Polypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyPhase 4MONDEGONCT06709339
Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Durability of Faricimab in Caucasian Patients With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (MONDEGO)
A Phase 4 study testing Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo] in people with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy, run by Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image at 31 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of faricimab in caucasian patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The main question it aims to answer is: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) injections of faricimab 6 milligrams (mg) on Best Corrected Visual… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- What is being tested?
- Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo]
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 31 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Aug 2025to Aug 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
General Inclusion Criteria:
Potential participants are eligible to be included in the study only if all of the following criteria apply:
- Signed ICF
- Age ≥ 50 years at the time of signing the ICF
- Caucasian
- Participants who are able to comply with the study protocol, in the investigator's judgment
- For female participants of childbearing potential: agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use contraception as defined below:
Female participants must remain abstinent or use contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1% per year, during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the final dose of faricimab.
A female participant is considered to be of childbearing potential if she is post-menarche, has not reached a postmenopausal state (≥ 12 continuous months of amenorrhea with no identified cause other than menopause), and is not permanently infertile due to surgery (i.e., removal of ovaries, fallopian tubes, and/or uterus) or another cause as determined by the investigator (e.g., Müllerian agenesis). Per this definition, a female participant with a tubal ligation is considered to be of childbearing potential. The definition of childbearing potential may be adapted for alignment with local guidelines or regulations.
Examples of contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1% per year include bilateral tubal ligation, male sterilization, hormonal contraceptives that inhibit ovulation, hormone-releasing intrauterine devices, and copper intrauterine devices.
The reliability of sexual abstinence should be evaluated concerning the duration of the clinical trial and the preferred and usual lifestyle of the individual.
Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not adequate methods of contraception.
If required per local guidelines or regulations, locally recognized adequate methods of contraception and information about the reliability of abstinence will be described in the local ICF.
Ocular Inclusion Criteria for study eye:
- Sufficiently clear ocular media and adequate pupillary dilatation to allow acquisition of good quality retinal images to confirm diagnosis
- Confirmed diagnosis, by the Reading Centre, of naïve symptomatic macular PCV defined by the following:
- Active macular polypoidal lesions shown by ICGA AND
- Presence of exudative or haemorrhagic features involving the macula as identified by the investigator using multimodal images.
- BCVA scores of 78-24 ETDRS letters, inclusive (20/32 to 20/320 approximate Snellen equivalent), using the ETDRS protocol and assessed at the initial testing distance of 4 meters [see the BCVA Standard Operational Procedures (SOP) for additional details] on study Day 1.
General Exclusion Criteria
Potential participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:
- Treatment with investigational therapy (device, drug, or traditional medicine with the exception of vitamins and minerals) within 3 months prior to initiation of study treatment on study Day 1
- Any major illness or major surgical procedure within 1 month before screening
- Active cancer within the 12 months prior to study Day 1 except for appropriately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, and prostate cancer with a Gleason score of ≤ 6 (Grade Group of 1) and a stable prostate-specific antigen for ≥ 12 months
- Continuous use of any medications and treatments indicated below:
- Systemic anti-VEGF therapy
- Systemic drugs known to cause macular oedema (fingolimod, tamoxifen)
- Other experimental therapies (except those comprising vitamins and minerals) and therapies that claim to have an effect on macular pathology (e.g., kallidinogenase)
- Systemic treatment for suspected or active systemic infection on study Day 1
- Ongoing use of prophylactic antibiotic therapy may be acceptable after discussion with the Medical Monitor.
- Uncontrolled blood pressure, defined as systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg while the participant is at rest on study Day 1
- History of stroke (cerebral vascular accident) or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to study Day 1
- History of other diseases, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or historical or current clinical laboratory findings giving reasonable suspicion of a condition that contraindicates the use of the IMP or that might affect the interpretation of the results of the study or renders the participant at high risk for treatment complications in the opinion of the investigator
- History of severe allergic reaction or anaphylactic reaction to a biologic agent or known hypersensitivity to any component of the faricimab injection, study-related procedure preparations (including fluorescein and indocyanine green dyes), dilating drops, or any of the anaesthetic and antimicrobial preparations used by a participant during the study
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding, or intention of becoming pregnant during the study or within 28 days after the final dose of faricimab
Ocular Exclusion Criteria
Potential participants are excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply to both eyes:
- History of idiopathic or autoimmune-associated uveitis in either eye
- Active ocular inflammation or suspected or active ocular or periocular infection in either eye on study Day 1
Participants who meet any of the following ocular criteria for the study eye will be excluded from study entry:
- Any history or presence of macular pathology unrelated to PCV affecting vision or contributing to the presence of macular haemorrhage, IRF, or SRF
- Retinal pigment epithelial tear involving the macula on study Day 1
- Diagnosis with or suspected of having narrow-angle glaucoma who have not undergone iridotomy. The inclusion of these patients will be conditional upon prior referral to the relevant specialist for appropriate treatment to enable participation in the study.
