Diabetic Foot UlcerPhase 1/2NCT06680856
Allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers
A Phase 1/2 study testing PRP+HA and HA in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Skin Lesions, run by Ospedale Policlinico San Martino at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Chronic skin ulcers pose a major health burden because of population aging and increased prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes. Standard therapy, such as ulcer debriding and physical treatments, is in most cases palliative. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Skin Lesions, Allogeneic
- What is being tested?
- PRP+HA and HA
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 23 Feb 2021to 17 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females
- Between the ages of 40 and 90 years
- Diagnosis of diabetes: random glycaemia >126 mg in more sample or second hour oral Glucose Tolerance Test glycaemia >200 mg or glycosylated hemoglobin >6.5 mmol/L
- The cross-sectional area of the index ulcer will be between 25 and 2000 mm2
- Injury-trophic level Grade I, II, Level A and B (according to Texas classification)
- Ankle Brachial Index >0.5
Show all 11Show fewer
- The patient's willingness to cooperate with the physician in follow-up
- No previous treatment with platelet derivatives
- Negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to commencement the treatment in premenopausal women.
- Fertile women must use an effective method of contraception during the treatment and for at least 6 months after completion of treatment as directed by their physician.
- Signature of the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Have End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-stage 5 of kidney disease), or severe heart failure which may require organ transplantation
- Are breast-feeding.
- Have a previous or current history of malignant neoplastic disease within the past 5 years
- Have neuropsychiatric diseases that may interfere with the patient's ability to collaborate in the study.
- They have any condition that, in the doctor's judgment, could endanger them.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
IRCCS Ospedale San Martino
Genova, GE, 16132
Istituto dermatopatico dell'Immacolata
Roma
About this study
Official title: Phase II, Multicenter, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial on "Off the Shelf" Allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Chronic skin ulcers pose a major health burden because of population aging and increased prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes. Standard therapy, such as ulcer debriding and physical treatments, is in most cases palliative. Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) as enhancer of healing was proposed as a real innovation in the field. However, conflicting results were obtained by different groups, because of the different production and clinical protocols and inter-individual variability in the patient's blood.
A multi center double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted to test an allogeneic platelet-derived product obtained from large pools of blood donations for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in association with Hyaluronic Acid (HA) dressing as compared to Hyaluronic Acid alone. Being prepared in batches, the product undergoes rigorous Quality Control analysis before use. An allogeneic PRP product would represent a substantial improvement in the treatment of skin ulcers.
Read the detailed description
Background Skin ulcers are open sores often accompanied by the sloughing-off of inflamed tissue. Chronic skin ulcers pose a major global health burden since they are closely linked to population aging and chronic diseases such as diabetes . There is a strong association between pain and quality of life, which are worse for larger ulcers with longer duration. Women have both more pain and poorer quality of life than men. Chronic skin ulcers recur frequently and heal poorly. 1/5 ulcers are still not healed after 2 years, and 1/12 are still open after 5 years and can last more than 10 years. Diabetes is the most common cause of ulcers in Europe and the USA. Diabetic patients have a lifetime risk of foot ulcer as high as 25%. Non healing chronic ulcers of the lower limbs in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes are at increased risk of complications, including infections and amputation. Approximately 50% of diabetic foot ulcers become infected, and 20% of these require amputation .
Chronic skin ulcers are difficult to treat also because of impaired blood flow and infection. Present standard treatment of diabetic ulcers includes regular debridement, off-loading, treatment of infection, revascularization when appropriate,optimizing metabolic control, and the treatment of any concomitant diseases, as well as education about foot care and the provision of appropriate footwear. However, healing rates are highly variable, and recurrences frequent .
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to treat chronic skin ulcers through the reactivation of dormant endogenous regeneration mechanisms is truly innovative. In fact, PRP not only increases endothelial cells recruitment and improves vascularization, but also promotes recruitment of macrophages which, in turn, through their paracrine activity, recruit and stimulate proliferation of mesenchymal and epithelial stem/progenitor cells, leading to synthesis of extracellular matrix molecules and skin regeneration. There is clinical evidence that autologous PRP gel therapy improves healing of chronic skin ulcers, but treatment of diabetic ulcers by autologous PRP is often hampered because diabetes leads to a reduced and/or inadequate production of growth factors, angiogenic response, impaired function of macrophages, reduced formation of granulation tissue, abnormal migration, and proliferation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes.
Moreover, before this new therapeutic approach can be available to a large population of patients, several issues need to be addressed. While some groups reported encouraging results on PRP as enhancer of tissue healing, others failed to observe an improvement in the healing process. This may be due to a poor quality of the PRP. In fact, there is significant inter-individual variability in platelet concentration, which can significantly vary depending on the health status of the different patients. Variability also exists in preparations from different Centers. In many cases, PRP is prepared based on non-standardized protocols, or by using commercially available devices that may be not fully adequate. Further limitations include difficulty to obtain sufficient quantities of blood from the elderly, or from debilitated patients with limited mobility, as well as the lack of prompt PRP availability, and the high production cost.
Hyphothesis and Significance:
The use of allogeneic PRP, obtained from a pool of blood donations, would be advantageous over the use of autologous PRP, and could be the only alternative when the autologous PRP is not available.
