CataractNCT06665659
Evaluation of the Eyhance and Zoe Lenses
An observational study of Cataract, run by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs). The main outcomes are: To assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs) To… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cataract
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Nov 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Both the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe are monofocal lenses approved for use in patients having routine cataract surgery and are available in the Southend Eye Clinic lens bank. Of these patients 50 participants who have had routine cataract surgery with one of these lenses within the past 12 months will be chosen. Patients will be identified from the Southend NHS database. The database search will be carried out by the clinical care team. Potential participants will be asked to come to the eye clinic for one additional follow up visit in which they will have vision assessed in the operated eye(s). Potential participants will be contacted by phone and by letter.
Who may be able to join
- Adult (over 18) patients with cataract requiring cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.
- Patients who have had either an OphthalmoPro Zoe or a Tecnis Eyhance monofocal lens implanted during routine cataract surgery within the past year
Who cannot join
- Previous penetrating keratoplasty or anterior lamellar keratoplasty
- Patients who are not willing to cooperate for the follow up period
- Patients where it is not possible to take informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Retrospective Evaluation of the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe Intraocular Lenses
The goal of this observational study is to assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs). The main outcomes are:
To assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs) To assess depth of focus of the IOLs To assess tilt and decentration of the IOLs
Read more
The potential participants will be chosen from the list of patients in the Southend NHS database who have had routine cataract surgery using the Zoe or Eyhance lenses in the past 12 months and contacted by phone and letter. The member of the ophthalmological team carrying out the screening will use the research inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 50 potential participants. Once identified, the potential participants will be asked if they would be willing to discuss inclusion into the study with a member of the clinical care team (Prof Myerscough or Dr Law). If they agree, they will be asked to attend one further clinical visit.
They will be given a patient information sheet and consent form at this visit. All potential participants will be informed that participation in this research study will be entirely voluntary.
At the clinical visit participants will have their vision assessed, have dilating drops instilled, and undergo two non-invasive scans of their eyes.
Read the detailed description
Background and rationale:
Artificial lenses, otherwise known as intraocular lenses (IOLs), are used to replace the natural crystalline lens within the eye during cataract or refractive lens surgery. Monofocal IOLs are the traditional IOL type and provide excellent distance vision following cataract surgery, however spectacles are required for reading and intermediate distance tasks.
The evolution of IOLs has been rapid over the last 50 years and there are now monofocal IOLs on the market (available to NHS hospitals) which aim to improve intermediate (computer distance) vision by increasing depth of focus.
There is currently little evidence to support which optical design provides the best visual outcome and existing literature for visual outcomes of intraocular lenses are largely derived from either ex-vivo bench studies, or tightly controlled groups in research settings with far reaching exclusion criteria. The idea of this retrospective study was to provide more data on how lenses perform in a busy NHS corneal service, not excluding (most) corneal comorbidity. The study aims to evaluate two of the monofocal IOLs that have been routinely used at Southend NHS hospital.
This research project is a retrospective study involving 50 subjects who have already received one of two standard treatment monofocal IOLs; the Ophthalmo Pro Zoe and the Tecnis Eyhance. Potential participants will be invited to attend an additional study visit at the hospital where their visual outcomes will be evaluated. There will be no comparison between the lenses therefore there is no need to match the participants or split the groups evenly.
Patient recruitment:
Both the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe are monofocal lenses approved for use in patients having routine cataract surgery and are available in the Southend Eye Clinic lens bank. Of these patients 50 participants who have had routine cataract surgery with one of these lenses within the past 12 months will be chosen. Patients will be identified from the Southend NHS database. The database search will be carried out by the clinical care team. Potential participants will be asked to come to the eye clinic for one additional follow up visit in which they will have vision assessed in the operated eye(s). Potential participants will be contacted by phone and by letter.
Each participant will be expected to be part of the study for the duration of one hospital visit. This post-surgical assessment will be within 18 months after surgery. This will mark the end of their participation required. The visit should last up to 45 minutes.
Informed consent for study involvement will be secured at the follow up visit for those who agree to participate. Three copies of the consent form will be filled out. One copy will be retained by the patient (with a copy of the patient information sheet), the other by the investigators and the last will be kept in the patient\'s NHS file. At the point of consent during the follow up visit the subject will be assigned a subject number code.
