Pain ManagementNCT06664203
Efficacy of Variable Volume Truncal Blocks in Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgery
A study testing Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacain and Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacain in people with Pain Management and Anaesthesia Complication, run by Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
aim of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Management, Anaesthesia Complication
- What is being tested?
- Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacain and Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacain
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2024to 1 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ASA 1-2
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m²
- Age: 18-65 years -Patients undergoing all upper extremity orthopedic surgeries, except shoulder surgeries (distal humerus, elbow, forearm, hand, and wrist), will be included. -
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Severe pulmonary disease
- Contralateral diaphragm paralysis
- Nerve injury secondary to trauma
- Neuromuscular disease
Show all 13Show fewer
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Bleeding diathesis
- Allergy to local anesthetics and dexamethasone
- Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Morbid obesity with BMI >35
- Severe cardiovascular, renal, or hepatic disease
- Infection at the site of the nerve block
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Training Hospital
Istanbul, 34255
serpil Sehirlioglu, MD, +905054431852, drserpilsahin@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Anesthetic and Analgesic Efficacy of Selective Truncal Blocks at Different Volumes in Upper Extremity Orthopedic Surgeries
aim of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Completing the operation under regional anesthesia will be considered a successful block.
Read the detailed description
The primary outcome of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Completing the operation under regional anesthesia will be considered a successful block.
Secondary Outcome Variables:
Secondary outcomes include comparisons between the two groups regarding total motor block duration and analgesia durations, tourniquet pain, incidence of diaphragm paralysis, complications (vascular puncture, paresthesia, Horner's syndrome, hoarseness), time to first postoperative analgesic administration, and total analgesic consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours.
This study aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy and complication rates associated with different volumes of local anesthetic used in upper extremity surgeries (elbow, forearm, and hand surgeries) in patients over 18 years of age with ASA scores of 1-2 to reduce complication rates.
In recent years, brachial plexus blocks, performed through various approaches, have become preferred over general anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries due to numerous advantages. Peripheral nerve blocks are known to maintain patient consciousness and spontaneous breathing, reduce airway interventions, provide effective postoperative pain control, decrease opioid-related side effects, limit surgical stress-induced metabolic and endocrine changes, enable early discharge, and reduce treatment costs.
The selective truncal block approach has rapid onset and high success rates. The use of ultrasound guidance in peripheral blocks has also reduced various complications, such as vascular injury. The selective truncal approach, defined by Manoj Kumar Karmakar in 2020, involves blocking the upper, middle, and lower trunks of the brachial plexus at the C7 transverse process level, achieving sensory and motor blockade across all ipsilateral upper extremity dermatomes except T2. Interscalene block, which targets the roots of the brachial plexus, may lead to complications such as Horner's syndrome and ipsilateral diaphragm paralysis due to phrenic nerve blockade. This study aims to compare the efficacy and complications of truncal blocks applied at different volumes in the selective truncal approach at the trunk level, reducing complications such as phrenic nerve paralysis and Horner's syndrome.
Higher volumes of local anesthetics are associated with increased complication risks, whereas lower volumes may result in block failure. The adjuvant use of dexamethasone allows for more effective anesthetic and analgesic efficacy at lower volumes and aims to reduce complications such as phrenic nerve paralysis and Horner's syndrome. Given the potential spread of high local anesthetic volumes to the phrenic nerve, 8 mg of dexamethasone will be added to both groups to facilitate lower volume usage.
