EmergenciesNCT06678815
How Can Volunteers in the NHS Be Best Supported?
An observational study of Emergencies, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study aims to investigate the impact of volunteers in the English National Health Service (NHS) and increase the evidence base for supporting and developing volunteering to best help patients and services. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergencies
- What is being tested?
- Emergency response
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jan 2025to Jul 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Those working as/with or treated by CFR
Who may be able to join
- working as/with or treated by CFR
Who cannot join
- not working as/with or treated by CFR
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site
King's College London
London, London, WC2B 6NR
Annette Boaz, PhD, 442078365454, annette.boaz@kcl.ac.uk
Alec Fraser, PhD, 442078365454, alec.fraser@kcl.ac.uk
About this study
This study aims to investigate the impact of volunteers in the English National Health Service (NHS) and increase the evidence base for supporting and developing volunteering to best help patients and services. The research will focus on one relatively established role: Community First Responders (CFR) supporting the ambulance service in English NHS Ambulance Trusts. We will take a mixed methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods to learn more about the effectiveness and wider perceived value of the CFR role from the perspectives of CFRs themselves, other NHS staff and NHS patients who may interact with them.
Our primary Research Question is: How can we maximise the impact of the Community First Responder role? Secondary Research Questions focus on what we can learn from the Community First Responders to support volunteer roles more widely. In particular: How can policy makers improve the deployment of volunteers? How do staff perceive the support they receive from volunteers (including impact on their workload and morale)? How do patients perceive the support they receive from volunteers? How are volunteers impacting services? What opportunities are there for further developing the volunteer role? We will work with (up to five) Ambulance Trusts already involved in the National Ambulance Volunteering Dashboard to extract quantitative data from existing management systems. These data will focus on (1) number and demographic characteristics of CFRs; (2) aggregate CFR activity (incidents attended, first on scene, responses times, response outcomes) and (3) CFR incident data (including location, time, category and CFR attendance). From these Trusts we will select 2 for qualitative data collection consisting of documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with CFRs, NHS staff and patients. This research aims to generate evidence to inform decisions on where policymakers can most efficiently focus future volunteer interventions and how the NHS can best support volunteers in the system.
Read the detailed description
Purpose \& research design
The study has a clear purpose - to learn more about the impacts that volunteers may have upon how NHS services function and how volunteers and volunteering can be supported. Whilst there is some existing research on the use of volunteers in the NHS, there are significant gaps in our knowledge - for instance about the effectiveness of volunteering in general - and the CFR role in particular, as well as the inter- and intra-organisational impacts of volunteering and the CFR role. For instance, do patients welcome and value the work of CFRs? Likewise, do NHS staff integrate well with CFRs, or not?
The mixed method research design enables the research team to collect data on both the impacts that the CFR role has on NHS services whilst exploring the perceptions of CFRs themselves, the patients they serve and the NHS colleagues with whom they interact.
The multi-site research design enables the research team to compare findings from different geographical settings thereby enabling both particularisation and transferability.
Motivation and relevance
The invitation to conduct the research comes from the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC). This reflects the policy salience of the work. It is strongly supported by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE). For both the DHSC and AACE, the findings of the research will be of high value in relation to lessons for wider developments of volunteering in the NHS as well as refinement of the CFR role.
Recruitment \& Selection
Recruitment decisions are led by AACE stakeholders. Pragmatism guides many of these decisions. It is important that the (Ambulance Trust) sites that are recruited are not only willing to take part but also able to provide the quantitative data of interest in a timely and efficient manner. 5 sites have been identified as both willing and able to provide these data and will be invited to take part based on the existing organisational knowledge of the AACE.
From within these 5 sites, we will purposively identify 2 sites for in depth qualitative data collection. We do not foresee any significant ethical, legal or managerial issues in relation to the collection, analysis and dissemination of the qualitative data that this study will generate.
In 2023 the AACE developed a National Ambulance Volunteering Dashboard (NAVD). This was designed to highlight the range of individuals who support ambulance trusts, the activities in which they participate, and the patients they help via clinical and non-clinical volunteering opportunities.