- On FFA/colour fundus photograph (CFP):
- Subretinal haemorrhage of > 4 macular photocoagulation study disc area and/or that involves the fovea
- Fibrosis or atrophy of > 50% of the total lesion area and/or that involves the fovea
- Any concurrent intraocular condition (e.g., amblyopia, aphakia, retinal detachment, cataract, diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy, or epiretinal membrane with traction) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could either reduce the potential for visual improvement or require medical or surgical intervention during the study
- Current vitreous haemorrhage on study Day 1
- Advanced/or uncontrolled glaucoma
- Spherical equivalent of refractive error demonstrating more than 8 dioptres of myopia
- Any prior or concomitant treatment for PCV or other retinal diseases, including, but not restricted to, IVT treatment (e.g., faricimab, anti-VEGF, steroids, tissue plasminogen activator, ocriplasmin, C3F8, air), periocular pharmacological intervention, argon laser photocoagulation, verteporfin PDT, diode laser, transpupillary thermotherapy, or ocular surgical intervention
- Any cataract surgery or treatment for complications of cataract surgery with steroids or yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser capsulotomy within 3 months prior to study Day 1
- Any other intraocular surgery (e.g., pars plana vitrectomy, glaucoma surgery, corneal transplant, or radiotherapy)
- Prior periocular pharmacological or IVT treatment (including anti-VEGF medication) for other retinal diseases
- Continuous use of any medications and treatments indicated below:
- IVT anti-VEGF agents (other than study-assigned faricimab)
- IVT, periocular (subtenon), steroid implants (i.e., Ozurdex®, Illuvien®), or chronic topical ocular corticosteroids (defined as continuous usage for 100 days or longer)
- Concurrent use of any macular photocoagulation or PDT with verteporfin Participants who have a non-functioning fellow (non-study) eye, defined as either BCVA of hand motion or worse, or no physical presence of non-study eye (i.e., monocular), at both the screening and study Day 1 visits will be excluded from study entry.
Trial locations and contacts
31 sites in 4 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
31 sites in 4 countries
Portugal10 sites, 10 recruiting
- Recruiting
Espaço Médico de Coimbra
Coimbra
João Figueira
- Recruiting
Ophthalmology Department, Hospitais Universidade de Coimbra,
Coimbra
Rufino Silva
- Recruiting
Unidade Local de Saúde da Região de Leiria, E.P.E.
Leiria
António Campos
- Recruiting
almPRIMUM- Serviços de Oftalmologia Médica e Cirúrgica
Lisbon
Carlos M Neves
- Recruiting
Instituto de Retina e Diabetes Ocular de Lisboa (IRL),
Lisbon
Mário Canastro
- Recruiting
Serviço de Oftalmologia, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Hospital de Santa Maria
Lisbon
Teresa Varandas
- Recruiting
Unidade Local de Saúde São José
Lisbon
Ana Luísa Basilio
- Recruiting
ULS-LOD - Hospital Beatriz Ângelo
Loures
Belmira Beltrán
- Not yet recruiting
Department of Ophthalmology, Porto Medical School / Hospital S. João
Porto
Ângela Carneiro
- Recruiting
Serviço Oftalmologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, E.P.E.,
Porto
Miguel Lume
Spain8 sites, 8 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centro de Oftalmologia Barraquer
Barcelona
Santiago Abengoechea
- Not yet recruiting
Hospital Vall d'Hebrón Department of Ophthalmology
Barcelona
Miguel A Zapata
- Recruiting
Institut Català de Retina (ICR), Clinical Trial Unit
Barcelona
Ignasi Jürgens
- Not yet recruiting
Valles Ophthalmology Research, S.L., Hospital General de Catalunya,
Barcelona
Laura Sararols
- Not yet recruiting
Department of Ophthalmology, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital
Madrid
José M Ruiz-Moreno
- Not yet recruiting
Instituto Oftalmologico Fernandez-Veja
Oviedo
Nelida Muñoz
- Not yet recruiting
Instituto Oftalmologico Fernandez-Veja
Oviedo
Maria I López Gálvez
- Not yet recruiting
Fundación de Oftalmología Médica de la Comunitat Valenciana (Fom)
Valencia
Carmen Esteban
Italy7 sites, 7 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico-Clinica Regina Elena
Milan
Francesco Viola
- Not yet recruiting
Medical Retina Service, Operative Unit Ophthalmology - MultiMedica Spa (IRCCSMM)
Milan
Stela Vujosevic
- Not yet recruiting
ASST-Fatebenefratelli-Sacco P.O.L. Sacco
Milan
Giovani Staurenghi
- Not yet recruiting
Eye Unit, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità
Novara
Stefano De Cillà
- Recruiting
IRCCS Fondazione G.B. Bietti per lo Studio e la Ricerca in Oftalmologia ONLUS,
Roma
Mariacristina Parravano
- Not yet recruiting
Department of Ophthalmology, University Vita Salute - Scientific Institute of San Raffaele
San Raffaele
Francesco Bandello
- Not yet recruiting
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Udine
Udine
Daniele Veritti
