MalnutritionKMH2NCT06706661
Implementation of Nutritional Efforts on Discharged Older Patients
A study testing Nutritional treatment in people with Malnutrition, run by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to implement a nutritional treatment when discharging older patients at risk of malnutrition. Data collected in the study will include an assessment of whether a combination of nutritional treatment and a liaison team reduces the risk of readmissions and mortality, improves nutritional status… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- Nutritional treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 6 Jan 2025to 31 Dec 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Prescription of the Liaison team At nutritional risk according to NRS2002 Age 50+ Can read, hear and understand Danish or English Cognitive able to participate in the study, based on whether they are informed in time, place and own data
Who cannot join
- Receives enteral or parenteral nutrition Following a special diet including texture modified food and drinks Short life expectancy Not deemed eligible by the project staff
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Anne Marie Beck, Ph.d. contact
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
Herlev, 2730
Anne Marie Beck, Senior researcher, +45 38682387, anne.marie.beck@regionh.dk
Tina Munk
About this study
Official title: Implementation of Nutritional Treatment to Older Patients Discharged With the Liaison Team
The aim of the study is to implement a nutritional treatment when discharging older patients at risk of malnutrition.
Data collected in the study will include an assessment of whether a combination of nutritional treatment and a liaison team reduces the risk of readmissions and mortality, improves nutritional status, physical function and quality of life
Read the detailed description
During hospitalization, many older patients are at risk of malnutrition. Malnutrition in older adults is related to reduced physical function, more complications, re-admissions, days in hospital and reduced quality of life. As hospitalizations are often short (approximately 5 days), it is important to focus on nutritional intake during the convalescence period.
Upon discharge, a "Nutrition Gap" often occurs in practice, where the patient does not consume sufficient nutrition to ensure an optimal convalescence period. The lack of nutritional follow-up in connection with the discharge of older patients has been shown to have a markedly negative effect on, among other things, functional ability and readmissions. A study from Herlev Hospital, where the effect of a nutritional treatment upon discharge of older patients was investigated, showed a significant effect on muscle strength, quality of life and nutritional status. Another study from Herlev Hospital has shown that by associating a clinical dietitian with a liaison team and thus focusing on nutrition, the readmission rate was halved.
The problem is that it has not been investigated whether such a cross-sectoral effort can be implemented in practice and the results confirmed.
Hypothesis 1 is that it is possible to include and retain the older patients who are discharged with the liaison team for an effort that includes treatment of the risk of malnutrition and that the older participants find the effort relevant
Hypothesis 2 is that nutritional treatment will be able to reduce the number of unintended readmissions and thereby be cost-effective. Furthermore, it is expected that the nutritional treatment will increase the participants' nutritional status, muscle strength, muscle mass, quality of life and possibly have a positive effect on mortality.
- Conditions
- Malnutrition
- Being tested
- Nutritional treatment
- Keywords
- food, dietician, malnutrition, nutrition risk, quality of life, muscle strength, readmissions, mortality, multimodal
- Medical subject headings
- Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nutritional treatmentOther
At the day of discharge the intervention group (IG) receives a package containing foods and drinks covering dietary requirements for the next 24 h. Further, a goodie-bag containing samples of protein-rich milk-based drinks is provided. At day 4 after discharge, the IG receives dietetic counselling including a recommendation of daily exercise, and an individual nutrition plan. Information regarding recommendations of nutritional therapy after discharge is systematically and electronically communicated to the municipality. The dietician performes telephone follow-ups on day 30 and a home visit at 12 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional treament | Experimental | At the day of discharge the intervention group (IG) receives a package containing foods and drinks covering dietary requirements for the next 24 h. Further, a goodie-bag containing samples of protein-rich milk-based drinks is provided. At day 4 after discharge, the IG receives dietetic counselling including a recommendation of daily exercise, and an individual nutrition plan. Information regarding recommendations of nutritional therapy after discharge is systematically and electronically communicated to the municipality. The dietician performes telephone follow-ups on day 30 and a home visit at 12 weeks Receives: Other: Nutritional treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Eligibility
Eligibility will be assessed as the number of patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria out of the number of patients discharged with the liaison team
Measured: Assessed at baseline
Recruitment
Recruitment rate will be assessed as the number of patients recruited out of the number of eligible patients
Measured: Assessed at baseline
Retention
Retention rate will be assessed as the number of patients who complete the nutritional treatment out of the total number of patients recruited
Measured: Assessed at three months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Mortality
health care records
Measured: 30 days, 12 weeks, 6 monts, 1 year and 3 year
Hospital re-admissions
health care records
Measured: 30 days, 12 weeks, 6 monts, 1 year and 3 year
Health related Quality of life
Euro-qol tool EQ5D5L
Measured: 12 weeks
Appetite
SNAQ with a score from 5 to 20 where a score at or below 14 can predict weight loss
Measured: 30 days, 12 weeks
Muscle strenght
30 seconds chair stand
Measured: 4 days, 30 days, 12 weeks
Dietary intake
24 hours recall
Measured: 30 days, 12 weeks
weight
body weight measurement
Measured: 4 days, 30 days
muscle mass
calf circumference
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Nov 2024
- Study start6 Jan 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MalnutritionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anne Marie Beck, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06706661
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F-24065575
- Acronym
- KMH2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 7 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Due to GDPR
Publications
Beck A, Andersen UT, Leedo E, Jensen LL, Martins K, Quvang M, Rask KO, Vedelspang A, Ronholt F. Does adding a dietician to the liaison team after discharge of geriatric patients improve nutritional outcome: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Nov;29(11):1117-28. doi: 10.1177/0269215514564700. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
PubMed 25552522Munk T, Svendsen JA, Knudsen AW, Ostergaard TB, Thomsen T, Olesen SS, Rasmussen HH, Beck AM. A multimodal nutritional intervention after discharge improves quality of life and physical function in older patients - a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov;40(11):5500-5510. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
PubMed 34656032
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementation of Nutritional Treatment to Older Patients Discharged With the Liaison Team
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06706661
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KMH2 / F-24065575
- Conditions
- Malnutrition
- Keywords
- food, dietician, malnutrition, nutrition risk, quality of life, muscle strength, readmissions, mortality
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev and Gentofte HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to implement a nutritional treatment when discharging older patients at risk of malnutrition.
