Adhesive Capsulitis of ShoulderNCT06699082
Kinesiotaping With Kaltenborn Mobilization Effects on Adhesive Capsulitis Recovery.
A study testing KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization in people with Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the Effects of Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn Mobilization on Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis. A randomized control trial was conducted at Habib physiotherapy complex Peshawar and Pak physio rehabilitation Peshawar. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder
- What is being tested?
- KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 29 Aug 2021to 21 Feb 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Both genders male and female.
- Age 35-60 years.
- Acute shoulder pain (10 to 36 weeks).
- Patients with diabetes mellitus.
- Referred and diagnose patients
Who cannot join
- Any fracture related to the shoulder joint.
- Post operative case and osteoporotic.
- Shoulder with manipulation under anesthesia.
- Steroid injection therapy
- Diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis
- Neurological deficits / Hemiplegics
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Kinesiotaping With Kaltenborn Mobilization on the Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis
The purpose of the study is to determine the Effects of Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn Mobilization on Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis. A randomized control trial was conducted at Habib physiotherapy complex Peshawar and Pak physio rehabilitation Peshawar. The sample size was 34 calculated through open-epi tool. The participants were divided into two groups each having 17 participants. The study duration was six months. Consecutive sampling technique was used for the selection of subjects for the study that fulfills the eligibility criteria was included in the study. Block randomization was used to allocate subjects into interventional and control arms of the trial. The first two patients who fulfill the criteria were allocated to interventional arm and the next two patients were allocated in control arm till completion of the sample size for both the arms. Tools used in this study are Goniometer, SPADI, NPRS. Data was collected before and immediately after the application of interventions. Data analyzed through SPSS version 20
Read the detailed description
Human kinematics is always in spotlight and considered as a unique feature in which shoulder joint kinematics have grabbed the attention of researchers. The complexity of the shoulder joint is evident from the literature. It is having high functional demands and wide range of motion than any other joint in the human body. It is balanced by stability and mobility provided by number of ligaments, capsule, labrum and active muscles. However sometimes this balance is disturbed that results in different musculoskeletal complaints and pathologies in which one of them is adhesive capsulitis (1).The exact cause of adhesive capsulitis remains controversial.
However calcific tendinitis, glenohumeral arthritis, acromioclavicular arthritis, dupuytrens, contractures, breast cancer, cardiac issues, autonomic neuropathy, stroke, cervical disc disorders, humeral fractures, hypoadrenalism, Parkinson's disease are some of the known causes (7). It can also occur as a sequalae of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or joint dislocation and fracture (8). The evaluation of adhesive capsulitis starts from a thorough history and proceeding towards physical examination, clinical tests and radiographic techniques. The patient usually recalls a mild trauma or accident that has caused damage to the shoulder joint, as well as limited range of motion especially external rotation, sleep disturbance and pain on insertion of deltoid and unable to perform overhead activities (9). Physical examination exposes loss of natural swing of arm. Scapular dyskinesis is also noted in some cases. shoulder joint may be painful to touch and muscle atrophy can be present. Loss of ROM is seen (9). Fasting blood sugar is performed in patients having diabetes mellitus. Since inflammation is its feature so erythrocyte sedimentation rate is suggested. Some special tests are also positive in this condition that are Neer impingement sign and Hawkin's-Kneddy. These tests are positive due to capsular stretch and internal impingement that occurs in this condition simultaneously but due to adhesive capsulitis (10). Adhesive capsulitis can be diagnosed using imaging studies like radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, arthrography, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the gold standard due to its soft tissue visualization and scanning capabilities. However, some studies suggest that it may not accurately diagnose the condition due to the similar thickness of the Page 3 of 11 (Draft) coracohumeral ligament (10 11). Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al describes kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization and Kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis is effective treatment to significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). Literature review: A systematic and evidence based search of relevant literature was performed by utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as search engines and the key words used were Kinesiotaping, mobilization, Kaltenborn mobilization, adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder conventional physical therapy, freezing stage. The purpose of the literature review is to find out the pre-existing literature regarding the Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn mobalization effects on adhesive capsulitis recovery. In 2017 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al on effectiveness of kinesiotaping along with kaltenborn mobilization and kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis stated that there is significance improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). In 2019 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Sumit Raghav et in India on effectiveness of Mulligan versus Kaltenborn mobilization in the management of adhesive capsulitis. The results of the study showed significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (13).
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder
- Being tested
- KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization
- Keywords
- Kinesiotaping, Kaltenborn mobilization, Frozen Shoulder
- Medical subject headings
- Bursitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
KinesioTaping and Keltonborn MobilizationOther
Also called Conventional Therapy with Keltonborn Mobilization
Experimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: 1 | Experimental | Experimental group was treated with kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides. The treatment protocol was administered in 10 reps' and 3 sets, and AP and PA glide were given.
