AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerBLOCTNCT06679920

Study With a Newly Optical Coherence Tomography Probe for Optimizing Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

A study testing Optical coherence tomography in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Amsterdam UMC at 2 sites in Netherlands.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if a new designed optical coherence tomography catheter can be used in bladder cancer in patients undergoing a transurethral resection of a bladder tumour. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
Optical coherence tomography
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
2 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Dec 2024to Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years.
  • Have at least 1 suspected bladder tumour seen at cystoscopy.
  • Have a bladder that is accessible for cystoscopy.
  • Be in a physical condition to undergo a TURBT.
  • Eligible patients must be fully informed about the study and written signed informed consent must be obtained prior to any study related investigation/intervention.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • The only tumour site is at the bladder neck.
  • The tumour(s) is larger than 2 centimetres in diameter.
  • >5 tumours present.
  • Solely a suspected flat lesion present.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Marinka Remmelink, MD contact

+310204441376

m.j.remmelink@amsterdamumc.nl

Jorg R Oddens, MD, PhD contact

j.r.oddens@amsterdamumc.nl

Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Amsterdam University Medical Center

    Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081HV

    Marinka Remmelink, MD, 00310204441376, m.j.remmelink@amsterdamumc.nl

    Jorg R Oddens, MD, PhD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Amsterdam University Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1081HV

    Marinka J Remmelink, MD, 0031204441376, m.j.remmelink@amsterdamumc.nl

    Jorg R Oddens, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: IDEAL Phase II Study of a Newly Designed Optical Coherence Tomography Probe During Transurethral Resection for Optimizing Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if a new designed optical coherence tomography catheter can be used in bladder cancer in patients undergoing a transurethral resection of a bladder tumour. The main question it aims to answer is:

  • Is the optical coherence tomography catheter feasible in capturing images of bladder tumours and normal bladder wall during a transurethral resection of a bladder tumour?

Participants will undergo measurements with a new optical coherence tomography device during the transurethral resection of their bladder tumour(s).

Read the detailed description

Rationale:

Bladder cancer is the 10th most common form of cancer in the world with 573.278 new cases of bladder cancer and 212,536 deaths in 2020. Despite current treatment options, 5-year recurrence rates up to 78% have been reported. Therefore, frequent and long-term follow-up of bladder cancer patients is required. Up until now, the gold standard for diagnosing bladder cancer is cystoscopy with subsequent transurethral resection of the bladder tumour (TURBT). In certain cases a repeat-TURBT (re-TURBT) is necessary to ensure radicality and to confirm the stage of the tumour. The frequent cystoscopies and multiple operations result in a substantial burden for bladder cancer patients and in substantial healthcare costs. Therefore, finding other options to determine the tumour grading and staging by a so called 'optical biopsy' is necessary. This would enable other treatment options, such as out-patient laser fulguration or active surveillance reducing the subsequent TURBT after cystoscopy.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an optical technique that uses infrared light to create high resolution, real-live images of tissue. OCT has been studied in the upper urogenital tract for urothelial carcinoma with good results. However, this is a different situation, since the ureter is a tubular structure with limited space and the tested OCT probe is a sideward looking probe. Previously, two different, forward looking, OCT probes have been studied in the bladder. The studies show different results on sensitivity and specificity. Some results are very promising, while others show no advantage for OCT over white light cystoscopy (WLC). However, the studied probes have a low frames per second (FPS) rate. This results in stammering images and makes the probes very sensitive for motion artefacts. Furthermore, both OCT catheters are not on the market (anymore). Since the OCT techniques have improved over the last decade, a new forward looking OCT probe has been developed. The newly designed OCT catheter has a much higher FPS rate and has used techniques to improve the resolution of the images. Therefore, the newly designed micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) based OCT catheter looks promising to improve the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. The present study is an IDEAL stage-IIa feasibility study.

Objectives:

The primary objective:

  • To investigate the feasibility of capturing in-vivo cross section images of the bladder wall in bladder cancer patients with the MEMS based OCT catheter.

Secondary objectives:

  • To evaluate the duration of the OCT measurements.
  • To determine the depth of invasion of the tumour based on OCT images and test if there is an association with the histopathological results of the resected tissue(s).
  • To determine the grade of the tumour based on OCT images and test if there is an association with the histopathological results of the resected tissue(s).
  • To determine if the OCT catheter is able to acquire evaluable images of resection beds.
  • To compare the tumour grade and invasion estimated by the urologist during WLC with the tumour grade and invasion determined by the OCT images.

Study design: A prospective, mono-center, IDEAL stage IIa clinical study to investigate the feasibility of a newly designed MEMS based OCT catheter.

Study population: Patients that are >18 years old, who are electively planned for a TURBT are eligible for the study. A maximum of 25 will be included patients but inclusion is earlier completed when 15 technically successful ("feasible") procedures are performed.

