AzTrials
AzTrials

AnemiaPhase 4EpoAidNCT06670963

Use of Epoetin Alfa and Iron Derisomaltose in Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock: a Randomized Controlled Trial

A Phase 4 study testing Iron, EPO and 0.9 % NaCl in people with Anemia and Sepsis, run by Piotr Czempik at 1 site in Poland.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Up to 66% of have anemia at the admission to the intensive care unit. This number increases to 95% after 72 hours of hospitalization in the intensive care unit due to illness and iatrogenic blood loss. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Anemia, Sepsis, Septic Shock
What is being tested?
Iron, EPO and 0.9 % NaCl
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
10 Nov 2024to 1 Apr 2027
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age ≥18,
  • diagnosed sepsis (Sepsis-3) or septic shock (Septic Shock-3),
  • hemoglobin <120 g/L in both sexes.

Who cannot join

  • bleeding,
  • decompensated liver disease,
  • inherited microcytic disorders,
  • macrocytosis,
  • contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis of VTE,
  • pregnancy,
Show all 9Show fewer
  • allergy to epoetin alfa and/or iron derisomaltose,
  • ferritin concentration >800 ng/mL,
  • unable to take informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Piotr F. Czempik, MD, PhD contact

00487894201

pczempik@sum.edu.pl

Agnieszka Wiórek, MD, PhD contact

00487894201

agnieszka.wiorek@gmail.com

Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne im. prof. K. Gibińskiego Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach

    Katowice, 40-752

    Piotr F. Czempik, MD, PhD, 00487894201, pczempik@sum.edu.pl

    Agnieszka Wiórek, MD, PhD, 00487894201, agnieszka.wiorek@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: The Use of Epoetin Alfa and Iron Derisomaltose in the Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock Hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Background Up to 66% of have anemia at the admission to the intensive care unit. This number increases to 95% after 72 hours of hospitalization in the intensive care unit due to illness and iatrogenic blood loss. Anemia worsens tissue oxygenation, especially in patietns with sepsis or septic shock, who already have blood flow issues. Instead of giving blood transfusions, which can have side effects, we aim to address the root causes of anemia in these patients. Sepsis can cause "inflammatory anemia" and combine with iron deficiency anemia. Current anemia treatments include drugs that stimulate red blood cell production and intravenous iron supplements. Some think that iron supplements can worsen infections by feeding pathogens, but this is not conclusively proven. Since transfused red blood cells (RBC) also contain iron, small doses of intravenous iron might help sepsis patients with iron deficiency.

There is a need for a study on the effects of epoetin alfa and iron derisomaltose on hemoglobin (Hb) levels in sepsis patients.

Read more

Hypothesis and Aim Treating anemia in sepsis patients could increase Hb levels and reduce RBC transfusions, improving patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the effects of epoetin alfa ± iron derisomaltose on Hb levels and RBC transfusion rates.

Primary Endpoints:

  1. Hb difference at study exit (discharge from ICU/death/bleeding/need for surgery/day 15 whatever comes first) and day 1 corrected for Hb increase due to possible RBC transfusion

Secondary Endpoints:

  1. Hb difference on days 8 and 1 corrected for Hb increase due to possible RBC transfusion
  2. Hb difference on days 15 and 1 corrected for Hb increase due to possible RBC transfusion
  3. number of blood transfusions
  4. percentage of patients receiving at least one blood transfusion
  5. actual vs. predicted mortality
  6. prevalence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
  7. mortality rates in ICU, hospital, 30-day, and 90-day.

Materials and Methods:

This will be a randomized controlled clinical trial recruting 200 patients

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥18
  2. diagnosed sepsis (Sepsis-3 definition) or septic shock (Septic Shock-3 definition)
  3. hemoglobin <120 g/L for both sexes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. bleeding
  2. decompensated liver disease
  3. inherited microcytic disorders
  4. macrocytosis
  5. contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism
  6. pregnancy
  7. allergy to epoetin alfa and/or iron derisomaltose.
  8. ferritin >800 ng/mL.
  9. inability to take consent

Study Group:

  1. epoetin alfa 50 u/kg IV (days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12)
  2. iron derisomaltose 0.2g IV when RET-He <29.3 pg (days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12)
  3. algorithm for red blood cell transfusions

Control Group:

  1. algorithm for red blood cell transfusions

Laboratory Parameters:

Initial: interleukin-6, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, creatinine, ammonia, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, complete blood count (CBC), reticulocytes (RET), ferritin, iron, transferrin.