Data collected in the study will include an assessment of whether a combination of nutritional treatment and a liaison team reduces the risk of readmissions and mortality, improves nutritional status, physical function and quality of life
Detailed description
During hospitalization, many older patients are at risk of malnutrition. Malnutrition in older adults is related to reduced physical function, more complications, re-admissions, days in hospital and reduced quality of life. As hospitalizations are often short (approximately 5 days), it is important to focus on nutritional intake during the convalescence period.
Upon discharge, a "Nutrition Gap" often occurs in practice, where the patient does not consume sufficient nutrition to ensure an optimal convalescence period. The lack of nutritional follow-up in connection with the discharge of older patients has been shown to have a markedly negative effect on, among other things, functional ability and readmissions. A study from Herlev Hospital, where the effect of a nutritional treatment upon discharge of older patients was investigated, showed a significant effect on muscle strength, quality of life and nutritional status. Another study from Herlev Hospital has shown that by associating a clinical dietitian with a liaison team and thus focusing on nutrition, the readmission rate was halved.
The problem is that it has not been investigated whether such a cross-sectoral effort can be implemented in practice and the results confirmed.
Hypothesis 1 is that it is possible to include and retain the older patients who are discharged with the liaison team for an effort that includes treatment of the risk of malnutrition and that the older participants find the effort relevant
Hypothesis 2 is that nutritional treatment will be able to reduce the number of unintended readmissions and thereby be cost-effective. Furthermore, it is expected that the nutritional treatment will increase the participants' nutritional status, muscle strength, muscle mass, quality of life and possibly have a positive effect on mortality.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional treament | Experimental | Other: Nutritional treatmentAt the day of discharge the intervention group (IG) receives a package containing foods and drinks covering dietary requirements for the next 24 h. Further, a goodie-bag containing samples of protein-rich milk-based drinks is provided. At day 4 after discharge, the IG receives dietetic counselling including a recommendation of daily exercise, and an individual nutrition plan. Information regarding recommendations of nutritional therapy after discharge is systematically and electronically communicated to the municipality. The dietician performes telephone follow-ups on day 30 and a home visit at 12 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Prescription of the Liaison team At nutritional risk according to NRS2002 Age 50+ Can read, hear and understand Danish or English Cognitive able to participate in the study, based on whether they are informed in time, place and own data
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Receives enteral or parenteral nutrition Following a special diet including texture modified food and drinks Short life expectancy Not deemed eligible by the project staff
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional treatmentAt the day of discharge the intervention group (IG) receives a package containing foods and drinks covering dietary requirements for the next 24 h. Further, a goodie-bag containing samples of protein-rich milk-based drinks is provided. At day 4 after discharge, the IG receives dietetic counselling including a recommendation of daily exercise, and an individual nutrition plan. Information regarding recommendations of nutritional therapy after discharge is systematically and electronically communicated to the municipality. The dietician performes telephone follow-ups on day 30 and a home visit at 12 weeks | Other | Nutritional treament |
Primary outcome
Eligibility
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Eligibility will be assessed as the number of patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria out of the number of patients discharged with the liaison team
Recruitment
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Recruitment rate will be assessed as the number of patients recruited out of the number of eligible patients
Retention
Time frame: Assessed at three months
Retention rate will be assessed as the number of patients who complete the nutritional treatment out of the total number of patients recruited
8 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 30 days, 12 weeks, 6 monts, 1 year and 3 year
Hospital re-admissions
Time frame: 30 days, 12 weeks, 6 monts, 1 year and 3 year
Health related Quality of life
Time frame: 12 weeks
Appetite
Time frame: 30 days, 12 weeks
Muscle strenght
Time frame: 4 days, 30 days, 12 weeks
Dietary intake
Time frame: 30 days, 12 weeks
weight
Time frame: 4 days, 30 days
muscle mass
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jul 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 25552522Beck A, Andersen UT, Leedo E, Jensen LL, Martins K, Quvang M, Rask KO, Vedelspang A, Ronholt F. Does adding a dietician to the liaison team after discharge of geriatric patients improve nutritional outcome: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Nov;29(11):1117-28. doi: 10.1177/0269215514564700. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
- Results publication: PubMed 34656032Munk T, Svendsen JA, Knudsen AW, Ostergaard TB, Thomsen T, Olesen SS, Rasmussen HH, Beck AM. A multimodal nutritional intervention after discharge improves quality of life and physical function in older patients - a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2021 Nov;40(11):5500-5510. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Due to GDPR
Related trials for Malnutrition
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Maternal Probiotic Intervention to Improve Gut Health-Trial II-Pakistan
Environmental Enteric Dysfunction (EED), Stunting
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Biomarkers in EV Associated With Marrow Adiposity in Anorexia
Anorexia Nervosa Restricting Type, Anorexia Nervosa (DSM-IV Revised Criteria)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Anne Marie Beck, Ph.d. contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nutritional treatment in people with Malnutrition, run by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tina Munk, Ph D (+45 61160138, tina.munk@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Eligibility (time frame: Assessed at baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06706661, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2026.