Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaPREDIC-TONCT06694779
Thrombosis in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma:the PREDIC-TO (PREDICt ThrOmbosis) Study
An observational study of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Thrombosis, run by Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Comparative Evaluation of Thrombotic Risk Models in DLBCL patients Objective: To assess the impact of thrombotic risk factors and compare the performance of existing predictive models (Khorana, Throly, Model IX) in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Primary Endpoints: Measure thrombotic risk factors in existing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Thrombosis
- How many people
- 1,504 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 25 May 2023to 25 May 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: -. Patients with a diagnosed of DLBCL from 01/01/2004 until 31/12/2022 can be enrolled in the study
Who may be able to join
- Subjects aged ≥ 18 years
- Histological diagnosis of DLBCL
- Informed consent freely given and obtained
Who cannot join
- Active anticoagulant therapy at the time of diagnosis
- Start of prophylactic heparin following diagnosis
- Absence of necessary data to extrapolate risk scores (Khorana, Throly and Model IX) at diagnosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Thrombosis in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Impact on Outcome, Evaluation, and Comparison of Predictive Models of Thrombotic Risk: Multicentre Retrospective Observational Study. The PREDIC-TO (PREDICt ThrOmbosis) Study
Comparative Evaluation of Thrombotic Risk Models in DLBCL patients
Objective: To assess the impact of thrombotic risk factors and compare the performance of existing predictive models (Khorana, Throly, Model IX) in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Read more
Primary Endpoints:
Measure thrombotic risk factors in existing models Determine occurrence, type, and timing of venous thrombotic events
Secondary Endpoints:
Assess performance of models in patients without thrombotic events at diagnosis Evaluate dynamic risk factors during DLBCL treatment Identify additional risk factors not included in published models Analyze overall survival and VTE-free survival
Methodology:
Real-world cohort study of DLBCL patients Collection of static and dynamic risk factors Correlation analysis of risk factors with thrombotic events Development and validation of DLBCL-specific predictive model
Conclusion:
This study aims to compare existing predictive models and develop a DLBCL-specific model to aid in identifying high-risk patients and inform thromboprophylaxis decisions. Results will contribute to improved understanding and management of thrombotic risk in DLBCL.
Read the detailed description
DLBCL is the most frequent lymphoid malignancy in the adult population and the one with the highest risk of thrombotic events. The indications for thromboprophylaxis are, however, debated.
For such reason, risk scores (i.e., the Khorana, Throly and the recently published Model IX score), have been developed to identify patients bearing a high thrombotic risk at diagnosis. These models, however, were developed considering not only aggressive lymphomas, but also indolent lymphomas, characterized by a markedly lower risk of VTE when compared to DLBCL.
The performance of the Khorana, Throly and Model IX score has never been evaluated and compared in the sole DLBCL population. Such understanding in a cohort of "real world" patients could aid clinicians in deciding whether to initiate thromboprophylaxis and may direct randomised controlled trials on the use of prophylactic heparin in the future.
Moreover, the aforementioned scores assess independent variables at diagnosis, not taking into account the possible occurrence of risk factors that may arise over the course of DLBCL treatment or in case of placement of a central venous catheter (CVC).
Assessing the impact of thrombotic risk factors at diagnosis and during the disease, in a cohort of sole DLBCL patients, could allow the development of a new predictive model of thrombotic risk adapted to DLBCL.
- OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS OBJECTIVES Primary objective
- To assess the impact of thrombotic risk factors on the development of VTE in patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): real-life comparison of models predictive of thrombotic risk (Khorana, Throly and Model IX scores).