Serial: CBC and RET (days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12)

Read the detailed description

Project Description:

Project Title: The use of epoetin alfa and iron derisomaltose in treating anemia in patients with sepsis or septic shock in the ICU: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Project Acronym: EpoAid

Theoretical Background and Rationale: Up to 66% of patients have anemia at admission to the intensive care unit. Additionally, many patients develop anemia during hospitalization in the intensive care unit due to illness and iatrogenic blood loss for laboratory diagnostics. After 72 hours 95% of intensive care unit patients are anemic. Anemia increases the risk of tissue oxygen deficiency, which is particularly important in sepsis or septic shock patients who may have peripheral perfusion disorders due to infection. Anemia should be treated causally because red blood cell transfusions can lead to adverse effects, including immunomodulation leading to innate immunity suppression, which is particularly significant in critically ill sepsis or septic shock patients. Anemia caused by sepsis is known as inflammatory anemia (AI). Sepsis patients often have mixed anemia, combining features of AI and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) - AI+IDA. Currently available treatments for mixed anemia include erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) and intravenous iron supplements (e.g., iron derisomaltose). Manufacturers of intravenous iron products contraindicate their use in infections since intravenous iron could theoretically exacerbate infections by stimulating pathogen growth. However, there is no conclusive data on this. Considering that stored red blood cells are also a source of iron that pathogens can use, it seems that fractional doses of intravenous iron could benefit sepsis patients with diagnosed iron deficiency. Additionally, ESA administration could cause functional iron deficiency, where small doses of intravenous iron might also be beneficial.

Attempts to use ESA and intravenous iron in the general ICU population have yielded inconclusive results due to methodological errors. In the IRONMAN study comparing iron carboxymaltose with placebo, no difference in transfusion rates (primary endpoint) was found, but higher Hb levels were observed at hospital discharge in the intervention group (107 vs. 100 g/L). This trial had some methodological flaws: intravenous iron was administered regardless of anemia etiology, red blood cell transfusion decisions were made by clinicians - there was no transfusion algorithm, and the average hospital stay was 11 days - maximal effect of intravenous iron is seen after 3-4 weeks, at least 2 weeks.

Iron deficiency diagnostics in sepsis patients must rely on parameters independent of the systemic inflammatory response since standard iron metabolism parameters (ferritin, transferrin saturation) are not useful here. Severe sepsis was an exclusion criterion in the IRONMAN study. Given the limitations of previous studies and the lack of research on the use of intravenous iron in sepsis patients, it is warranted to conduct a study evaluating the effect of epoetin alfa ± iron derisomaltose on Hb levels in sepsis or septic shock patients.

Hypothesis and Research Aim: Causal treatment of anemia in sepsis or septic shock patients may lead to increased Hb levels and reduced transfusion rates, potentially improving patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa ± iron derisomaltose on one primary and several secondary outcomes.

Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial is planned. Blinding will be single due to the color (rusty) of the intervention drug (iron derisomaltose) and problems with complete blinding of the intervention. Randomization will be done using a computer generator of randomized numbers using block of 4. Two hundred patients will be recruited (100 in the experimental group, 100 in the control group). If a study subject starts bleeding or requires surgery (affects Hb levels and transfusion necessity - primary endpoints), the time until this event will be evaluated. Data collected: demographics (gender, age), infection site, length of stay (ICU, hospital), mortality (ICU, hospital, 30 days, 90 days). Blood loss for laboratory diagnostics will be monitored (calculation based on laboratory parameters ordered and test tube used). Pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis will be used in the experimental and contorol groups: enoxaparin 40 mg x 1 sc in patients with creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min or dalteparin 5000 IU x 1 sc in patients with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, and a red blood cell transfusion decision algorithm will be employed.

