Nursing StudentsNCT06712953
The Effect of Repeated Standardized Patient Use on Students' Anxiety and Learning Levels in Teaching Extremity Examination Skills
A study testing the peer assessment group in people with Nursing Students, run by Suleyman Demirel University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Aims: This study aimed to examine the effects of peer assessment and repeated standardized patient use on students' self-confidence and anxiety and their psychomotor skill performance in teaching extremity examination skills. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Nursing Students
- What is being tested?
- the peer assessment group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 67 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2023to 21 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Second-grade nursing students
- Enrolled in the " Health Diagnosis" course at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing of a university in the fall semester of the 2023-2024 academic year
Who cannot join
- Students who actively continue their nursing profession as well as their education life
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Suleyman Demirel University
Isparta, Center, 32260
About this study
Aims: This study aimed to examine the effects of peer assessment and repeated standardized patient use on students' self-confidence and anxiety and their psychomotor skill performance in teaching extremity examination skills.
Design: This randomized controlled experimental study was carried out following the CONSORT checklist.
Methods: The study sample consisted of second-grade nursing students enrolled in the " Health Diagnosis" course in the fall semester of the 2023-2024 academic year (n:67). The students in the peer assessment group performed the upper and lower extremity examinations once whereas those in the standardized patient group performed these examinations three times. Research data were analyzed in IBM SPSS 25.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check whether the data were normally distributed. Parametric and nonparametric tests and descriptive statistical methods were used for data analysis. The significance levels were taken as p<0.001 and p<0.05. The scales used were analyzed with the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient; the scenarios and forms created by the researchers were evaluated with the Lawshe Technique.
- Conditions
- Nursing Students
- Being tested
- the peer assessment group
- Keywords
- Anxiety, self-confidence, active learning, passive learning, psychomotor skills, standardized patient, peer, extremity
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
the peer assessment groupOther
Students in the peer assessment group were paired (by randomization, on their request) to have a teammate of the same sex before the extremity examination experience. In the following process, the students were asked to perform extremity examinations in line with the specified objectives. Students in the standardized patient group were asked to perform extremity examinations per the specified objectives in standardized patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| the peer assessment group | Experimental | Students in the peer assessment group were paired (by randomization, on their request) to have a teammate of the same sex before the extremity examination experience. In the following process, the students were asked to perform extremity examinations in line with the specified objectives. Receives: Other: the peer assessment group |
| the standardized patient group | Experimental | Students in the standardized patient group were asked to perform extremity examinations per the specified objectives in standardized patient. Receives: Other: the peer assessment group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Extremity examinations
The students in the standardized patient group performed extremity examinations on the same standardized patient three times, whereas the students in the peer assessment group performed this examination on their peers once
Measured: First week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Dec 2024
- Study start9 Nov 2023
- Primary completion21 Dec 2023
- Study completion21 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nursing StudentsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Suleyman Demirel University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tuğçe Çamlıca, Suleyman Demirel University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06712953
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 72867572-050.01.04-616349
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Aydin AG, Ince S. The effect of Jigsaw technique on nursing students' psychomotor skill levels and academic achievement: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Nov;73:103821. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103821. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
PubMed 37952472
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Repeated Standardized Patient Use on Students' Anxiety and Learning Levels in Teaching Extremity Examination Skills
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06712953
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 72867572-050.01.04-616349
- Conditions
- Nursing Students
- Keywords
- Anxiety, self-confidence, active learning, passive learning, psychomotor skills, standardized patient, peer, extremity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 67 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Suleyman Demirel UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aims: This study aimed to examine the effects of peer assessment and repeated standardized patient use on students' self-confidence and anxiety and their psychomotor skill performance in teaching extremity examination skills.
Design: This randomized controlled experimental study was carried out following the CONSORT checklist.
Methods: The study sample consisted of second-grade nursing students enrolled in the " Health Diagnosis" course in the fall semester of the 2023-2024 academic year (n:67). The students in the peer assessment group performed the upper and lower extremity examinations once whereas those in the standardized patient group performed these examinations three times. Research data were analyzed in IBM SPSS 25.0 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to check whether the data were normally distributed. Parametric and nonparametric tests and descriptive statistical methods were used for data analysis. The significance levels were taken as p<0.001 and p<0.05. The scales used were analyzed with the Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient; the scenarios and forms created by the researchers were evaluated with the Lawshe Technique.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| the peer assessment group | Experimental | Other: the peer assessment groupStudents in the peer assessment group were paired (by randomization, on their request) to have a teammate of the same sex before the extremity examination experience. In the following process, the students were asked to perform extremity examinations in line with the specified objectives. |
| the standardized patient group | Experimental | Other: the peer assessment groupStudents in the standardized patient group were asked to perform extremity examinations per the specified objectives in standardized patient. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Second-grade nursing students
- Enrolled in the " Health Diagnosis" course at the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing of a university in the fall semester of the 2023-2024 academic year
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Students who actively continue their nursing profession as well as their education life
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| the peer assessment groupStudents in the peer assessment group were paired (by randomization, on their request) to have a teammate of the same sex before the extremity examination experience. In the following process, the students were asked to perform extremity examinations in line with the specified objectives. Students in the standardized patient group were asked to perform extremity examinations per the specified objectives in standardized patient. | Other | the peer assessment group, the standardized patient group |
Primary outcome
Extremity examinations
Time frame: First week
The students in the standardized patient group performed extremity examinations on the same standardized patient three times, whereas the students in the peer assessment group performed this examination on their peers once
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 37952472Aydin AG, Ince S. The effect of Jigsaw technique on nursing students' psychomotor skill levels and academic achievement: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Nov;73:103821. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103821. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Nursing Students
Not yet recruiting
The Effectiveness of Comic-based Learning Materials on Nursing Students' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Dementia Care
Dementia Care Education, Students, Nursing
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Based Model for Predicting Type 2 Diabetes Risk Using Lifestyle Factors Among Senior Nursing Students
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
SELF-ASSESSMENT AND KNOWLEDGE LEVEL OF NURSING STUDENTS' PATIENT SAFETY COMPETENCY
Simulation Training, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Happiness Workshops on Nursing Students' Levels of Psychological Resilience
Psychological Resilience, Nursing Students
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing the peer assessment group in people with Nursing Students, run by Suleyman Demirel University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Extremity examinations (time frame: First week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06712953, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2024.