AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SurgeryCARTONCT06693258

Study of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Standard Open Thyroidectomy: Prospective, Comparative Single-Center Study

A study testing thyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach and thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery in people with Carpal Tunnel Surgery, run by Clinique Bizet at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of our study is to evaluate the two surgical approaches, standard thyroidectomy and robotic thyroidectomy, in terms of postoperative pain management, scar quality, quality of life, as well as the occurrence of postoperative complications (hypocalcemia, compressive cervical hematoma and nerve stimulation) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
What is being tested?
thyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach and thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
25 Nov 2024to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject aged over 20 years
  • Referred for a thyroidectomy (total or partial)
  • Absence of participation in another clinical study
  • Subject affiliated to a social security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme
  • Accepts the completion of the various study questionnaires

Who cannot join

  • Patient under 20 years of age.
  • Patients who have undergone combined radical cervical lymph node dissection
  • Patient with a postoperative wound problem
  • Patient with an underlying systemic disease that may influence the wound healing process
  • Unable to undergo medical follow-up for the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • clinique Bizet

    Paris, 75116

    bouchra benkessou, chef de projet, 07 64 48 60 16, b.benkessou@hexagone-sante-paris.fr

    Patrick AIDAN, Doctor

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Standard Open Thyroidectomy

The aim of our study is to evaluate the two surgical approaches, standard thyroidectomy and robotic thyroidectomy, in terms of postoperative pain management, scar quality, quality of life, as well as the occurrence of postoperative complications (hypocalcemia, compressive cervical hematoma and nerve stimulation)

Being tested
thyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach, thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • thyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approachProcedure or surgery

    thyroidectomy

  • thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery

    thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery

Study groups in NCT06693258
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimentalthyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach
Receives: Procedure: thyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach
Control groupActive comparatorthyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery
Receives: Procedure: thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate the post-operative quality of life at D30 between the two groups

    thyca-Qol

    Measured: day 30

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Total dysphagia score between the two groups

    EAT-10 scale

    Measured: Day7, Day30 and 3 months

  2. Quality of the scar between the two groups

    Vancouver scale

    Measured: day 30

  3. Assess the functional recovery of the vocal cords

    fibroscopy

    Measured: day 7 and day 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2024
  2. Study start25 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective, Comparative, Monocentric Study
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06693258
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024-A01697-40
Acronym
CARTO
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
12 Nov 2024
Last updated
10 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing thyroidectomy by robotic surgery via axillary approach and thyroidectomy by standard conventional surgery in people with Carpal Tunnel Surgery, run by Clinique Bizet at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate the post-operative quality of life at D30 between the two groups (time frame: day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in