United Kingdom6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
Clinical Trial Unit, Dep. Ophth., Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,
Gloucester
Emily Fletcher
- Recruiting
Clinical Eye Research Centre - St. Paul's Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool
Ian Pearce
- Recruiting
Clinical Trial Unit, Dep. Ophth., Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London
Senthil Selvam
- Not yet recruiting
ICORG - Imperial College Ophthalmologic Research Group
London
Saad Younis
- Recruiting
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton
Gabriella Salvo
- Not yet recruiting
Wolverhampton and Midland Counties Eye Infirmary, New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton
Nirodhini Narendran
About this study
Official title: A Phase IV, Multicentre, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Durability of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Caucasian Patients With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of faricimab in caucasian patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The main question it aims to answer is:
To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) injections of faricimab 6 milligrams (mg) on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) outcomes in caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV.
Participants will undergo ophthalmic examination, safety assessment and treatment with faricimab according to a patient specific treat and extend regimen.
Read the detailed description
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) was first described in 1982 by Yannuzzi as a choroidal vasculopathy leading to haemorrhagic and exudative macular degeneration. More than four decades later, the pathogenesis of the disease remains uncertain with authors considering PCV a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) while others advocate a separate clinical entity and adequate treatment is still an unmet need.
Several studies have reported an association between PCV and major and minor interethnic classification differences regarding morphological alterations, prevalence, genetic associations, lesion location, and results after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, among others. For instance, the reported prevalence of PCV in patients with neovascular AMD ranges from 4% to 9,8% in Caucasians and from 22% to 55% in Asians. However, a recent study reported a much higher prevalence in Caucasians (22,1%), suggesting that PCV may actually be underdiagnosed in this population.
Today, intravitreal (IVT) anti-VEGF therapy plays a key role in the management of PCV and has become the standard of care. The anti-permeability property of anti-VEGF agents, such as aflibercept and ranibizumab, play a role in reducing the exudation from abnormal choroidal vessels and polypoidal lesions, thereby decreasing the subretinal fluid and preserving vision.
Although the current standard of care has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with PCV, many limitations exist in understanding the disease as a result of its heterogeneity in clinical features and treatment outcomes. The burden of frequent injections, incomplete polypoidal lesion closure, and the risk and unpredictability of lesion relapse reinforce the need to develop new treatments for patients with PCV. This population is at risk of disease relapse, retinal haemorrhage, and vision loss, and is appropriate for inclusion in this clinical trial.
Faricimab is a novel humanized bispecific Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that selectively binds with high affinity to VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). Faricimab was studied for the treatment of neovascular AMD (nAMD) in the global Phase III Studies TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300) and is currently being studied in the long-term extension Study AVONELLE-X (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04777201). The TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300) studies consistently showed that faricimab, given at intervals of up to 16 weeks, offered non-inferior vision gains compared with aflibercept, given every 2 months in the first year. Approximately 50% of participants eligible for extended dosing with faricimab were able to be treated every 4 months, and nearly 80% of participants every 3 months or longer. However, patients with symptomatic macular PCV were under-represented in the faricimab Phase III pivotal Studies TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300).
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab 6 mg IVT administered at up to 24-week intervals in the treatment-naive study eye of Caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV. This study will add to the evidence base for the benefit-risk profile of faricimab IVT injection in Caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV.
