HIV PreventionNCT06666309
Adaptive Intervention Strategies for HIV PrEP Care in Rural People Who Inject Drugs
A study testing SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging, CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging and T-SBCM in people with HIV Prevention, run by Hilary L Surratt, PhD at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
During this 5-year study, stepped-care adaptive interventions will be deployed in three rural syringe service programs in a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design to test the optimal intervention pathways for HIV PrEP uptake, defined as PrEP initiation (measured by dispensed prescription for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV Prevention
- What is being tested?
- SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging, CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging and T-SBCM
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 424 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 May 2025to Jan 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- self-report of at least one occasion of injection drug use in the past month
- use of the SSP in the past 30 days
- expressed willingness to participate in a multi-session intervention and follow-up
- having an indication for PrEP in the past 6 months based on CDC guidelines
Who cannot join
- being HIV positive
- current PrEP care
- self-reported severe renal impairment and/or chronic HBV infection
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States4 sites
Knox County Health Department
Barbourville, Kentucky, 40906
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Clay County Health Department
Manchester, Kentucky, 40962
Madison County Health Department
Richmond, Kentucky, 40475
About this study
Official title: Optimizing PrEP Care Delivery Through Adaptive Intervention Strategies for Underserved Rural People Who Inject Drugs
During this 5-year study, stepped-care adaptive interventions will be deployed in three rural syringe service programs in a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design to test the optimal intervention pathways for HIV PrEP uptake, defined as PrEP initiation (measured by dispensed prescription for oral PrEP) and persistence in PrEP care (measured by refill verification and biomarker confirmation). The study will be accomplished through three Specific Aims. AIM 1: Compare the relative effectiveness of adaptive interventions (AIs) that begin with Peer-led SBCM-PrEP versus those that begin with CDC-PrEP education plus text messaging (TM) on patient-level PrEP care outcomes (initiation and persistence) at 1-, 3- and 6-months; AIM 2: Estimate and rank the effectiveness of four embedded AIs on PrEP care outcomes at 3- and 6-months: (1) CDC-PrEP education, continue TM for responders, add Mobile Outreach for non-responders (NR); (2) CDC-PrEP education, continue TM for responders, add Peer transitional SBCM for NR; (3) Peer-led SBCM-PrEP, continue TM for responders, add Mobile Outreach for NR; (4) Peer-led SBCM-PrEP, continue TM for responders, add Peer transitional SBCM for NR. AIM 3: Across interventions, examine the effects of age, baseline injection frequency, perceived HIV risk, PrEP interest, SSP utilization patterns, and other factors, in predicting PrEP care outcomes at 1-, 3- and 6-months to inform optimally-tailored intervention strategy recommendations.
Read the detailed description
Kentucky's HIV epidemic displays an especially profound and disproportionate impact among people who inject drugs (PWID): 14.8% of males and 54.2% of females newly diagnosed with HIV in 2021 have an injection drug use-related transmission factor, far exceeding the national average for this exposure category. A central pillar of Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) is the prevention of new HIV infections through scale up of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in key populations, including PWID. For PWID, PrEP uptake remains severely limited, and no evidence-based PrEP interventions specifically targeted for PWID are available. In the previous pilot in KY's Appalachian region, two brief, low-intensity interventions to promote linkage to co-located PrEP care in rural syringe service programs (SSPs) were successfully implemented, including a newly adapted strengths-based case management (SBCM-PrEP) intervention designed to address multi-level barriers to PrEP initiation. The pilot trial has demonstrated proof of concept for integrated PrEP care within rurally-located SSPs and high acceptability among PWID with high uptake of initial clinical interventions. Nevertheless, just 51% returned for test results, and 28% progressed to PrEP prescription, indicating that augmented intervention support is required to optimize PrEP uptake. The stepped-care Adaptive Interventions (AIs) to be tested respond directly to identified challenges in the pilot trial and the need for augmented support among initial non-responders. AIs have shown remarkable promise in diverse behavioral and medical conditions, including areas such as chronic lower back pain, risky drinking and violent behavior, reducing alcohol use, preventing suicidal behavior, and HIV treatment retention
- Conditions
- HIV Prevention
- Being tested
- SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging, CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging, T-SBCM, Mobile Outreach
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SBCM-PrEP + Text MessagingBehavioural
Two sessions Strengths-Based Case Management intervention adapted for HIV PrEP related educational content delivered to individual clients in the syringe service program setting
CDC-PrEP + Text MessagingBehavioural
1 session PrEP education based on CDC guidelines delivered to individual clients in syringe service program settings
T-SBCMBehavioural
Up to two post-linkage sessions of SBCM delivered by a peer support specialist in a format of the participants' choice (onsite, virtual/phone) in study month 2
Mobile OutreachBehavioural