Dexamethasone is a widely used glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory and anti-toxic effects, characterized by potent lipophilic activity. It is fat-soluble and increases pH, facilitating the penetration of local anesthetics into the nerve sheath, and has been shown to prolong the duration of action of local anesthetics. Additionally, dexamethasone is commonly used in pain management due to its neuromodulatory effects.The selective trunk block targets the trunks of the brachial plexus, blocking the nerves at the trunk level rather than the root level. Today, the brachial plexus block is often preferred over general anesthesia in upper extremity surgeries due to several advantages, such as preservation of consciousness, minimized respiratory impact, reduced airway intervention, long-lasting postoperative pain control, fewer opioid-related side effects, limited metabolic and endocrine changes associated with surgery, and early discharge. In interscalene brachial plexus blocks, diaphragm paralysis and Horner syndrome are common due to the proximity to the phrenic nerve. In infraclavicular and supraclavicular blocks, the close proximity to the pleura presents a disadvantage; however, the widespread use of ultrasound guidance has reduced the risk of complications associated with this proximity. In 2020, Manoj Kumar Karmakar introduced the selective trunk approach, suggesting that blocking the upper, middle, and lower trunks of the brachial plexus at the C7 transverse process level produces sensory and motor blocks in all ipsilateral upper extremity dermatomes except T2. However, diaphragm paralysis and Horner syndrome can still occur with high-volume local anesthetic applications at this level.
This study aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy and complication rates of selective trunk blocks with different volumes. After informed consent is obtained, all patients will be taken to the preoperative intervention room 40 minutes before surgery for the block application. Both groups will receive a selective trunk block. An IV line will be placed for each patient, who will be monitored and given 0.05 mg/kg IV midazolam for sedation.
Patients will be randomized into two groups using a sealed envelope method. Group 1 will receive a selective trunk approach peripheral nerve block with a volume of 25 ml, and Group 2 will receive a volume of 15 ml. Different anesthesiologists will administer the block and perform postoperative follow-ups.
Patients will be placed in a supine position without a pillow, with arms aligned alongside the body and the head turned away from the block side. A high-frequency linear ultrasound (USG) probe will be used to locate the C7 transverse process, which will serve as a sonoanatomic landmark. Once the C5 ventral ramus is identified at the C7 transverse process level, the linear probe will be slightly caudally angled to visualize the C6 ventral ramus. The area where the superior trunk is formed by C5 and C6 will be examined with the USG probe until the superior trunk is visualized. Below the superior trunk, the middle trunk and the C8 ventral ramus will be visible. The T1 ventral ramus will be seen on the first rib upon caudal angling of the probe. After obtaining all these images, the block needle will be directed from lateral to medial. In Group 1, a total of 23 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used as the local anesthetic mixture, totaling 25 ml. In Group 2, 13 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used, totaling 15 ml. In Group 1, 7 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, and the needle will then be slightly withdrawn and redirected to the middle trunk for an additional 8 ml. The probe will then be directed caudally to obtain an optimal view of the lower trunk, where 10 ml of the same mixture will be injected close to the lower trunk. In Group 2, 5 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, followed by 5 ml into the middle trunk and 5 ml into the lower trunk, as in Group 1.
After the block is performed, sensory and motor blocks in the median, ulnar, radial, musculocutaneous, and axillary nerve dermatomes will be assessed every 10 minutes for 30 minutes. Sensory block will be evaluated using the pinprick test (0: no sensory block, 1: touch sensation but no pain, 2: no touch or pain sensation). For the block to be considered sufficient for anesthesia, the following criteria must be met:
Sensory block level of 1 in all dermatomes at 30 minutes. Motor block in at least three of the musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, median, and axillary nerves.
If there is no motor block in three or more distal peripheral nerves, general anesthesia will be administered, and the patient will be excluded from the study. Diaphragm thickening fractions during expiration and deep inspiration will be measured with ultrasound before and 30 minutes after the block to evaluate diaphragm paralysis. All patients will be monitored for Horner syndrome. Once in the operating room, all patients will receive midazolam at 0.4 - 0.5 mg/kg IV to maintain a Ramsey sedation scale of 3-4.