The study consists of a screening period of up to 28 days (Days -28 to -1) in length and an approximately 100-week study treatment period consisting of a Treatment Initiation period (Weeks 1-12) and the treat and extend (T\&E) regimen period (Weeks 20-Week 100).
- Conditions
- Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- Being tested
- Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo]
- Keywords
- Faricimab, Caucasian patients, PCV, Durability, Safety, Efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo]Drug
The investigational medicinal product (IMP) for this study is faricimab (RO6867461), as per clinical practice. No control treatment will be used for this study
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Faricimab | Experimental | This open-label, single-arm study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo] 6 mg anti-VEGF IVT in Caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV. Receives: Drug: Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the study eye to Week 40 or 44 or 48
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Measured: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48
Secondary outcomes (23)
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the Study
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart
Measured: From baseline through last treatment visit (up to 100 weeks)
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye to the last treatment visit
At a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Measured: From Baseline through last treatment visit (up to 100 weeks)
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Measured: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters from the Baseline BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Time
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Measured: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters from the Baseline BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score) and avoiding a loss in BCVA from baseline indicates no worsening in visual acuity.
Measured: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Percentage of Participants Maintaining or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 (BCVA =69 Letters) in the Study Eye
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured on the ETDRS chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA letter score from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
Measured: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of participants with complete polypoidal lesion regressions at Weeks 40, 44, or 48
Complete polypoidal lesions regressions are measured using Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA), as assessed by the central reading center.
Measured: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48
Proportion of participants with complete polypoidal lesion regressions at the end of the study
Complete polypoidal lesions regressions are measured using Indocyanine Green Angiography (ICGA), as assessed by the central reading center.
Measured: From Baseline through the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye at Weeks 40 or 44, or 48
Central subfield thickness (CST) is defined as the distance between the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) using optical coherence tomography (OCT), as assessed by the central reading center.
Measured: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48
Change from Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye to the end of the study
Central subfield thickness (CST) is defined as the distance between the ILM and the RPE using OCT, as assessed by the central reading center.
Measured: From Baseline through the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time
Central subfield thickness (CST) is defined as the distance between the ILM and the RPE using OCT, as assessed by the central reading center.
Measured: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid and no subretinal fluid in the Study Eye at Week 20
Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid are measured using OCT in the central subfield (center 1 millimetre [mm]).
Measured: From Baseline and Week 20
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid and no subretinal fluid in the Study Eye at Weeks 40 or 44, or 48
Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid are measured using OCT in the central subfield (center 1 mm).
Measured: From Baseline and Week 40 or 44 or 48
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid and no subretinal fluid in the Study Eye at the end of the study
Intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid are measured using OCT in the central subfield (center 1 mm).
Measured: From Baseline and the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid, no Subretinal Fluid and no sub-RPE fluid in the Study Eye at Week 20
Intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid and sub-RPE fluid are measured using OCT in the central subfield (center 1 mm).
Measured: From Baseline and Week 20
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid, no Subretinal Fluid and no sub-RPE fluid in the Study Eye at Weeks 40 or 44, or 48
Intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid and sub-RPE fluid are measured using OCT in the central subfield (center 1 mm).
Measured: From Baseline and Week 40 or 44 or 48
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid, no Subretinal Fluid and no sub-RPE fluid in the Study Eye at the end of the study
Intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid and sub-RPE fluid are measured using OCT in the central subfield (center 1 mm).
Measured: From Baseline and the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Change From Baseline in branch Neovascularization network in the Study Eye at 1 year
The branch neovascularization network in the study eye is evaluated by a central reading center using OCT angiography (OCTA).
Measured: Baseline and 1 year
Change From Baseline in branch Neovascularization network in the Study Eye at 2 years
The branch neovascularization network in the study eye is evaluated by a central reading center using OCT angiography (OCTA).
Measured: Baseline and 2 years
Proportion of participants on 12 weeks or more treatment intervals at the end of the study.
Proportions are based on the number of participants who have not discontinued the study at the end of the study. The treatment interval at a given visit is defined as the treatment interval decision followed at that visit.
Measured: End of study (up to 100 weeks)
Number of faricimab injections received from Week 20 until the end of the study.
Count of the number of faricimab injections each participant received after the treatment initiation period (baseline to week 12).
Measured: Week 20 through end of study (up to 100 weeks)
Incidence and severity of ocular adverse events
This analysis of adverse events (AEs) only includes ocular AEs. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs are recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE.