The quantitative element of this project will aim to build on this work to help the engaged trusts to identify and standardise their data relating to CFRs. This data is likely to be held on varying systems and using different categorisation and data linkages. Given limited resources in each trust we will need to work to identify which data can be accessed and extracted without disproportionate additional burden to the trusts. This may mean that the resulting data has elements missing and it is highly likely that trusts will vary in their capacity to provide data. We will minimise this risk by only reporting descriptive statistics from the trusts with transparent reporting on data gaps. The project can be used as a baseline with which the trusts can work to improve this data quality.
Where possible the data on CFRs will be combined with existing statutory collections for ambulance dispatch data relating to response times, categories, conveyance rates and other information. All data relating to CFRs will need to be anonymised within the trust and data suppression used to ensure that any data shared with the project has no risk of disclosure.
The qualitative work will consist of approximately 15 semi-structured interviews in each of the 2 qualitative sites (30 in total), with key informants (likely to include several CFRs with different levels of experience and career trajectories; NHS staff - Ambulance service strategic and operational managers, NHS ambulance service paramedics, ambulance service call handlers; Hospital Emergency Department staff - both clinical and managerial) and service users. These interviews will mostly take place virtually via Microsoft Teams.
We will request local policy documents produced by NHS Ambulance and NHS hospital Trusts that outline the roles and responsibilities of CFRs to triangulate the interview and focus group findings alongside publicly available national and regional documents.
Interviews
To recruit interview participants into the qualitative part of the study, we will draw on the support of the volunteer managers at each of our selected sites. These individuals are best placed to help the research team to identify and help approach service users, CFRs and NHS informants. The volunteer managers will reach out to potential informants and inform the potential informants about the research. If potential informants are happy to take part, then their email addresses will be shared with the research team. Potentially interested informants will then receive an individual email from a member of the researcher team with a participant information sheet inviting them to take part in the research project. A date and time for the online interview will be agreed between the informant and the researcher. Before the interview, the informant will be sent a consent form to complete. In the online meeting, the researcher will go through the information sheet and consent form with the informant and enable them to ask any questions they may have. Once consent is granted, the recording function will be enabled interview will be recorded. The interviews will most likely last about 60 minutes.
Each interview recording will be given an anonymised reference number. An audio file will be made of each interview and saved to the King's College London One Drive in a protected folder. Each anonymised audio file will be securely transferred for transcription by a professional transcriber. Following transcription, a word document will be securely shared with the research team - identifiable only by an anonymised reference number. This file will be uploaded into a securely located qualitative research software platform to enable the researchers to code and analyse the data further.
Documents
Any confidential documents that are shared with the research team such as protocols, strategy documents etc. will be treated in a similar way to interview transcripts - i.e., they will be given an anonymised identification code and uploaded into a qualitative research software platform for analysis alongside any publicly available documentation. The qualitative analysis will not include any documents will patient identifiable data.
Risks, burdens and benefits
Overall, there is a risk that these inquiries pose political risks to the trusts, if they are construed as trusts being reliant on volunteers to keep response times down, or using volunteers as a substitute for paid staff. It will be important that the narrative put around these data is careful to emphasise that volunteers add value rather than replace paid staff. In relation to the qualitative research specifically, there are no risks for those taking part in interviews or focus groups as all information will be fully anonymised. The only burden is that of participants' time. There are likely to be few direct personal benefits for individuals through taking part. However, there may be wider benefits for NHS patients, clinicians, managers and policy makers through the knowledge generated in this project through greater understanding of volunteering in the NHS.
Confidentiality
We will follow University and NHS best-practice Principles through each stage of this proposed research project as outlined above.
Conflicts of Interest
We do not foresee any conflicts of interest in the proposed research.