Secondary objectives
- To evaluate the statistical performance of the aforementioned predictive models in the subgroup of patients who did not have a thrombotic event at diagnosis
- To assess the impact of dynamic risk factors (i.e., not present at diagnosis) on thrombotic risk
- To evaluate the impact of risk factors at diagnosis which are not included in the published predictive models
- To evaluate overall survival and VTE-free survival
- Creation of a predictive model of thrombotic risk adapted to DLBCL
ENDPOINTS Primary endpoints
- Measurement of thrombotic risk factors present in the Khorana, Throly and Model IX scores: previous arterial or venous thrombotic event, ECOG, weight, extra nodal and/or mediastinal localization of disease, leukocytes, neutrophils, haemoglobin, platelet count, albumin, bulky mass
- Occurrence of arterial and venous thrombotic events, type of event, time to event after diagnosis and during disease
Secondary endpoints
- Data collection of static thrombotic risk factors at diagnosis and not included in the already published scores:
- de novo or secondary DLBCL status
- Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (ANC/ALC ratio)
- Cardio aspirin
- R-IPI
- Immunohistochemistry: Ki67, Myc, CD10, BCL-6, BCL-2
- Correlation between static risk factors at diagnosis and relative risk of thrombotic events
- Data collection of dynamic risk factors (as both categorical-dichotomous and temporal variable) present from diagnosis to expected event, death or lost at follow-up:
- Central venous catheter placement
- Therapy: radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anthracycline therapy, number of therapeutic lines, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- LDH, haemoglobin < 10 g/dl if > than 10 at diagnosis, venous compression at CT scan, extra nodal localisation if not present at diagnosis, albumin < 3.5 g/dl if greater at diagnosis
- ANC/ALC ratio at the time of thrombotic event
- Correlation between acquisition of dynamic risk factors and relative risk of thrombotic event
- Date of thrombotic event, death or lost to follow-up to determine overall survival and VTE free survival
- Creation and validation of a predictive model adapted to DLBCL based on the Hazard Ratios of the independent variables
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Thrombosis
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Thrombosis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measurement of thrombotic events
Measurement of thrombotic risk factors present in the Khorana, Throly and Model IX scores.
Thrombotic events after diagnosis
Measured: From the date of diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) to the occurrence of a thrombotic event (arterial or venous), death, loss to follow-up, or a maximum period of 24 months from diagnosis, whichever comes first.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Nov 2024
- Study start25 May 2023
- Primary completion1 Jan 2026
- Study completion25 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1,504 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Milano Bicocca
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06694779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PREDIC-TO
- Acronym
- PREDIC-TO
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Thrombosis in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Impact on Outcome, Evaluation, and Comparison of Predictive Models of Thrombotic Risk: Multicentre Retrospective Observational Study. The PREDIC-TO (PREDICt ThrOmbosis) Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06694779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PREDIC-TO / PREDIC-TO
- Conditions
- Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Thrombosis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,504 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei TintoriUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Milano Bicocca
- Study start
- 25 May 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparative Evaluation of Thrombotic Risk Models in DLBCL patients
Objective: To assess the impact of thrombotic risk factors and compare the performance of existing predictive models (Khorana, Throly, Model IX) in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)
Primary Endpoints:
Measure thrombotic risk factors in existing models Determine occurrence, type, and timing of venous thrombotic events
Secondary Endpoints:
Assess performance of models in patients without thrombotic events at diagnosis Evaluate dynamic risk factors during DLBCL treatment Identify additional risk factors not included in published models Analyze overall survival and VTE-free survival
Methodology:
Real-world cohort study of DLBCL patients Collection of static and dynamic risk factors Correlation analysis of risk factors with thrombotic events Development and validation of DLBCL-specific predictive model
Conclusion:
This study aims to compare existing predictive models and develop a DLBCL-specific model to aid in identifying high-risk patients and inform thromboprophylaxis decisions. Results will contribute to improved understanding and management of thrombotic risk in DLBCL.
Detailed description
DLBCL is the most frequent lymphoid malignancy in the adult population and the one with the highest risk of thrombotic events. The indications for thromboprophylaxis are, however, debated.
For such reason, risk scores (i.e., the Khorana, Throly and the recently published Model IX score), have been developed to identify patients bearing a high thrombotic risk at diagnosis. These models, however, were developed considering not only aggressive lymphomas, but also indolent lymphomas, characterized by a markedly lower risk of VTE when compared to DLBCL.
The performance of the Khorana, Throly and Model IX score has never been evaluated and compared in the sole DLBCL population. Such understanding in a cohort of "real world" patients could aid clinicians in deciding whether to initiate thromboprophylaxis and may direct randomised controlled trials on the use of prophylactic heparin in the future.