Experimental group:

  1. epoetin alfa (Binocrit, Sandoz, Poland) given intravenously when Hb <120 g/L, dosed by a study subject weight:
  • 2000 IU (<60 kg)
  • 3000 IU (60-79 kg)
  • 4000 IU (80-99 kg)
  • 5000 IU (>100 kg) administered on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12
  1. iron derisomaltose (Monover, Pharmacosmos, Denmark) given intravenously at a dose of 0.2g when Hb <120 g/L and RET-He <29.3 pg, administered on days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12
  2. red blood cell transfusion decision based on a proprietary decision algorithm. Binocrit will be stored at 2-8 °C. Before use, the drug will be stored at room temperature for 15 minutes. The drug is packaged in prefilled syringes; it will be mixed with 0.9% sodium chloride to a volume of 20 mL, then injected intravenously as a bolus, followed by a 20 mL 0.9% NaCl sodium chloride bolus to ensure immediate drug entry into the bloodstream. It is crucial to administer the entire dose without loss, as it is the primary intervention drug in this study. Monover is provided in 0.1g ampoules. The drug will be administered at a fixed dose of 0.2g when RET-HE <29.3 pg on the scheduled administration day. The drug will be diluted with 0.9% NaCl to a volume of 50mL and administered in a brown 50mL syringe using an infusion pump at a rate of 60mL/h.

Control Group:

red blood cell transfusion decision based on a proprietary decision algorithm.

Monitored parameters:

  • initial lab parameters (extended): interleukin-6, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, creatinine, ammonia, blood urea nitrogen, aspartate aminotransferase (AspAT), alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, complete blood count (CBC), reticulocytes (RET), ferritin, iron, transferrin.
  • serial measurements: Hb and hemoglobin equivalent in reticulocytes (RET-He) on the day of epoetin alfa ± iron derisomaltose administration.

Timeline: November 2024 - December 2026

Feasibility: given the number of ICU hospitalizations (approximately 400 per year) and the prevalence of sepsis/septic shock, it will be possible to enroll about 100 patients per year.

Being tested
Iron, EPO, 0.9 % NaCl
Keywords
anemia, sepsis, septic shock, epoetin alfa, iron derisomaltose, red blood cell, hemoglobin, intensive care unit
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Sepsis, Shock, Septic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IronDrug

    Iron derisomaltose 0.2g IV if reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent <29.3 pg (lower limit for the local laboratory reference range for reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent)

  • EPODrug

    Epoetin alfa 50 units/kg IV 3 times weekly

  • 0.9 % NaClDrug

    Volume of 0.9% NaCl identical as volume of medications used in experimental arm

Study groups in NCT06670963
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epoetin alfa +/- ferric derisomaltoseExperimentalEpoetin alfa 50 units/kg IV 3 times weekly and ferric derisomaltose 0.2g IV if reticulocyte hemoglobin equivalent <29.3 pg
Receives: Drug: Iron; Drug: EPO
PlaceboPlacebo comparator0.9% NaCl
Receives: Drug: 0.9 % NaCl

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hemoglobin concentration difference at exit from the study

    The difference between hemoglobin concentration at exit from the study and day 1 corrected for Hb increase due to possible RBC transfusion [RBC volume x RBC Hb concentration/study subject's blood volume (weight x 65 mL for women/weight x 75 mL for men)]

    Measured: From enrollment to day 15/death/discharge from ICU/bleeding episode/surgery whatever comes first

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Hemoglobin concentration difference at 1 week

    The difference in hemoglobin concentration on days 8 and 1 corrected for Hb increase due to possible RBC transfusion [RBC volume x RBC Hb concentration/study subject's blood volume (weight x 65 mL for women/weight x 75 mL for men)]

    Measured: From enrollment to day 8 (if a study subject still in the trial)

  2. Hemoglobin concentration difference at 2 weeks

    The difference in hemoglobin concentration between day 15 and day 1 corrected for Hb increase due to possible RBC transfusion [RBC volume x RBC Hb concentration/study subject's blood volume (weight x 65 mL for women/weight x 75 mL for men)]