Measured: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 104 weeks)
Incidence and severity of Non-Ocular Adverse Event
This analysis of AEs only includes non-ocular (systemic) AEs. Multiple occurrences of the same AE in one individual are counted only once. Investigators sought information on AEs at each contact with the participants. All AEs were recorded and the investigator made an assessment of seriousness, severity, and causality of each AE.
Measured: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 104 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Nov 2024
- Study start6 Aug 2025
- Primary completionAug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Polypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This study will be conducted in adult Caucasian participants with symptomatic macular PCV, a subtype of nAMD, which was under-represented in the faricimab Phase III pivotal Studies TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300) where less than 2% of the enrolled participants with nAMD were diagnosed with PCV and no Caucasian participants with symptomatic macular PCV were identified in the mentioned pivotal Studies.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06709339
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ECR-AMD-2024-15
- Other IDs
- 2024-515640-22-00
- Acronym
- MONDEGO
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Giridhar A, Lekha T, Chandran K. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2026 May 1;74(5):669-680. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3237_25. Epub 2026 Apr 29.
PubMed 42054086
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase IV, Multicentre, Open-label, Single-arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy, Safety and Durability of Faricimab (RO6867461) in Caucasian Patients With Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06709339
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MONDEGO / ECR-AMD-2024-15
- Conditions
- Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
- Keywords
- Faricimab, Caucasian patients, PCV, Durability, Safety, Efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and ImageUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of faricimab in caucasian patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). The main question it aims to answer is:
To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal (IVT) injections of faricimab 6 milligrams (mg) on Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) outcomes in caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV.
Participants will undergo ophthalmic examination, safety assessment and treatment with faricimab according to a patient specific treat and extend regimen.
Detailed description
Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) was first described in 1982 by Yannuzzi as a choroidal vasculopathy leading to haemorrhagic and exudative macular degeneration. More than four decades later, the pathogenesis of the disease remains uncertain with authors considering PCV a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) while others advocate a separate clinical entity and adequate treatment is still an unmet need.
Several studies have reported an association between PCV and major and minor interethnic classification differences regarding morphological alterations, prevalence, genetic associations, lesion location, and results after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, among others. For instance, the reported prevalence of PCV in patients with neovascular AMD ranges from 4% to 9,8% in Caucasians and from 22% to 55% in Asians. However, a recent study reported a much higher prevalence in Caucasians (22,1%), suggesting that PCV may actually be underdiagnosed in this population.
Today, intravitreal (IVT) anti-VEGF therapy plays a key role in the management of PCV and has become the standard of care. The anti-permeability property of anti-VEGF agents, such as aflibercept and ranibizumab, play a role in reducing the exudation from abnormal choroidal vessels and polypoidal lesions, thereby decreasing the subretinal fluid and preserving vision.
Although the current standard of care has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with PCV, many limitations exist in understanding the disease as a result of its heterogeneity in clinical features and treatment outcomes. The burden of frequent injections, incomplete polypoidal lesion closure, and the risk and unpredictability of lesion relapse reinforce the need to develop new treatments for patients with PCV. This population is at risk of disease relapse, retinal haemorrhage, and vision loss, and is appropriate for inclusion in this clinical trial.
Faricimab is a novel humanized bispecific Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that selectively binds with high affinity to VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2). Faricimab was studied for the treatment of neovascular AMD (nAMD) in the global Phase III Studies TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300) and is currently being studied in the long-term extension Study AVONELLE-X (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04777201). The TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300) studies consistently showed that faricimab, given at intervals of up to 16 weeks, offered non-inferior vision gains compared with aflibercept, given every 2 months in the first year. Approximately 50% of participants eligible for extended dosing with faricimab were able to be treated every 4 months, and nearly 80% of participants every 3 months or longer. However, patients with symptomatic macular PCV were under-represented in the faricimab Phase III pivotal Studies TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300).
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, durability, and safety of faricimab 6 mg IVT administered at up to 24-week intervals in the treatment-naive study eye of Caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV. This study will add to the evidence base for the benefit-risk profile of faricimab IVT injection in Caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV.
The study consists of a screening period of up to 28 days (Days -28 to -1) in length and an approximately 100-week study treatment period consisting of a Treatment Initiation period (Weeks 1-12) and the treat and extend (T\&E) regimen period (Weeks 20-Week 100).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This study will be conducted in adult Caucasian participants with symptomatic macular PCV, a subtype of nAMD, which was under-represented in the faricimab Phase III pivotal Studies TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823300) where less than 2% of the enrolled participants with nAMD were diagnosed with PCV and no Caucasian participants with symptomatic macular PCV were identified in the mentioned pivotal Studies.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Faricimab | Experimental | Drug: Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo]This open-label, single-arm study will evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo] 6 mg anti-VEGF IVT in Caucasian patients with symptomatic macular PCV. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo]The investigational medicinal product (IMP) for this study is faricimab (RO6867461), as per clinical practice. No control treatment will be used for this study | Drug | Faricimab |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the study eye to Week 40 or 44 or 48
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) is measured on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart at a starting distance of 4 meters. The BCVA letter score ranges from 0 to 100 (best score), and a gain in BCVA from baseline indicates an improvement in visual acuity.