Pain will be assessed intraoperatively using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). If VAS ≥3, the patient will initially receive a 0.1 mcg/kg IV bolus of fentanyl. If the VAS remains ≥3 after 15 minutes, an additional 0.1 mcg/kg fentanyl dose will be administered. If the VAS remains ≥3 after these interventions, general anesthesia will be administered, and the block will be considered unsuccessful.
Patients will be assessed postoperatively for motor block and analgesic efficacy at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, with VAS tracking. The postoperative assessments will be conducted by an observer blinded to the block administration. Motor block will be considered resolved once motor function returns in two or more nerves (median, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, axillary). Analgesic efficacy will be considered resolved if VAS >3. For rescue analgesia, 1 gram of paracetamol IV will be administered, with an additional 1 mg/kg tramadol if pain persists after 15 minutes.
The time to achieve sensory block in all dermatomes after the block will be recorded as the "ready for surgery" time. Intraoperative tourniquet pain records will be kept. The time to first postoperative analgesic use and total analgesic consumption within 24 hours postoperatively will be recorded, and patients will be evaluated for complications.
- Conditions
- Pain Management, Anaesthesia Complication
- Being tested
- Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacain, Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacain
- Keywords
- postoperative pain, selective turuncus block, arm anaesthesia
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacainProcedure or surgery
A high-frequency linear ultrasound (USG) probe will be used to locate the C7 transverse process, which will serve as a sonoanatomic landmark. Once the C5 ventral ramus is identified at the C7 transverse process level, the linear probe will be slightly caudally angled to visualize the C6 ventral ramus. The area where the superior trunk is formed by C5 and C6 will be examined with the USG probe until the superior trunk is visualized. Below the superior trunk, the middle trunk and the C8 ventral ramus will be visible. In Group 1, a total of 23 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used as the local anesthetic mixture, totaling 25ml. 7ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, the middle trunk for an additional 8 ml. The probe will then be directed caudally to obtain an optimal view of the lower trunk, where 10 ml of the same mixture will be injected close to the lower trunk.
Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacainProcedure or surgery
In Group 2, 13 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used, totaling 15 ml. In Group 2, 5 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, followed by 5 ml into the middle trunk and 5 ml into the lower trunk, as in Group II.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| with 15 ml SeTb group | Active comparator | This group will receive a SeTB (Selective Trunk Block) with a total of 15 ml of bupivacaine Receives: Procedure: Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacain |
| With 25 ml bupivacain SeTb | Active comparator | This group will receive a SeTB (Selective Trunk Block) with a total of 25 ml of bupivacaine Receives: Procedure: Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacain |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia
The primary outcome of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Completing the operation under regional anesthesia will be considered a successful block.
Measured: 24 hour
Secondary outcomes (3)
Total Opioid Consumption
total analgesic consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours
Measured: 24 hour
time to first rescue analgesic requirement.
time to first postoperative analgesic administration,
Measured: 24 hour
diaphragm paralysis
ASSESMENT OF diaphragm paralysis
Measured: 24 hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Oct 2024
- Study start1 Nov 2024
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain ManagementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, SERPİL ŞEHİRLİOĞLU, Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital
- Investigators
- Serpil Sehirlioglu, MD, Principal investigator, Gaziosmanpasa Research and Training Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06664203
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GaziosmanpasaTREH-SeTb
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The data associated with the paper are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Publications
Sivashanmugam T, Sripriya R, John Paul S, Ravishankar M. Estimation of minimum effective local anaesthetic volume to block the lower trunk during selective truncal injection brachial plexus block. Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;66(Suppl 5):S281-S283. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1087_21. Epub 2022 Aug 12. No abstract available.
PubMed 36262721Bao X, Huang J, Feng H, Qian Y, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Hu H, Wang X. Effect of local anesthetic volume (20 mL vs 30 mL ropivacaine) on electromyography of the diaphragm and pulmonary function after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):69-75. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000014.