    Measured: From enrollment to day 15 (if a study subject still in the trial)

  3. Number of red blood cell units transfused

    Number of allogeneic red blood cell units transfused

    Measured: From enrollment to day 15/death/discharge from ICU/bleeding episode/surgery whatever comes first

  4. Tranfusion rate

    Percentage of study subjects receiving at least one red blood cell unit

    Measured: From enrollment to day 15/death/discharge from ICU/bleeding episode/surgery whatever comes first

  5. Deep vein thrombosis prevalence

    Number of deep vein thrombosis cases

    Measured: From enrollment to day 15/death/discharge from ICU/bleeding episode/surgery whatever comes first

  6. Pulmonaly embolism prevalence

    Number of pulmonary embolism cases

    Measured: From enrollment to day 15/death/discharge from ICU/bleeding episode/surgery whatever comes first

  7. Intensive care unit mortality

    Death during intensive care unit hospitalization (index hospitalization)

    Measured: From enrollment to discharge from ICU

  8. 30-day mortality

    Death within 30 days of day 1

    Measured: From enrollment to day 30

  9. 90-day mortality

    Death within 90 days of day 1

    Measured: From enrollment to day 90

  10. Actual vs. predicted intensive care unit mortality

    Difference between actual intensive care unit mortality and intensive care unit mortality predicted by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (index hospitalization)

    Measured: From enrollment to discharge from ICU

  11. Actual vs. predicted intensive care unit mortality

    Difference between actual intensive care unit mortality and intensive care unit mortality predicted by Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation Score (index hospitalization)

    Measured: From enrollment to discharge from ICU

  12. Actual vs. predicted intensive care unit mortality

    Difference between actual intensive care unit mortality and intensive care unit mortality predicted by Simplified Acute Physiology Score III (index hospitalization)

    Measured: From enrollment to discharge from ICU

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2024
  2. Study start10 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06670963
Sponsor's protocol ID
BNW-1-006/N/4/K
Acronym
EpoAid
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
31 Oct 2024
Last updated
27 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data privacy issues

Publications

  • Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

    PubMed 26903338
  • IRONMAN Investigators; Litton E, Baker S, Erber WN, Farmer S, Ferrier J, French C, Gummer J, Hawkins D, Higgins A, Hofmann A, De Keulenaer B, McMorrow J, Olynyk JK, Richards T, Towler S, Trengove R, Webb S; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Intravenous iron or placebo for anaemia in intensive care: the IRONMAN multicentre randomized blinded trial : A randomized trial of IV iron in critical illness. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1715-1722. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4465-6. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

    PubMed 27686346
  • Czempik PF, Wilczek D, Herzyk J, Krzych LJ. Hospital-Acquired Anemia in Patients Hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 6;11(14):3939. doi: 10.3390/jcm11143939.

    PubMed 35887702
  • Czempik PF, Pluta MP, Krzych LJ. Physiologic approach to red blood cell transfusion in non-bleeding critically ill patients. Arch Med Sci. 2022 Aug 30;18(5):1423-1425. doi: 10.5114/aoms/152217. eCollection 2022. No abstract available.

    PubMed 36160360
  • Czempik PF, Wiorek A. Comparison of Standard and New Iron Status Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study in Sepsis Patients. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;11(7):995. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070995.

    PubMed 37046922
  • Czempik PF, Wiorek A. Iron deficiency in sepsis patients managed with divided doses of iron dextran: a prospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 31;13(1):5264. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32002-y.

    PubMed 37002279
  • Czempik PF, Wiorek A. Iron deficiency in sepsis patients based on reticulocyte hemoglobin and hepcidin concentration: a prospective cohort study. Arch Med Sci. 2023 May 24;19(3):805-809. doi: 10.5114/aoms/161802. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37313179

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Iron, EPO and 0.9 % NaCl in people with Anemia and Sepsis, run by Piotr Czempik at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Piotr F. Czempik, MD, PhD (00487894201, pczempik@sum.edu.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hemoglobin concentration difference at exit from the study (time frame: From enrollment to day 15/death/discharge from ICU/bleeding episode/surgery whatever comes first). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06670963, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in