AzTrials
AzTrials

Central Nervous System InfectionsNCT06702943

Comparing Tigecycline Vs. Colistimethate in CNS Infections

An observational study of Central Nervous System Infections, run by Ain Shams University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This observational study compares the efficacy and safety of tigecycline, an alternative antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity, versus the standard colistimethate sodium-based regimen in managing these infections in pediatric patients. Inclusion Criteria: Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 28 days to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Central Nervous System Infections
What is being tested?
Tigecycline (Tygacil) and Colistimethate sodium (CMS)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
70 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Dec 2024to Jun 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 28 days to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: A total of 70 pediatric patients, aged 1 month to 18 years, admitted with confirmed or suspected CNS infections and with an external ventricular drain (EVD) in place.

Who may be able to join

  • Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years.
  • Presence of CNS infection symptoms such as fever, altered mental status, and positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings.
  • EVD placement for managing CNS infections.

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy to tigecycline or colistimethate sodium. Patients with concurrent severe comorbid conditions that may confound study results.
  • Neonates (less than 1 month old).

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Tigecycline Based Regimen Versus Colistimethate Sodium-based Regimen in Patients with Central Nervous System Bacterial Infections

This observational study compares the efficacy and safety of tigecycline, an alternative antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity, versus the standard colistimethate sodium-based regimen in managing these infections in pediatric patients.

Inclusion Criteria:

Read more

Pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years. Presence of CNS infection symptoms such as fever, altered mental status, and positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings.

EVD placement for managing CNS infections.

Exclusion Criteria:

Known allergy to tigecycline or colistimethate sodium. Patients with concurrent severe comorbid conditions that may confound study results.

Neonates (less than 1 month old), pregnant, or breastfeeding patients.

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcomes: Clinical cure (resolution of infection symptoms) and microbiological cure (sterilization of CSF cultures).

Secondary Outcomes: Mortality rates and adverse drug events, such as nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, chemical meningitis, or seizures.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Central nervous system (CNS) bacterial infections, such as meningitis and ventriculitis, are severe conditions in pediatric patients, often resulting from healthcare-associated complications, invasive procedures, or the spread of infection from other body sites. Multi-drug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, particularly carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, pose significant challenges in treating these infections. Standard treatment options, like colistimethate sodium, are associated with limited penetration into the CNS and potential toxicity. This study compares the efficacy and safety of tigecycline, an alternative antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity, versus the standard colistimethate sodium-based regimen in managing these infections in pediatric patients.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Patient data, including demographics, clinical presentations, treatment regimens, laboratory findings (CSF analysis, cultures), and adverse effects, will be systematically collected and analyzed. The study will employ appropriate statistical tests to determine the significance of differences between the two groups.

Ethical Considerations:

Ethical approval will be obtained from the Research Ethics Committees of Ain Shams University and Cairo University. Informed consent will be obtained from the guardians of all pediatric patients. The study will ensure strict adherence to ethical guidelines, including patient confidentiality and data protection.

Expected Impact:

This study aims to provide crucial data on the effectiveness and safety of alternative antibiotic regimens for pediatric CNS infections, potentially guiding clinical practice and improving outcomes for children affected by these severe infections in Egypt and globally.

Study Design:

A prospective observational clinical trial conducted on Pediatrics at Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt.

Study Population:

A total of 70 pediatric patients, aged 1 month to 18 years, admitted with confirmed or suspected CNS infections and with an external ventricular drain (EVD) in place.

Patient Groups:

Intervention Group (n = 35): Pediatric patients receiving a tigecycline-based regimen administered both intravenously (IV) and intraventricularly (IVT) for 14-21 days.

Control Group (n = 35): Pediatric patients receiving a colistimethate sodium-based regimen (standard therapy for MDR infections) administered both IV and IVT for 14-21 days.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Patient data, including demographics, clinical presentations, treatment regimens, laboratory findings (CSF analysis, cultures), and adverse effects, will be systematically collected and analyzed. The study will employ appropriate statistical tests to determine the significance of differences between the two groups.

Ethical Considerations:

Ethical approval will be obtained from the Research Ethics Committees of Ain Shams University and Cairo University. Informed consent will be obtained from the guardians of all pediatric patients. The study will ensure strict adherence to ethical guidelines, including patient confidentiality and data protection.

Expected Impact:

This study aims to provide crucial data on the effectiveness and safety of alternative antibiotic regimens for pediatric CNS infections, potentially guiding clinical practice and improving outcomes for children affected by these severe infections in Egypt and globally.

Being tested
Tigecycline (Tygacil), Colistimethate sodium (CMS)
Keywords
Central nervous system infections, MDR bacteria
Medical subject headings
Central Nervous System Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tigecycline (Tygacil)Drug

    tigecycline-based regimen administered both intravenously (IV) and intraventricularly (IVT) for 14-21 days

  • Colistimethate sodium (CMS)Drug

    Colistimethate sodium-based regimen (standard therapy for MDR infections) administered both IV and IVT for 14-21 days.

Study groups in NCT06702943
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pediatrics patients having EVD and suffering from meningitis caused by MDR bacteriaNot described
Receives: Drug: Tigecycline (Tygacil); Drug: Colistimethate sodium (CMS)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Microbiological eradication

    CSF Culture: Conducted at diagnosis and follow up for it till the end of the treatment course to monitor microbiological clearance. Two consecutive negative cultures are required to consider positive microbiological eradication.

    Measured: follow up of the patients from time of enrollment to end of treatment is for 14-21 days

  2. Clinical Cure rate

    Resolution of infection symptoms like fever, seizures, fatigue and neck stiffness.

    Measured: follow up of the patients from time of enrollment to end of treatment is for 14-21 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Nov 2024
  2. Study start1 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionOct 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06702943
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACUC-FP-ASU#265
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
10 Sep 2024
Last updated
25 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Central Nervous System Infections, run by Ain Shams University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Abdelwahab, MSc (+20-1224959630, Nouran_elsherazy@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Microbiological eradication (time frame: follow up of the patients from time of enrollment to end of treatment is for 14-21 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in