Participants will be free to withdraw from the study at any time but any data already collected will be included.
Risk, burden and benefit to participants:
The study will include one additional visit. As a result, participation in this study will increase the length and number of appointments that the participant will have to attend. The additional appointment will allow additional care and screening for the participant.
Assessment will involve dilation of the pupils by eye drops. This occurs as part of the routine pre- and post-surgical assessments normally. The co-investigators (Prof Myerscough and Dr Law) carrying out this assessment are an ophthalmic surgeon and a registered Optometrist respectively and dilation and the use of mydriatics is a routine procedure.
All assessments carried out in this study are noncontact and non-invasive. Scans of the eye do not use any radiation. Participants may experience some light sensitivity during the examination, but this is the same as they would have experienced at previous appointments and does not cause any lasting damage.
There is a minimal risk of raised intraocular pressure following the application of dilating drops. However, the participants would have already had this done as a part of their pre-operative visit without any side effects. The risk of this side effect is minimised further by removal of the cataract therefore the risk of raised intraocular pressure at the postoperative visit is negligible.
The participants will benefit from an additional follow up visit, as this will increase the monitoring and care for any post-surgical complications compared to usual practice. They will have the opportunity to ask questions to the optometrist and ophthalmologist about their eye condition. It will also help increase the patient awareness and understanding of the surgical procedure and outcomes.
Ethical approval:
The protocol, informed consent form, participant information sheet and any proposed advertising material will be submitted to an appropriate Research Ethics Committee (REC), and host institution for written approval. The Investigator will submit and, where necessary, obtain approval from the above parties for all substantial amendments to the original approved documents.
Funding:
There is no external funding application.
Publication policy and data management:
No identifiable personal data will be used in any publications. If participants have expressed an interest in the results of the study, they will be sent a lay summary of the results and outcomes.
The scientific quality of the research will be assessed within the co-investigator's institution and the educational supervisor. The study forms part of an MD project and hence has been subject to review by the education supervisors, the research team and the university ethics council. The statistics will be reviewed by the educational supervisor.
The results of the study will be disseminated in peer reviewed scientific journals, internal reports, and at conference presentations.
As with all studies, there is a very small risk of breach in confidentiality and failure to maintain data securely. However, every care will be taken to ensure that a strict policy of data protection and securing of the data is followed by any members of the study who are all qualified clinicians and familiar with this policy.
The co-investigators (Prof Myerscough and Dr Law) are part of the Ophthalmological clinical care team. These team members have access to the data as part of the clinical record keeping required for routine NHS assessment and care. There is no referral to an outside research team and no other investigators will have access to any personal data. If the patient agrees to participate then they will be made fully aware that their details will be reviewed and are free to decline, in which case their records will not be included in the process.
To maintain anonymity, participant data will be identified only by a code, which will be entered on to a password protected spreadsheet on the NHS database and will only be accessible to the coinvestigators, Prof Myerscough and Dr Law, both of whom are part of the Southend Ophthalmological clinical care team and are bound by a code of conduct and data protection. No personal data will be removed or transcribed from the patient records. Initial examination findings from the postoperative visit will be entered into written patient notes, which will be later scanned and uploaded on to the NHS database and then destroyed, as is protocol for all patient notes in the ophthalmology department at Southend Hospital. All data will be stored using OneDrive. No data will be stored on the desktop or on any external hard drives that may be accessed by anyone else.
Plymouth University is the Sponsor and will be the data controller for the study. The Mid and South Essex NHS trust (to which Southend Hospital belongs), the sponsor representative from Plymouth University, and regulatory bodies will have access to data to ensure that the study is being run correctly. Dr Sharma will be analysing the anonymised data at Plymouth University and will not have access to patient identifiable information or patient notes. Any data that leaves Southend Hospital will be anonymised before being shared with the research team via OneDrive.
Informed consent will be obtained from each individual participant. A signed copy of the consent form will be kept by the subject, the investigators and one will be kept in the patient file. They are all required to be consenting adults with mental capacity, who can show that they are able to understand the patient information sheet and consent to the study themselves. It will be collected on by one of the two investigators (Prof Myerscough or Dr Law) at the follow up visit post procedure.
If the participant is unable to communicate adequately to the investigators, then they will be classified as unable to give valid informed consent to the study.