Intervention: In the operation theatre, the urologist will introduce a rigid resectoscope and will perform a white light cystoscopy which are part of the standard procedure. The urologist will estimate the tumour invasion and tumour grade for each tumour. Then the OCT catheter is inserted through this rigid resectoscope which is used for the planned TURBT. Cross-sectional OCT images of the tumour(s) will be acquired as well as OCT images of one part of normal looking bladder wall contralateral to the tumour(s). A maximum of 5 tumours in each participant with a maximum diameter of 2 centimeter will be analysed with the OCT catheter. After the images are recorded, the TURBT will be performed. In case of multiple tumours, the resected tissue of the different tumours will be collected separately. After the TURBT is completed, the OCT catheter will be introduced again through the resectoscope to capture images of the resection bed(s). The resected tumour tissue will be send to the pathology laboratory as part of the standard procedure.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

The primary outcomes of this study are:

  • Assessment of procedural feasibility of OCT measurement:
  • Procedural feasibility will be determined by the ability to generate images of the normal bladder wall and bladder tumour(s), as assessed by the operating urologist. Feasibility will be achieved if diagnostic images of the tumour and normal bladder are obtained in over 60% of the patients. Our aim is to obtain diagnostic images from 15 procedures, limiting the inclusion to a maximum of 25 patients.
  • Analysis of feasibility based on image utilization:
  • Feasibility will also be assessed by determining the percentage of images suitable for diagnosis out of the total number obtained. A percentage exceeding 80% will be deemed feasible.

The secondary outcomes:

  • The duration of the OCT measurements in minutes.
  • The overall concordance between the OCT catheter diagnosis of tumour invasion (stage) compared with the pathological results of the resected tissue(s).
  • The overall concordance between the OCT catheter diagnosis of tumour grade compared with the pathological results of the resected tissue(s).
  • The ability of the OCT catheter to acquire evaluable images of the resection bed.
  • The concordance between tumour grade and invasion estimated by the urologist during WLC and the tumour grade and invasion determined by the OCT images and histopathology.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: There is little burden for the patients. The only burden is a prolonged operation time which is expected to be approximately 20 minutes. It is assumed that there is hardly no additional risk for the patient, since the OCT catheter is inserted through the working channel of the resectoscope that is used for the TURBT The probe is designed with rounded corners. Additionally, the probe is not purposeful in contact with the bladder wall, since the focus point is approximately 1cm from the tip of the probe. Therefore, the risk of bladder perforation is not expected to be increased.

The probe is tested in vitro (use through the working channel of operating instruments, sterilization process is tested and according to GCP). Because the catheter is not tested in vivo, there is a very small chance of unexpected events related to the material, e.g. breaking of material, fragment loss inside bladder that can be removed by surgical instruments through the working channel.

There is no benefit for participants of this study. The burden and risks of this study are the same for all participants. The patients will receive the standard of clinical care during participation and the histopathological evaluation will not be affected by the study protocol.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Being tested
Optical coherence tomography
Keywords
OCT, Optical Coherence Tomography, Bladder cancer
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Optical coherence tomographyDevice

    Measurement with opctical coherence tomography of tumour and normal bladder tissue during transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TURBT)

Study groups in NCT06679920
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Optical coherence tomography measurements during transurethral resection of a bladder tumourOtherSingle arm
Receives: Device: Optical coherence tomography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Procedural feasibility

    The ability to generate images of the normal bladder wall and bladder tumour(s). Feasibility will be achieved if diagnostic images of the tumour and normal bladder are obtained in over 60% of the patients.

    Measured: During the TURBT

  2. Image utilization feasibility

    Feasibility will also be assessed by determining the percentage of images suitable for diagnosis out of the total number obtained. A percentage exceeding 80% will be deemed feasible.

    Measured: During the TURBT

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Duration of the measurements

    The duration of the OCT measurements in minutes

    Measured: During the TURBT

  2. Concordance tumour stage based on OCT with histopathology

    The overall concordance between the OCT catheter diagnosis of tumour invasion (stage) compared with the pathological results of the resected tissue(s)

    Measured: From TURBT to histopathology result (approximately 4 weeks)

  3. Concordance between tumour grade based on OCT and histopathology

    The overall concordance between the OCT catheter diagnosis of tumour grade compared with the pathological results of the resected tissue(s).

    Measured: From TURBT to histopathology result (approximately 4 weeks)

  4. Evaluable resection bed OCT images

    The ability of the OCT catheter to acquire evaluable images of the resection bed.

    Measured: During the TURBT

  5. Concordance OCT and WLC tumour stage and grade

    The concordance between tumour grade and invasion estimated by the urologist during WLC and the tumour grade and invasion determined by the OCT images and histopathology.

    Measured: From TURBT to histopathology result (approximately 4 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2024
  2. Study startDec 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06679920
Sponsor's protocol ID
NL83449.018.23
Other IDs
ESTAR21207
Acronym
BLOCT
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
5 Nov 2024
Last updated
6 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Remmelink MJ, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, de Bruin DM, Oddens JR. Newly Designed Optical Coherence Tomography Catheter for Optimizing Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: Protocol for a Feasibility Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Dec 2;14:e76644. doi: 10.2196/76644.

    PubMed 41329952

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Optical coherence tomography in people with Bladder Cancer, run by Amsterdam UMC at 2 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Marinka Remmelink, MD (+310204441376, m.j.remmelink@amsterdamumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Procedural feasibility (time frame: During the TURBT). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06679920, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in