and percentage of patients presenting a clinically significant improvement in the ODI at the different timepoints versus baseline in the two treatment arms

    Measured: Around week 4, 9 (intervention period) and week 18 (follow-up)

  8. Back pain

    • Pain responding rate : Number and percentage of patients presenting a clinically significant improvement in the NPRS at the different timepoints versus baseline in the two treatment arms

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  9. Function

    Function responding rate : Number and percentage of patients presenting a clinically significant improvement in the pain specific function scale at the different timepoints versus baseline in the two treatment arms.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  10. Kinesiophobia

    Responding Rate kinesiophobia : Number and percentage of patients presenting a clinically significant improvement in Tampa scale (TSK-17) at the different timepoints versus baseline in the two treatment arms.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

  11. Pain catastrophizing

    Responding Rate pain catastrophization : Number and percentage of patients presenting a clinically significant improvement in Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) at the different timepoints versus baseline, in the two-treatment arms.

    Measured: Around week 4, 9, 13, 18

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Oct 2024
  2. Study start24 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion26 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion26 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06662032
Sponsor's protocol ID
LumbaCure2302_2.0
Other IDs
CIV-23-05-043012
Acronym
LumbaCure2302
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
16 Oct 2024
Last updated
15 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing LumbaCure® and Rehab program in people with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), run by Odix at 2 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disability (time frame: Around week 13 (intervention period)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in