Kinesiotaping: First the deltoid area was dried and cleansed, excessive hair were trimmed, the KT was cut into Y-shape and I- shape, after that whole length of the thumb was used to stretch the tape for about 15% to 25% and then from 25% to 50%. The tape was rubbed vigorously for few seconds, heat activates glue. The whole procedure takes about 15 to 20 minutes. Receives: Other: KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization |
| Control Group: 2 | Active comparator | Control was treated with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides along with conservative treatment and Home plane exercises. Receives: Other: KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numerical pain rating scale
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults,[1][2][3] including those with chronic pain due to rheumatic diseases The 11-points of numeric pain rating scale ranges from '0' representing one with no pain, 1 to 3 with mild pain, 4 to 7 with moderate pain and 8 to 10 representing the pain extreme.
Measured: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
shoulder pain and disability index
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use. The SPADI takes 5 to 10 minutes for a patient to complete and is the only reliable and valid region-specific measure for the shoulder.
Measured: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
Goniometry
A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. In orthopedics, the former description applies more. The art and science of measuring the joint ranges in each joint plane are called goniometry.
Goniometric measurements were obtained by aligning the goniometer arms with bony landmarks and aligning the fulcrum of the goniometer with the approximate location of the glenohumeral joint axis.
Measured: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2024
- Study start29 Aug 2021
- Primary completion22 Jan 2022
- Study completion21 Feb 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adhesive Capsulitis of ShoulderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Experimental Group: kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides Experimental group was treated with kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides. The treatment protocol was administered in 10 reps' and 3 sets. AP Glide and PA Glide were applied. Kinesiotaping: First the deltoid area was dried and cleansed, excessive hair were trimmed, the KT was cut into Y-shape and I- shape was applied. The conventional therapy included; hot pacK, TENS for 5 mins and AROMS exercises 10 reps 2 sets. Home plan exercises included pendulum exercise, towel stretch exercise, finger ladder exercises and cross body adduction exercise.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lal Gul Khan, MS, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06699082
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RiphahIU Neelo Gul
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2024
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Hsu JE, Anakwenze OA, Warrender WJ, Abboud JA. Current review of adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):502-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Dec 16. No abstract available.
PubMed 21167743Cohen C, Ejnisman B. Epidemiology of frozen shoulder. Shoulder stiffness: Springer; 2015. p. 21-30.
Kingston K, Curry EJ, Galvin JW, Li X. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: epidemiology and predictors of surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1437-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 25.
PubMed 29807717Gaspar PD, Willis FB. Adhesive capsulitis and dynamic splinting: a controlled, cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 7;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-111.
PubMed 19735563White D, Choi H, Peloquin C, Zhu Y, Zhang Y. Secular trend of adhesive capsulitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63(11):1571-5. doi: 10.1002/acr.20590.
PubMed 22034118Malavolta EA, Gracitelli MEC, Ribeiro Pinto GM, Freire da Silveira AZ, Assuncao JH, Ferreira Neto AA. Asian ethnicity: a risk factor for adhesive capsulitis? Rev Bras Ortop. 2018 Feb 23;53(5):602-606. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.004. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
PubMed 30258826Wang K, Ho V, Hunter-Smith DJ, Beh PS, Smith KM, Weber AB. Risk factors in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: a case control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul;22(7):e24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.049. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
PubMed 23352186Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, Hindle P, Murray IR. Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):1-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27093.
PubMed 22219239Struyf F, Meeus M. Current evidence on physical therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing? Clin Rheumatol. 2014 May;33(5):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2464-3. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
PubMed 24374758Harris G, Bou-Haidar P, Harris C. Adhesive capsulitis: review of imaging and treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec;57(6):633-43. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12111. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
PubMed 24283550Song KD, Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Choi SH. Indirect MR arthrographic findings of adhesive capsulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):W1105-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6099.
PubMed 22109326Pathak RMaH. Effect Of Kinesiotaping Along With Kalternborn Mobilization In Patients With Sub Acute Adhesive Capsulitis. International Journal of Current Advanced Research. 2017;Vol 6(Issue 12):8489-98.
Ragav S, Singh A. Comparison of Effectiveness of Mulligan ‗MWM'Technique versus Kaltenborn Mobilization Technique on Pain and End Range of Motion in Patients with Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder Joint: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Exercise Science & Physiotherapy Vol. 2019;15(1).