Moreover, the aforementioned scores assess independent variables at diagnosis, not taking into account the possible occurrence of risk factors that may arise over the course of DLBCL treatment or in case of placement of a central venous catheter (CVC).
Assessing the impact of thrombotic risk factors at diagnosis and during the disease, in a cohort of sole DLBCL patients, could allow the development of a new predictive model of thrombotic risk adapted to DLBCL.
- OBJECTIVES AND ENDPOINTS OBJECTIVES Primary objective
- To assess the impact of thrombotic risk factors on the development of VTE in patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): real-life comparison of models predictive of thrombotic risk (Khorana, Throly and Model IX scores).
Secondary objectives
- To evaluate the statistical performance of the aforementioned predictive models in the subgroup of patients who did not have a thrombotic event at diagnosis
- To assess the impact of dynamic risk factors (i.e., not present at diagnosis) on thrombotic risk
- To evaluate the impact of risk factors at diagnosis which are not included in the published predictive models
- To evaluate overall survival and VTE-free survival
- Creation of a predictive model of thrombotic risk adapted to DLBCL
ENDPOINTS Primary endpoints
- Measurement of thrombotic risk factors present in the Khorana, Throly and Model IX scores: previous arterial or venous thrombotic event, ECOG, weight, extra nodal and/or mediastinal localization of disease, leukocytes, neutrophils, haemoglobin, platelet count, albumin, bulky mass
- Occurrence of arterial and venous thrombotic events, type of event, time to event after diagnosis and during disease
Secondary endpoints
- Data collection of static thrombotic risk factors at diagnosis and not included in the already published scores:
- de novo or secondary DLBCL status
- Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (ANC/ALC ratio)
- Cardio aspirin
- R-IPI
- Immunohistochemistry: Ki67, Myc, CD10, BCL-6, BCL-2
- Correlation between static risk factors at diagnosis and relative risk of thrombotic events
- Data collection of dynamic risk factors (as both categorical-dichotomous and temporal variable) present from diagnosis to expected event, death or lost at follow-up:
- Central venous catheter placement
- Therapy: radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anthracycline therapy, number of therapeutic lines, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- LDH, haemoglobin < 10 g/dl if > than 10 at diagnosis, venous compression at CT scan, extra nodal localisation if not present at diagnosis, albumin < 3.5 g/dl if greater at diagnosis
- ANC/ALC ratio at the time of thrombotic event
- Correlation between acquisition of dynamic risk factors and relative risk of thrombotic event
- Date of thrombotic event, death or lost to follow-up to determine overall survival and VTE free survival
- Creation and validation of a predictive model adapted to DLBCL based on the Hazard Ratios of the independent variables
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- -. Patients with a diagnosed of DLBCL from 01/01/2004 until 31/12/2022 can be enrolled in the study
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects aged ≥ 18 years
- Histological diagnosis of DLBCL
- Informed consent freely given and obtained
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Active anticoagulant therapy at the time of diagnosis
- Start of prophylactic heparin following diagnosis
- Absence of necessary data to extrapolate risk scores (Khorana, Throly and Model IX) at diagnosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Measurement of thrombotic events
Time frame: From the date of diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) to the occurrence of a thrombotic event (arterial or venous), death, loss to follow-up, or a maximum period of 24 months from diagnosis, whichever comes first.
Measurement of thrombotic risk factors present in the Khorana, Throly and Model IX scores. Thrombotic events after diagnosis
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax, Ibrutinib, Prednisone, Obinutuzumab, and Revlimid (ViPOR) in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Copanlisib and Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Richter's Transformation or Transformed Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Clinical Study of MK-1045 in People With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (MK-1045-008)
Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, Follicular
RecruitingPhase 2
Glofitamab as a Bridge to and/or Consolidation Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With Relapsed B Cell Lymphomas
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Refractory
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacokinetic Study of Venetoclax Tablets Crushed and Dissolved Into a Solution
Hematologic Malignancy, Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and Thrombosis, run by Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measurement of thrombotic events (time frame: From the date of diagnosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) to the occurrence of a thrombotic event (arterial or venous), death, loss to follow-up, or a maximum period of 24 months from diagnosis, whichever comes first.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2026.