The participant will be withdrawn from the study if it is felt that they no longer has the capacity to give informed consent for the study. They will need to be compliant with the assessment and follow up appointment to complete the study. If they are withdrawn it will not affect their surgery or medical care by the hospital. All the data gathered prior to the withdrawal will be removed from the study and destroyed. This is unlikely to happen as participants will only need to attend for one visit, after which there would be no further contact with them. Participants who cannot give consent to attend this visit will not be included.
The data will be archived at Plymouth University for 10 years.
Postoperative visit routine:
At the visit the following non-invasive visual function tests will be conducted:
- A detailed assessment of visual acuity
- An objective and subjective assessment of refraction will be used to determine if there is any residual refractive error.
- Defocus curve profiles (visual acuity over imposed defocus) will be measured for each patient over a defocus range of +1.50D to -4.00D in 0.50D steps. The presentation of the letters and lenses will be randomised.
The MS-39 (CSO Ophthalmic) will be used to determine the position of the IOL and to assess if any tilt or decentration is present.
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Medical subject headings
- Cataract
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Monofocal IOL group | Participants who have had either the Tecnis Eyhance or OphthalmoPro Zoe monofocal lens implanted during routine cataract surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual acuity
To assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs)
Measured: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Depth of focus
To assess depth of focus of the IOLs
Measured: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months
Tilt
To assess tilt of the IOLs
Measured: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months
Decentration
To assess decentration of the IOLs
Measured: From enrollment to the postoperative visit at 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2024
- Study start30 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion29 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CataractStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Southend NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Phillip Buckhurst, PhD, Study director, Plymouth University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06665659
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 345720
- Status last verified
- Sep 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lapp T, Wacker K, Heinz C, Maier P, Eberwein P, Reinhard T. Cataract Surgery-Indications, Techniques, and Intraocular Lens Selection. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 May 30;120(21):377-386. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0028.
PubMed 36794457Kanclerz P, Toto F, Grzybowski A, Alio JL. Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020 May-Jun;9(3):194-202. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000296.
PubMed 32511121
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Retrospective Evaluation of the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe Intraocular Lenses
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06665659
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 345720
- Conditions
- Cataract
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Plymouth NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Southend NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 30 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 29 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs). The main outcomes are:
To assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs) To assess depth of focus of the IOLs To assess tilt and decentration of the IOLs
The potential participants will be chosen from the list of patients in the Southend NHS database who have had routine cataract surgery using the Zoe or Eyhance lenses in the past 12 months and contacted by phone and letter. The member of the ophthalmological team carrying out the screening will use the research inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify 50 potential participants. Once identified, the potential participants will be asked if they would be willing to discuss inclusion into the study with a member of the clinical care team (Prof Myerscough or Dr Law). If they agree, they will be asked to attend one further clinical visit.
They will be given a patient information sheet and consent form at this visit. All potential participants will be informed that participation in this research study will be entirely voluntary.
At the clinical visit participants will have their vision assessed, have dilating drops instilled, and undergo two non-invasive scans of their eyes.
Detailed description
Background and rationale:
Artificial lenses, otherwise known as intraocular lenses (IOLs), are used to replace the natural crystalline lens within the eye during cataract or refractive lens surgery. Monofocal IOLs are the traditional IOL type and provide excellent distance vision following cataract surgery, however spectacles are required for reading and intermediate distance tasks.
The evolution of IOLs has been rapid over the last 50 years and there are now monofocal IOLs on the market (available to NHS hospitals) which aim to improve intermediate (computer distance) vision by increasing depth of focus.
There is currently little evidence to support which optical design provides the best visual outcome and existing literature for visual outcomes of intraocular lenses are largely derived from either ex-vivo bench studies, or tightly controlled groups in research settings with far reaching exclusion criteria. The idea of this retrospective study was to provide more data on how lenses perform in a busy NHS corneal service, not excluding (most) corneal comorbidity. The study aims to evaluate two of the monofocal IOLs that have been routinely used at Southend NHS hospital.
This research project is a retrospective study involving 50 subjects who have already received one of two standard treatment monofocal IOLs; the Ophthalmo Pro Zoe and the Tecnis Eyhance. Potential participants will be invited to attend an additional study visit at the hospital where their visual outcomes will be evaluated. There will be no comparison between the lenses therefore there is no need to match the participants or split the groups evenly.