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Kinesiotaping With Kaltenborn Mobilization on the Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06699082
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RiphahIU Neelo Gul
- Conditions
- Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder
- Keywords
- Kinesiotaping, Kaltenborn mobilization, Frozen Shoulder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Feb 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to determine the Effects of Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn Mobilization on Rate of Recovery in Freezing Stage of Adhesive Capsulitis. A randomized control trial was conducted at Habib physiotherapy complex Peshawar and Pak physio rehabilitation Peshawar. The sample size was 34 calculated through open-epi tool. The participants were divided into two groups each having 17 participants. The study duration was six months. Consecutive sampling technique was used for the selection of subjects for the study that fulfills the eligibility criteria was included in the study. Block randomization was used to allocate subjects into interventional and control arms of the trial. The first two patients who fulfill the criteria were allocated to interventional arm and the next two patients were allocated in control arm till completion of the sample size for both the arms. Tools used in this study are Goniometer, SPADI, NPRS. Data was collected before and immediately after the application of interventions. Data analyzed through SPSS version 20
Detailed description
Human kinematics is always in spotlight and considered as a unique feature in which shoulder joint kinematics have grabbed the attention of researchers. The complexity of the shoulder joint is evident from the literature. It is having high functional demands and wide range of motion than any other joint in the human body. It is balanced by stability and mobility provided by number of ligaments, capsule, labrum and active muscles. However sometimes this balance is disturbed that results in different musculoskeletal complaints and pathologies in which one of them is adhesive capsulitis (1).The exact cause of adhesive capsulitis remains controversial.
However calcific tendinitis, glenohumeral arthritis, acromioclavicular arthritis, dupuytrens, contractures, breast cancer, cardiac issues, autonomic neuropathy, stroke, cervical disc disorders, humeral fractures, hypoadrenalism, Parkinson's disease are some of the known causes (7). It can also occur as a sequalae of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis or joint dislocation and fracture (8). The evaluation of adhesive capsulitis starts from a thorough history and proceeding towards physical examination, clinical tests and radiographic techniques. The patient usually recalls a mild trauma or accident that has caused damage to the shoulder joint, as well as limited range of motion especially external rotation, sleep disturbance and pain on insertion of deltoid and unable to perform overhead activities (9). Physical examination exposes loss of natural swing of arm. Scapular dyskinesis is also noted in some cases. shoulder joint may be painful to touch and muscle atrophy can be present. Loss of ROM is seen (9). Fasting blood sugar is performed in patients having diabetes mellitus. Since inflammation is its feature so erythrocyte sedimentation rate is suggested. Some special tests are also positive in this condition that are Neer impingement sign and Hawkin's-Kneddy. These tests are positive due to capsular stretch and internal impingement that occurs in this condition simultaneously but due to adhesive capsulitis (10). Adhesive capsulitis can be diagnosed using imaging studies like radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, arthrography, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine. Magnetic resonance imaging is considered the gold standard due to its soft tissue visualization and scanning capabilities. However, some studies suggest that it may not accurately diagnose the condition due to the similar thickness of the Page 3 of 11 (Draft) coracohumeral ligament (10 11). Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al describes kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization and Kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis is effective treatment to significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). Literature review: A systematic and evidence based search of relevant literature was performed by utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar as search engines and the key words used were Kinesiotaping, mobilization, Kaltenborn mobilization, adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder conventional physical therapy, freezing stage. The purpose of the literature review is to find out the pre-existing literature regarding the Kinesiotaping with Kaltenborn mobalization effects on adhesive capsulitis recovery. In 2017 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Rahee Mulmulay and Himanshu Pathak et al on effectiveness of kinesiotaping along with kaltenborn mobilization and kaltenborn mobilization alone on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis stated that there is significance improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (12). In 2019 a randomized controlled trial conducted by Sumit Raghav et in India on effectiveness of Mulligan versus Kaltenborn mobilization in the management of adhesive capsulitis. The results of the study showed significant improvement in terms of pain, range of motion and functional disability (13).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Experimental Group: kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides Experimental group was treated with kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides. The treatment protocol was administered in 10 reps' and 3 sets. AP Glide and PA Glide were applied. Kinesiotaping: First the deltoid area was dried and cleansed, excessive hair were trimmed, the KT was cut into Y-shape and I- shape was applied. The conventional therapy included; hot pacK, TENS for 5 mins and AROMS exercises 10 reps 2 sets. Home plan exercises included pendulum exercise, towel stretch exercise, finger ladder exercises and cross body adduction exercise.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: 1 | Experimental | Other: KinesioTaping and Keltonborn MobilizationExperimental group was treated with kinesiotaping along with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides. The treatment protocol was administered in 10 reps' and 3 sets, and AP and PA glide were given. Kinesiotaping: First the deltoid area was dried and cleansed, excessive hair were trimmed, the KT was cut into Y-shape and I- shape, after that whole length of the thumb was used to stretch the tape for about 15% to 25% and then from 25% to 50%. The tape was rubbed vigorously for few seconds, heat activates glue. The whole procedure takes about 15 to 20 minutes. |
| Control Group: 2 | Active comparator | Other: KinesioTaping and Keltonborn MobilizationControl was treated with Kaltenborn mobilization AP and PA glides along with conservative treatment and Home plane exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Both genders male and female.
