AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseMY-FUSIONNCT06670768

Myocardial Perfusion Quantification With SPECT Using Multi-Pinhole Collimator Compared to Photon-Counting Coronary CTA

A study testing Stress Dynamic MPI SPECT, Stress Static MPI SPECT and Rest Dynamic MPI SPECT in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, run by Semmelweis University at 1 site in Hungary.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective study aims to compare functional abnormalities detected using myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging (MPI SPECT) with the extent and severity of anatomical findings on coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Stress Dynamic MPI SPECT, Stress Static MPI SPECT and Rest Dynamic MPI SPECT
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteHungary
Study dates
6 Mar 2024to 30 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • suspected coronary artery disease
  • referred to coronary CTA or SPECT MPI by the patient's physician
  • agrees to the other imaging modality that was not indicated by their physician (coronary CTA or SPECT MPI)
  • suitable for informed consent

Who cannot join

  • moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis
  • atrial fibrillation
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • history of coronary artery bypass graft implantation
  • history of stent implantation
  • chronic renal failure (eGFR < 30 ml/m2)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • active oncological treatment
  • congenital heart disease
  • left or right bundle branch block

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Prof. Dr. contact

+36206632485

maurovich-horvat.pal@semmelweis.hu

Hungary1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Semmelweis University, Medical Imaging Centre

    Budapest, Budapest, 1083

    Pál Maurovich-Horvat, MD, PhD, MPH, +36206632485, maurovich-horvat.pal@semmelweis.hu

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: Myocardial Perfusion Quantification With Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Using Multi-Pinhole Collimator Compared to Photon-Counting Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

This prospective study aims to compare functional abnormalities detected using myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging (MPI SPECT) with the extent and severity of anatomical findings on coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA). Additionally, the investigators aim to enhance the diagnostic value of MPI SPECT by quantifying myocardial blood flow and utilizing myocardial flow reserve calculated from dynamic SPECT images.

50 patients with suspected coronary artery disease are anticipated to be enrolled. Pharmacological stress and rest-phase dynamic and static MPI SPECT following an additional coronary CTA scan are to be performed. The obtained multimodality imaging data (functional and anatomical parameters) are planned to be compared and subjected to statistical analysis. The results of this study are expected to improve risk assessment for patients with moderate cardiovascular risk and enhance the diagnostic performance of MPI SPECT.

Read the detailed description

Diagnostic management of patients with moderate clinical likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) remains challenging. Myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging (MPI SPECT) is a widely available and cost-effective modality that provides functional information on segmental perfusion defects. However, conventional static MPI SPECT has moderate diagnostic performance in identifying subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

The novel multi-pinhole (MPH) collimator technology with a three-detector SPECT camera (AnyScan® TRIO SPECT/CT, Mediso Ltd., Hungary) enables temporal and spatial resolution, absolute quantification of stress and rest myocardial blood flow (sMBF and rMBF), and calculated myocardial flow reserve (MFR), overcoming the difficulties of semi-quantitative evaluation.

This study aims to investigate the association between quantitative MFR, semi-quantitative functional parameters of dynamic, static MPI SPECT, and coronary CTA-based plaque metrics. Flow parameters of myocardial wall segments will be corresponded to the appropriate coronary artery based on the CT-assessed anatomy. Furthermore, the investigators aim to build statistical models representative of clinical scenarios to test the diagnostic accuracy of the MPH collimator.

In this prospective study, 50 patients with moderate cardiovascular pre-test probability (PTP) referred to either coronary CTA or MPI SPECT are anticipated to be enrolled. Cardiovascular PTP is estimated according to the CAD consortium based on age, sex, type of chest pain, and cardiovascular risk factors. Patients with a history of coronary artery bypass graft implantation, left or right bundle branch block, and atrial fibrillation will be excluded. Participants will be subjected (1) to dynamic and (2) static MPI SPECT (pharmacological stress and rest) and (3) to coronary CTA within 30 days. Patients undergoing pharmacological stress (dipyridamole or adenosine) dynamic MPI SPECT, which will be performed with AnyScan® TRIO SPECT/CT (Mediso Ltd.). Imaging will be started at the time of the radiopharmaceutical administration both in stress and rest, captured for 15 minutes in list mode. BMI-standardized doses of 99m-Tc will be used, with a same-day acquisition protocol, resulting in a three-fold increase for the rest phase compared to stress. Following each phase of dynamic acquisition in 30-60 minutes, an ECG-gated static MPI SPECT will be performed using a conventional LEHR collimator.