- Conditions
- Emergencies
- Being tested
- Emergency response
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Emergency responseOther
Those delivering or receiving emergency care from a CFR.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Those either working as, with, or treated by Community First Responders | Those either working as, with, or treated by Community First Responders Receives: Other: Emergency response |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Descriptive data on CFR demographics and activities
Descriptive statistics on CFRs
Measured: 2025
Secondary outcomes (1)
Qualitative data on CFR role/NHS volunteering more broadly
Interview data
Measured: 2025
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2024
- Study startJan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EmergenciesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by King's College LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06678815
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 347570
- Other IDs
- NIHR206121(08), 347570
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 6 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How Can Volunteers in the NHS Be Best Supported?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06678815
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 347570
- Conditions
- Emergencies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to investigate the impact of volunteers in the English National Health Service (NHS) and increase the evidence base for supporting and developing volunteering to best help patients and services. The research will focus on one relatively established role: Community First Responders (CFR) supporting the ambulance service in English NHS Ambulance Trusts. We will take a mixed methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods to learn more about the effectiveness and wider perceived value of the CFR role from the perspectives of CFRs themselves, other NHS staff and NHS patients who may interact with them.
Our primary Research Question is: How can we maximise the impact of the Community First Responder role? Secondary Research Questions focus on what we can learn from the Community First Responders to support volunteer roles more widely. In particular: How can policy makers improve the deployment of volunteers? How do staff perceive the support they receive from volunteers (including impact on their workload and morale)? How do patients perceive the support they receive from volunteers? How are volunteers impacting services? What opportunities are there for further developing the volunteer role? We will work with (up to five) Ambulance Trusts already involved in the National Ambulance Volunteering Dashboard to extract quantitative data from existing management systems. These data will focus on (1) number and demographic characteristics of CFRs; (2) aggregate CFR activity (incidents attended, first on scene, responses times, response outcomes) and (3) CFR incident data (including location, time, category and CFR attendance). From these Trusts we will select 2 for qualitative data collection consisting of documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews with CFRs, NHS staff and patients. This research aims to generate evidence to inform decisions on where policymakers can most efficiently focus future volunteer interventions and how the NHS can best support volunteers in the system.
Detailed description
Purpose \& research design
The study has a clear purpose - to learn more about the impacts that volunteers may have upon how NHS services function and how volunteers and volunteering can be supported. Whilst there is some existing research on the use of volunteers in the NHS, there are significant gaps in our knowledge - for instance about the effectiveness of volunteering in general - and the CFR role in particular, as well as the inter- and intra-organisational impacts of volunteering and the CFR role. For instance, do patients welcome and value the work of CFRs? Likewise, do NHS staff integrate well with CFRs, or not?
The mixed method research design enables the research team to collect data on both the impacts that the CFR role has on NHS services whilst exploring the perceptions of CFRs themselves, the patients they serve and the NHS colleagues with whom they interact.
The multi-site research design enables the research team to compare findings from different geographical settings thereby enabling both particularisation and transferability.
Motivation and relevance
The invitation to conduct the research comes from the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC). This reflects the policy salience of the work. It is strongly supported by the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE). For both the DHSC and AACE, the findings of the research will be of high value in relation to lessons for wider developments of volunteering in the NHS as well as refinement of the CFR role.
Recruitment \& Selection
Recruitment decisions are led by AACE stakeholders. Pragmatism guides many of these decisions. It is important that the (Ambulance Trust) sites that are recruited are not only willing to take part but also able to provide the quantitative data of interest in a timely and efficient manner. 5 sites have been identified as both willing and able to provide these data and will be invited to take part based on the existing organisational knowledge of the AACE.
From within these 5 sites, we will purposively identify 2 sites for in depth qualitative data collection. We do not foresee any significant ethical, legal or managerial issues in relation to the collection, analysis and dissemination of the qualitative data that this study will generate.
In 2023 the AACE developed a National Ambulance Volunteering Dashboard (NAVD). This was designed to highlight the range of individuals who support ambulance trusts, the activities in which they participate, and the patients they help via clinical and non-clinical volunteering opportunities.
The quantitative element of this project will aim to build on this work to help the engaged trusts to identify and standardise their data relating to CFRs. This data is likely to be held on varying systems and using different categorisation and data linkages. Given limited resources in each trust we will need to work to identify which data can be accessed and extracted without disproportionate additional burden to the trusts. This may mean that the resulting data has elements missing and it is highly likely that trusts will vary in their capacity to provide data. We will minimise this risk by only reporting descriptive statistics from the trusts with transparent reporting on data gaps. The project can be used as a baseline with which the trusts can work to improve this data quality.