- Age 35-60 years.
- Acute shoulder pain (10 to 36 weeks).
- Patients with diabetes mellitus.
- Referred and diagnose patients
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Any fracture related to the shoulder joint.
- Post operative case and osteoporotic.
- Shoulder with manipulation under anesthesia.
- Steroid injection therapy
- Diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| KinesioTaping and Keltonborn MobilizationAlso: Conventional Therapy with Keltonborn MobilizationExperimental group was treated with kinesiotape and kaltenborn mobilization while the non experimental group was treated with conventional therapy along with kaltenborn mobilization. | Other | Control Group: 2, Experimental Group: 1 |
Primary outcome
Numerical pain rating scale
Time frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (an outcome measure) that is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity in adults,[1][2][3] including those with chronic pain due to rheumatic diseases The 11-points of numeric pain rating scale ranges from '0' representing one with no pain, 1 to 3 with mild pain, 4 to 7 with moderate pain and 8 to 10 representing the pain extreme.
shoulder pain and disability index
Time frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use. The SPADI takes 5 to 10 minutes for a patient to complete and is the only reliable and valid region-specific measure for the shoulder.
Goniometry
Time frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks
A goniometer is a device that measures an angle or permits the rotation of an object to a definite position. In orthopedics, the former description applies more. The art and science of measuring the joint ranges in each joint plane are called goniometry. Goniometric measurements were obtained by aligning the goniometer arms with bony landmarks and aligning the fulcrum of the goniometer with the approximate location of the glenohumeral joint axis.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2024.
- Background: PubMed 21167743Hsu JE, Anakwenze OA, Warrender WJ, Abboud JA. Current review of adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Apr;20(3):502-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.08.023. Epub 2010 Dec 16. No abstract available.
- BackgroundCohen C, Ejnisman B. Epidemiology of frozen shoulder. Shoulder stiffness: Springer; 2015. p. 21-30.
- Background: PubMed 29807717Kingston K, Curry EJ, Galvin JW, Li X. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: epidemiology and predictors of surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Aug;27(8):1437-1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 19735563Gaspar PD, Willis FB. Adhesive capsulitis and dynamic splinting: a controlled, cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Sep 7;10:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-111.
- Background: PubMed 22034118White D, Choi H, Peloquin C, Zhu Y, Zhang Y. Secular trend of adhesive capsulitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63(11):1571-5. doi: 10.1002/acr.20590.
- Background: PubMed 30258826Malavolta EA, Gracitelli MEC, Ribeiro Pinto GM, Freire da Silveira AZ, Assuncao JH, Ferreira Neto AA. Asian ethnicity: a risk factor for adhesive capsulitis? Rev Bras Ortop. 2018 Feb 23;53(5):602-606. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.004. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
- Background: PubMed 23352186Wang K, Ho V, Hunter-Smith DJ, Beh PS, Smith KM, Weber AB. Risk factors in idiopathic adhesive capsulitis: a case control study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jul;22(7):e24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.049. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 22219239Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, Hindle P, Murray IR. Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):1-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27093.
- Background: PubMed 24374758Struyf F, Meeus M. Current evidence on physical therapy in patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing? Clin Rheumatol. 2014 May;33(5):593-600. doi: 10.1007/s10067-013-2464-3. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
- Background: PubMed 24283550Harris G, Bou-Haidar P, Harris C. Adhesive capsulitis: review of imaging and treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec;57(6):633-43. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12111. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 22109326Song KD, Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Choi SH. Indirect MR arthrographic findings of adhesive capsulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec;197(6):W1105-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6099.
- BackgroundPathak RMaH. Effect Of Kinesiotaping Along With Kalternborn Mobilization In Patients With Sub Acute Adhesive Capsulitis. International Journal of Current Advanced Research. 2017;Vol 6(Issue 12):8489-98.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Clinic Versus mHealth Application-Based Shoulder Rehabilitation in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis
Adhesive Capsulitis
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Injection Combined With Spencer Technique on Painful Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Posterior Capsular Stretching With and Without Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Frozen Shoulder
Frozen Shoulder
Active, not recruiting
Spencer vs. Ola Grimsby Techniques With Scapular Motor Training in Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis
Idiopathic Adhesive Capsulitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lal Gul Khan, MS principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing KinesioTaping and Keltonborn Mobilization in people with Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numerical pain rating scale (time frame: 3 times a week for 3 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06699082, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2024.