AzTrials
AzTrials

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckProCoPallNCT06699316

Prognostic Counselling in Palliative Head and Neck Cancer (ProCoPall)

A study testing Individualized prognostic counselling in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators test the effect of providing individualized prognostic information on life-expectancy to head and neck cancer patients in the palliative phase. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
What is being tested?
Individualized prognostic counselling
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
1 Sep 2022to 31 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who received a palliative diagnosis of a squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, supraglottic larynx, glottis larynx and unknown primary.

Who cannot join

  • Illiterate patients
  • Insufficient knowledge of Dutch language
  • Incompetent (due to i.e. mental state) to consider their own treatment choice

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Erasmus MC

    Rotterdam

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Individualized Prognostic Counseling on Life Expectancy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients in the Palliative Phase

The investigators test the effect of providing individualized prognostic information on life-expectancy to head and neck cancer patients in the palliative phase.

Read the detailed description

In this prospective sequential cohort study, the investigators aim to include 160 patients with a palliative diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, divided into two cohorts. In cohort 1, patients will receive general prognostic counselling, while in cohort 2, patients will receive individualized prognostic counselling using the recently developed prognostic model 'OncologIQ Palliative'. Cohort 2 will commence after completion of cohort 1. The primary outcome will be decisional conflict and satisfaction with the decision-making process and proactive care planning. Additionally, we will assess whether patients undergo palliative treatment and, if so, the type of treatment received. We will also evaluate overall survival, the incidence of palliative sedation or euthanasia, and quality of life.

Being tested
Individualized prognostic counselling
Keywords
Palliative Care, Life expectancy, Counseling, Quality of life, Prognosis
Medical subject headings
Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Individualized prognostic counsellingOther

    Individualized prognostic counselling on life expectancy using the prognostic model 'OncologIQ Palliative'

Study groups in NCT06699316
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1No interventionCurrent general counselling on life expectancy
Cohort 2ExperimentalIndividualized prognostic counselling on life expectancy
Receives: Other: Individualized prognostic counselling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decisional conflict

    Decisional conflict (DC) will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) questionnaire, reported two weeks after the consultation in which the palliative diagnosis is shared. The overall score can range from 0 (no DC) to 100 (extremely high DC). A score of ≥25 is considered the cutoff for clinically significant decisional conflict.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  2. Satisfaction with decision making process and proactive care planning

    To measure satisfaction with decision making process and proactive care planning, including end-of-life discussions on preferred place of death and wishes for palliative sedation and euthanasia we will conduct interviews among patients after counselling with OncologIQ Palliative

    Measured: 3-4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Treatment

    The amount and type of treatment(s) the patient receives in the palliative phase

    Measured: At the end of the study

  2. Survival

    Overall survival from the start of the palliative trajectory

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 2 years

  3. Quality of Life Score

    Quality of life will be assessed using the validated questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL at baseline and at regular intervals throughout the study period.

    It consists of 15 questions, assessing 10 domains. All questions are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A higher score indicates a better QoL for the domains of emotional functioning, physical functioning, and global health status. In contrast, for the remaining domains, lower scores indicate better QoL.

    Measured: Baseline and every 6-8 weeks

  4. Palliative sedation and Euthanasia

    The incidence of palliative sedation and euthanasia

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Nov 2024
  2. Study start1 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06699316
Sponsor's protocol ID
9109
Acronym
ProCoPall
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
25 Oct 2024
Last updated
21 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • van den Besselaar BN, Sewnaik A, Dorr MC, Hoesseini A, Hardillo JA, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Offerman MPJ. A study protocol for individualized prognostic counselling in the palliative phase. BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 10;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01647-z.

    PubMed 39794711

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Individualized prognostic counselling in people with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck, run by Erasmus Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Decisional conflict (time frame: 2 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06699316, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in