Patient recruitment:
Both the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe are monofocal lenses approved for use in patients having routine cataract surgery and are available in the Southend Eye Clinic lens bank. Of these patients 50 participants who have had routine cataract surgery with one of these lenses within the past 12 months will be chosen. Patients will be identified from the Southend NHS database. The database search will be carried out by the clinical care team. Potential participants will be asked to come to the eye clinic for one additional follow up visit in which they will have vision assessed in the operated eye(s). Potential participants will be contacted by phone and by letter.
Each participant will be expected to be part of the study for the duration of one hospital visit. This post-surgical assessment will be within 18 months after surgery. This will mark the end of their participation required. The visit should last up to 45 minutes.
Informed consent for study involvement will be secured at the follow up visit for those who agree to participate. Three copies of the consent form will be filled out. One copy will be retained by the patient (with a copy of the patient information sheet), the other by the investigators and the last will be kept in the patient\'s NHS file. At the point of consent during the follow up visit the subject will be assigned a subject number code.
Participants will be free to withdraw from the study at any time but any data already collected will be included.
Risk, burden and benefit to participants:
The study will include one additional visit. As a result, participation in this study will increase the length and number of appointments that the participant will have to attend. The additional appointment will allow additional care and screening for the participant.
Assessment will involve dilation of the pupils by eye drops. This occurs as part of the routine pre- and post-surgical assessments normally. The co-investigators (Prof Myerscough and Dr Law) carrying out this assessment are an ophthalmic surgeon and a registered Optometrist respectively and dilation and the use of mydriatics is a routine procedure.
All assessments carried out in this study are noncontact and non-invasive. Scans of the eye do not use any radiation. Participants may experience some light sensitivity during the examination, but this is the same as they would have experienced at previous appointments and does not cause any lasting damage.
There is a minimal risk of raised intraocular pressure following the application of dilating drops. However, the participants would have already had this done as a part of their pre-operative visit without any side effects. The risk of this side effect is minimised further by removal of the cataract therefore the risk of raised intraocular pressure at the postoperative visit is negligible.
The participants will benefit from an additional follow up visit, as this will increase the monitoring and care for any post-surgical complications compared to usual practice. They will have the opportunity to ask questions to the optometrist and ophthalmologist about their eye condition. It will also help increase the patient awareness and understanding of the surgical procedure and outcomes.
Ethical approval:
The protocol, informed consent form, participant information sheet and any proposed advertising material will be submitted to an appropriate Research Ethics Committee (REC), and host institution for written approval. The Investigator will submit and, where necessary, obtain approval from the above parties for all substantial amendments to the original approved documents.
Funding:
There is no external funding application.
Publication policy and data management:
No identifiable personal data will be used in any publications. If participants have expressed an interest in the results of the study, they will be sent a lay summary of the results and outcomes.
The scientific quality of the research will be assessed within the co-investigator's institution and the educational supervisor. The study forms part of an MD project and hence has been subject to review by the education supervisors, the research team and the university ethics council. The statistics will be reviewed by the educational supervisor.
The results of the study will be disseminated in peer reviewed scientific journals, internal reports, and at conference presentations.
As with all studies, there is a very small risk of breach in confidentiality and failure to maintain data securely. However, every care will be taken to ensure that a strict policy of data protection and securing of the data is followed by any members of the study who are all qualified clinicians and familiar with this policy.
The co-investigators (Prof Myerscough and Dr Law) are part of the Ophthalmological clinical care team. These team members have access to the data as part of the clinical record keeping required for routine NHS assessment and care. There is no referral to an outside research team and no other investigators will have access to any personal data. If the patient agrees to participate then they will be made fully aware that their details will be reviewed and are free to decline, in which case their records will not be included in the process.
To maintain anonymity, participant data will be identified only by a code, which will be entered on to a password protected spreadsheet on the NHS database and will only be accessible to the coinvestigators, Prof Myerscough and Dr Law, both of whom are part of the Southend Ophthalmological clinical care team and are bound by a code of conduct and data protection. No personal data will be removed or transcribed from the patient records. Initial examination findings from the postoperative visit will be entered into written patient notes, which will be later scanned and uploaded on to the NHS database and then destroyed, as is protocol for all patient notes in the ophthalmology department at Southend Hospital. All data will be stored using OneDrive. No data will be stored on the desktop or on any external hard drives that may be accessed by anyone else.