Up to two in-person field session visits will be conducted by a peer support specialist for the purpose of offering direct support to arrange joint activities for overcoming identified barriers (e.g., transportation) to PrEP care initiation in study month 2.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging | Experimental | Two session Strengths-based Case Management intervention delivered by a peer support specialist to individual clients in the syringe service program Receives: Behavioral: SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging | Active comparator | 1 session PrEP education following CDC guidelines delivered to individual clients in the syringe service program Receives: Behavioral: CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging |
| Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) | Experimental | SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging no response by end of month 1, and randomized to rup to 2 sessions of post-linkage transitional SBCM delivered by a peer support specialist Receives: Behavioral: SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging; Behavioral: T-SBCM |
| Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach | Experimental | SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging no response by end of month 1, and randomized to up to 2 sessions of post-linkage field session visits delivered by a peer support specialist Receives: Behavioral: SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging; Behavioral: Mobile Outreach |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) | Other | CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging; no response by end of month 1, and randomized to rup to 2 sessions of post-linkage transitional SBCM delivered by a peer support specialist Receives: Behavioral: CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging; Behavioral: T-SBCM |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach | Other | CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging no response by end of month 1, and randomized to up to 2 sessions of post-linkage field session visits delivered by a peer support specialist Receives: Behavioral: CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging; Behavioral: Mobile Outreach |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants initiating PrEP
Documented PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed prescription
Measured: 1 month post-baseline
Number of participants initiating PrEP
Documented PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed prescription
Measured: 3 months post-baseline
Number of participants initiating PrEP
Documented PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed prescription
Measured: 6 month post-baseline
Secondary outcomes (7)
Linkage to PrEP Care
Number of participants completing initial clinical evaluation for PrEP, measured by provider report
Measured: 1 month post-baseline
Linkage to PrEP Care
Number of participants completing initial clinical evaluation for PrEP, measured by provider report
Measured: 3 month post-baseline
Linkage to PrEP Care
Number of participants completing initial clinical evaluation for PrEP, measured by provider report
Measured: 6 month post-baseline
PrEP Persistence
Number of participants receiving dispensed PrEP refill, measured by provider report/pharmacy verification.
Measured: 3 months post-baseline
PrEP Persistence
Number of participants receiving Dispensed PrEP refill, measured by provider report/pharmacy verification.
Measured: 6 months post-baseline
PrEP Adherence
Number of participants with Presence of PrEP (TFV) in blood sample
Measured: 3 months post-baseline
PrEP Adherence
Number of participants with Presence of PrEP (TFV) in blood sample
Measured: 6 months post-baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2024
- Study start14 May 2025
- Primary completionJan 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV PreventionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hilary L Surratt, PhD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Hilary L Surratt, PhD, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Hillary L Surratt, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06666309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 98939
- Other IDs
- R01DA061996-01
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 11 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All Aim 1 and 2 de-identified REDCap survey data and clinical data extracts from report forms will be preserved and shared. We will not share participant locator information. Datasets will be shared as CSV files.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing PrEP Care Delivery Through Adaptive Intervention Strategies for Underserved Rural People Who Inject Drugs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06666309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 98939
- Conditions
- HIV Prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 424 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hilary L Surratt, PhDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- 14 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
During this 5-year study, stepped-care adaptive interventions will be deployed in three rural syringe service programs in a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART) design to test the optimal intervention pathways for HIV PrEP uptake, defined as PrEP initiation (measured by dispensed prescription for oral PrEP) and persistence in PrEP care (measured by refill verification and biomarker confirmation). The study will be accomplished through three Specific Aims. AIM 1: Compare the relative effectiveness of adaptive interventions (AIs) that begin with Peer-led SBCM-PrEP versus those that begin with CDC-PrEP education plus text messaging (TM) on patient-level PrEP care outcomes (initiation and persistence) at 1-, 3- and 6-months; AIM 2: Estimate and rank the effectiveness of four embedded AIs on PrEP care outcomes at 3- and 6-months: (1) CDC-PrEP education, continue TM for responders, add Mobile Outreach for non-responders (NR); (2) CDC-PrEP education, continue TM for responders, add Peer transitional SBCM for NR; (3) Peer-led SBCM-PrEP, continue TM for responders, add Mobile Outreach for NR; (4) Peer-led SBCM-PrEP, continue TM for responders, add Peer transitional SBCM for NR. AIM 3: Across interventions, examine the effects of age, baseline injection frequency, perceived HIV risk, PrEP interest, SSP utilization patterns, and other factors, in predicting PrEP care outcomes at 1-, 3- and 6-months to inform optimally-tailored intervention strategy recommendations.
