AzTrials
AzTrials

Bone LossNCT06666595

Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Class 1 Removable Partial Denture.

A study testing Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis. in people with Bone Loss and Partial Edentulism Class 1, run by Menoufia University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objective: To report the implant survival rates, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of subcrestal short implant versus crestal standard length implant supported removable partial denture (RPD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 70 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bone Loss, Partial Edentulism Class 1
What is being tested?
Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
4 Jan 2021to 1 Aug 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients aged 50 years or older with class 1 RPD with missing mandibular molars at least and complaining from instability of the prosthesis were recruited.
  • Medical history revealed no contraindication to implant therapy.
  • Patients have an amount of bone nearly equal to 8 mm length above the inferior alveolar canal to receive a 6 mm short implant with 2 mm subcrestal to the bone level with sufficient bone width ≥ 8mm on one side and an amount of bone equal to or more than 8 mm to receive a standard-length implant of 7.5, 9, or 10.5 mm placed at crestal bone level with sufficient bone width ≥ 8mm on the contralateral side which was examined by CBCT.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of active infection or inflammation in the areas intended for implant placement; *systemic diseases such as diabetes.
  • Pregnant and lactating patients.
  • Habit of severe bruxism or clenching.
  • Treatment with therapeutic radiation to the head within the past 12 months.
  • Treatment with bisphosphonate within the past 12 months.
  • More than 10 cigarettes/day smoking habit.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mohammed A. El-Sawy, PhD contact

01061314522

Dr_sawy@windowslive.com

Mohamed T. Khater, PhD contact

mohamed.tarek67@dent.menofia.edu.eg

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Mohammed A. El-Sawy

    Al Mansurah, 12345

    Mohamed A. El-Sawy, PhD, 161314522, Dr_sawy@windowslive.com

    Mohamed T. Khater, PhD, mohamed.tarek67@dent.menofia.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Clinical Outcome of Subcrestal Short Implant Versus Crestal Standard Length Implant to Retain Kennedy Class 1 Removable Partial Denture: A Split-mouth Study

Objective: To report the implant survival rates, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of subcrestal short implant versus crestal standard length implant supported removable partial denture (RPD).

Read the detailed description

30 individuals with at least 2 adjacent missing teeth bilaterally were included.to support class Ι RPD with conventional loading protocol were chosen for this research. Each participant received 2 implants in a split mouth design, one side received 1 subcrestal short implant and the contralateral side crestal standard length implant. Plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), radiographic crestal bone level (CBL) and implant survival rate were evaluated. at implant placement (T0), restoration delivery (T1), and 3-year follow-up after loading (T2). MBL was calculated as the change in distance from the implant-abutment interface to the first radiographically visible bone-implant contact. A repeated-measures mixed ANOVA followed by a paired Student's t-test with the Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant

Being tested
Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.
Medical subject headings
Bone Diseases, Metabolic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.Procedure or surgery

    Placement of titanium dental implant to retain and support Kennedy class 1 removable partial denture (RPD).The implant fuses with the bone through a process called osseointegration.

Study groups in NCT06666595
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subcrestal short implantActive comparatorEvaluation the amount of bone loss after one, two, and three years of function.
Receives: Procedure: Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.
crestal standard length implantActive comparatorEvaluation the amount of bone loss after one, two, and three years of function.
Receives: Procedure: Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bone loss

    Evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants will be performed by periapical digital radiograph using parallel technique to avoid distortion or elongation to the image.

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Plaque index (PI)

    Evaluation of PI around implants were assessed by using a numerical recording of BI (present = 1; absent = 0), PI (present = 1; absent = 0), as well as PD. With the use of a plastic periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois).

    Measured: 3 years

  2. Bleeding on probing (BOP)

    Evaluation of BOP around implants were assessed by using a numerical recording of BOP (present = 1; absent = 0), PI (present = 1; absent = 0), as well as PD. With the use of a plastic periodontal probe (Hu-Friedy, Chicago, Illinois).

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Oct 2024
  2. Study start4 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion20 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06666595
Sponsor's protocol ID
ADMNF-00701124
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
26 Oct 2024
Last updated
30 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Up on reasonable request from the corresponding author

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Titanium dental implant (Conical SPI, Vitronix, Italy), Medical device that interfaces with the jawbone to support a dental prosthesis. in people with Bone Loss and Partial Edentulism Class 1, run by Menoufia University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mohammed A. El-Sawy, PhD (01061314522, Dr_sawy@windowslive.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bone loss (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in