Data, such as sMBF, rMBF, MFR, summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), summed difference score (SDS), as well as visually evaluated perfusion defect severity and extent will be determined from MPI SPECT. Within 30 days of MPI SPECT, coronary CTA with Calcium Score assessment will also be performed using a photon-counting detector CT (NAEOTON Alpha, Siemens Healthineers, Germany). Coronary CTA will be analyzed as follows: coronary artery calcium score (CACS), the severity of luminal stenosis, total plaque volume, quantitative plaque composition, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR). The following additional anamnestic covariants will be used: age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors such as type of chest pain, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, smoking, obesity, and dyslipidemia.

The investigators hypothesized that dynamic MPI SPECT may prove to be superior to semi-quantitative static MPI SPECT in detecting CAD. Furthermore, MFR data combined with CACS may improve the diagnostic accuracy of MPI SPECT and guide the selection of patients for invasive coronary angiography.

MPI SPECT and coronary CTA data will be analyzed on-site at Semmelweis University, Hungary. The results will be available after the completion of patient enrollment.

Being tested
Stress Dynamic MPI SPECT, Stress Static MPI SPECT, Rest Dynamic MPI SPECT, Rest Static MPI SPECT, Cardiac CT
Keywords
Coronary Artery Disease,, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Absolute Quantification, Myocardial Flow Reserve, Plaque volume
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Arteriosclerosis, Myocardial Ischemia, Coronary Disease, Chest Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Stress Dynamic MPI SPECTDiagnostic test

    BMI standardized radiopharmaceutical injection in pharmacological stress (dipyridamole or adenosine) is performed under the SPECT camera to record the temporal distribution of the activity. A one-day protocol and multi-pinhole collimator are used.

  • Stress Static MPI SPECTDiagnostic test

    30-60 minutes after stress dynamic SPECT imaging is performed, an ECG-gated static SPECT MPI is conducted with a conventional LEHR collimator.

  • Rest Dynamic MPI SPECTDiagnostic test

    3 hours after the stress phase, the rest phase is also recorded. A radiopharmaceutical injection with a three-fold dose at rest is performed under the SPECT camera to record the temporal distribution of the activity. A one-day protocol and multi-pinhole collimator are used.

  • Rest Static MPI SPECTDiagnostic test

    30-60 minutes after rest, dynamic SPECT imaging is performed, and an ECG-gated static SPECT MPI is conducted with a conventional LEHR collimator.

  • Cardiac CTDiagnostic test

    Within 30 days of MPI SPECT imaging, a cardiac CT is performed for every patient, including a native calcium-scoring scan and a coronary CT angiography as a reference standard. A photon-counting detector CT is used.

Study groups in NCT06670768
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Consecutive patients with moderate pre-test probability according to CAD consortiumExperimentalPatients undergo dynamic and static MPI SPECT and cardiac CT within 30-days.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Stress Dynamic MPI SPECT; Diagnostic Test: Stress Static MPI SPECT; Diagnostic Test: Rest Dynamic MPI SPECT; Diagnostic Test: Rest Static MPI SPECT; Diagnostic Test: Cardiac CT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The association between Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) and total non-calcified plaque volume as assessed by coronary CTA.

    Predictive value of MFR on vessel and participant level, expressed as the ratio of Stress/Rest Myocardial Blood Flow (sMBF/rMBF). The total non-calcified plaque volume will be measured by PCD-CT.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Predictive Value of Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) to CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR-CT)

    The predictive value of MFR on vessel and participant levels is expressed as the ratio of stress/rest myocardial blood flow (sMBF/rMBF) to FFR-CT of 0.8 or less in any coronary artery. FFR-CT values are defined as follows: greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  2. Predictive Value of stress Myocardial Blood Flow (sMBF) to lumen stenosis extent on coronary CTA

    The predictive value of sMBF on vessel and participant level, derived from dynamic MPI SPECT, expressed in unit of ml/min/g to luminal stenosis extent. The severity of luminal stenosis is defined as follows: no stenosis, 1-24% minimal, 25-49% mild, 50-69% moderate, 70-99% severe, occlusion.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  3. Predictive Value of stress Myocardial Blood Flow (sMBF) to CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR-CT)

    The predictive value of sMBF on vessel and participant levels, derived from dynamic MPI SPECT, is expressed in a unit of ml/min/g to FFR-CT of 0.8 or less in any coronary artery. FFR-CT values are defined as follows: greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  4. Correlation of Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) and quantitative plaque composition

    Correlation of MFR on vessel level, expressed as the ratio of Stress/Rest Myocardial Blood Flow (sMBF/rMBF) and plaque composition. Plaque components are defined based on the following Hounsfield Unit (HU) threshold ranges: Low-attenuation plaque: - 100 to 30 HU; Non-calcified plaque: 30 to 350 HU; Calcified plaque: above 350 HU.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  5. Predictive Value of Summed Stress Score (SSS) to lumen stenosis extent on coronary CTA.