23 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the Study
Time frame: From baseline through last treatment visit (up to 100 weeks)
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye to the last treatment visit
Time frame: From Baseline through last treatment visit (up to 100 weeks)
Change From Baseline in BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time
Time frame: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants Gaining Greater Than or Equal to (≥)15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters from the Baseline BCVA in the Study Eye Averaged Over Time
Time frame: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants Avoiding a Loss of ≥15, ≥10, or ≥5 Letters from the Baseline BCVA in the Study Eye Over Time
Time frame: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Percentage of Participants Maintaining or Achieving BCVA Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 (BCVA =69 Letters) in the Study Eye
Time frame: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of participants with complete polypoidal lesion regressions at Weeks 40, 44, or 48
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48
Proportion of participants with complete polypoidal lesion regressions at the end of the study
Time frame: From Baseline through the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye at Weeks 40 or 44, or 48
Time frame: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48
Change from Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye to the end of the study
Time frame: From Baseline through the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness in the Study Eye Over Time
Time frame: Over time (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid and no subretinal fluid in the Study Eye at Week 20
Time frame: From Baseline and Week 20
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid and no subretinal fluid in the Study Eye at Weeks 40 or 44, or 48
Time frame: From Baseline and Week 40 or 44 or 48
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid and no subretinal fluid in the Study Eye at the end of the study
Time frame: From Baseline and the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid, no Subretinal Fluid and no sub-RPE fluid in the Study Eye at Week 20
Time frame: From Baseline and Week 20
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid, no Subretinal Fluid and no sub-RPE fluid in the Study Eye at Weeks 40 or 44, or 48
Time frame: From Baseline and Week 40 or 44 or 48
Proportion of Participants With no Intraretinal Fluid, no Subretinal Fluid and no sub-RPE fluid in the Study Eye at the end of the study
Time frame: From Baseline and the end of the study (up to 104 weeks)
Change From Baseline in branch Neovascularization network in the Study Eye at 1 year
Time frame: Baseline and 1 year
Change From Baseline in branch Neovascularization network in the Study Eye at 2 years
Time frame: Baseline and 2 years
Proportion of participants on 12 weeks or more treatment intervals at the end of the study.
Time frame: End of study (up to 100 weeks)
Number of faricimab injections received from Week 20 until the end of the study.
Time frame: Week 20 through end of study (up to 100 weeks)
Incidence and severity of ocular adverse events
Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 104 weeks)
Incidence and severity of Non-Ocular Adverse Event
Time frame: From first dose of study drug through end of study (up to 104 weeks)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42054086Giridhar A, Lekha T, Chandran K. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2026 May 1;74(5):669-680. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_3237_25. Epub 2026 Apr 29.
Related trials for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
Active, not recruiting
Speculum-Free Intravitreal Injection Using Cotton-Tipped Applicator Retraction: Pain, Procedure Time, Patient Satisfaction, and Safety
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD), Diabetic Macular Edema
RecruitingPhase 3
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of SMZ1 With Ranibizumab in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration Without Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
Neovascular (Wet) Age-related Macular Degeneration Without Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Durability of a Personalized Treat-and-extend Regimen of Faricimab for Treatment-naive Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy
Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV), Age Related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Intravitreal (IVT) Injection of ABI-110 (AAV2.N54-VEGF Trap) in Subjects With Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration (wAMD), Including Symptomatic Macular Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV)
Neovascular (Wet) AMD
RecruitingPhase 3
Prospective Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Personalized Regimen of High-dose Aflibercept 8mg on Treatment-naive Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: the PALLAS Trial
Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy, Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy (PCV)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
31 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Faricimab Injection [Vabysmo] in people with Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy, run by Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image at 31 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 31 sites in Portugal, Spain, Italy, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Joana F Tavares, PhD (351239480137, mondego@aibili.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in BCVA in the study eye to Week 40 or 44 or 48 (time frame: From Baseline through Week 40 or 44 or 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06709339, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2026.