PubMed 30640655
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Anesthetic and Analgesic Efficacy of Selective Truncal Blocks at Different Volumes in Upper Extremity Orthopedic Surgeries
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06664203
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GaziosmanpasaTREH-SeTb
- Conditions
- Pain Management, Anaesthesia Complication
- Keywords
- postoperative pain, selective turuncus block, arm anaesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education HospitalOther government
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
aim of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Completing the operation under regional anesthesia will be considered a successful block.
Detailed description
The primary outcome of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Completing the operation under regional anesthesia will be considered a successful block.
Secondary Outcome Variables:
Secondary outcomes include comparisons between the two groups regarding total motor block duration and analgesia durations, tourniquet pain, incidence of diaphragm paralysis, complications (vascular puncture, paresthesia, Horner's syndrome, hoarseness), time to first postoperative analgesic administration, and total analgesic consumption within the first 24 postoperative hours.
This study aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy and complication rates associated with different volumes of local anesthetic used in upper extremity surgeries (elbow, forearm, and hand surgeries) in patients over 18 years of age with ASA scores of 1-2 to reduce complication rates.
In recent years, brachial plexus blocks, performed through various approaches, have become preferred over general anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries due to numerous advantages. Peripheral nerve blocks are known to maintain patient consciousness and spontaneous breathing, reduce airway interventions, provide effective postoperative pain control, decrease opioid-related side effects, limit surgical stress-induced metabolic and endocrine changes, enable early discharge, and reduce treatment costs.
The selective truncal block approach has rapid onset and high success rates. The use of ultrasound guidance in peripheral blocks has also reduced various complications, such as vascular injury. The selective truncal approach, defined by Manoj Kumar Karmakar in 2020, involves blocking the upper, middle, and lower trunks of the brachial plexus at the C7 transverse process level, achieving sensory and motor blockade across all ipsilateral upper extremity dermatomes except T2. Interscalene block, which targets the roots of the brachial plexus, may lead to complications such as Horner's syndrome and ipsilateral diaphragm paralysis due to phrenic nerve blockade. This study aims to compare the efficacy and complications of truncal blocks applied at different volumes in the selective truncal approach at the trunk level, reducing complications such as phrenic nerve paralysis and Horner's syndrome.
Higher volumes of local anesthetics are associated with increased complication risks, whereas lower volumes may result in block failure. The adjuvant use of dexamethasone allows for more effective anesthetic and analgesic efficacy at lower volumes and aims to reduce complications such as phrenic nerve paralysis and Horner's syndrome. Given the potential spread of high local anesthetic volumes to the phrenic nerve, 8 mg of dexamethasone will be added to both groups to facilitate lower volume usage.
Dexamethasone is a widely used glucocorticoid with anti-inflammatory and anti-toxic effects, characterized by potent lipophilic activity. It is fat-soluble and increases pH, facilitating the penetration of local anesthetics into the nerve sheath, and has been shown to prolong the duration of action of local anesthetics. Additionally, dexamethasone is commonly used in pain management due to its neuromodulatory effects.The selective trunk block targets the trunks of the brachial plexus, blocking the nerves at the trunk level rather than the root level. Today, the brachial plexus block is often preferred over general anesthesia in upper extremity surgeries due to several advantages, such as preservation of consciousness, minimized respiratory impact, reduced airway intervention, long-lasting postoperative pain control, fewer opioid-related side effects, limited metabolic and endocrine changes associated with surgery, and early discharge. In interscalene brachial plexus blocks, diaphragm paralysis and Horner syndrome are common due to the proximity to the phrenic nerve. In infraclavicular and supraclavicular blocks, the close proximity to the pleura presents a disadvantage; however, the widespread use of ultrasound guidance has reduced the risk of complications associated with this proximity. In 2020, Manoj Kumar Karmakar introduced the selective trunk approach, suggesting that blocking the upper, middle, and lower trunks of the brachial plexus at the C7 transverse process level produces sensory and motor blocks in all ipsilateral upper extremity dermatomes except T2. However, diaphragm paralysis and Horner syndrome can still occur with high-volume local anesthetic applications at this level.