    The predictive value of semi-quantitative SSS derived from static MPI SPECT using a dedicated software on vessel and participant level to lumen stenosis extent. Classification of SSS is as follows: 0-3 normal, 4-8 mildly abnormal, 8-13 moderately abnormal, and above 13 severely abnormal. The severity of luminal stenosis is defined as follows: no stenosis, 1-24% minimal, 25-49% mild, 50-69% moderate, 70-99% severe, occlusion.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  6. Predictive Value of Summed Stress Score (SSS) to CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR-CT)

    The predictive value of semi-quantitative SSS derived from static MPI SPECT using a dedicated software on vessel and participant level to FFR-CT of 0.8 or less in any coronary artery. Classification of SSS is as follows: 0-3 normal, 4-8 mildly abnormal, 8-13 moderately abnormal, and above 13 severely abnormal. FFR-CT values are defined as follows: greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  7. Predictive Value of Summed Difference Score (SDS) to lumen stenosis extent on coronary CTA.

    The predictive value of semi-quantitative SDS derived from static MPI SPECT using a dedicated software on vessel and participant level to lumen stenosis extent. of 50% or more in the left main coronary artery or 70% or more in any coronary artery. Classification of SDS is as follows: 0-3 normal, 4-8 mildly abnormal, 8-13 moderately abnormal, and above 13 severely abnormal. The severity of luminal stenosis is defined as follows: no stenosis, 1-24% minimal, 25-49% mild, 50-69% moderate, 70-99% severe, occlusion.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  8. Predictive Value of Summed Difference Score (SDS) to CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR-CT)

    The predictive value of semi-quantitative SDS derived from static MPI SPECT using a dedicated software on vessel and participant level to FFR-CT of 0.8 or less in any coronary artery. Classification of SDS is as follows: 0-3 normal, 4-8 mildly abnormal, 8-13 moderately abnormal, and above 13 severely abnormal. FFR-CT values are defined as follows: greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  9. Comparison of visual assessment of static MPI SPECT to luminal stenosis extent on coronary CTA.

    Static MPI SPECT images will be evaluated by a nuclear medicine specialist. Results will be compared to luminal stenosis extent on coronary CTA. The severity of luminal stenosis is defined as follows: no stenosis, 1-24% minimal, 25-49% mild, 50-69% moderate, 70-99% severe, occlusion.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  10. Comparison of visual assessment of static MPI SPECT to CT-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR-CT)

    Static MPI SPECT images will be evaluated by a nuclear medicine specialist. Results will be compared to FFR-CT. FFR-CT values are defined as follows: greater than 0.8 is normal, 0.76-0.8 is borderline, and 0.75 or less is abnormal.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  11. Predictive Models of Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) and Other Covariants to Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Severity Identified by Coronary CTA

    Composite endpoint:

    model 1: type of chest pain, sex, age model 2: model 1 + static MPI SPECT (SSS, SRS, SDS with the following classification: 0-3 normal, 4-8 mildly abnormal, 8-13 moderately abnormal, and above 13 severely abnormal) model 3: model 2 + MFR (expressed as a sMBF/rMBF ratio) model 4: model 3 + CACS (The following classification is used for CACS: 0, 1-9, 10-99, 100-399, 400-1000, >1000)

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

  12. Predictive Value of Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) to stenosis extent on coronary CTA.

    Predictive value of MFR on vessel and participant level, expressed as the ratio of Stress/Rest Myocardial Blood Flow (sMBF/rMBF) to luminal stenosis extent. The severity of luminal stenosis is defined as follows: no stenosis, 1-24% minimal, 25-49% mild, 50-69% moderate, 70-99% severe, occlusion.

    Measured: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2024
  2. Study start6 Mar 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease are enrolled. Patients are referred to dynamic and static MPI using 99mTc radionuclide imaged by SPECT, following coronary CTA examination.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06670768
Sponsor's protocol ID
OGYÉI/64876-6/2023
Acronym
MY-FUSION
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
24 Oct 2024
Last updated
25 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: A secure platform will be used to share clinical and imaging data after the results are published.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Stress Dynamic MPI SPECT, Stress Static MPI SPECT and Rest Dynamic MPI SPECT in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, run by Semmelweis University at 1 site in Hungary.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Pál Maurovich-Horvat, Prof. Dr. (+36206632485, maurovich-horvat.pal@semmelweis.hu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The association between Myocardial Flow Reserve (MFR) and total non-calcified plaque volume as assessed by coronary CTA. (time frame: As soon as all required data is available but not later than study completion, an avarage of one year.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Apr 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in