Effects of a Floss Band on Ankle in Stroke

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

• Ages Any age
• All sexes
• No healthy volunteers
• Child, Adult, Older adult

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

About this study

Official title: Effects of Floss Band on Ankle Range of Motion, Balance, and Gait in Chronic Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Study

Conditions

Chronic Stroke

Being tested

floss band, Sham (No Treatment)

Keywords

floss band, ankle intervention

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

• floss bandBehavioural

  The floss band intervention used the standard floss band technique, wrapping a floss band (lime green Sanctband Comprefloss™, 2" × 3.5 m; PENTEL, Shah Alam, Malaysia) made of natural rubber tightly around the ankle on the affected side. It was started at the fifth metatarsal and wrapped horizontally around the metatarsals twice, in a figure eight to the medial malleolus, over the Achilles tendon and the lateral malleolus three times, and around the medial malleolus again, before being passed twice from the medial mal-leolus over the Achilles tendon to the lateral malleolus, forming an end knot

• Sham (No Treatment)Behavioural

  The wrap used in the sham group lacked the elasticity of a floss band; the ankle was wrapped in the same manner, but loosely to facilitate blood circulation. Similarly, the participants were instructed to perform low-intensity active exercise involving ankle DF and plantar flexion for 2 minutes after applying the sham floss band. Finally, the sham floss band was removed, and the patient was asked to walk lightly on level ground for about 1 minute under the same conditions as in the floss band group.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

1. Ankle range of motion

   Ankle passive ROM was measured using a universal goniometer in a non-weight bearing position. Subjects were prone with the knee joint at 90° . The ankle joint was set at 0° of eversion and inversion. The goniometer axis was placed beneath the lateral malleolus, and the stationary arm was positioned parallel to the fibula. The movable arm was positioned parallel to the fifth metatarsal, with the ankle in a neutral position. The measurement was repeated three times, and the average value was calculated. DF and PF measured angle.

   Measured: 1 year

2. Weight-bearing lunge test

   The WBLT was performed to assess DF in a functional ankle joint. A measuring tape was placed horizontally on the floor perpendicular to a wall. The participants placed their affected-side foot on the tape with their big toe contacting the wall, and were instructed to touch the wall with the knee on the affected side. While maintaining this position, they were instructed to perform lunges by bending their knee, aiming for contact between their knee and the wall while keeping their heel firmly fixed on the floor. Once they were able to maintain knee and heel contact, the affected side foot was moved away from the wall, and they repeated the lunge test. The test was performed with 1-cm increases until knee and heel contact were no longer maintained. The maximum lunge distance was the far-thest distance from the wall to the big toe with the foot staying on the floor (without heel lifting) when the knee touched the wall. WBLT measured distance in centimeters.

   Measured: 1 year

3. Static balance ability

   Static balance was assessed using the APDM Mobility Lab™ Opal inertial sensor system (APDM, Portland, OR, USA). The test was conducted in a quiet treatment room. During the test, participants were barefoot and wore three Opal inertial sensors: one over their clothing at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebra and one on each ankle. Each subject was instructed to maintain their balance as stably as possible in a barefoot standing po-sition (10 cm between heels, toe-out of 5°) for 30 seconds. The test was repeated three times at 30-second intervals. The static balance outcome measure was the postural sway area (cm/s2). The signal was sampled, processed automatically, and streamed to a laptop using Mobility Lab™ software (Mobility Lab, Arlington, VA, USA). Balance measured sway range in millimeters squared.

   Measured: 1 year

4. Gait ability

   The APDM Mobility Lab™ Opal inertial sensor system (APDM) was used to assess gait based on the foot strike (FS) and toe-off (TO) angles. Data were collected from the sensor wirelessly at a sampling rate of 128 Hz and processed to quantify postural sway parameters. The test was conducted in a quiet treatment room. During the test, participants were barefoot and wore three Opal inertial sensors: one over their clothing at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebra and at each ankle. Verbal instructions were given to ensure accuracy. The subject was told to stand still at the start line until the first long tone was heard, at which time they started walking at a comfortable natural pace. When a second tone was heard after 2 minutes, the participants were asked to stop walking. After practicing for 30 seconds to become familiar with the test, participants were asked to walk back and forth along a straight 10-meter corridor at their usual pace for 2 minutes without a walking assist.

   Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

1. First posted26 Nov 2024
2. Study start23 Nov 2021
3. Primary completion31 Aug 2022
4. Study completion31 Aug 2022

Resources

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
• Other trials for Chronic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
• What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.