This study aims to compare the anesthetic efficacy and complication rates of selective trunk blocks with different volumes. After informed consent is obtained, all patients will be taken to the preoperative intervention room 40 minutes before surgery for the block application. Both groups will receive a selective trunk block. An IV line will be placed for each patient, who will be monitored and given 0.05 mg/kg IV midazolam for sedation.
Patients will be randomized into two groups using a sealed envelope method. Group 1 will receive a selective trunk approach peripheral nerve block with a volume of 25 ml, and Group 2 will receive a volume of 15 ml. Different anesthesiologists will administer the block and perform postoperative follow-ups.
Patients will be placed in a supine position without a pillow, with arms aligned alongside the body and the head turned away from the block side. A high-frequency linear ultrasound (USG) probe will be used to locate the C7 transverse process, which will serve as a sonoanatomic landmark. Once the C5 ventral ramus is identified at the C7 transverse process level, the linear probe will be slightly caudally angled to visualize the C6 ventral ramus. The area where the superior trunk is formed by C5 and C6 will be examined with the USG probe until the superior trunk is visualized. Below the superior trunk, the middle trunk and the C8 ventral ramus will be visible. The T1 ventral ramus will be seen on the first rib upon caudal angling of the probe. After obtaining all these images, the block needle will be directed from lateral to medial. In Group 1, a total of 23 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used as the local anesthetic mixture, totaling 25 ml. In Group 2, 13 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used, totaling 15 ml. In Group 1, 7 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, and the needle will then be slightly withdrawn and redirected to the middle trunk for an additional 8 ml. The probe will then be directed caudally to obtain an optimal view of the lower trunk, where 10 ml of the same mixture will be injected close to the lower trunk. In Group 2, 5 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, followed by 5 ml into the middle trunk and 5 ml into the lower trunk, as in Group 1.
After the block is performed, sensory and motor blocks in the median, ulnar, radial, musculocutaneous, and axillary nerve dermatomes will be assessed every 10 minutes for 30 minutes. Sensory block will be evaluated using the pinprick test (0: no sensory block, 1: touch sensation but no pain, 2: no touch or pain sensation). For the block to be considered sufficient for anesthesia, the following criteria must be met:
Sensory block level of 1 in all dermatomes at 30 minutes. Motor block in at least three of the musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, median, and axillary nerves.
If there is no motor block in three or more distal peripheral nerves, general anesthesia will be administered, and the patient will be excluded from the study. Diaphragm thickening fractions during expiration and deep inspiration will be measured with ultrasound before and 30 minutes after the block to evaluate diaphragm paralysis. All patients will be monitored for Horner syndrome. Once in the operating room, all patients will receive midazolam at 0.4 - 0.5 mg/kg IV to maintain a Ramsey sedation scale of 3-4.
Pain will be assessed intraoperatively using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). If VAS ≥3, the patient will initially receive a 0.1 mcg/kg IV bolus of fentanyl. If the VAS remains ≥3 after 15 minutes, an additional 0.1 mcg/kg fentanyl dose will be administered. If the VAS remains ≥3 after these interventions, general anesthesia will be administered, and the block will be considered unsuccessful.
Patients will be assessed postoperatively for motor block and analgesic efficacy at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, with VAS tracking. The postoperative assessments will be conducted by an observer blinded to the block administration. Motor block will be considered resolved once motor function returns in two or more nerves (median, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, axillary). Analgesic efficacy will be considered resolved if VAS >3. For rescue analgesia, 1 gram of paracetamol IV will be administered, with an additional 1 mg/kg tramadol if pain persists after 15 minutes.