Plymouth University is the Sponsor and will be the data controller for the study. The Mid and South Essex NHS trust (to which Southend Hospital belongs), the sponsor representative from Plymouth University, and regulatory bodies will have access to data to ensure that the study is being run correctly. Dr Sharma will be analysing the anonymised data at Plymouth University and will not have access to patient identifiable information or patient notes. Any data that leaves Southend Hospital will be anonymised before being shared with the research team via OneDrive.
Informed consent will be obtained from each individual participant. A signed copy of the consent form will be kept by the subject, the investigators and one will be kept in the patient file. They are all required to be consenting adults with mental capacity, who can show that they are able to understand the patient information sheet and consent to the study themselves. It will be collected on by one of the two investigators (Prof Myerscough or Dr Law) at the follow up visit post procedure.
If the participant is unable to communicate adequately to the investigators, then they will be classified as unable to give valid informed consent to the study.
The participant will be withdrawn from the study if it is felt that they no longer has the capacity to give informed consent for the study. They will need to be compliant with the assessment and follow up appointment to complete the study. If they are withdrawn it will not affect their surgery or medical care by the hospital. All the data gathered prior to the withdrawal will be removed from the study and destroyed. This is unlikely to happen as participants will only need to attend for one visit, after which there would be no further contact with them. Participants who cannot give consent to attend this visit will not be included.
The data will be archived at Plymouth University for 10 years.
Postoperative visit routine:
At the visit the following non-invasive visual function tests will be conducted:
- A detailed assessment of visual acuity
- An objective and subjective assessment of refraction will be used to determine if there is any residual refractive error.
- Defocus curve profiles (visual acuity over imposed defocus) will be measured for each patient over a defocus range of +1.50D to -4.00D in 0.50D steps. The presentation of the letters and lenses will be randomised.
The MS-39 (CSO Ophthalmic) will be used to determine the position of the IOL and to assess if any tilt or decentration is present.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Monofocal IOL group | – | –Participants who have had either the Tecnis Eyhance or OphthalmoPro Zoe monofocal lens implanted during routine cataract surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Both the Tecnis Eyhance and OphthalmoPro Zoe are monofocal lenses approved for use in patients having routine cataract surgery and are available in the Southend Eye Clinic lens bank. Of these patients 50 participants who have had routine cataract surgery with one of these lenses within the past 12 months will be chosen. Patients will be identified from the Southend NHS database. The database search will be carried out by the clinical care team. Potential participants will be asked to come to the eye clinic for one additional follow up visit in which they will have vision assessed in the operated eye(s). Potential participants will be contacted by phone and by letter.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult (over 18) patients with cataract requiring cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.
- Patients who have had either an OphthalmoPro Zoe or a Tecnis Eyhance monofocal lens implanted during routine cataract surgery within the past year
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous penetrating keratoplasty or anterior lamellar keratoplasty
- Patients who are not willing to cooperate for the follow up period
- Patients where it is not possible to take informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Visual acuity
Time frame: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months
To assess distance and near visual acuity of patients who have undergone cataract surgery with two intraocular lenses (IOLs)
3 secondary outcomes
Depth of focus
Time frame: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months
Tilt
Time frame: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months
Decentration
Time frame: From enrollment to the postoperative visit at 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 36794457Lapp T, Wacker K, Heinz C, Maier P, Eberwein P, Reinhard T. Cataract Surgery-Indications, Techniques, and Intraocular Lens Selection. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 May 30;120(21):377-386. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0028.
- Results publication: PubMed 32511121Kanclerz P, Toto F, Grzybowski A, Alio JL. Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses: An Update. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020 May-Jun;9(3):194-202. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000296.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cataract
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Trial to Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of the KI-362-US1 (YP2.2VM) Intraocular Lens (IOL) in Adult Participants for Correction of Aphakia Following Cataract Extraction
Aphakia, Postcataract
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Follow-Up
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Objective Depth-of-Focus Changes During Light Adjustable Lens UV Adjustments
Light Adjustable Lens, Objective Depth of Focus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Phillip Buckhurst, PhD study director
Plymouth University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cataract, run by University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact James Myerscough, MBBS (+44 1702435555, james.myerscough1@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual acuity (time frame: From enrollment to the clinical assessment at 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06665659, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2024.