Detailed description
Kentucky's HIV epidemic displays an especially profound and disproportionate impact among people who inject drugs (PWID): 14.8% of males and 54.2% of females newly diagnosed with HIV in 2021 have an injection drug use-related transmission factor, far exceeding the national average for this exposure category. A central pillar of Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) is the prevention of new HIV infections through scale up of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) in key populations, including PWID. For PWID, PrEP uptake remains severely limited, and no evidence-based PrEP interventions specifically targeted for PWID are available. In the previous pilot in KY's Appalachian region, two brief, low-intensity interventions to promote linkage to co-located PrEP care in rural syringe service programs (SSPs) were successfully implemented, including a newly adapted strengths-based case management (SBCM-PrEP) intervention designed to address multi-level barriers to PrEP initiation. The pilot trial has demonstrated proof of concept for integrated PrEP care within rurally-located SSPs and high acceptability among PWID with high uptake of initial clinical interventions. Nevertheless, just 51% returned for test results, and 28% progressed to PrEP prescription, indicating that augmented intervention support is required to optimize PrEP uptake. The stepped-care Adaptive Interventions (AIs) to be tested respond directly to identified challenges in the pilot trial and the need for augmented support among initial non-responders. AIs have shown remarkable promise in diverse behavioral and medical conditions, including areas such as chronic lower back pain, risky drinking and violent behavior, reducing alcohol use, preventing suicidal behavior, and HIV treatment retention
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging | Experimental | Behavioral: SBCM-PrEP + Text MessagingTwo session Strengths-based Case Management intervention delivered by a peer support specialist to individual clients in the syringe service program |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging | Active comparator | Behavioral: CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging1 session PrEP education following CDC guidelines delivered to individual clients in the syringe service program |
| Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) | Experimental | Behavioral: SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging, Behavioral: T-SBCMSBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging no response by end of month 1, and randomized to rup to 2 sessions of post-linkage transitional SBCM delivered by a peer support specialist |
| Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach | Experimental | Behavioral: SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging, Behavioral: Mobile OutreachSBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging no response by end of month 1, and randomized to up to 2 sessions of post-linkage field session visits delivered by a peer support specialist |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) | Other | Behavioral: CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging, Behavioral: T-SBCMCDC-PrEP + Text Messaging; no response by end of month 1, and randomized to rup to 2 sessions of post-linkage transitional SBCM delivered by a peer support specialist |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach | Other | Behavioral: CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging, Behavioral: Mobile OutreachCDC-PrEP + Text Messaging no response by end of month 1, and randomized to up to 2 sessions of post-linkage field session visits delivered by a peer support specialist |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- self-report of at least one occasion of injection drug use in the past month
- use of the SSP in the past 30 days
- expressed willingness to participate in a multi-session intervention and follow-up
- having an indication for PrEP in the past 6 months based on CDC guidelines
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- being HIV positive
- current PrEP care
- self-reported severe renal impairment and/or chronic HBV infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SBCM-PrEP + Text MessagingTwo sessions Strengths-Based Case Management intervention adapted for HIV PrEP related educational content delivered to individual clients in the syringe service program setting | Behavioural | Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging, Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach, Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) |
| CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging1 session PrEP education based on CDC guidelines delivered to individual clients in syringe service program settings | Behavioural | CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging, CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach, CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) |
| T-SBCMUp to two post-linkage sessions of SBCM delivered by a peer support specialist in a format of the participants' choice (onsite, virtual/phone) in study month 2 | Behavioural | CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM), Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Peer Transitional SBCM (T-SBCM) |
| Mobile OutreachUp to two in-person field session visits will be conducted by a peer support specialist for the purpose of offering direct support to arrange joint activities for overcoming identified barriers (e.g., transportation) to PrEP care initiation in study month 2. | Behavioural | CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach, Strengths Based Case Management - PrEP + Text Messaging + Mobile outreach |
Primary outcome
Number of participants initiating PrEP
Time frame: 1 month post-baseline
Documented PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed prescription
Number of participants initiating PrEP
Time frame: 3 months post-baseline
Documented PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed prescription
Number of participants initiating PrEP
Time frame: 6 month post-baseline
Documented PrEP initiation, measured by dispensed prescription
7 secondary outcomes
Linkage to PrEP Care
Time frame: 1 month post-baseline
Linkage to PrEP Care
Time frame: 3 month post-baseline
Linkage to PrEP Care
Time frame: 6 month post-baseline
PrEP Persistence
Time frame: 3 months post-baseline
PrEP Persistence
Time frame: 6 months post-baseline
PrEP Adherence
Time frame: 3 months post-baseline
PrEP Adherence
Time frame: 6 months post-baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All Aim 1 and 2 de-identified REDCap survey data and clinical data extracts from report forms will be preserved and shared. We will not share participant locator information. Datasets will be shared as CSV files.
Related trials for HIV Prevention
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
HIV/STI/HCV Testing and Overdose Prevention Among Survivors of Sex Trafficking
HIV Testing, STI
Not yet recruiting
HC-HMP: Healthy Choices Implementation Trial
Alcohol Drinking, HIV Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
NOTRE: Optimizing Long-Acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Interventions in Carceral Settings
HIV Infections, Opioid Use Disorder
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Long-term Follow-up of Long-acting Cabotegravir (CAB LA) for PrEP (Pre-exposure Prophylaxis) in Participants at Risk of Acquiring HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus)
HIV Infections
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hillary L Surratt, PhD principal investigator
University of Kentucky
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SBCM-PrEP + Text Messaging, CDC-PrEP + Text Messaging and T-SBCM in people with HIV Prevention, run by Hilary L Surratt, PhD at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants initiating PrEP (time frame: 1 month post-baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2026.