The time to achieve sensory block in all dermatomes after the block will be recorded as the "ready for surgery" time. Intraoperative tourniquet pain records will be kept. The time to first postoperative analgesic use and total analgesic consumption within 24 hours postoperatively will be recorded, and patients will be evaluated for complications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| with 15 ml SeTb group | Active comparator | Procedure: Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacainThis group will receive a SeTB (Selective Trunk Block) with a total of 15 ml of bupivacaine |
| With 25 ml bupivacain SeTb | Active comparator | Procedure: Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacainThis group will receive a SeTB (Selective Trunk Block) with a total of 25 ml of bupivacaine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ASA 1-2
- Body Mass Index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m²
- Age: 18-65 years -Patients undergoing all upper extremity orthopedic surgeries, except shoulder surgeries (distal humerus, elbow, forearm, hand, and wrist), will be included. -
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patient refusal
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Severe pulmonary disease
- Contralateral diaphragm paralysis
- Nerve injury secondary to trauma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacainA high-frequency linear ultrasound (USG) probe will be used to locate the C7 transverse process, which will serve as a sonoanatomic landmark. Once the C5 ventral ramus is identified at the C7 transverse process level, the linear probe will be slightly caudally angled to visualize the C6 ventral ramus. The area where the superior trunk is formed by C5 and C6 will be examined with the USG probe until the superior trunk is visualized. Below the superior trunk, the middle trunk and the C8 ventral ramus will be visible. In Group 1, a total of 23 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used as the local anesthetic mixture, totaling 25ml. 7ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, the middle trunk for an additional 8 ml. The probe will then be directed caudally to obtain an optimal view of the lower trunk, where 10 ml of the same mixture will be injected close to the lower trunk. | Procedure or surgery | With 25 ml bupivacain SeTb |
| Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacainIn Group 2, 13 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine plus 2 ml (8 mg dexamethasone) will be used, totaling 15 ml. In Group 2, 5 ml of the local anesthetic mixture will be injected into the superior trunk, followed by 5 ml into the middle trunk and 5 ml into the lower trunk, as in Group II. | Procedure or surgery | with 15 ml SeTb group |
Primary outcome
on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia
Time frame: 24 hour
The primary outcome of this study is to compare the effect of selective truncal blocks, performed at different doses and volumes, on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia in patients scheduled for hand, wrist, forearm, and elbow surgeries. Completing the operation under regional anesthesia will be considered a successful block.
3 secondary outcomes
Total Opioid Consumption
Time frame: 24 hour
time to first rescue analgesic requirement.
Time frame: 24 hour
diaphragm paralysis
Time frame: 24 hour
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 36262721Sivashanmugam T, Sripriya R, John Paul S, Ravishankar M. Estimation of minimum effective local anaesthetic volume to block the lower trunk during selective truncal injection brachial plexus block. Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;66(Suppl 5):S281-S283. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1087_21. Epub 2022 Aug 12. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 30640655Bao X, Huang J, Feng H, Qian Y, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Hu H, Wang X. Effect of local anesthetic volume (20 mL vs 30 mL ropivacaine) on electromyography of the diaphragm and pulmonary function after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan;44(1):69-75. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000014.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The data associated with the paper are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Related trials for Pain Management
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Laparoscopic-Assisted TAP Block in Laparoscopic Appendectomy
Appendectomy, Laparoscopic, Blockades Neuromuscular
Recruiting
Photobiomodulation for Management of Temporomandibular Disorder Pain
Pain Related to TMD
Recruiting
SIRI Levels Following PENG Block in Pediatric Hip Surgery
Hip Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Serpil Sehirlioglu, MD principal investigator
Gaziosmanpasa Research and Training Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Selective turuncus block with 25 ml bupivacain and Selective turuncus block with 15 ml bupivacain in people with Pain Management and Anaesthesia Complication, run by Gaziosmanpasa Research and Education Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact serpil Sehirlioglu, MD (+905054431852, drserpilsahin@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
on the onset times of motor and sensory blocks required for anesthesia (time frame: 24 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06664203, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.