AzTrials
AzTrials

TranscutaneousNCT06710782

Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Application Plus Genicular Nerve Block Versus Intraarticular Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Management of Chronic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis.

A study testing Hyaluronic acid and Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency in people with Transcutaneous and Pulsed Radiofrequency, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the present study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of combined transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency plus genicular nerve block with bupivacaine plus corticosteroid versus intraarticular Hyaluronic acid injections, in terms of clinical and functional parameters, in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
What is being tested?
Hyaluronic acid and Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Aug 2023to 1 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged above 40 years.
  • Both sexes
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)physical status I and II.
  • Patients radiologically proven symptomatic knee joint osteoarthritis not responding to medical treatment.
  • Patients with knee pain of moderate or greater intensity on most or all days for ≥ 3 months, showing significant radiological osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1 to 3).
  • Radiological severity was assessed using the Kellgrenand Lawrence global scale as follow: Grade 0; means absence of radiological finding; grade 1: suspected narrowing of joint space; grade 2 refers to osteophytes and possible narrowing; grade 3 is defined as multiple os-teophytes, definite narrowing of joint space and grade 4 comprises large osteophytes, marked narrowing of joint space.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients who show improvement on medical treatment, patients on an oral, topical, or intra-articular steroid during the 4 weeks before the study; patients with an oral, topical, or suppository non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 2 weeks before the study.
  • Patients having secondary knee osteoarthritis.
  • Patients with severe osteoarthritis.(K/L grade >3) in a location other than the knee joint.
  • Patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Patients with joint replacement surgery in either knee and/or a hip.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with meniscal tear, ligament injury, bursitis, and popliteal cyst and blood investigations suggestive of any infection.
  • Morbid obese patients (body mass index (BMI) of >40 kg/m2)
  • Infection at site of injection.
  • Bleeding diathesis and coagulopathy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Tanta University

    Tanta, ElGharbia, 31527

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study Between Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency Application Plus Genicular Nerve Block Versus Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Management of Chronic Pain in Knee Osteo-arthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

The aim of the present study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of combined transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency plus genicular nerve block with bupivacaine plus corticosteroid versus intraarticular Hyaluronic acid injections, in terms of clinical and functional parameters, in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

Total knee arthroplasty is commonly used as a surgical option for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis to relieve pain and improve function, although it is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly in older patients with co morbidities. Despite high success rates after total knee arthroplasty , a significant number of patients report suffering from postoperative pain, which can be worse than reported preoperative pain.

As an alternative approach, radiofrequency treatment modalities on the knee joint have been used to reduce knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Genicular nerve block (GNB) is a recently developed therapeutic option for knee osteoarthritis. that targets the three sensory nerves of the knee: superior lateral, superior medial and inferior medial genicular nerve, to inhibit pain transmission to the central nervous system.

Early osteoarthritis. treatment combines non pharmacological techniques with oral pharmacological therapies, intraarticular injections (IAI) of hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroid with local anesthetic or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) are used in progressive or very symptomatic stage. Intraarticular injections (IAI) is considered one of first-line treatments in recent studies as it is effective in decreasing pain and safer than oral pharmacological therapies.

Being tested
Hyaluronic acid, Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain, Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hyaluronic acidDrug

    Patients underwent intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection.

  • Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequencyDevice

    Patients underwent transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency application plus genicular nerve block.

Study groups in NCT06710782
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hyaluronic Acid groupExperimentalPatients underwent intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection.
Receives: Drug: Hyaluronic acid
Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency groupExperimentalPatients underwent transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency application plus genicular nerve block.
Receives: Device: Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Degree of pain

    Assessment of pain severity by visual analog scale (VAS) at the baseline (before injection), 1month and 3month, intervals after injection.

    The visual analog scale (VAS) score it has 10-cm scale that represents a continuum between "0 = no pain" and "10 = worst pain."

    Measured: 3 month after injection

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Functional status

    Functional status and daily activity via the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoartheritis index (WOMAC) score before one month and three monthes after injection.

    The WOMAC consists of three subscales: pain (five questions), stiffness (two questions), and physical function (17 questions). The subscale scores can vary, with pain ranging from 0 to 20 points; stiffness, 0 to 8 points; and physical function, 0 to 68 points. Higher scores represent worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Measured: 3 month after injection

  2. Daily activity

    Daily activity via the western ontario and mcmaster universities osteoartheritis index (WOMAC) score before one month and three monthes after injection.

    The WOMAC consists of three subscales: pain (five questions), stiffness (two questions), and physical function (17 questions). The subscale scores can vary, with pain ranging from 0 to 20 points; stiffness, 0 to 8 points; and physical function, 0 to 68 points. Higher scores represent worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.

    Measured: 3 month after injection

  3. Analgesic requirement

    Analgesic requirement (Dose and frequency of oral acetaminophen intake) for post injection pain if visual analogue scale (VAS) more than 3.

    Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) used as an effective tool to detect intensity of pain was recorded;"0" represents no pain,"10" worst pain, "1-3" mild pain,"4-6 " moderate pain and" 7-10 " severe pain

    Measured: 3 month after injection

  4. Adverse events

    Adverse events were recorded such as toxicity of local anesthetic drug occur, the research was stopped and was cleared to ehtical committees.

    Measured: 3 month after injection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Nov 2024
  2. Study start1 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06710782
Sponsor's protocol ID
36264MS262/7/23
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
26 Nov 2024
Last updated
29 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data was available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hyaluronic acid and Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency in people with Transcutaneous and Pulsed Radiofrequency, run by Tanta University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Degree of pain (time frame: 3 month after injection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in