This multicenter clinical trial tested an allogeneic platelet-derived product, obtained from pools of blood donations according to standardized large-scale procedures. This product would represent a substantial improvement in the treatment of chronic skin ulcers. Furthermore, allogeneic PRP - produced in batches and not immediately used underwent a rigorous Quality Control analysis before its clinical use.
Specific Aim 1:
Implementation of a phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial on "off the shelf" allogeneic PRP to treat diabetic foot ulcers. The protocol was approved by the pertinent Ethical Committees prior to project start.
The trial was conducted in accordance with the protocol and in compliance with European and local legal and regulatory requirements, as well as the general principles set forth in the Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/1995) and the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association - 2013).
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether allogeneic PRP could improve the rate of healing of foot ulcers in diabetic patients. Preparations of allogeneic PRP in association with hyaluronic acid dressing were compared with hyaluronic acid only.
The primary endpoint is the cumulative rate of wound healing at the end of the 12 week follow-up.
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to:
- Experimental Group: Treatment with offloading, debridement, and hyaluronic acid gel + PRP gel;
- Control Group: Treatment with offloading, debridement, and hyaluronic acid gel
Specific Aim 2:
Secondary aim was the evaluation of the safety of the allogeneic PRP.
Specific Aim 3:
Third aim was to study the immune response after allogeneic PRP treatment.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Skin Lesions, Allogeneic, PRP
- Being tested
- PRP+HA, HA
- Keywords
- allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma, diabetic foot ulcer, Hyaluronic acid, skin regeneration
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PRP+HACombination product
treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with allogeneic PRP+HA
HACombination product
treatment of diabetic foot ulcers with HA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PRP+HA | Experimental | Diabetic foot ulcers were treated with PRP+HA dressing Receives: Combination Product: PRP+HA |
| HA alone | Active comparator | Diabetic foot ulcers were treated with HA dressing alone Receives: Combination Product: HA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
wound size measurements of diabetic foot ulcer lesion
The cumulative rate of wound healing at the end of the 12 week follow-up was determined by computed-aided imaging on standard pictures of the lesion taken at different times
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Incidence of Adverse Events at any site classified according to the Common Toxicity criteria of Adverse Events e.g. pain, disability, stress, etc.)
Measured: 0,1,2,3,4 and 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2024
- Study start23 Feb 2021
- Primary completion17 Oct 2024
- Study completion17 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Foot UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * Experimental Group: Platelet Rich Plasma + Hyaluronic Acid (PRP+HA) (Group 1) * Control Group: Hyaluronic acid gel (HA) (Group 2)
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCSS Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Fondazione Luigi Maria Monti, Universita degli Studi di Genova
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giovanni Pratesi, MD, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
- Investigators
- Giovanni Pratesi, MD, Principal investigator, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06680856
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RF-2018-12366868
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II, Multicenter, Double Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial on "Off the Shelf" Allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to Treat Diabetic Foot Ulcers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06680856
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RF-2018-12366868
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Skin Lesions, Allogeneic, PRP
- Keywords
- allogeneic Platelet Rich Plasma, diabetic foot ulcer, Hyaluronic acid, skin regeneration
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ospedale Policlinico San MartinoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCSS Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Fondazione Luigi Maria Monti, Universita degli Studi di Genova
- Study start
- 23 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic skin ulcers pose a major health burden because of population aging and increased prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes. Standard therapy, such as ulcer debriding and physical treatments, is in most cases palliative. Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) as enhancer of healing was proposed as a real innovation in the field. However, conflicting results were obtained by different groups, because of the different production and clinical protocols and inter-individual variability in the patient's blood.
A multi center double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted to test an allogeneic platelet-derived product obtained from large pools of blood donations for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in association with Hyaluronic Acid (HA) dressing as compared to Hyaluronic Acid alone. Being prepared in batches, the product undergoes rigorous Quality Control analysis before use. An allogeneic PRP product would represent a substantial improvement in the treatment of skin ulcers.
Detailed description
Background Skin ulcers are open sores often accompanied by the sloughing-off of inflamed tissue. Chronic skin ulcers pose a major global health burden since they are closely linked to population aging and chronic diseases such as diabetes . There is a strong association between pain and quality of life, which are worse for larger ulcers with longer duration. Women have both more pain and poorer quality of life than men. Chronic skin ulcers recur frequently and heal poorly. 1/5 ulcers are still not healed after 2 years, and 1/12 are still open after 5 years and can last more than 10 years. Diabetes is the most common cause of ulcers in Europe and the USA. Diabetic patients have a lifetime risk of foot ulcer as high as 25%. Non healing chronic ulcers of the lower limbs in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes are at increased risk of complications, including infections and amputation. Approximately 50% of diabetic foot ulcers become infected, and 20% of these require amputation .
Chronic skin ulcers are difficult to treat also because of impaired blood flow and infection. Present standard treatment of diabetic ulcers includes regular debridement, off-loading, treatment of infection, revascularization when appropriate,optimizing metabolic control, and the treatment of any concomitant diseases, as well as education about foot care and the provision of appropriate footwear. However, healing rates are highly variable, and recurrences frequent .
Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) to treat chronic skin ulcers through the reactivation of dormant endogenous regeneration mechanisms is truly innovative. In fact, PRP not only increases endothelial cells recruitment and improves vascularization, but also promotes recruitment of macrophages which, in turn, through their paracrine activity, recruit and stimulate proliferation of mesenchymal and epithelial stem/progenitor cells, leading to synthesis of extracellular matrix molecules and skin regeneration. There is clinical evidence that autologous PRP gel therapy improves healing of chronic skin ulcers, but treatment of diabetic ulcers by autologous PRP is often hampered because diabetes leads to a reduced and/or inadequate production of growth factors, angiogenic response, impaired function of macrophages, reduced formation of granulation tissue, abnormal migration, and proliferation of fibroblasts and keratinocytes.
Moreover, before this new therapeutic approach can be available to a large population of patients, several issues need to be addressed. While some groups reported encouraging results on PRP as enhancer of tissue healing, others failed to observe an improvement in the healing process. This may be due to a poor quality of the PRP. In fact, there is significant inter-individual variability in platelet concentration, which can significantly vary depending on the health status of the different patients. Variability also exists in preparations from different Centers. In many cases, PRP is prepared based on non-standardized protocols, or by using commercially available devices that may be not fully adequate. Further limitations include difficulty to obtain sufficient quantities of blood from the elderly, or from debilitated patients with limited mobility, as well as the lack of prompt PRP availability, and the high production cost.
Hyphothesis and Significance:
The use of allogeneic PRP, obtained from a pool of blood donations, would be advantageous over the use of autologous PRP, and could be the only alternative when the autologous PRP is not available.
This multicenter clinical trial tested an allogeneic platelet-derived product, obtained from pools of blood donations according to standardized large-scale procedures. This product would represent a substantial improvement in the treatment of chronic skin ulcers. Furthermore, allogeneic PRP - produced in batches and not immediately used underwent a rigorous Quality Control analysis before its clinical use.
Specific Aim 1:
Implementation of a phase II, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial on "off the shelf" allogeneic PRP to treat diabetic foot ulcers. The protocol was approved by the pertinent Ethical Committees prior to project start.
The trial was conducted in accordance with the protocol and in compliance with European and local legal and regulatory requirements, as well as the general principles set forth in the Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/1995) and the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association - 2013).
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether allogeneic PRP could improve the rate of healing of foot ulcers in diabetic patients. Preparations of allogeneic PRP in association with hyaluronic acid dressing were compared with hyaluronic acid only.
The primary endpoint is the cumulative rate of wound healing at the end of the 12 week follow-up.
Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to:
- Experimental Group: Treatment with offloading, debridement, and hyaluronic acid gel + PRP gel;
- Control Group: Treatment with offloading, debridement, and hyaluronic acid gel
Specific Aim 2:
Secondary aim was the evaluation of the safety of the allogeneic PRP.
Specific Aim 3:
Third aim was to study the immune response after allogeneic PRP treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- * Experimental Group: Platelet Rich Plasma + Hyaluronic Acid (PRP+HA) (Group 1) * Control Group: Hyaluronic acid gel (HA) (Group 2)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PRP+HA | Experimental | Combination Product: PRP+HADiabetic foot ulcers were treated with PRP+HA dressing |
| HA alone | Active comparator | Combination Product: HADiabetic foot ulcers were treated with HA dressing alone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Males and females
- Between the ages of 40 and 90 years
- Diagnosis of diabetes: random glycaemia >126 mg in more sample or second hour oral Glucose Tolerance Test glycaemia >200 mg or glycosylated hemoglobin >6.5 mmol/L
- The cross-sectional area of the index ulcer will be between 25 and 2000 mm2
- Injury-trophic level Grade I, II, Level A and B (according to Texas classification)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-stage 5 of kidney disease), or severe heart failure which may require organ transplantation
- Are breast-feeding.
- Have a previous or current history of malignant neoplastic disease within the past 5 years
- Have neuropsychiatric diseases that may interfere with the patient's ability to collaborate in the study.
- They have any condition that, in the doctor's judgment, could endanger them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PRP+HAtreatment of diabetic foot ulcers with allogeneic PRP+HA | Combination product | PRP+HA |
| HAtreatment of diabetic foot ulcers with HA | Combination product | HA alone |
Primary outcome
wound size measurements of diabetic foot ulcer lesion
Time frame: 12 weeks
The cumulative rate of wound healing at the end of the 12 week follow-up was determined by computed-aided imaging on standard pictures of the lesion taken at different times
1 secondary outcome
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time frame: 0,1,2,3,4 and 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy Evaluation of Turmeric-Derived Nanoparticle Hydrogel for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Wounds
Diabete Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Better Care Closer to Home: Enhancing Primary and Community Care
Diabetic Foot Disease, Recurrence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giovanni Pratesi, MD principal investigator
IRCCS Ospedale San Martino
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing PRP+HA and HA in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Skin Lesions, run by Ospedale Policlinico San Martino at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
wound size measurements of diabetic foot ulcer lesion (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2024.