Where possible the data on CFRs will be combined with existing statutory collections for ambulance dispatch data relating to response times, categories, conveyance rates and other information. All data relating to CFRs will need to be anonymised within the trust and data suppression used to ensure that any data shared with the project has no risk of disclosure.
The qualitative work will consist of approximately 15 semi-structured interviews in each of the 2 qualitative sites (30 in total), with key informants (likely to include several CFRs with different levels of experience and career trajectories; NHS staff - Ambulance service strategic and operational managers, NHS ambulance service paramedics, ambulance service call handlers; Hospital Emergency Department staff - both clinical and managerial) and service users. These interviews will mostly take place virtually via Microsoft Teams.
We will request local policy documents produced by NHS Ambulance and NHS hospital Trusts that outline the roles and responsibilities of CFRs to triangulate the interview and focus group findings alongside publicly available national and regional documents.
Interviews
To recruit interview participants into the qualitative part of the study, we will draw on the support of the volunteer managers at each of our selected sites. These individuals are best placed to help the research team to identify and help approach service users, CFRs and NHS informants. The volunteer managers will reach out to potential informants and inform the potential informants about the research. If potential informants are happy to take part, then their email addresses will be shared with the research team. Potentially interested informants will then receive an individual email from a member of the researcher team with a participant information sheet inviting them to take part in the research project. A date and time for the online interview will be agreed between the informant and the researcher. Before the interview, the informant will be sent a consent form to complete. In the online meeting, the researcher will go through the information sheet and consent form with the informant and enable them to ask any questions they may have. Once consent is granted, the recording function will be enabled interview will be recorded. The interviews will most likely last about 60 minutes.
Each interview recording will be given an anonymised reference number. An audio file will be made of each interview and saved to the King's College London One Drive in a protected folder. Each anonymised audio file will be securely transferred for transcription by a professional transcriber. Following transcription, a word document will be securely shared with the research team - identifiable only by an anonymised reference number. This file will be uploaded into a securely located qualitative research software platform to enable the researchers to code and analyse the data further.
Documents
Any confidential documents that are shared with the research team such as protocols, strategy documents etc. will be treated in a similar way to interview transcripts - i.e., they will be given an anonymised identification code and uploaded into a qualitative research software platform for analysis alongside any publicly available documentation. The qualitative analysis will not include any documents will patient identifiable data.
Risks, burdens and benefits
Overall, there is a risk that these inquiries pose political risks to the trusts, if they are construed as trusts being reliant on volunteers to keep response times down, or using volunteers as a substitute for paid staff. It will be important that the narrative put around these data is careful to emphasise that volunteers add value rather than replace paid staff. In relation to the qualitative research specifically, there are no risks for those taking part in interviews or focus groups as all information will be fully anonymised. The only burden is that of participants' time. There are likely to be few direct personal benefits for individuals through taking part. However, there may be wider benefits for NHS patients, clinicians, managers and policy makers through the knowledge generated in this project through greater understanding of volunteering in the NHS.
Confidentiality
We will follow University and NHS best-practice Principles through each stage of this proposed research project as outlined above.
Conflicts of Interest
We do not foresee any conflicts of interest in the proposed research.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Those either working as, with, or treated by Community First Responders | – | Other: Emergency responseThose either working as, with, or treated by Community First Responders |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Those working as/with or treated by CFR
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- working as/with or treated by CFR
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- not working as/with or treated by CFR
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Emergency responseThose delivering or receiving emergency care from a CFR. | Other | Those either working as, with, or treated by Community First Responders |
Primary outcome
Descriptive data on CFR demographics and activities
Time frame: 2025
Descriptive statistics on CFRs
1 secondary outcome
Qualitative data on CFR role/NHS volunteering more broadly
Time frame: 2025
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2024.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Emergencies
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Emergencies, run by King's College London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Annette Boaz, PhD (44 2078465454, annette.boaz@kcl.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Descriptive data on CFR demographics and activities (time frame: 2025). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2024.